Objective To investigate the short-term effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (UBE-TLIF) in the treatment of Meyerding degree Ⅰ or Ⅱ single-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis. MethodsThe clinical data of 26 patients with Meyerding degree Ⅰ or Ⅱ single-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis treated with UBE-TLIF between January 2021 and August 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, there were 10 males and 16 females with a mean age of 61.5 years (range, 35-76 years). The lesion segment included L3, 4 in 2 cases, L4, 5 in 18 cases, and L5, S1 in 6 cases. There were 17 cases of degenerative spondylolisthesis and 9 cases of isthmic spondylolisthesis; according to the Meyerding classification of spondylolisthesis, 19 cases were grade Ⅰ and 7 cases were grade Ⅱ. Twenty-one cases were complicated with lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis and 5 cases with lumbar spinal stenosis. The operation time, hospitalization stay, complications, hemoglobin (Hb) and serum creatine kinase (CK) levels before operation and at 1 day after operation were recorded; lumbar lordosis angle changes and postoperative spondylolisthesis reduction were evaluated by lumbar anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films before operation and at last follow-up; visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate the low back pain and leg pain before operation, at 2 days, 1 week, 2 weeks after operation, and at last follow-up; Oswestry disability index (ODI) was used to evaluate the functional recovery of the patients before operation and at last follow-up. ResultsThe operation was successfully completed in all 26 patients, with an average operation time of 181.9 minutes (range, 130-224 minutes) and an average hospitalization stay of 6.3 days (range, 3-9 days). Hb levels were significantly lower and serum CK levels were significantly higher at 1 day after operation when compared with those before operation (t=7.594, P<0.001; t=–15.647, P<0.001). No serious complication occurred during and after operation. CT examination at 3 days after operation showed that the percutaneous screw was not in good position in 1 case, and nerve paralysis (pain, numbness) occurred in 2 cases after operation, which were improved within 2 weeks after operation. All the 26 patients were followed up 6-11 months, with an average of 8.7 months. Complete reduction (the slippage reduction rate was 100%) was achieved in 24 patients (92.3%), and partial reduction (the slippage reduction rate was 87.5%) in 2 patients (7.7%). During the follow-up, there was no complication such as incision infection, fusion Cage subsidence or displacement, and internal fixator loosening. The VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain significantly improved at each time point after operation when compared with those before operation (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in the VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain between at 2 days and 1 week after operation, the VAS scores of low back pain between at 1 week and 2 weeks after operation, and the VAS scores of leg pain between at 2 weeks after operation and last follow-up (P>0.05); but there was significant difference between the other time points after operation (P<0.05). ODI and lumbar lordosis angle significantly improved at last follow-up (P<0.05). Conclusion UBE-TLIF provides favorable short-term effectiveness and obvious advantages of minimally invasive in the treatment of Meyerding degree Ⅰ or Ⅱ single-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis. However, the safety and long-term effectiveness need to be further studied.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) technique assisted spinal canal decompression combined with percutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation versus traditional open decompression and internal fixation for treatment of lumbar burst fractures. MethodsA retrospective study was conducted on the clinical data of 61 patients with single-segment lumbar burst fractures who met the selection criteria and were admitted between October 2022 and December 2023. Of them, 25 patients received UBE technique assisted decompression combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (UBE group), while 36 patients were treated with traditional posterior unilateral hemilaminectomy decompression and internal fixation (open group). There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05), including gender, age, body mass index, fracture segment, cause of injury, AO classification of lumbar fractures, and preoperative height ratio of the anterior margin of injured vertebra, segmental kyphosis angle, rate of spinal canal invasion, the classification of American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grading, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and Oswestry disability index (ODI). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. VAS score, ODI, and ASIA grading were used to evaluate the effectiveness before operation, at 1 week after operation, and at last follow-up. Lumbar anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films and CT were performed to measure the segmental kyphosis angle, height ratio of the anterior margin of injured vertebra, and the rate of spinal canal invasion.ResultsSurgery was successfully completed in both groups. No complication such as dural sac, nerve root, or vascular injury was found during operation, and all incisions healed by first intention. There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups (P>0.05), the UBE group revealed significant less intraoperative blood loss when compared with open group (P<0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 6-20 months, with an average of 13 months. There was no loosening, breakage, or failure of internal fixation in all patients. The ASIA grading, VAS score, ODI of the two groups significantly improved at 1 week after operation and further improved at last follow-up (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in ASIA grading at 1 week after operation and last follow-up between the two groups (P>0.05), but the VAS score and ODI in the UBE group were significantly superior to the open group (P<0.05). At 1 week after operation, the height ratio of the anterior margin of injured vertebra, segmental kyphosis angle, rate of spinal canal invasion significantly improved when compared to preoperative ones (P<0.05), the height ratio of the anterior margin of injured vertebra and segmental kyphosis angle significantly decreased at last follow-up when compared to the values at 1 week after operation (P<0.05), but the rate of spinal canal invasion was further significantly improved, and there was no significant difference between the two groups at different time point postoperatively. ConclusionUBE technique assisted spinal canal decompression combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is a safe and effective treatment for lumbar burst fractures, which with little trauma and faster recovery when compared with traditional open decompression and internal fixation.
