• 1. Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510010, P. R. China;
  • 2. Department of Echocardiography, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510010, P. R. China;
  • 3. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510010, P. R. China;
JIAN Xuhua, Email: jianxuhua@gdph.org.cn
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Infective endocarditis is one of the severest valvar diseases, commonly affecting the mitral valve. Currently, valvuloplasty and replacement are the main surgical options for mitral infective endocarditis. However, the complexity of the infectious lesions has caused a raging debate on which surgical approach offers more benefits. With the development of surgical treatment for endocarditis, mitral valvuloplasty may be a superior solution. It can preserve the integrity of the valve structure, avoiding complications caused by replacement. However, there is a lack of evidence from randomized clinical trials and other evidence-based medical supports. Furthermore, issues regarding the timing of surgery, repair methods, and material choices for mitral valvuloplasty in these patients have not been standardized. Therefore, this article summarizes existing literature to assist clinicians in making appropriate treatment decisions.

Copyright © the editorial department of Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery of West China Medical Publisher. All rights reserved