Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effects of endoscopic treatment on biliary tract complications after liver transplantation. Methods The clinical data of 55 patients with biliary tract complications after liver transplantation undergoing endoscopic treatment from January 2006 to June 2009 were analyzed retrospectively. Results Ninety-eight times of endoscopic treatment were performed in 55 patients. There were 11 cases of biliary fistula, 4 cases of bile duct stricture with biliary fistula, 21 cases of bile duct stricture, 12 cases of bile duct stricture with biliary sludge or stones, 3 cases of biliary sludge or stones, 2 cases of angular distortion of the bile duct and papilla duodeni stenosis in 2 cases. Different procedures including biliary tract dilation, endoscopic nasobiliary drainage, endoscopic sphincterotomy, stone extraction technique and biliary stent placement were performed in different biliary tract complications. The endoscopic treatments were successful in 46 cases (83.6%). The procedure related complications were found in 13 times (13.3%). Conclusion Endoscopy may serve as the primary modality for treating biliary tract complications after liver transplantation with safety and effectiveness.
Objective To investigate whether intraductal electrocautery incision （IEI） could decrease the recurrence of post-liver transplant anastomotic strictures （PTAS） after conventional endoscopic intervention of balloon dilatation （BD） and plastic stenting （PS）. Methods The clinical data of 27 patients with PTAS who were given endoscopic treatment of BD＋PS or IEI＋BD＋PS in our hospital from January 2007 to October 2011 were reviewed retrospectively. Results The treatment of BD＋PS was initially successful in 9 of 11 （81.8%） cases， but showed recurrence in 5 of 9 （55.6%）. The treatment of IEI＋BD＋PS was initially successful in 14 of 16 （87.5%） cases, and the recurrence was observed only in 3 of 14 （21.4%）. The total diameter of inserted plastic stents in IEI＋BD＋PS group was significantly greater than that in BD＋PS group 〔（12±3.2） Fr vs. （8±1.3） Fr，P=0.039〕. All recurrences were successfully retreated by IEI＋BD＋PS. Procedure-related complications included pancreatitis in 5 cases （18.5%）, cholangitis in 8 cases （29.6%）, bleeding after EST in 1 cases （3.7%）, which were all cured with medical treatment. No complications related to intraductal endocautery incision procedure such as bleeding and perforation were observed. Median follow-up after completion of endoscopic therapy was 22 months （range 1-49 months）. Conclusions Intraductal electrocautery incision is an effective and safe supplement to balloon dilatation and plastic stenting treatment of PTAS, which can decrease the recurrence of anastomotic strictures in conventional endoscopic intervention.
Objective To compare the therapy effect between surgical therapy and endoscopic therapy for chronic pancreatitis (CP) combined with pancreatic ductal stones (PDS). Methods Clinical data of 113 cases of CP combined with PDS who got treatment in Southwest Hospital of The Third Military Medical University between January 2010 and December 2015 were analyzed retrospectively, 84 of them underwent surgery (surgery group), and 29 of them got endoscopic therapy (endoscopy group). Results The operative time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative hospital stay, and days in hospital, mortality, incidence of complication (pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, diabetes mellitus, and acute pancreatitis) of the surgery group were all higher than those of endoscopy group (P ＜0.05), but the ratios of the two-stage surgery and recurrence of PDS were all lower (P ＜00.05). The differences between symptom remission rate and residual stones rate were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusions For cases of CP combined with PDS, the clinical therapy effect in symptom remission and residual stones between surgical and endoscopic therapy is similar, but compared with the endoscopic therapy, the operative time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative hospital stay, and days in hospital of the surgical therapy are both longer. However, the ratios of the two-stage surgery and recurrence of PDS in the endoscopy group is significantly higher than those of surgery group.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in treating Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) after Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS). Methods The following databases and periodicals such as PubMed (Jan. 1980 to Jan. 2009), MEDLINE (1980 to 2009), EBSCOhost (Jan. 1975 to Jan. 2009), CALIS (1984 to 2009), CNKI (1979 to 2007), VIP (1989 to 2009), CBM (1978 to 2009); Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (1990 to 2008), Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (1988 to 2008), Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (1990 to 2008), and Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine (1996 to 2008) were searched by computer and handwork for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about TCM to treat CRS after ESS. The trial screening, quality assessment, and the data extraction of the included trials were conducted before performing statistical analyses by using RevMan 4.2.10 software. Results A total of 32 RCTs in three sub-groups in Chinese literatures were identified with meta-analyses in comparisons of the cure rate (OR=1.99, 95%CI 1.78 to 2.23), total effective rate (OR=2.66, 95%CI 2.20 to 3.22), degree I postoperative improvement rate (OR=2.22, 95%CI 1.60 to 3.06), total postoperative improvement rate (OR=8.77, 95%CI 1.09 to 70.64), postoperative clean time (OR=2.54, 95%CI 1.70 to 3.79), postoperative epithelization time (OR= –29.46, 95%CI –37.73 to –21.18), and mucociliary transport rate (OR=1.14, 95%CI 0.22 to 2.06). A total of 4 RCTs were meta-analyzed to evaluate the safety in comparisons of gastrointestinal reaction (OR=0.25, 95%CI 0.00 to 33.78) and local reaction (OR=0.03, 95%CI 0.01 to 0.12). Conclusion The current evidence shows TCM in treating CRS after ESS tends to improve the clinical efficacy and reduce the cure time without obvious adverse reaction. Due to the low methodological quality of included trials, more RCTs with high quality and large scale are required.