Objective To compare the mid-term effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE)-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) assisted with three-dimensional microscope in the treatment of single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods A total of 41 single level lumbar spondylolisthesis patients who met the selection criteria were retrospectively collected between June 2018 and September 2019. Twenty-three patients were treated with UBE-TLIF (study group) and 18 with MIS-TLIF assisted with three-dimensional microscope (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, Meyerding degree of slippage, type of spondylolisthesis, lesion segment, course of disease, and preoperative hemoglobin (Hb) level, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), lumbar lordosis (LL), and disc height (DH) between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, hospitalization time, intraoperative blood loss, Hb level between preoperative and postoperative at 1 day, and complications were compared between the two groups. The recovery of clinical sign and symptom was evaluated by VAS score and ODI before operation, and at 1 month, 3 months, 1 year, and 3 years after operation. The LL and DH were measured by radiography before operation and at last follow-up, and the fusion rate was calculated according to Suk grade at last follow-up. ResultsAll the operations were successfully completed. There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups (P>0.05); the hospitalization time, intraoperative blood loss, and Hb difference between pre- and post-operation in the study group were significantly less than those in the control group (P<0.05). Both groups were followed up 36-48 months, with an average of 39.2 months. In the study group, 1 case of dural tear and 2 cases of Cage subsidence occurred, without postoperative infection and epidural hematoma; in the control group, infection occurred in 1 case, dural tear in 2 cases, Cage subsidence in 1 case, and no epidural hematoma occurred; there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (13.04% vs. 22.22%) (χ2=0.601, P=0.438). The VAS score and ODI at each time point after operation in both groups significantly improved when compared with those before operation, and further improved with time (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS scores between the two groups at each time point after operation (P>0.05); the ODI of the study group was significantly lower than that of the control group at 1 and 3 months after operation (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups at other time points (P>0.05). The imaging test showed that the intervertebral fusion rates were 95.7% in the study group and 94.4% in the control group at last follow-up, with no significant difference (χ2=0.032, P=0.859). At last follow-up, LL and DH in the two groups significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05), and the difference between before and after operation showed no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionBoth UBE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF assisted with three-dimensional microscope have the advantages of clear intraoperative field and high surgical efficiency in treating lumbar spondylolisthesis, and can obtain satisfactory mid-term effectiveness. Compared with MIS-TLIF assisted with three-dimensional microscope, UBE-TLIF has the advantages of less bleeding and faster recovery.
Objective To analyze the learning curve of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (UBE-LIF). Methods Fifty-five patients with single-segment lumbar degenerative disease treated with UBE-LIF between December 2020 and February 2022 were selected as the research subjects. The patients were grouped according to the operation sequence, the first 27 cases were in the early group, and the last 28 cases were in the late group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, gender, disease type, and surgical segment distribution (P>0.05). The operation time, the amount of hemoglobin loss (the difference between 1 day before operation and 3 days after operation), the hospital stay after operation, and the incidence of perioperative complications were recorded; the learning curve of UBE-LIF was analyzed by log-curve regression analysis. Results All the operations were successfully completed without changing to other operations. The operation time, the amount of hemoglobin loss, and hospital stay in the early group were significantly more than those in the late group (P<0.05). Complications occurred in 2 cases (7.4%) in the early group, including 1 case of dural tear during operation and 1 case of epidural hematoma after operation, and 1 case (3.6%) with transient radiculitis in the late group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P=0.518) . The log-curve regression analysis showed that the operation time decreased significantly with the increase of the number of patients (P<0.05). The operation time tended to be stable after the surgeon completed 17 cases. ConclusionFor single-level lumbar degenerative disease, the operation time of UBE-LIF can decrease gradually with the increase of the number of patients, and tend to be stable after 17 cases.
