目的 探讨腹腔镜超低位直肠癌保肛手术的可行性。方法 回顾性总结2004年9月至2007年10月期间行腹腔镜超低位直肠癌保肛手术58例患者的临床资料。结果 54例在腹腔镜下顺利完成手术，中转开腹4例，无手术死亡病例。平均手术时间187 min，术中平均失血110 ml，术后肛门排气时间平均为2.3 d。手术切除淋巴结平均为18.5个； 随访6~42个月(平均17.6个月)未见切口种植及吻合口复发。结论 腹腔镜超低位直肠癌保肛手术具有创伤小、术后恢复快等优点，可以取得比开腹手术更好的根治效果。
目的:探讨保留肛门外括约肌低位直肠癌保肛手术的应用。方法: 在全直肠系膜切除的基础上,应用国产一次性管状吻合器,对32例低位直肠癌行保留肛门外括约肌超低位结肛吻合,随访12～36个月。回顾性分析其根治性、术后排便功能、手术并发症、局部复发率。结果: 全组病例术后病理检查无切端癌残留,无大便失禁,无吻合口漏;全组无手术死亡;肿瘤局部复发率9.4%(3/32)。结论: 低位直肠癌保留肛门外括约肌保肛手术,遵循肿瘤根治的原则下,能保留患者正常的肛门排便功能,明显改善该类患者的生活质量。
Objective To compare the outcomes of low/ultra-low anterior rectal resection and valgus resection in elder patients with rectal or anal cancer. Methods The clinical data of 184 patients with rectal or anal cancer， who were treated with extreme sphincter preserving surgery in West China Hospital from January 2009 to December 2011， were collected and analyzed retrospectively. The intraoperative and postoperative indexes between low/ultra-low anterior rectal resection group and valgus resection group were compared. Results ①There were no significant differences in the age，body mass index， gender， diameter of tumor， TNM stage， degree of differentiation， histological type， gross type， and complications before operation， such as hypertension， chronic obstructive pulmonary disease， cardiovascular diseases， diabetes， renal disease， and hypoproteinemia in two groups （P＞0.05）. ②Compared with the low/ultra-low anterior rectal resection group， the distance from the anal verge to the tumor was shorter （P＜0.05） and the distance of distal resec-tion margin of tumor was longer （P＜0.05） in the valgus resection group. ③There were no significant differences in the operation time， blood loss， ASA grade， and the postoperative complications in two groups （P＞0.05）. ④There were no significant differences in the duration of pulling out nasogastric tube， urinary catheter， and drainage tube， the duration of first passing flatus， first defecation， first oral intake， and first ambulation， and hospitalization cost （P＞0.05）. But the postoperative hospital stay and total hospital stay in the valgus resection group were significantly longer than those in the low/ultra-low anterior rectal resection group （P＜0.05）. ⑤All the patients were followed-up for 6-24 months （average 13 months）. During the following-up， only 1 case suffered local tumor recurrence in the valgus resection group. One case suffered distant metastases in the ultra-low anterior rectal resection and valgus resection group， respectively. Eight cases （4.35%） died， of which 4 cases （4.04%） in the low/ultra-low anterior rectal group and 4 cases （4.71%） in the valgus resection group. All the patients were in functional recovery of anal control after operation. Conclusions As the extreme sphincter preserving surgery for elder patients with rectal or anal cancer， the low or ultra-low anterior rectal resection and valgus resection could both be used for elder patients with extreme-low rectal or anal cancer. However， valgus resection results in longer distal surgical margin than that low/ultra-low anterior rectal resection， and it is suitable for the patients with shorter distances from the anal verge to the tumor.
ObjectiveTo investigate current status of anal sphincter preservation in low rectal cancer.MethodThe recent literatures on the progress of anal sphincter preservation in the low rectal cancer were reviewed.ResultsIn the past, the surgical treatment of the low rectal cancer was mainly based on the Miles. With the deepening of the anatomical understanding, the improvement of surgical concepts, and the development of minimally invasive techniques, the treatment concept of the low rectal cancer had gradually entered the era of retaining anal and anal function. At present, many surgical methods including the transanal local excision, intersphincteric resection, transanal total mesorectal excision, etc. could be applied to the anal sphincter preservation of the lower rectal cancer, but the advantages and disadvantages of each surgical procedure and the scope of application were slightly different.ConclusionsAlthough there are many surgical procedures that can be applied to patients with low rectal cancer, none of them can achieve perfection in terms of retaining anal and anal function, reducing complications and recurrence rates, and improving survival. It is believed that with continuous understanding of rectal anatomy by surgeons, emergence of various neoadjuvant chemoradiation and new devices, and more anal sphincter preservation procedures and even artificial anal surgery, treatment of low rectal cancer will also be more good care for anal and maintenance function, so that patients can obtain a higher quality and a long-term survival opportunity.
目的 探讨肛管拖出式双吻合器在超低位直肠癌保肛手术中的应用价值。方法 回顾性总结我院23例超低位直肠癌保肛手术的经验。结果 本组病例利用肛管拖出和双吻合器技术行超低位保肛术均获成功，术后发生吻合口漏1例（4.3%），切口感染2例（8.7%），术后局部复发2例（8.7%），无手术死亡。结论 肛管拖出式双吻合器技术行超低位保肛术是安全可靠的，它可以大大提高超低位直肠癌保肛手术的成功率。