ObjectiveTo compare the effects of piriformis muscle release versus preservation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) via supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip (SuperPATH) approach on muscle injury. MethodsForty-nine patients undergoing initial THA via SuperPATH approach between June 2022 and June 2023 were randomly divided into two groups, with 24 patients in trial group and 25 patients in control group. The trial group received piriformis muscle release intraoperatively, whereas the control group underwent muscle preservation. There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, body mass index, disease type, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grading, and preoperative muscle infiltration, muscle atrophy, muscle injury serological indicators, Harris score, etc. (P>0.05). The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total blood loss, hospital stay, preoperative and postoperative 1-day muscle injury serological indicators [including creatine kinase (CK) and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH)], and incidence of complications between two groups were recorded. Harris score was used to evaluate the recovery of hip joint function. MRI was used to evaluate the extent of hip muscle injuries (gluteus minimus, gluteus medius, piriformis, obturator internus, quadratus femoris), including tendon integrity, degree of muscle fat infiltration, and degree of muscle atrophy preoperative and 1 year postoperatively. ResultsThe operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and total blood loss in the trial group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incision length and length of hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). Both groups showed a significant increase in serum CK and LDH levels on postoperative day 1 compared to preoperative levels (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up, the follow-up time for the trial group and the control group was (14.8±2.8) and (15.1±3.0) months, respectively, with no significant difference (t=−0.400, P=0.691). Incisions healed by first intention in both groups, with 1 case in the trial group and 2 cases in the control group experiencing venous thrombosis in the calf muscle space. There was no complication such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, hip dislocation, prosthesis loosening, or periprosthetic infection in the lower limbs. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). At 1 year after operation, both groups of patients showed a significant increase in Harris scores compared to preoperative levels (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with preoperative results, both groups showed significant fat infiltration in the piriformis and obturator muscles at 1 year after operation (P<0.05), while there was no significant fat infiltration in the gluteus minimus, gluteus medius, and quadratus femoris muscles (P>0.05). At 1 year after operation, except for the higher incidence of piriformis muscle fat infiltration in the control group compared to the trial group (P<0.05), there was no significant difference in the incidence of other muscle infiltrations between the two groups (P>0.05). At 1 year after operation, both groups of piriformis and obturator muscles showed significant muscle atrophy compared to preoperative levels (P<0.05). The gluteus minimus and gluteus medius showed mild atrophy compared to preoperative levels, while the maximum transverse diameter of the quadriceps muscle slightly increased, but the differences were not significant (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the maximum cross-sectional diameter or cross-sectional area changes of each muscle between the two groups (P>0.05). At 1 year after operation, the continuity of the gluteus medius and quadratus femoris muscles in both groups was intact. Both groups had some patients with incomplete continuity of the piriformis muscle, obturator internus, and gluteus minimus, but the difference was not significant (P>0.05). ConclusionThe SuperPATH approach THA may cause injury to the piriformis, gluteus minimus, and obturator internus. The piriformis muscle release does not increase muscle injury, but it can shorten the operation time and reduce bleeding.
