目的 观察内镜治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎（ABP）的疗效及其并发症。方法 30例ABP患者在抗炎、抑酶等综合治疗基础上，经内镜（1～3 d 内）逆行胰胆管造影（ERCP）及经内镜十二指肠乳头括约肌切开（EST）或鼻胆管引流（ENBD）等治疗。结果 内镜治疗后22 例（73.3%）轻症急性胆源性胰腺炎（MABP）患者3～5 d 体温恢复正常； 8例（26.7%） 重症急性胆源性胰腺炎（SABP）患者3～8 d 腹部体征好转，血常规、淀粉酶及血生化1~2周内基本恢复，平均住院18.7 d，3例死亡（10.0%）。内镜治疗过程中5例出现十二指肠乳头括约肌切口少量出血，经简单治疗止血，未再出现其他并发症。与同期开腹手术治疗相比较，症状体征缓解、血常规、淀粉酶、血生化恢复正常及住院的时间更短，死亡率无明显差异。结论 ABP早期ERCP 及内镜治疗安全有效。
目的 探讨经肛门内镜显微手术(TEM)治疗直肠肿瘤的疗效。方法 回顾性分析2009年1~12月期间我院行TEM治疗7例直肠腺瘤患者的临床资料。结果 7例直肠肿瘤均获完整切除，切缘均阴性。手术时间55～240 min，平均110 min; 术中出血量5～100 ml,平均45 ml。术后病理诊断: 直肠绒毛状腺瘤4例，绒毛管状腺瘤2例，直肠腺癌1例。手术并发症: 术中直肠穿孔1例，肺部感染1例，尿潴留1例。 7例随访6~13个月,平均8个月，肿瘤无复发。结论 TEM治疗直肠肿瘤安全、有效。
近年胰腺癌的发病率明显增加，过去10年，美国及欧洲的发病率已达到8/10万～12/10万，我国与其相近似。胰腺癌的治疗效果至今却难以令人满意，5年生存率无显著提高。主要的原因是由于胰腺的位置深在，胰腺癌又缺乏特异性的临床表现，早期诊断非常困难，大多数患者到医院就诊时已属于Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ期肿瘤。治愈的唯一可能性是肿瘤的外科切除，但根治性手术切除率仅为18.6%，5年生存率在0～24%。未治疗者中位生存期为6～8个月。目前，随着影像学技术、内窥镜和腹腔镜超声等多项检查手段的应用与普及，对胰腺癌能否切除可以做出较准确的术前评估，这对合理地选择治疗方法，提高手术切除率，避免不必要的“开腹探查”有着重要的意义。
Objective To find the most effective treatment for a patient with difficult selective biliary cannulation (DSBC) during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) by EBM practice. Methods Evidence was retrieved from The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2010), ACP online, NGC (1998 to June 2010), PubMed (1950 to June 2010), and CBM (1994 to June 2010). The collected evidence was then graded. Results After preliminary research, we identified 18 relevant articles. The evidence showed that pre-cutting technique could increase cannulation success rates in DSBC and was safe, effective, and time-saving for an experienced endoscopist. Pancreatic duct occupation was easier to perform than pre-cutting technique and could also increase selective cannulation success rates in DSBC. According to the evidence, together with endoscopist’s experience and the preference of the patient and his family, needle-knife precut papillotomy was performed. Successful selective biliary cannulation was accomplished after pre-cutting. Conclusion The current evidence suggests that pre-cutting technique and pancreatic duct occupation could increase selective cannulation success rates in DSBC. Patients’ condition and endoscopist’s experience should be considered properly before the operation.
