west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "单孔" 110 results
  • Perioperative outcomes of uniportal versus three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for 2 112 lung cancer patients: A propensity score matching study

    Objective To analyze the perioperative outcomes of uniportal thoracoscopic lobectomy compared with three-port thoracoscopic lobectomy. Methods Data were extracted from the Western China Lung Cancer Database, a prospectively maintained database at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Perioperative outcomes of the patients who underwent uniportal or three-port thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer during January 2014 through April 2021 were analyzed by using propensity score matching. Altogether 5 817 lung cancer patients were enrolled who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy (uniportal: 530 patients; three-port: 5 287 patients). After matching, 529 patients of uniportal and 1 583 patients of three-port were included. There were 529 patients with 320 males and 209 females at median age of 58 (51, 65) years in the uniportal group and 1 583 patients with 915 males and 668 females at median age of 58 (51, 65) years in the three-port group. Results Uniportal thoracoscopic lobectomy was associated with less intraoperative blood loss (20 mL vs. 30 mL, P<0.001), longer operative time (115 min vs. 105 min, P<0.001) than three-port thoracoscopic lobectomy. No significant difference was found between the two groups regarding the number of lymph node dissected, rate of conversion to thoracotomy, incidence of postoperative complication, postoperative pain score within 3 postoperative days, length of hospital stay, or hospitalization expenses. Conclusion Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy is safe and effective, and the overall perioperative outcomes are comparable between uniportal and three-port strategies, although the two groups show differences in intraoperative blood loss.

    Release date:2021-09-18 02:21 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Progress in single-incision laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer

    With the upgrading of minimally invasive surgical concepts and laparoscopic equipment for gastric cancer, single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) had emerged as a new focus of research in gastric cancer surgery. SILS offered advantages such as reduced damage, superior cosmetic outcomes, decreased postoperative pain, and faster recovery as compared with traditional laparoscopic gastrectomy. However, its level of difficulty limited its further promotion and application. Although numerous studies supported the safety and feasibility of SILS, more high-level evidence-based medical research was required to endorse its widespread use. The author reviewed the development history, current status, and prospects of SILS laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery.

    Release date:2023-10-27 11:21 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 单孔腹腔镜胆囊逆行切除术的学习曲线分析

    目的 总结采用常规腹腔镜器械进行逆行切除法在单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中应用的学习曲线。 方法 回顾性分析中国医科大学附属盛京医院单一主刀医生于 2012 年 7 月至 2015 年 12 月期间施行的连续单孔腹腔镜手术的 120 例患者的临床资料,单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中采用常规腹腔镜器械进行胆囊逆行切除。 结果 所有患者的手术都顺利进行。手术施行期间,手术时间随手术例数增加而明显减少,10 例以后手术时间基本稳定。前期组和后期组患者的手术花费、帕瑞昔布钠剂量和美容评分比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),但与前期组比较,后期组的手术时间较短,术中出血量较少,术后住院时间较短,中转多孔率和并发症发生率较低,视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)较低,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论 单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中采用常规腹腔镜器械进行胆囊逆行切除的学习曲线短,易于术者掌握。

    Release date:2017-06-19 11:08 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Application of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery without chest tube in enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery

    ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical feasibility and safety of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) without chest tube in enhanced recovery thoracic surgery.MethodThe clinical data of patients with pulmonary bulla, pulmonary nodules and mediastinal tumors who underwent uniportal VATS in Department of Thoracic Surgery in the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University between January 2015 to May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 78 patients did not receive closed thoracic drainage tube (a tube-free group), including 30 males and 48 females aged 32.5±8.3 years, 92 patients closed thoracic drainage tube after operation (a control group), including 38 males and 54 females aged 31.4±13.6 years. The surgery-related indicators, postoperative complications and visual analogue score (VAS) were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe time of early ambulation and hospital stay after operation in the tube-free group (1.0±0.3 d, 3.3±0.7 d) were significantly shorter than those in the control group (1.8±0.6 d, 5.2±0.8 d) (P=0.000, P=0.000). The VAS pain scores on the first, second and third day after operation in the tube-free group (4.5±1.8, 3.6±2.4, 2.5±1.4) were also significantly lower than those in the control group (6.8±2.2, 5.7±2.9, 3.9±1.2) (P=0.000, P=0.000, P=0.000). Operation time and intraoperative blood loss in the tube-free group (55.3±12.2 min, 21.5±5.1 mL) and the control group (57.1±6.5 min, 22.2±3.5 mL) were not statistically different (P=0.220, P=0.146). There was no pulmonary infection in both groups, and the wound healing rate was 100.0%. There was no significant difference in pneumothorax, pleural effusion, arrhythmia and re-insertion of chest drain between the tube-free group (5 patients, 8 patients, 1 patient, 3 patients) and the control group (1 patient, 4 patients, 2 patients, 1 patient, P=0.145, P=0.134, P=0.885, P=0.499).ConclusionIn strictly screened patients undergoing uniportal thoracoscopic surgery, no thoracic closed drainage tube can relieve postoperative pain, promote early ambulation activities and enhanced recovery of patients.

    Release date:2019-12-13 03:50 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Single-incision Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery versus Conventional Multiple Ports Surgery for Lung Cancer: A Meta-analysis

    ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of single-incision video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus conventional multiple ports VATS for lung cancer. MethodsWe searched databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2016), EMbase, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data from inception to April 2016, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing single-incision VATS and conventional multiple ports VATS for lung cancer. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. ResultsA total of 9 cohort studies involving 1 318 patients were finally included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with the conventional multiple ports VATS group, the single-incision VATS group had shorter chest drainage time (MD=-0.70, 95%CI -1.38 to -0.02, P=0.04), shorter hospital stay (MD=-0.52, 95%CI -0.91 to -0.14, P=0.007), less amount of intraoperative bleeding (MD=-18.49, 95%CI -33.61 to -3.37, P=0.02), lower VAS score at 1 and 3 days after surgery (MD=-0.32, 95%CI -0.51 to -0.14, P=0.000 7; MD=-0.48, 95%CI -0.58 to -0.38, P < 0.000 01). Meanwhile, there were no statistical differences between both groups in operation time (MD=-3.40, 95%CI -13.65 to 6.85, P=0.52), the postoperative complications (OR=0.91, 95%CI 0.65 to 1.27, P=0.56), the number of lymph node dissection (MD=-0.79, 95%CI -2.35 to 0.77, P=0.32), the total cost (MD=0.47, 95%CI -0.39 to 1.32, P=0.28), the intraoperative conversion rate (OR=0.92, 95%CI 0.44 to 1.93, P=0.82) and VAS score at 7 days after surgery (MD=-1.18, 95%CI -2.42 to 0.07, P=0.06). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows, single-incision VATS is superior in the surgical trauma to conventional multiple ports VATS in the treatment of lung cancer, However, due to the limited quality and quantity of included studies, more large-scale, high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.

    Release date:2016-10-02 04:54 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Improved Transumbilical Single-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

    目的 探讨改良的经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床可行性。 方法 回顾性分析2009年2月-2012年4月75例患者行改良经脐单孔腹腔镜手术的临床资料。其中39例胆囊结石,20例胆囊息肉,急性胆囊炎14例,急性胆囊炎伴穿孔2例。 结果 73例手术均成功完成,2例转为传统三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术后顺利完成手术,无中转开腹。平均手术时间为54.4 min (23~120 min)。术中出血量5~30 mL,平均(14.9 ± 5.10) mL。术后疼痛轻,恢复快,3 d后出院。随访1~10个月,未出现出血、漏胆、胆管损伤、消化道损伤、切口疝等并发症。且瘢痕隐蔽,不易发现。 结论 改良后的经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术安全可行,具有微创、经济、恢复快等优点,具有推广价值。

    Release date:2016-09-07 02:34 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Retrospective Comparative Study of Transumbilical Single-Incison Laparoscopic Assisted and Laparotomy Ventriculoperitoneal Shunting: A Single Center Experience

