ObjectiveTo explore the clinical significance of prone position in the treatment of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) caused by pulmonary contusion.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on pulmonary contusion patients in the Intensive Care Medicine (ICU) from January 2017 to April 2021. The patients were divided into a prone position group (n=121) and a control group (n=117) after screening. The patients' basic conditions, occurrence of ARDS (P/F<150 mm Hg), changes in vital signs, laboratory examinations, lung compliance and other changes after treatment, mechanical ventilation time, staying in ICU, complications, and mortality were recorded and conpared between the two groups.ResultsWhen ARDS [oxygenation index (P/F)<150 mm Hg] occurred, compared with 1 day later, the P/F [(125.7±15.3) vs. (209.5±22.4) mm Hg , P<0.05] and lung compliance [(64.6±4.8) vs. (76.0±5.4) mL/cm H2O, P<0.05] increased in the prone position group. Compare with the control group after 1 day of treatment ARDS (P/F<150 mm Hg), P/F [(209.5±22.4) vs. (126.1±19.5) mm Hg, P<0.05] and lung compliance [(76.0±5.4) vs. (63.5±5.5) mL/cm H2O, P<0.05] increased in the prone position group (P<0.05). Compare with the control group, the prone position group had shortened mechanical ventilation time and ICU stay time, less atelectasis, lower mortality (P<0.05), lower occurrence of pneumothorax (P>0.05).ConclusionProne position treatment for patients with pulmonary contusion after ARDS (P/F<150 mm Hg) can correct hypoxemia faster, improve lung compliance, reduce atelectasis, shorten mechanical ventilation time and stay time of ICU, and reduce mortality, hence it has clinical value.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the surgical outcomes of 25G+ vitrectomy with air tamponade and 1-day prone positioning for idiopathic macular hole (IMH).MethodsA prospective analysis was performed on 39 patients (39 eyes) underwent 25G+ pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with the internal limiting membrane (ILM) removal and fluid-air exchange for IMH from July 2012 to December 2013. After vitrectomy, patients were instructed to keep prone positioning for only 1 day (the air group). These patients were compared to 30 consecutive patients from July 2010 to July 2012, who were conducted 25G+ PPV with 25% SF6 tamponade. They remained in the same face-down position for 3 days postoperatively (SF6 group). Age, gender, logMAR BCVA, macular thickness, macular hole diameter, axial length, macular hole stages and pseudophakic status were collected as baseline characteristics in both groups. The initial hole-closure rate, visual outcome and intra-operative & post-operative complications were evaluated for 6 months. Group comparisons of numeric variables were made by using two sample t -test. Group difference of categorical variables was determined by using standard chi-square test or rank sum test.ResultsThirty nine patients (39 eyes) and 30 patients (30 eyes) were respectively enrolled in air group and SF6 group. The distribution of age (t=－1.63), gender (χ2=0.03), logMAR BCVA (t=0.39), macular thickness (t=－0.93), macular hole diameter (t=－0.70), axial length (t=－0.56), macular hole stages (Z=－0.47) and pseudophakic status (χ2=0.13) was similar in both groups. Anatomical closure of macular holes was achieved in 35 (89.7%) of the 39 eyes in the air group and in 27 eyes (90.0%) in the SF6 group. There was no significant difference of closure rate between the two groups (χ2=0.001, P=0.970). The postoperative visual acuity of gaining, stability and decreasing 2 or more 2 lines was achieved in 23 eyes,10 eyes and 6 eyes in air group and 18 eyes, 6 eyes and 6 eyes in SF6 group. The proportion of visual acuity improvement in air group was lower than that in SF6 group without the statistical significance (Z=－0.08, P=0.93). The gas bubble was absorbed sooner in the air group (mean 8.54±1.74 days) than in the SF6 group (mean 31.10±3.20 days). No retinal break, retinal detachment or endophthalmitis occurred in either group. Postoperatively intraocular pressure was elevated temporarily in 2 eyes of the air group and 3 eyes in the SF6 group. All returned to normal limit after local medication.ConclusionCompared to SF6 group, air group has similar anatomical macular hole closure rate and visual acuity rehabilitation.