Objective To analyze the early effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBED) combined with annulus fibrosus suture in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Methods The clinical data of 19 patients with LDH treated with UBED and annulus fibrosus suture between October 2020 and October 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 12 males and 7 females with an average age of 39.1 years (range, 26-59 years). The operative segment was L4, 5 in 13 cases, and L5, S1 in 6 cases. The mean disease duration was 6.7 months (range, 3-15 months). Preoperative neurological examination showed that muscle strength, sensation, and tendon reflex weakened or disappeared in varying degrees. Single annulus fibrosus suture (14 cases) or anchor assisted annulus fibrosus suture (5 cases) was selected according to the location of annulus fibrosus tears. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to assess the low back and leg pain before operation and at 3 days, 3 months, and 6 months after operation. Oswestry disability index (ODI) was used to evaluate the function recovery of lumbar spine before operation and at 3 days, 3 months, and 6 months after operation. At 3 days and 3 months after operation, MRI was used to examine the removal of nucleus pulposus and decompression of nerve root. MacNab criteria was used to evaluate the effectiveness at 6 months after operation and the recovery of nerve root function was recorded. Results All operations were successfully completed with a mean operation time of 52.7 minutes (range, 40-75 minutes). There was no complication such as nerve injury, spinal cord hypertension syndrome, or dural sac tear during operation, and no complication such as infection, aggravation of nerve damage, or cerebrospinal fluid leakage after operation. All the patients were followed up 6-10 months (mean, 8.2 months). Postoperative MRI showed that the herniated disc was completely removed and nerve roots were fully decompressed. During the follow-up, there was no recurrence of disc herniation. The VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain and ODI at each time point after operation significantly improved when compared with those before operation, and those at 6 months after operation further improved than those at 3 days and 3 months after operation, all showing significant differences (P<0.05). At 6 months after operation, MacNab standard was used to evaluate the effectiveness, and the results were excellent in 14 cases, good in 4 cases, and fair in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate of 94.7%. Neurological examination showed that the sensation and muscle strength of the affected nerve root innervated area recovered significantly when compared with those before operation (P<0.05); the recovery of tendon reflex was not obvious, showing no significant difference when compared with that before operation (P>0.05). ConclusionUBED combined with annulus fibrosus suture is a safe and effective technique for LDH and early effectiveness is satisfactory.
Objective To investigate the relationships between the bony structures, nerve, and indentations of ligamentum flavum of the upper lumbar spine by using CT three-dimensional reconstruction technique, in order to guide the unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) technique via contralateral approach in the treatment of upper lumbar disc herniation (ULDH). Methods Twenty-one ULDH patients who were admitted between June 2019 and July 2021 and met the selection criteria were selected as the research subjects. There were 12 males and 9 females with an average age of 62.1 years (range, 55-72 years). The disease duration was 1-12 years (mean, 5.7 years). There was 1 case of L1, 2, 4 cases of L2, 3, and 16 cases of L3, 4. The CT myelography data of T12-S3 segment was saved in DICOM format and imported into Mimics21.0 software for three-dimensional reconstruction. The relationship between the intersection (point Q) of spinous process and the inferior margin of lamina, the indentation of superior margin of ligamentum flavum, the inferior margin of nerve root origin, intervertebral space, and foramen were observed. The Mimics21.0 software was used to create a 3-mm-diameter cylinder to simulate the UBE channel and measure its abduction angle (∠b1), as well as measure the following lumbar vertebra-related indicators: in L1,2-L3,4 segments, the vertical distance from the point Q to the inferior margin of the contralateral lumbar pedicle of the same lumbar vertebra (a1), the superior margin of the contralateral pedicle of the lower lumbar vertebra (a2), the lower endplate of the same lumbar vertebra (a3), the upper endplate of the lower lumbar vertebra (a4); the vertical distance from the lower endplate of lumbar vertebra to the inferior margin of the lumbar pedicle (c1), the vertical distance from the upper endplate of the lower lumbar vertebra to the superior margin of the lumbar pedicle (c2); the vertical distance from the inferior margin of the nerve root origin to the superior margin (d1) and the inferior margin (d2) of the lumbar pedicle, respectively; the vertical distance from the intersection (point P) of the