Objective To systematically evaluate the difference in leg length discrepancy (LLD) between robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) and traditional THA. Methods The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, EMbase, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and CBM databases were searched by computer to collect cohort studies of robot-assisted and traditional THAs from inception to August 11th, 2021. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 10 high-quality cohort studies were included. The results of Meta-analysis showed that compared with traditional THA, LLD after robot-assisted THA was smaller [MD=−1.64, 95%CI (−2.25, −1.04), P<0.001], Harris scores at 3 and 12 months after operation were higher [MD=1.50, 95%CI (0.44, 2.57), P=0.006; MD=7.60, 95%CI (2.51, 12.68), P=0.003]. However, the operative time was longer [MD=8.36, 95%CI (4.56, 12.17), P<0.000 1], and the postoperative acetabular anteversion angle was larger [MD=1.91, 95%CI (1.43, 2.40), P<0.001]. There was no significant difference in Harris score at 6 months, amnesia index (Forgotten joint score, FJS), postoperative acetabular abduction angle, and incidence of complication between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Robot-assisted THA is superior to traditional THA in postoperative LLD.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the accuracy of using smartphone to measure the angle of acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty (THA). MethodsBetween June 2012 and September 2015, the acetabular abduction and anteversion angles were measured in 50 patients undergoing THA. There were 24 males and 26 females, aged 37 to 83 years (mean, 71 years). The left hip was involved in 22 cases and the right hip in 28 cases. Of 50 patients, 34 suffered from fracture of the femoral neck, and 16 suffered from avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Acetabular dysplasia was excluded in all cases. A smartphone was used to measure the acetabular abduction and anteversion angles during operation; standard Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) was used to measured the acetabular abduction and anteversion angles on the X-ray film at 1 week after operation. It was defined as positive that the component angle values by PACS measurement were greater than those by the smartphone measurement, whereas as negative. The two measurement methods were compared, and intra-observer variability was assessed by analyzing the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the Mann-Whitney U-test was used to analyze difference. ResultsThe ICC was 0.84 in the acetabular component angles by smartphone and PACS measurement methods. The acetabular component abduction angle was (44.02±1.33)° and the anteversion angle was (17.62±2.20)° by smartphone measurement. The acetabular component abduction angle was (44.74±4.05)° and the anteversion angle was (17.22±5.57)° by PACS measurement. There was no significant difference between two measurement methods (Z=-1.977, P=0.482; Z=-0.368, P=0.713). The acetabular component angle was in the safe zone in 44 cases; and the acetabular component anteversion angle was beyond safe range of 1 to 5°, and the abduction angle was beyond safe range of 1 to 3° in 6 cases. Intra-measurement variability was -21 to +10° for the anteversion angle and -10 to + 9° for the abduction angle, indicating that the acetabular component anteversion angle by smartphone measurement was greater than that by the PACS measurement, and the abduction angle was less than that by PACS measurement. ConclusionSmartphone is a convenient tool to measure the acetabular component angle in THA.
Objective To review research advances of revision surgery after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) for patients with Crowe type Ⅳ developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Methods The recent literature on revision surgery after primary THA in patients with Crowe type Ⅳ DDH was reviewed. The reasons for revision surgery were analyzed and the difficulties of revision surgery, the management methods, and the related prosthesis choices were summarized. Results Patients with Crowe type Ⅳ DDH have small anteroposterior diameter of the acetabulum, large variation in acetabular and femoral anteversion angles, severe soft tissue contractures, which make both THA and revision surgery more difficult. There are many reasons for patients undergoing revision surgery after primary THA, mainly due to aseptic loosening of the prosthesis. Therefore, it is necessary to restore anatomical structures in primary THA, as much as possible and reduce the generation of wear particles to avoid postoperative loosening of the prosthesis. Due to the anatomical characteristics of Crowe type Ⅳ DDH, the patients have acetabular and femoral bone defects, and the repair and reconstruction of bone defects become the key to revision surgery. The acetabular side is usually reconstructed with the appropriate acetabular cup or combined metal block, Cage, or custom component depending on the extent of the bone defect, while the femoral side is preferred to the S-ROM prosthesis. In addition, the prosthetic interface should be ceramic-ceramic or ceramic-highly cross-linked polyethylene wherever possible. Conclusion The reasons leading to revision surgery after primary THA in patients with Crowe type Ⅳ DDH and the surgical difficulties have been clarified, and a large number of clinical studies have proposed corresponding revision modalities based on which good early- and mid-term outcomes have been obtained, but further follow-up is needed to clarify the long-term outcomes. With technological advances and the development of new materials, personalized prostheses for these patients are expected to become a reality.