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the full thickness idiopathic macular hole (IMH) closure rates in patients positioning non-supine (NSP) compared with patients positioning face-down (FDP). MethodsA computerized search was conducted in the PubMed, Chinese Biomedical Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and VIP database. All the included studies were divided into NSP and FDP group. A total of 9 papers were included in this meta analysis, including 285 eyes (145 eyes with small hole ≤400 μm, 104 eyes with large hole >400 μm) in NSP group and 303 eyes (141 eyes with small hole and 124 eyes with large hole ). RevMan 4.2 software was applied for investigating heterogeneity and meta-analysis, and the risk of publication bias was evaluated. ResultsMeta analysis indicated that there was statistical significance on closure rates betwen NSP and FDP group. The difference of closure rates in small macular hole eyes between NSP and FDP group was statistically significant (OR=0.45, 95%CI 0.13-1.51;P=0.20). The difference of closure rates in large macular hole eyes between NSP and FDP group was statistically significant (OR=0.35, 95%CI 0.17-0.75;P=0.006). ConclusionNSP is equally effective as strict FDP in the repair of small macular hole. Post-operative FDP may improve the macular hole closure rates for holes larger than 400 μm.
ObjectiveTo investigate the factors affecting enteral nutrition tolerance in patients accepting prone position ventilation.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted to analyze the tolerance of enteral nutrition in patients with prone position ventilation from January 2013 to December 2018. The single factor and multiple factors were used to analyze the influencing factors of enteral nutrition tolerance in patients accepting prone position ventilation.ResultsNinety-two patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into 2 groups according to enteral nutrition tolerance table: 45 patients with good tolerance and 47 patients with poor tolerance. Univariate analysis showed age, use of muscle relaxants, albumin, prealbumin, feeding amount per unit time, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHEⅡ), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), nutrition risk in critically ill (NUTRIC) score and gastric residual volume were factors affecting the patient's tolerance (P<0.05). Logistic analysis showed that the factors affecting the patient's tolerance during the prone position were age, use of muscle relaxant, albumin, prealbumin, APACHEⅡ, SOFA, and NUTRIC scores (P<0.05).ConclusionFactors affecting enteral nutrition tolerance in patients accepting prone position ventilation are age, use of muscle relaxants, albumin, prealbumin, APACHEⅡ, SOFA and NUTRIC scores.
ObjectiveTo compare the short-and mid-term outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer after subtotal esophagectomy via thoracoscopy in lateral prone position, prone position, or left lateral position. MethodsThis randomized prospectively controlled study was conducted in 121 patients receiving subtotal esophagectomy via thoracoscopy between January 2010 and February 2013. The patients were randomly assigned into three groups to underwent esophagectomy in lateral prone position, prone position, or left lateral position, respectively. Forty-three patients (24 males, 19 females, 61.5±1.5 years) underwent surgery in lateral prone position, 39 patients (21 males, 18 females, 63.2±1.7 years) in prone position and other 39 patients (22 males, 17 females, 60.1±1.6 years) in left lateral position. Esophagogastric anastomosis was performed in the left neck. ResultsThe median operative time in the three groups was 232 (165-296) min, 230 (170-310) min, and 280 (190-380) min, respectively (P < 0.05). The median perioperative bleeding was 262 (185-330) ml, 275 (100-320) ml and 350 (120-560) ml, respectively (P > 0.05). The average number of harvested lymph nodes was 19.1 (9-26), 18.4 (11-23), 10.9 (6-21), respectively (P < 0.05). The postoperative medical complications occurred in 10, 9 and 11 patients in three groups, respectively, with no statistical difference. Twenty patients died in the lateral prone position group after a median follow-up period of 19.2 (6-31) months, 18 patients died in the prone position group after a median follow-up period of 20.7 (8-29) months, and 21 patients died in the left lateral position group after a median follow-up period of 18.5 (12-33) months. ConclusionThe results confirm the feasibility and safety of this minimally invasive esophagectomy via thoracoscopy in lateral prone position, prone position, or left lateral position for patients with esophageal carcinoma. A possible advantage of lateral prone technique is that in case of an emergency, precious time could be saved in changing the position of the patient.