目的 用保留十二指肠水平段的胰十二指肠切除术及Roux-Y同步吻合重建消化道的方法，达到降低手术并发症，促进患者恢复，提高其生存质量和时间。方法 在行胰十二指肠切除术时，保留十二指肠水平段、升段、屈氏韧带及空肠上段，用RouxY同步吻合的方法将胰、胆、胃、肠重建排列，术后胆肠吻合口不置T管及空肠不置造瘘管，腹腔置2 mm硅胶管用于灌洗。结果 28例中除2例切口裂开，行二期缝合外，均顺利恢复出院。平均住院25天。无胆、胰漏，无返流性胆管、胰管炎等。随访6个月~6年，1年生存24例（85.7%），3年生存15例（53.6%），5年生存5例（17.9%）。结论 保留十二指肠水平段，消化功能恢复快，不影响根治时相关淋巴结的廓清。用Roux-Y同步吻合重建消化道，并发症少。不置T管和空肠造瘘管，对患者侵扰小，恢复快，提高了患者生存率。
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical efficacy and summarize the experience of intracapsular approach used in laparoscopic duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection (LDPPHRt). MethodThe clinical data of patients (from April 2020 to June 2024), including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative details who underwent LDPPHRt in Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology were collected and analyzed. ResultsSeventy-five patients were collected in this study, including 35 males (46.7%) and 40 females (53.3%). The age was (38.3±7.9) years old, and 35 patients (46.7%) presented without symptoms. The main symptoms were abdominal pain (21 cases, 28.0%), repeated diarrhea (15 cases, 20.0%), weight loss (4 cases, 5.3%). The diameter of the pancreatic head lesions was (3.2±0.8) cm. The operative time was (210.6±23.8) min, and the blood loss was (62.4±38.1) mL. There were 18 cases (24.0%) of postoperative complications, including 6 cases (8.0%) of postoperative pancreatic fistula, 5 cases (6.7%) of haemorrhage, 4 cases (5.3%) of biliary leakage, 2 cases (2.7%) of lymphatic leakage, 4 cases (5.3%) of delayed gastric emptying, 2 cases (2.7%) of abdominal infection, 1 case (1.3%) of pulmonary infection and 2 cases (2.7%) of wound infection. The length of postoperative hospital stay was (11.7±3.3) d, and no one died within 90 d after surgery. ConclusionsThe intracapsular approach is a feasible and safe surgical procedure in LDPPHRt for patients with benign, borderline or low grade malignant tumors.
ObjectiveTo explore the advantages and disadvantages of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) in the clinical application of pancreatic surgical diseases, and to summarize the progress of minimally invasive application of DPPHR combined with the current application of laparoscopy and robot surgery in pancreatic surgery. MethodThe related research literatures about DPPHR at home and abroad in recent years were searched and reviewed. ResultsThe effect of DPPHR compared with traditional pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for treatment of benign pancreatic diseases was still controversial, and the postoperative remission effect, perioperative period, occurrence of long-term complications and improvement of quality of life were not very advantageous compared with PD, and the prognosis of minimally invasive surgery was poor. ConclusionDPPHR remains highly controversial for surgical intervention in benign pancreatic disease and has enormous scope for advances in minimally invasive surgical applications in pancreatic surgery, but more clinical studies are needed to verify its clinical efficacy.
The surgical treatment of chronic pancreatitis, benign, borderline and low-grade malignant tumors of the pancreatic head is definite in effect. How to preserve more functional organs is the focus of such surgeries. The duodenum, common bile duct and Oddi’s sphincter-preserving pancreatic head total resection (DCOPPHTR) surgical method pioneered by the author team has theoretical advantages compared to other surgical methods. However, due to the difficulty of surgical operation and higher requirements for surgeons, its widespread application is limited. By elaborating on the invention principle and evolution process of this surgery, analyzing the key steps in detail and showing the clinical effects, the author proves that DCOPPHTR is safe and effective and has higher clinical application value.
ObjectiveTo estimate the prognosis of duodenum-preserving resection of pancreatic head (DPRPH) in the treatment of space occupying with extensive calcification of pancreatic head, and to summarize the key points of surgery.MethodsThe clinical data of a middle-aged woman with rare space occupying with extensive calcification of pancreatic head who underwent surgery in Department of Pancreatic Surgery of West China Hospital in May. 2016 was collected and analyzed.ResultsThe DPRPH operation was successfully completed, with the operative time was 207 min, the intraoperative blood loss was 130 mL, and the hospital stay was 12 d. Removing time of the gastric tube and off-bed activity were on the 3rd day after operation, and the volume of peritoneal drainage per day was decreasing from 30 mL to 10 mL until 7th day after operation. We made examination of serum amylase and fluid amylase for the patient every 2 days, and the examination indexes were within normal level. After removing the peritoneal drainage tube, the pain was obviously relieved on the 12th day after operation, then the patient made hospital discharge. There was no observable pancreatic fistula, duodenal fistula, biliary fistula, delay gastric emptying, peritoneal effusion, pleural effusion, abdominal infection, and abdominal bleeding, neither nor any special discomfort. During the follow-up period of 18 months, we got a good prognosis without any symptom of relapse or discomfort according to the result of CT scans and other examinations.ConclusionDPRPH can make a satisfied prognosis in the treatment of rare space occupying with extensive calcification of pancreatic head.
Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) is a surgical approach indicated for benign or low-grade malignant tumors of the pancreatic head, pancreatic duct stones in the pancreatic head, chronic pancreatitis, and related pathologies. Compared to traditional pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), its core principle lies in preserving the integrity of the stomach, duodenum, and biliary tract, thereby reducing postoperative digestive dysfunction and metabolic complications to improve patients’ quality of life. With the continuous advancement of laparoscopic techniques, laparoscopic duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (LDPPHR) has emerged as a significant refinement of conventional PD, achieving an optimal integration of minimally invasive laparoscopy and organ function preservation. This article synthesizes recent Chinese and English literature to provide a systematic review of surgical indications, technical nuances, complication management, and clinical outcomes of LDPPHR.
ObjectiveTo review the current clinical application of Beger procedure and Frey procedure for benign disease or low-grade malignant potential lesion of pancreas. MethodsRelevant literatures about current advance of clinical application of Beger procedure and Frey procedure published recently of domestic and abroad were collected and reviewed. ResultsWith the concept of organ-preserving operations was adopted in recent years, Beger procedure and Frey procedure were applied generally. Beger procedure and Frey procedure were associated with tolerable perioperative risk, postoperative complications, and good outcomes in the aspects of preservation of function and curability in these lesions compared to conventional pancreatectomy, with preservation of the physiological food passage, thus patients gained weight faster, had less pain, and demonstrated better exocrine and endocrine pancreatic function postoperatively and an improvement in the quality of life. Both procedures had reached an international position as a standard operation for the treatment of benign disease or low-grade malignant potential lesion of pancreas. But after long-term following-up early advantages were no longer present. ConclusionsBeger procedure and Frey procedure are safe and effective in providing good outcomes in the aspects of preservation of function and curability in benign disease or low-grade malignant potential lesion of pancreas. Organ-preserving pancreatectomy could become a new organ-preserving standard operation.
ObjectiveTo summarize and analyze the long-term clinical effect of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy.MethodsThe clinical data of 102 patients who underwent DPPHR (n=35) or pancreaticoduodenectomy (n=67) from January 2014 to December 2019 in The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University were analyzed retrospectively.ResultsThe operations of patients in the DPPHR group and the PD group were successfully complete, no one died during operation or perioperative period. The weight gain in one year after operation and incidences of exocrine dysfunction in the DPPHR group were all better than those of the PD group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference on the other complications between the two groups (P>0.05). The pain score, diarrhea score, and the overall health status score in one year after operation significantly improved in the DPPHR group than those in the PD group (P<0.05).ConclusionDPPHR is more beneficial to improve the quality of life after operation, and is a better surgical procedure for benign and low-grade malignant diseases of pancreatic head.
ObjectiveTo compare the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (LDPPHR) and minimally invasive enucleation (MIEN) in the treatment of benign or low-grade malignant tumors of the pancreatic head. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of patients who underwent LDPPHR (n=30) and MIEN (n=38) at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center between March 2021 and November 2024. The perioperative outcomes of the LDPPHR and MIEN groups were compared. Preoperative assessment of tumors in the MIEN group showed that they were partially or completely encircling the main pancreatic duct. ResultsThe MIEN group had a significantly shorter operative time compared to the LDPPHR group (229.0 min vs. 388.5 min, P<0.001), with less intraoperative blood loss (100.0 mL vs. 200.0 mL, P=0.028). Regarding the management of the main pancreatic duct, 26.3% (10/38) of patients in the MIEN group had an intact and unexposed main pancreatic duct, 10.5% (4/38) had exposed but undamaged ducts, 7.9% (3/38) had duct injury repaired with simple suture, and 55.3% (21/38) required stenting for duct repair and reconstruction following injury. Although the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula was higher in the MIEN group compared to the LDPPHR group [grade B: 73.7% (28/38) vs. 43.3% (13/30)], no significant differences were observed between the two groups in other perioperative outcomes (such as postoperative length of stay, discharge rate with drainage tube, and Clavien-Dindo complication grading, all P>0.05). One patient in the MIEN group required reoperation due to early postoperative hemorrhage. ConclusionsMIEN is a feasible surgical option for treating benign or low-grade malignant pancreatic head tumors with involvement of the main pancreatic duct. It shows significant advantages, particularly in terms of preserving organ function and maintaining normal anatomical structures. Despite the higher incidence of pancreatic fistula, no significant differences were observed in other perioperative outcomes compared to LDPPHR. Therefore, MIEN holds great promise in the treatment of pancreatic head tumors, especially for younger patients with a strong desire for function preservation.