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical outcomes of acetabular revision using a metal reconstruction cage. MethodsBetween October 2006 and October 2013, 16 patients (16 hips) underwent acetabular revision with a metal reconstruction cage. There were 4 males and 12 females, with the mean age of 62.7 years (range, 49-78 years). The time from total hip arthroplasty to revision was 3-15 years (mean, 8.2 years). The causes for revision were aseptic acetabular loosening in 15 cases, and femoral periprosthetic fracture (Vancouver type B3) in 1 case. According to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) classification, there were 12 cases of type III and 4 cases of type IV; according to the Paprosky classification, there were 12 cases of type IIIA and 4 cases of type IIIB. Harris score was used for hip function evaluation, and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain in the thigh. X-ray films were taken for imaging evaluation. ResultsHealing of incision by first intention was obtained in all patients. Deep venous thrombosis occurred in 1 patient, and was cured after anticoagulation therapy. No complications of infection, neurovascular injury, and prosthetic dislocation were found. Sixteen patients were followed up 6.8 years on average (range, 2-9 years). The Harris score was significantly increased from preoperative 42.44±4.66 to 91.88±3.28 at last follow-up (t=–106.30, P=0.00). Two patients had mild pain in the thigh, but pain disappeared at 1 year after operation. At immediate after operation, the abduction angle was 37-54° (mean, 42.9°). The distance between acetabular rotation centre and teardrop line was (33.67±12.19) mm for preoperative value and was (20.67±9.63) mm for postoperative value, showing significant difference (t=–9.60, P=0.00). The distance between acetabular rotation centre and lateral teardrop was (34.98±12.30) mm for preoperative value and was (40.04±6.61) mm for postoperative value, showing significant difference (t=–3.15, P=0.00). X-ray film results showed bony fusion at the osteotomy sites at 4 to 12 months after operation. No continuous radiolucent line, prosthetic dislocation, or osteolysis was found, and bony ingrowth was observed in all patients. No patient received re-revision due to prosthetic loosening. ConclusionThe metal reconstruction cage for acetabular revision can achieve good effectiveness for patients with serious bone defect.
Objective To investigate the impact of joint capsule repair and external rotators suture on the prognosis in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) by posterolateral approach. Methods Between January 2006 and June 2009, 159 patients with femoral neck fracture underwent primary THA by posterolateral approach, and were divided into 4 groups according to different treatments: joint capsule repair and external rotators suture were given in group A (n=38), only joint capsule repair in group B (n=39), only external rotators suture in group C (n=41), and no joint capsule repair or external rotators suture in group D (n=41). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injure, disease duration, type of fracture, combined medical disease, or prosthesis selection among 4 groups (P gt; 0.05). The bleeding volume, drainage, postoperative hip dislocation rate, hip Harris score, and the hip range of motion (ROM) in internal rotation and external rotation were compared. Results There was no significant difference in operative time, bleeding volume, or drainage among 4 groups (P gt; 0.05). Postoperative hip dislocation occurred in 0, 0, 4 (9.8%), and 4 (9.8%) cases of groups A, B, C, and D, respectively, showing significant difference in incidence of postoperative hip dislocation among 4 groups (χ2=7.910, P=0.048). The hip Harris scores were significantly improved after operation when compared with preoperative scores in 4 groups (P lt; 0.05). Significant differences were found in hip Harris score at 6 weeks and 6 months after operation among 4 groups (P lt; 0.05); group D was significantly lower than groups A, B, and C, and groups B and C were significantly lower than group A (P lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in the hip ROM in internal rotation among 4 groups at 6 weeks and 6, 12 months after operation (P gt; 0.05); but the hip ROM in external rotation were significantly bigger in groups A and C than in groups B and D at 6 weeks and 6 months after operation (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion Joint capsule repair and external rotators suture in primary THA by posterolateral approach do not increase the bleeding volume and drainage, but can reduce the early postoperative hip dislocation risk, increase the Harris score, and recover the external rotation function of involved hip. So joint capsule and external rotators should be repaired in THA by posterolateral approach.