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of prone position ventilation on mortality in ARDS patients by cumulative meta-analysis.MethodsDatabases including PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data were searched from inception to September 30th, 2016 to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about prone position ventilation in ARDS patients. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. In accordance with the published literature or published in chronological order, cumulative meta-analysis was performed using Stata12.0 software, and the trial sequencing analysis (TSA) method was used to assess the reliability and authenticity of the results.ResultsA total of 9 RCTs involving 2 359 patients were included. The cumulative meta-analysis results showed that the prone position ventilation could reduce the mortality in ARDS patients (OR=0.60, 95%CI 0.40 to 0.90). The TSA results showed that the definite conclusion had been obtained before the desired amount of information had been reached.ConclusionThe current evidence shows that prone position ventilation is associated with decreased mortality in ARDS patients. Due to limited quality and quantity of included studies, the above results are needed to validate by more studies.
Objective To formulate an evidence-based position program for a ventilation patient with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods Based on fully assessing the patient’s conditions, the clinical problems were put forward according to PICO principles. Such database as The Cochrane Library (2005 to January 2011), DARE (March 2011), CCTR (March 2011), MEDLINE (1996 to January 2011) and CNKI (1979 to January 2011) were retrieved to collect high quality clinical evidence, and then the optimum nursing program was designed in line with patient’s conditions and relatives’ willingness. Results Three meta-analyses, three randomized controlled trials, one systematic review and one anterior-posterior self-control study were included. The available clinical evidence displayed that: a) the prone position adopting earlier, especially for patients with bilateral lungs or left lung functional disorder, was propitious to effectively improve the oxygenation condition and reduce the incidence of ventilator induced lung injury (VILI); b) The long-term prone position could increase the risk of pressure sore; c) The prone position could prolong the survival time, but there was no enough evidence to prove that it could obviously decrease the mortality rate of ARDS. So finally a nursing plan was made in combination with literature evidence and patient’s condition: adopting the prone position after onset within 24 to 36 hours, and enhancing the skin nursing to prevent pressure sore at the same time. After 4-week comprehensive therapy and prone position ventilation, the patient got obvious alleviated in oxygenation, with SpO 2 up to 90% to 100%, stable vital signs, and no more VILI and pressure sore. And then the patient was stopped applying ventilator, and transferred to a general ward for further treatment. Conclusion The earlier adoption of prone position ventilation for severe ARDS can improve oxygenation and reduce ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) and VILI, but whether it can prolong survival time and reduce mortality for mild ARDS or not still has to be proved with more high quality evidence in the future.
Objective To investigate the current status and influencing factors of the awake prone position in patients with mild and moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods A total of 210 patients with mild to moderate ARDS admitted between December 2022 and January 2023 were investigated by general information questionnaire and self-made prone position knowledge questionnaire. The daily prone position time during hospitalization was recorded. The influencing factors of awake prone position were analyzed by univariate and multivariate linear regression. Results The 210 mild and moderate ARDS patients had an average daily prone position length of stay of (4.97±3.94)h/d, showing a low level. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that prone position knowledge score, age, waist circumference and BMI were the influencing factors of awake prone position (P<0.05). Conclusions Daily awake prone position length was at a low level in mild and moderate ARDS patients. Healthcare workers can prolong the time in the prone position by developing an individualized treatment plan for the prone position, improving the patient’s perception of the prone position, and resolving the discomfort from the prone position.