west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "保肛手术" 21 results
  • Clinical Analysis of Preserving External Sphincter of Anus for 32 Cases of Anus Preservation Operation on Low Position Rectal Cancer

    目的:探讨保留肛门外括约肌低位直肠癌保肛手术的应用。方法: 在全直肠系膜切除的基础上,应用国产一次性管状吻合器,对32例低位直肠癌行保留肛门外括约肌超低位结肛吻合,随访12~36个月。回顾性分析其根治性、术后排便功能、手术并发症、局部复发率。结果: 全组病例术后病理检查无切端癌残留,无大便失禁,无吻合口漏;全组无手术死亡;肿瘤局部复发率9.4%(3/32)。结论: 低位直肠癌保留肛门外括约肌保肛手术,遵循肿瘤根治的原则下,能保留患者正常的肛门排便功能,明显改善该类患者的生活质量。

    Release date:2016-09-08 10:02 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Comparative Outcomes of Low/Ultra-Low Anterior Rectal Resection and Valgus Resection in Elder Patients with Rectal or Anal Cancer

    Objective To compare the outcomes of low/ultra-low anterior rectal resection and valgus resection in elder patients with rectal or anal cancer. Methods The clinical data of 184 patients with rectal or anal cancer, who were treated with extreme sphincter preserving surgery in West China Hospital from January 2009 to December 2011, were collected and analyzed retrospectively. The intraoperative and postoperative indexes between low/ultra-low anterior rectal resection group and valgus resection group were compared. Results ①There were no significant differences in the age,body mass index, gender, diameter of tumor, TNM stage, degree of differentiation, histological type, gross type, and complications before operation, such as hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, renal disease, and hypoproteinemia in two groups (P>0.05). ②Compared with the low/ultra-low anterior rectal resection group, the distance from the anal verge to the tumor was shorter (P<0.05) and the distance of distal resec-tion margin of tumor was longer (P<0.05) in the valgus resection group. ③There were no significant differences in the operation time, blood loss, ASA grade, and the postoperative complications in two groups (P>0.05). ④There were no significant differences in the duration of pulling out nasogastric tube, urinary catheter, and drainage tube, the duration of first passing flatus, first defecation, first oral intake, and first ambulation, and hospitalization cost (P>0.05). But the postoperative hospital stay and total hospital stay in the valgus resection group were significantly longer than those in the low/ultra-low anterior rectal resection group (P<0.05). ⑤All the patients were followed-up for 6-24 months (average 13 months). During the following-up, only 1 case suffered local tumor recurrence in the valgus resection group. One case suffered distant metastases in the ultra-low anterior rectal resection and valgus resection group, respectively. Eight cases (4.35%) died, of which 4 cases (4.04%) in the low/ultra-low anterior rectal group and 4 cases (4.71%) in the valgus resection group. All the patients were in functional recovery of anal control after operation. Conclusions As the extreme sphincter preserving surgery for elder patients with rectal or anal cancer, the low or ultra-low anterior rectal resection and valgus resection could both be used for elder patients with extreme-low rectal or anal cancer. However, valgus resection results in longer distal surgical margin than that low/ultra-low anterior rectal resection, and it is suitable for the patients with shorter distances from the anal verge to the tumor.

    Release date:2016-09-08 10:23 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Double Stapling Technique with Pulling out Through Anal Canal for Anus-Conserving Therapy in Low Rectal Cancer (Report of 23 Cases)

    目的  探讨肛管拖出式双吻合器在超低位直肠癌保肛手术中的应用价值。方法 回顾性总结我院23例超低位直肠癌保肛手术的经验。结果 本组病例利用肛管拖出和双吻合器技术行超低位保肛术均获成功,术后发生吻合口漏1例(4.3%),切口感染2例(8.7%),术后局部复发2例(8.7%),无手术死亡。结论 肛管拖出式双吻合器技术行超低位保肛术是安全可靠的,它可以大大提高超低位直肠癌保肛手术的成功率。

    Release date:2016-09-08 11:53 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Short Term Efficacy of Total Mesorectal Resection and Intersphincter Resection for Ultra-Low Rectal Cancer and Anorectal Cancer