    ObjectiveTo analyze safety and feasibility of transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic assisted ventriculoperitoneal shunting. MethodsThe clinical data of 36 patients who diagnosed as hydrocephalus underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunting from May 2013 to August 2015 in this hospital were collected. Twelve patients were performed transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic assisted ventriculoperitoneal shunting (laparoscopy group) and 24 patients were performed laparotomy ventriculoperitoneal shunting (laparotomy group). The abdominal operation time, postoperative exhaust time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative pain score, and postoperative complications rate were compared between the laparoscopy group and the laparotomy group. ResultsAll the operations were completed successfully. Compared with the laparotomy group, the abdominal operation time (P < 0.05), postoperative exhaust time (P < 0.05), and postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.05) were significantly shorter, the postoperative pain score was significantly less (P < 0.05) in the laparoscopy group. The postoperative complications rate had no significant difference between the laparoscopy group and the laparotomy group (P > 0.05). ConclusionsThe preliminary results of limited cases in this study show that transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic assisted ventriculoperitoneal shunting is safe and feasible, with better cosmetic. more comparative studies or randomized controlled trials are required to make a confirmed conclusion.

    Release date:2016-10-02 04:54 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 单孔与单向式胸腔镜肺癌切除术的结合—单孔单向式胸腔镜肺癌切除术 Combinating the concepts of single-port and single-direction in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lung cancer resection—Uniportal single-direction VATS lung cancer resection

    Release date:2017-12-04 10:31 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 单孔胸腔镜肺手术的扶镜体会与思考

    Release date:2018-11-27 04:47 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Clinical application of ultra-micro 5 mm single-port endoscopic thoracic sympathicotomy in selected patients with primary palmar hyperhidrosis

    ObjectiveTo assess the feasibility and safety of ultra-micro 5 mm single-port endoscopic thoracic sympathicotomy in selected patients with primary palmar hyperhidrosis. MethodsFrom March 1, 2018 to February 1, 2021, 90 patients with primary palmar hyperhidrosis who underwent ultra-micro 5 mm single-port endoscopic thoracic sympathicotomy at the Thoracic Surgery Department of the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital. There were 47 males and 43 females, with a median age of 26.0 (22.0, 31.0) years. During the operation, T3 and/or T4 thoracic sympathetic nerve chain was transected using an ultra-micro 5 mm single-port incision near the areola or under the axilla. The surgical data of the patients were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Results All patients successfully completed the operation without major bleeding during the operation and no conversion to thoracotomy. There was no death or serious complication during the perioperative period. The operation time was 43.0 (23.0, 60.0) min, and the intraoperative blood loss was 2.0 (1.0, 2.0) mL. In the perioperative period, only one patient needed a tiny chest tube indwelling. The symptoms of hyperhidrosis on the hands all disappeared after the operation. The pain score on the postoperative day was 2.0 (2.0, 2.0) points. The hospital stay after surgery was 1.0 (1.0, 1.0) d. In the first month after the operation, the symptoms of hyperhidrosis on the hands were significantly relieved compared with those before the operation. The surgical incisions healed well, the wounds were concealed, and there was no wound infection or poor healing. The patients' satisfaction with the surgical incisions was 100.0%. After the operation, 14 (15.6%) patients had mild compensatory hyperhidrosis, 5 (5.6%) patients had moderate compensatory hyperhidrosis, and no patient had severe compensatory hyperhidrosis. Overall satisfaction rate was 94.0%. Conclusion The clinical application of ultra-micro 5 mmsingle-port endoscopic thoracic sympathicotomy in selected patients with primary palmar hyperhidrosis is safe and feasible. The surgical wound is extremely small and hidden, the operation time is short, the pain is very slight, and the clinical outcome is good. It can fully meet the patients' pursuit of beauty.

    Release date:2022-03-18 02:44 Export PDF Favorites Scan
11 pages Previous 1 2 3 ... 11 Next

Format

Content