indentation of superior margin of ligamentum flavum and the medial margin of the lumbar pedicle to the superior margin (e1) and the inferior margin (e2) of the lumbar pedicle, respectively; the horizontal distance from the lateral margin of the dural mater (f1) and the narrowest part of the lumbar isthmus (f2) to the facet joint space, respectively. Thirteen of the patients included in the study chose the UBE surgery via contralateral approach. There were 8 males and 5 females with an average age of 63.3 years (range, 55-71 years). The disease duration was 2-12 years, with an average of 6.2 years. There were 3 cases of L2, 3 and 10 cases of L3, 4. The perioperative complications and surgical decompression were recorded. And the effectiveness were evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and short form-36 health survey (SF-36) score. Results The imaging results showed that there was no significant difference in a1, a3, a4, e1, e2, f1, and f2 between segments (P>0.05), and there were significant differences (P<0.05) in a2 and c2 between L1, 2 and L3, 4 segments, in ∠b1 and d2 between L1, 2, L2, 3 segments and L3, 4 segments, and in c1 and d1 between L1, 2 and L2, 3, L3, 4 segments. The 87.30% (110/126) of point Q of L1, 2-L3, 4 segments corresponded to the inferior articular process, and 78.57% (99/126) of the lower endplate corresponded to the level of the isthmus. All 13 patients completed the UBE surgery via contralateral approach, and none were converted to open surgery. All patients were followed up 12-17 months (mean, 14.6) months. The VAS score of low back pain and leg pain, ODI, and SF-36 score at 6 and 12 months after operation significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05), and further improved at 12 months after operation when compared with 6 months after operation (P<0.05). The imaging review results showed that the herniated disc was removed and the dura mater was decompressed adequately. Conclusion The point Q, the superior margin of ligamentum flavum, and lumbar pedicle can be used as the markers for the treatment of ULBD with UBE surgery via contralateral approach, making the procedure safer, more precise, and more effective.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (UBE-TLIF) and endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF) in the treatment of single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods Between November 2019 and May 2023, a total of 81 patients with single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with lumbar spondylolisthesis who met the selection criteria were enrolled. They were randomly divided into UBE-TLIF group (39 cases) and Endo-TLIF group (42 cases). There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05), including gender, age, body mass index, surgical segment, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for low back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and serum markers including creatine kinase (CK) and C reactive protein (CRP). Total blood loss (TBL), intraoperative blood loss, hidden blood loss (HBL), postoperative drainage volume, and operation time were recorded and compared between the two groups. Serum markers (CK, CRP) levels were compared between the two groups at 1 day before operation and 1, 3, and 5 days after operation. Furthermore, the VAS scores for low back and leg pain, and ODI at 1 day before operation and 1 day, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after operation, and intervertebral fusion rate at 12 months after operation were compared between the two groups. Results All surgeries were completed successfully without occurrence of incision infection, vascular or nerve injury, epidural hematoma, dural tear, or postoperative paraplegia. The operation time in UBE-TLIF group was significantly shorter than that in Endo-TLIF group, but the intraoperative blood loss, TBL, and HBL in UBE-TLIF group were significantly more than those in Endo-TLIF group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative drainage volume between the two groups (P>0.05). The levels of CK at 1 day and 3 days after operation and CRP at 1, 3, and 5 days after operation in UBE-TLIF group were slightly higher than those in the Endo-TLIF group (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in the levels of CK and CPR between the two groups at other time points (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 12 months. VAS score of low back and leg pain and ODI at each time point after operation significantly improved when compared with those before operation in the two groups (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in VAS score of low back and leg pain and ODI between the two groups at each time point after operation (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the intervertebral fusion rate between the two groups at 12 months after operation (P>0.05). ConclusionUBE-TLIF and Endo-TLIF are both effective methods for treating degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with lumbar spondylolisthesis. However, compared to Endo-TLIF, UBE-TLIF requires further improvement in minimally invasive techniques to reduce tissue trauma and blood loss.