目的探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜联合胃镜治疗微小胃间质瘤(gastric stromal tumors, GIST)的可行性和临床疗效。 方法回顾性分析我院2010年10月至2011年5月期间行经脐单孔腹腔镜联合胃镜治疗微小GIST 30例患者的临床资料。 结果30例病灶直径（1.0±0.2） cm（0.5～2.0 cm），术后病理检查均证实为极低危险程度GIST。 24例在单孔腹腔镜辅助下成功完成内镜黏膜下剥离术（endoscopic submucosal dissection，ESD）； 3例因ESD术中发生胃壁穿孔而改行内镜全层切除术（endoscopic full-thickness resection, EFR），其中2例继续在单孔下完成穿孔修补术，1例于左上腹壁另加一 Trocar，在双孔下完成穿孔修补术； 另3例因ESD剥离瘤体困难，改行胃局部切除术，其中2例继续在单孔下完成手术，1例在双孔下完成手术。 ESD成功率为80.0%（24／30），经脐部单孔完成率为93.3%（28/30）。手术时间（87.5±10.3） min （45～150 min）。 全组术后（4.3±0.5） d （3～8 d）出院。术后随访期3～7个月（平均4.6个月），均无病变复发。 结论经脐部单孔腹腔镜联合胃镜治疗微小GIST是安全可行的，早期疗效令人满意。
Objective To summarize the research progress of magnetic-controlled capsule endoscopy (MCCE) in application for gastric diseases. Method By searching the literatures in domestic and foreign database, the latest literatures on the application of MCCE for gastric diseases were reviewed. Results Compared with traditional gastroscopy, the diagnostic accuracy of MCCE was comparable to that of traditional gastroscopy, and there was no serious complications had been reported in use of MCCE. In addition, MCCE had advantages of comfort, safety, and prevention of cross-infection. However, it could not be used for biopsy and treatment. With the constant technical innovation, application of MCCE would be more extensive in future. Conclusions The diagnostic accuracy of MCCE in gastric diseases is high. Compared with traditional gastroscopy, it has more advantages. The shortcomings of MCCE can be improved with the development of science and technology, and it can be used for the initial screening of gastric diseases.
目的探讨腹腔镜胆总管探查(LCBDE)取石与内镜(ERCP、EST)胆总管取石的适用范围，以及中西医结合治疗胆总管结石的疗效。方法25例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者，其中23例行腹腔镜胆囊切除(LC)+LCBDE，2例因高龄、胆总管直径lt;1.0 cm并伴有高血压和糖尿病不能耐受长时间手术而先选择ERCP+EST，后择期行LC。8例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石伴胆源性胰腺炎患者先行ERCP+EST，其中3例EST取石失败而行LC+LCBDE。4例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石伴急性化脓性胆管炎患者先在内镜下置鼻胆管引流，病情稳定后行LC+LCBDE。4例单纯胆总管结石患者行ERCP+EST。手术按常规方法进行。术后均给予口服中药。结果30例行LC+LCBDE患者，均获得治愈，术后无胆管残留结石。14例行ERCP+EST治疗胆总管结石患者中11例EST取石成功，3例失败后行LC+LCBDE。41例患者均获得治愈。平均随访6个月，无胆管结石复发、胆管狭窄及其他并发症发生。结论LCBDE和EST治疗胆总管结石微创、安全、有效，同时结合中药治疗，有利患者术后恢复。LCBDE较内镜胆总管取石成功率高，其与选择病例和严格掌握各自适应证有关。
ObjectiveTo explain the advantage of laparoscopic endoscopic rendezvous procedures used to treat rectal carcinoma, and predict the future direction of the surgery methods for rectal carcinoma. MethodsA review and summary based on the clinical experience of our hospital and the published researches about the laparoscopic endoscopic rendezvous procedures over the past years in home and abroad were performed. ResultsLaparoscopy can monitor the situation of the abdominal cavity.Endoscopy can detect the location of rectal carcinoma.Laparoscopic endoscopic rendezvous procedures used to treat rectal carcinoma can combine the advantage of each other.And the purpose of "less invasion, less pain, and faster recovery" will be achieved.The effect of "1+1 > 2" will be realized. ConclusionLaparoscopy and transanal endoscopic microsurgery hybrid could be a naive form of nature orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery to treat rectal carcinoma.