Recent Progress in Technology of Diagnostic Radiology ofBreast Cancer and Its Clinical Application_CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY

Authors：

何之彦

Corresponding author：

Keywords：

乳腺癌; 全视野数字化乳腺X射线摄影; 数字化乳腺X射线断层合成; 对比增强双能数字化乳腺X射线摄影; 诊断

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Citation： 何之彦. Recent Progress in Technology of Diagnostic Radiology ofBreast Cancer and Its Clinical Application. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY, 2013, 20(8): 842-845. doi: Copy

1.	Tabar L， Yen MF， Vitak B， et al. Mammography service screeningand mortality in breast cancer patients：20-year follow-up beforeand after introduction of screening[J]. Lancet， 2003， 361(9367)：.
2.	Otto SJ， Fracheboud J， Looman CW， et al. Initiation of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities and effect on breast-cancer mortality：a systematic review[J]. Lancet， 2003，.
3.	Rosenberg RD， Hunt WC， Williamson MR， et al. Effects of age， breast density， ethnicity， and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis：review of 183 134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque，New Mexico[J]. Radiology， 1998， 209(2)：511-518.
4.	BarraI FR， BarraII RR， Sobrinho AB. Novel functional methods in the evaluation of breast lesions[J]. Radiol Bras， 2012， 45(6)：340-344.
5.	Bocage AEM. Procede et dispositifs de radiographie sur plaque en movement[P]. French patent 536464.
6.	Miller ER， McCurry EM， Hruska B. An infinite number of laminagrams from a finite number of radiographs[J]. Radiology， 1971， 98(2)：249-255.
7.	Grant DG. Tomosynthesis：a three-dimensional radiographic ima-ging technique[J]. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng， 1972， 19(1)：20-28.
8.	Niklason LT， Christian BT， Niklason LE， et al. Digital tomosyn-thesis in breast imaging[J]. Radiology， 1997， 205(2)：399-406.
9.	Hendrick RE， Pisano ED， Averbukh A， et al. Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol， 2010， 194(2)：362-369.
10.	Andersson I， Ikeda DM， Zackrisson S， et al. Breast tomosynthesisand digital mammography：a comparison of breast cancer visibilityand BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings[J]. Eur Radiol， 2008， 18(12)：2817-2825.
11.	Skaane P， Bandos AI， Gullien R， et al. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program[J]. Radiology， 2013， 267(1)：47-56.
12.	Jong RA， Yaffe MJ， Skarpathiotakis M， et al. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography：initial clinical experience[J]. Radiology， 2003， 228(3)：842-850.
13.	Dromain C， Balleyguier C， Muller S， et al. Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol， 2006， 187(5)：528-537.
14.	Lewin JM， Isaacs PK， Vance V， et al. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography：feasibility[J]. Radio-logy， 2003， 229(1)：261-268.
15.	Dromain C， Thibault F， Muller S， et al. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography：initial clinical results[J]. Eur Radiol， 2011， 21(3)：565-574.
16.	Bushberg JT， Seibert JA， Leidholdt EM， et al. The essential physics of medical imaging[M]. 2th ed. Philadilphia：LippincottWilliams and Wilkins， 2002：38-230， 323-325.
17.	Dromain C， Balleyguier C， Adler G， et al. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography[J]. Eur J Radiol， 2009， 69(1)：34-42.
18.	Jochelson MS， Dershaw DD， Sung JS， et al. Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography：feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma[J]. Radiology， 2013， 266(3)：743-751.
19.	Diekmann F， Freyer M， Diekmann S， et al. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography[J]. Eur J Radiol， 2011， 78(1)：112-121.
20.	(9367)：1411-1417.
21.	-1410.

1. Tabar L， Yen MF， Vitak B， et al. Mammography service screeningand mortality in breast cancer patients：20-year follow-up beforeand after introduction of screening[J]. Lancet， 2003， 361(9367)：.
2. Otto SJ， Fracheboud J， Looman CW， et al. Initiation of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities and effect on breast-cancer mortality：a systematic review[J]. Lancet， 2003，.
3. Rosenberg RD， Hunt WC， Williamson MR， et al. Effects of age， breast density， ethnicity， and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis：review of 183 134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque，New Mexico[J]. Radiology， 1998， 209(2)：511-518.
4. BarraI FR， BarraII RR， Sobrinho AB. Novel functional methods in the evaluation of breast lesions[J]. Radiol Bras， 2012， 45(6)：340-344.
5. Bocage AEM. Procede et dispositifs de radiographie sur plaque en movement[P]. French patent 536464.
6. Miller ER， McCurry EM， Hruska B. An infinite number of laminagrams from a finite number of radiographs[J]. Radiology， 1971， 98(2)：249-255.
7. Grant DG. Tomosynthesis：a three-dimensional radiographic ima-ging technique[J]. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng， 1972， 19(1)：20-28.
8. Niklason LT， Christian BT， Niklason LE， et al. Digital tomosyn-thesis in breast imaging[J]. Radiology， 1997， 205(2)：399-406.
9. Hendrick RE， Pisano ED， Averbukh A， et al. Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol， 2010， 194(2)：362-369.
10. Andersson I， Ikeda DM， Zackrisson S， et al. Breast tomosynthesisand digital mammography：a comparison of breast cancer visibilityand BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings[J]. Eur Radiol， 2008， 18(12)：2817-2825.
11. Skaane P， Bandos AI， Gullien R， et al. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program[J]. Radiology， 2013， 267(1)：47-56.
12. Jong RA， Yaffe MJ， Skarpathiotakis M， et al. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography：initial clinical experience[J]. Radiology， 2003， 228(3)：842-850.
13. Dromain C， Balleyguier C， Muller S， et al. Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol， 2006， 187(5)：528-537.
14. Lewin JM， Isaacs PK， Vance V， et al. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography：feasibility[J]. Radio-logy， 2003， 229(1)：261-268.
15. Dromain C， Thibault F， Muller S， et al. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography：initial clinical results[J]. Eur Radiol， 2011， 21(3)：565-574.
16. Bushberg JT， Seibert JA， Leidholdt EM， et al. The essential physics of medical imaging[M]. 2th ed. Philadilphia：LippincottWilliams and Wilkins， 2002：38-230， 323-325.
17. Dromain C， Balleyguier C， Adler G， et al. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography[J]. Eur J Radiol， 2009， 69(1)：34-42.
18. Jochelson MS， Dershaw DD， Sung JS， et al. Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography：feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma[J]. Radiology， 2013， 266(3)：743-751.
19. Diekmann F， Freyer M， Diekmann S， et al. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography[J]. Eur J Radiol， 2011， 78(1)：112-121.
20. (9367)：1411-1417.
21. -1410.

CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY

Recent Progress in Technology of Diagnostic Radiology ofBreast Cancer and Its Clinical Application

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Format

Content