Objective To analyze the perioperative efficacy of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation using unilateral biportal endoscopy technique. Methods A total of 55 patients who received unilateral biportal endoscopy technique for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation in Tianjin Hospital between January and December 2020 were selected and randomly divided into the traditional group and the ERAS group according to random number table method. The routine inpatient care management was adopted in the traditional group, while the holistic integrated care plan was formulated in the ERAS group according to the multidisciplinary collaboration of the accelerated rehabilitation plan. The first postoperative exhaust time, the first time out of bed, length of hospital stay, hospital costs, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores before operation, one day and three days after operation, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores before operation and one month after operation, and the excellent and good rate of modified MacNab efficacy one month after operation were compared between the two groups. Results There were 28 cases in the traditional group and 27 cases in the ERAS group. The first postoperative exhaust time [(2.31±1.02) vs. (3.19±0.87) h], the first postoperative ambulation time [(1.06±0.40) vs. (2.00±0.53) d], length of hospital stay [(3.8±0.8) vs. (4.6±0.8) d], and hospital cost [(32.18±9.10) thousand yuan vs. (39.81±11.10) thousand yuan] in the ERAS group were all less than those in the traditional group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The VAS scores of the ERAS group one day after operation (3.2±0.8 vs. 4.1±0.8) and three days after operation (1.4±0.5 vs. 1.7±0.5) were lower than those of the traditional group (P<0.05). The ODI scores of the ERAS group one month after operation was lower than that of the traditional group (13.3±4.0 vs. 16.6±4.8, P<0.05). In the modified MacNab efficacy evaluation one month after surgery, there was no significant difference in the excellent and good rate between the ERAS group and the traditional group (96.3% vs. 96.4%, P>0.05). Conclusions ERAS regimen can significantly accelerate the patients’ recovery, including shortening the first exhaust time, facilitating early ambulation, and reducing the hospital stay and hospitalization expenses. Meanwhile, ERAS regimen can effectively reduce the postoperative pain of the patients, and promote early functional recovery.
ObjectiveTo summarize the characteristics of the learning curve and the occurrence of postoperative adverse events during the development of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) technique by comparing the clinical data of early and late patients treated with UBE technique. Methods All patients who underwent single-level UBE technique between April 1, 2020 and December 31, 2021 were selected as the research subjects. According to the surgical options, all patients were allocated into 3 groups: unilateral decompression and discectomy (UDD) group, unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) group, and lumbar intervertebral fusion (LIF) group. The first 60 cases from each group were extracted and ranked orderly. The endoscopic operation time, the times of fluoroscopy during non-internal fixation implantation, the postoperative hospital stay, the drainage volume, the decrease of hemoglobin, the decrease of hematocrit, and the adverse events were collected. In each group, the patients were allocated into early and late cases according to the operation sequence. The first 30 cases of each group were classified as early cases, and the last 30 cases as late cases. Statistical analysis was performed on the above observation indicators between the early and late cases, and a scatter plot of relevant data changes was drawn to observe the change trend. Results Compared with the early cases, the endoscopic operation time and the times of fluoroscopy during non-internal fixation implantation of late cases in each group were significantly lower (P<0.05); the postoperative hospital stay of late cases in LIF group was significantly shorter (P<0.05); the decreased values of hemoglobin and hematokrit of late cases in ULBD group and LIF group were significantly lower (P<0.05); the postoperative drainage volume of late cases in ULBD group significantly decreased (P<0.05). The endoscopic operation time and the times of fluoroscopy during non-internal fixation implantation of 3 groups showed a significant downward trend. The adverse events occurred in 3 early cases and 1 late case of the UDD group, in 6 and 3 cases of the UBLD group, and 8 and 3 cases of the LIF group, respectively. The difference was not significant between the early and late cases (P>0.05). Conclusion In the early practice of UBE technique, there is a high incidence of complication, and the surgical trauma is relatively large, which is related to the lack of understanding of the UBE technique characteristics and insufficient surgical experience. With the proficiency of surgical techniques and accumulation of experience, the operation time and the incidence of postoperative adverse events were significantly reduced.