Objective By comparing with the traditional X-ray template measurement method, to explore the accuracy of artificial intelligence preoperative planning system (AI-HIP) to predict the type of prosthesis and guide the placement of prosthesis before total hip arthroplasty (THA) in adult patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Methods Patients with DDH scheduled for initial THA between August 2020 and August 2022 were enrolled as study object, of which 28 cases (28 hips) met the selection criteria were enrolled in the study. Among them, there were 10 males and 18 females, aged from 34 to 77 years, with an average of 59.3 years. There were 12 cases of the left DDH and 16 cases of the right DDH. According to DDH classification, there were 10 cases of Crowe type Ⅰ, 8 cases of type Ⅱ, 5 cases of type Ⅲ, and 5 cases of type Ⅳ. According to Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) staging of osteonecrosis of the femoral head, 13 cases were in stage Ⅲ and 15 cases in stage Ⅳ. The disease duration was 2.5-23.0 years (mean, 8.6 years). The limb length discrepancy (LLD) was 11.0 (8.0, 17.5) mm. Before operation, the prosthesis types of all patients were predicted by AI-HIP system and X-ray template measurement method, respectively. And the preoperative results were compared with the actual prosthesis type during operation in order to estimate the accuracy of the AI-HIP system. Then, the differences in the acetabular abduction angle, acetabular anteversion angle, femoral neck osteotomy position, tip-shoulder distance, and LLD were compared between preoperative planned measurements by AI-HIP system and actual measurement results after operation, in order to investigate the ability of AI-HIP system to evaluate the placement position of prosthesis. Results The types of acetabular and femoral prostheses predicted based on AI-HIP system before operation were consistent with the actual prostheses in 23 cases (82.1%) and 24 cases (85.7%), respectively. The types of acetabular and femoral prostheses predicted based on X-ray template measurement before operation were consistent with the actual prostheses in 16 cases (57.1%) and 17 cases (60.7%), respectively. There were significant differences between AI-HIP system and X-ray template measurement (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in acetabular abduction angle, acetabular anteversion angle, femoral neck osteotomy position, and tip-shoulder distance between AI-HIP system and actual measurement after operation (P>0.05). LLD after operation was significantly lower than that before operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the LLD predicted based on AI-HIP system and the actual measurement after operation (P>0.05). Conclusion Compared with the traditional X-ray template measurement method, the preoperative planning of AI-HIP system has better accuracy and repeatability in predicting the prosthesis type. It has a certain reference for the prosthesis placement of adult DDH.
Objective To investigate the operative methods, cl inical outcomes and compl ications of total hi p arthroplasty (THA) in the treatment of patient with hi p joint flexion rigidity due to ankylosing spondyl itis (AS). Methods From May 1992 to July 2004, 56 patients (32 left hips and 39 right hips) with AS received THA through a modified anterolateral approach, including 52 males (67 hips) and 4 females (4 hips) aged 17-48 years with an average of 35.5 years. All the hips were ankylosed in (43.1 ± 7.2)° of flexion and 15 patients had bilaterally ankylosed hips. Preoperatively, Harris hip score was (42.6 ± 5.3) points and all the hips were classified as stage IV according to the standard of American College of Rheumatology (ACR). And the course of disease was 3-11 years. Results Intraoperatively, 1 patient suffering from proximal femur fracture due to severe osteoporosis was treated with titanium wire fixation, and the fracture was healed 6 weeks later. All the patients were followed up for 3-15 years (average 5.3 years). Postoperatively, 1 patient (1 hip) got subcutaneous soft tissue infection at 8 days, 1 patient (1 hip) got wound disunion at 11 days, 2 patients (2 hips) got infection at 11 months and 3 years, respectively. All the infections were healed after symptomatic treatment. The wounds of the rest 52 patients were healed by first intention without joint infections. The postoperative X-rays demonstrated that 4 hips (5.6%) had loose acetabulum prosthesis, 3 hips (4.2%) had loose femoral prosthesis and 5 hips had loose acetabulum and femoral prosthesis (7.0%), and the total loosening rate was 16.8%. Among which, 8 hips received revision resulting in satisfactory therapeutic effects, and the rest 4 hips had no further treatment. Fifteen hips (21.1%) had heterotopic ossification, which was rel ieved after taking nonsteroidal anti-inflamatory drugs. Harris hip score at final follow-up was (82.7 ± 4.1) points, indicating there was a significant difference between before and after operation (P lt; 0.05). Ten hips were evaluated as excellent, 43 hips good, 14 hips fare, and 4 hips bad, and the excellent and good rate was 74.7%. Conclusion THA through the anterolateral approach is effective for the treatment of patient with hip joint flexion rigidity caused by AS.