    Objective To investigate the safety and feasibility of the total mesorectal excision (TME) and intersphincteric resection (ISR) for ultra-low rectal cancer and anal sphincter preservation surgery for anorectal cancer, and to evaluate the short term efficacy and postoperative anal function. Methods A retrospective analysis of clinical and follow-up data of 86 cases with TME+ISR for ultra-low rectal cancer and anorectal cancer from January 2009 to December 2010 in West China Hospital of Sichuan University were performed. Results Eighty-six patients were successfully performed the operation, the lower edge of tumor from the anus was 1-5 cm (average 1.63cm); tumor diameter was 2-7 cm (average 3.4cm). The tumors were high differentiation in 4 cases, moderately differentiation in 60 cases,and poorly differentiation in 22 cases. The pTNM stages were stageⅠin 12 cases, stageⅡA in 11 cases, stage ⅡB in 15 cases, stage ⅢA in 2 cases, stage ⅢB in 23 cases, stage ⅢC in 16 cases, and stage Ⅳ in 7 cases. There were postoperative anastomotic leakage in 3 cases, perianal infection in 2 cases (1 case received reoperation with permanent colostomy because of pelvic peritoneal infection caused by perianal severe infections). Anastomotic bleeding and anastomotic stenosis were of 2 cases respectively. Rectovaginal fistula, inflammatory ileus, urinary retention, and abdominal infection were of 1 case respectively. Eighty-six patients were followed-up for 12-24 months, the mean time was 18 months. Liver metastases was found in 1 case in 7 months after operation, 2 cases dead in the 7th month and 12th month after operation respectively. Local recurrence were found in 3 cases (3.5%) in 1 year after operation. The survival rate of 1-year was 97.7% (84/86). The times of defecation was 1-5 times a day. The Kirwan’s score level on function of control defecation was 1-2 grade. Conclusions TME+ISR for low rectal cancer and anorectal cancer is a viable, safe, and radical operation type for preservation of anus. The short term efficacy is satisfactory.

    Release date:2016-09-08 10:38 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Advance in Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Lower Rectal Cancer

    Release date:2016-09-08 10:38 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Laparoscopic Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Low Rectal Cancer

    Release date:2016-09-08 10:38 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Application of Domestic Single Stapler in Anus-Preserving Anterior Resection for Low Rectal Cancer

    目的 探讨国产单吻合器在低位直肠癌保肛手术中的临床应用效果。方法 结合相关文献回顾性分析2003年1月至2007年12月期间我院收治的128例低位直肠癌中行直肠全系膜切除(TME)且应用国产管状吻合器及荷包钳进行手术的91例患者的资料。结果 全组无手术死亡病例,保肛均获成功,保肛率为71.09%(91/128),术后病理检查肿瘤远端切缘无癌残留。未发生吻合口出血及狭窄; 1例(1.10%)发生吻合口漏,经保守治疗后痊愈; 无大便失禁发生。全组获随访1~5年,平均3.8年,局部复发6例(6.59%); 总的1年生存率为97.80%(89/91),3年生存率为80.00%(72/90),5年生存率为68.97%(60/87)。结论 TME联合国产管状吻合器及荷包钳应用于低位直肠癌根治术,可提高保肛率,操作简单安全,疗效满意。

    Release date:2016-09-08 11:04 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Anatomical Basis for Anus-Preserved Operation of Rectal Cancer

    Release date:2016-09-08 10:38 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Role of Curved-Cutter-Stapler in Anus-Preserving for Low Rectal Cancer

    Objective To evaluate the role of curved-cutter-stapler in anus-preserving for low rectal cancer. Methods The clinical data of 32 patients with low rectal cancer from June 2007 to December 2008 who received low anterior resection and ultra low anterior resection by using curved-cutter-stapler were reviewed retrospectively. Results No operation death case, complete cutting and safe closure in all cases, one case was complicated with anastomotic leakage, and one case of rectovaginal fistula. Thirty patients were followed up 4 to 22 months after the operation, with an average time of 12.6 months, no hemorrhea of pelvic cavity and anastomotic stoma or anastomotic stenosis cases. Conclusion Curved-cutter-stapler has the advantages of complete cutting, safe closure and low complications, and easy being used in anus-preserving operation for low rectal cancer, which can increase the rate of anus-preserving.

    Release date:2016-09-08 10:56 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • AnoSaving Surgery in Lower Rectal Carcinoma (〖KG*9〗Report of 90 Cases )

    【摘要】目的 探讨低位直肠癌保肛手术的术式选择及其治疗效果。方法 回顾性分析我院1997年7月至2002年7月期间行低位直肠癌保肛手术治疗的90例患者的临床资料。结果 行低位直肠癌保肛手术者占同期的66.2%(90/136)。90例中距肛缘5 cm以内者14例,5~8 cm者76例; 行Dixon术84例,经肛门局部切除术4例,Parks术2例。术后发生吻合口漏8例,其中Dixon术7例,Parks术 1例; 肛门狭窄2例,其中Dixon术1例,Parks术 1例; 无手术死亡。90例患者术后均获随访,64例随访23~59个月,中位随访时间为39个月,其中Dixon术59例,Parks术2例,局部切除术3例。局部复发6例,其中Dixon术5例,局部切除术1例。 结论 Dixon术是低位直肠癌保肛手术的主要术式; 在严格掌握适应证的情况下,可考虑施行低位直肠癌的局部切除术。

    Release date:2016-09-08 11:54 Export PDF Favorites Scan
3 pages Previous 1 2 3 Next

Format

Content