ObjectiveThe aim of this paper is to summarize the advantages and disadvantages of non-surgical treatments of the enterocutaneous fistula, in order to give some advice.MethodsPubmed, EMBASE, Medline, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were retrieved for the published article addressing the non-surgical treatments of enterocutaneous fistula between 2004 to 2018. The keywords were " enterocutaneous fistula” in English and Chinese, respectively. The non-surgical treatments of enterocutaneous fistula were reviewed.ResultsThe results of this search suggested that non-surgical treatments of the enterocutaneous fistula mainly include fibrin glue, endoscopic treatment, laser ablation, and somatostatin. Fibrin glue was widely used at domestic and abroad, but it needed repeated operations. Endoscopic treatment of enterocutaneous fistula required a certain professional foundation; laser ablation technology was still immature and required theoretical data support. Now, the use of somatostatin was controversial.ConclusionEach of measures have its advantages and disadvantages, we should determine according to the patient’s condition and economic situation.
ObjectiveTo understand advances in the timing and surgical mode selection of gastrointestinal endoscopy and surgical intervention for acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP).MethodThe recent literatures on the timing and choice of gastrointestinal endoscopy and surgical treatments aimed at ABP were reviewed.ResultsFor ABP patients with early cholangitis or biliary obstruction, no matter how serious, endoscopic treatment should be used to relieve obstruction and relieve symptoms. For patients only with ABP, if non-surgical treatment was not effective and patients showed symptoms such as biliary obstruction or biliary tract infection, endoscopic intervention should be considered. Most ABP patients had milder symptoms and could undergo cholecystectomy during the same hospitalization to prevent ABP recurrence after symptoms relief. Patients with severe ABP could be treated with cholecystectomy along with pancreatic necrotic tissue removal, and surgery should be performed after the disease was controlled. If the preoperative imaging examination highly suspected that there were stones in the biliary tract, biliary exploration should be performed at the same time. Laparoscopic surgery should be selected as far as possible to facilitate the postoperative recovery of the patient.ConclusionsFor patients with ABP, whether endoscopic or surgical treatment, the timing and surgical mode selection should follow the specific clinical situation with the “individualization” principle of the treatment. We should make the reasonable and effective policy at diagnosis and treatment according to different conditions.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of cap-assisted endoscopy in the treatment of esophageal foreign bodies. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, CNKI and Wanfang databases were searched by computer for relevant literatures on cap-assisted endoscopy and traditional endoscopy for esophageal foreign bodies from inception to November 2022. The quality assessment of the literature was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1. Results Finally, 27 studies were collected, including 17 randomized controlled trials, 2 cohort studies and 8 case-control studies, with a total of 3 619 patients. NOS scores of all studies were ≥7 points. Meta-analysis results showed that compared with traditional endoscopic treatment, the success rate of removing esophageal foreign bodies in the cap-assisted endoscopy group was higher (OR=14.43, 95%CI 10.64 to 19.55, P<0.000 1), postoperative complications were fewer (OR=0.30, 95%CI 0.23 to 0.38, P<0.000 1), patients' tolerance was better (OR=4.07, 95%CI 2.95 to 5.60, P<0.000 1), intraoperative visual field clarity was better (OR=12.00, 95%CI 7.29 to 19.76, P<0.000 1) and operative time was shorter (SMD=−1.83, 95%CI −2.31 to −1.34, P<0.000 1). Conclusion Cap-assisted endoscopy for esophageal foreign bodies is an effective and safe method, worthy of further promotion and application in clinical practice.
目的探讨肝移植术后胆道并发症的病因及内镜在肝移植并发症中的治疗。 方法笔者所在单位1995年9月至2010年3月期间共施行尸体肝移植516例，将其分为2个阶段，即1995～2001年的技术摸索阶段和2001～2010年的技术成熟阶段。第1阶段125例，有17例（13.60%）发生胆道并发症；第2阶段391例，有15例（3.84%）发生胆道并发症。对这32例患者行内镜诊治的相关临床资料进行回顾性分析。 结果32例中单纯胆瘘5例，单纯胆管结石2例，单纯胆管狭窄11例，胆管狭窄伴结石9例，胆管狭窄合并胆瘘2例，胆管扭曲2例，十二指肠乳头狭窄1例。针对不同的胆道并发症，采取了胆管扩张、乳头切开取石、胆道支架置放、鼻胆管引流等不同的治疗方式，32例患者共行内镜治疗56例次，治疗成功27例（84.38%）；发生内镜相关并发症4例（12.50%）。 结论内镜治疗肝移植术后胆道并发症的疗效是值得肯定的。