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of one-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty by direct anterior approach (DAA) and by posterolateral approach, and to investigate the application value of DAA in one-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty. Methods The clinical data of 65 patients who underwent one-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty by DAA or posterolateral approach between June 2010 and November 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. DAA was used in 34 cases (group A) and posterolateral approach was used in 31 cases (group B). There was no significant difference in the gender, age, body mass index, preoperative hemoglobin level, etiology, disease duration, preoperative Harris score, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score between 2 groups (P>0.05) with comparability. The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total blood transfusion volume, hospitalization time, early postoperative complications, Harris score, and VAS score were recorded and compared between 2 groups. The simple Likert scale method was applied to evaluate the patient satisfaction, and the imaging evaluation was used. Results The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total blood transfusion volume, and hospitalization time of group A were significantly less than those of group B (P<0.05). The patients were followed up 15-48 months (mean, 25.3 months) in group A and 12-51 months (mean, 27.6 months) in group B. The overall incidence of complications related to surgery in group A (10.29%) was significantly lower than that of group B (19.35%) (χ2=8.769, P=0.023). The acetabular anteversion and abduction angle were in the normal range of 2 groups except 1 hip (1.47%) of group A had a higher acetabular anteversion than normal value. Unstable fixed prosthesis happened in 1 hip of groups A and B respectively, and the remaining femoral calcar had no obvious bone resorption and fixed stably. The Harris score and VAS score at each time point after operation of 2 groups were significantly improved when compared with preoperative scores (P<0.05), and the differences between the time points after operation were also significant (P<0.05). The Harris score at 1 and 3 months after operation and the VAS score at 3 days after operation of group A were significantly better than those of group B (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found at last follow-up between 2 groups (P>0.05). According to the simple Likert scale method to analyze patient satisfaction, comprehensive satisfaction of group A (97.1%, 33/34) was significantly higher than that of group B (67.7%, 21/31) (χ2=10.343, P=0.001). Conclusion The application of DAA in one-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty can significantly relieve the pain, accelerate the recovery of hip joint function, and improve the patient satisfaction. But in clinical application, more attentions should be paid to strictly grasp the indications and prevent the early complications. The long-term effectiveness needs to be further observed.
Objective To explore the surgical technique and effectiveness of autologous femoral head bone graft in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for Crowe type Ⅲ developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) with acetabular bone defect. Methods Between July 2012 and September 2015, 12 cases (12 hips) of Crowe type Ⅲ DDH with acetabular bone defect were included. Of the 12 patients, 2 were male and 10 were female, with an average age of 54.3 years (range, 37-75 years). The Harris score before operation was 41.08±7.90. The preoperative leg length discrepancy was 0.53-4.28 cm, with an average of 2.47 cm. Autologous femoral head bone graft and cancellous screw fixation were used in all cases to reconstruct acetabula in THA. Four cases were performed with subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy at the same time. Results All incisions healed by first intention. Twelve cases were followed up 1 year and 10 months to 5 years, with an average of 3.0 years. X-ray films showed that bone healing was observed in all cases at 6 months to 1 year after operation. There was no bone graft osteolysis, absorption, bone graft collapse, and acetabular prosthesis loosening. At last follow-up, the Harris score was 89.50±2.78, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative value (t=–25.743, P=0.003). The length discrepancy was 0-1.81 cm at last follow-up with an average of 0.76 cm. Conclusion Autologous femoral head bone graft is effective for Crowe type Ⅲ DDH with acetabular bone defect, which has advantages of restoring pelvic bone stock, obtaining satisfied prosthetic stability and mid-term effectiveness.