Objective To analyze the perioperative outcomes of uniportal thoracoscopic lobectomy compared with three-port thoracoscopic lobectomy. Methods Data were extracted from the Western China Lung Cancer Database, a prospectively maintained database at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Perioperative outcomes of the patients who underwent uniportal or three-port thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer during January 2014 through April 2021 were analyzed by using propensity score matching. Altogether 5 817 lung cancer patients were enrolled who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy (uniportal: 530 patients; three-port: 5 287 patients). After matching, 529 patients of uniportal and 1 583 patients of three-port were included. There were 529 patients with 320 males and 209 females at median age of 58 (51, 65) years in the uniportal group and 1 583 patients with 915 males and 668 females at median age of 58 (51, 65) years in the three-port group. Results Uniportal thoracoscopic lobectomy was associated with less intraoperative blood loss (20 mL vs. 30 mL, P<0.001), longer operative time (115 min vs. 105 min, P<0.001) than three-port thoracoscopic lobectomy. No significant difference was found between the two groups regarding the number of lymph node dissected, rate of conversion to thoracotomy, incidence of postoperative complication, postoperative pain score within 3 postoperative days, length of hospital stay, or hospitalization expenses. Conclusion Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy is safe and effective, and the overall perioperative outcomes are comparable between uniportal and three-port strategies, although the two groups show differences in intraoperative blood loss.
With the upgrading of minimally invasive surgical concepts and laparoscopic equipment for gastric cancer, single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) had emerged as a new focus of research in gastric cancer surgery. SILS offered advantages such as reduced damage, superior cosmetic outcomes, decreased postoperative pain, and faster recovery as compared with traditional laparoscopic gastrectomy. However, its level of difficulty limited its further promotion and application. Although numerous studies supported the safety and feasibility of SILS, more high-level evidence-based medical research was required to endorse its widespread use. The author reviewed the development history, current status, and prospects of SILS laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the security and feasibility of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy (TULESC) with conventional laparoscopic instruments. MethodsThe clinical data of 62 adult patients undergoing TULESC between October 2011 and June 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 13 males and 49 females aged between 22 and 70 years old averaging 40±15. Forty-nine patients suffered from chronic cholecystitis with cholelithiasis, 10 from asymptomatic cholelithiasis and 3 from cholecystic polyposis. A single arc incision was cut on the edge of the umbilicus, and two 10 mm Trocars and one 5 mm Trocar were placed by puncture. Cholecystectomy was performed with conventional laparoscopic instruments and equipment. ResultsAll the 62 patients underwent TULESC successfully without severe complications such as bile leakage or biliary injury. The operation time was 20-70 minutes with the average of (40±15) minutes; The blood loss was 5-40 mL with the average of (15±10) mL. All the patients were discharged from the hospital within 3 to 7 days after surgery, averaging 4.0±1.0. During the 1 to 12-month follow-up (averaging 3 months), there was no obviously visible scars on the abdominal wall and the aesthetic effect was significant. ConclusionTULESC with conventional laparoscopic instruments and equipment is safe, feasible and cosmetic.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical feasibility and safety of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) without chest tube in enhanced recovery thoracic surgery.MethodThe clinical data of patients with pulmonary bulla, pulmonary nodules and mediastinal tumors who underwent uniportal VATS in Department of Thoracic Surgery in the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University between January 2015 to May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 78 patients did not receive closed thoracic drainage tube (a tube-free group), including 30 males and 48 females aged 32.5±8.3 years, 92 patients closed thoracic drainage tube after operation (a control group), including 38 males and 54 females aged 31.4±13.6 years. The surgery-related indicators, postoperative complications and visual analogue score (VAS) were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe time of early ambulation and hospital stay after operation in the tube-free group (1.0±0.3 d, 3.3±0.7 d) were significantly shorter than those in the control group (1.8±0.6 d, 5.2±0.8 d) (P=0.000, P=0.000). The VAS pain scores on the first, second and third day after operation in the tube-free group (4.5±1.8, 3.6±2.4, 2.5±1.4) were also significantly lower than those in the control group (6.8±2.2, 5.7±2.9, 3.9±1.2) (P=0.000, P=0.000, P=0.000). Operation time and intraoperative blood loss in the tube-free group (55.3±12.2 min, 21.5±5.1 mL) and the control group (57.1±6.5 min, 22.2±3.5 mL) were not statistically different (P=0.220, P=0.146). There was no pulmonary infection in both groups, and the wound healing rate was 100.0%. There was no significant difference in pneumothorax, pleural effusion, arrhythmia and re-insertion of chest drain between the tube-free group (5 patients, 8 patients, 1 patient, 3 patients) and the control group (1 patient, 4 patients, 2 patients, 1 patient, P=0.145, P=0.134, P=0.885, P=0.499).ConclusionIn strictly screened patients undergoing uniportal thoracoscopic surgery, no thoracic closed drainage tube can relieve postoperative pain, promote early ambulation activities and enhanced recovery of patients.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of single-incision video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus conventional multiple ports VATS for lung cancer. MethodsWe searched databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2016), EMbase, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data from inception to April 2016, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing single-incision VATS and conventional multiple ports VATS for lung cancer. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. ResultsA total of 9 cohort studies involving 1 318 patients were finally included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with the conventional multiple ports VATS group, the single-incision VATS group had shorter chest drainage time (MD=-0.70, 95%CI -1.38 to -0.02, P=0.04), shorter hospital stay (MD=-0.52, 95%CI -0.91 to -0.14, P=0.007), less amount of intraoperative bleeding (MD=-18.49, 95%CI -33.61 to -3.37, P=0.02), lower VAS score at 1 and 3 days after surgery (MD=-0.32, 95%CI -0.51 to -0.14, P=0.000 7; MD=-0.48, 95%CI -0.58 to -0.38, P < 0.000 01). Meanwhile, there were no statistical differences between both groups in operation time (MD=-3.40, 95%CI -13.65 to 6.85, P=0.52), the postoperative complications (OR=0.91, 95%CI 0.65 to 1.27, P=0.56), the number of lymph node dissection (MD=-0.79, 95%CI -2.35 to 0.77, P=0.32), the total cost (MD=0.47, 95%CI -0.39 to 1.32, P=0.28), the intraoperative conversion rate (OR=0.92, 95%CI 0.44 to 1.93, P=0.82) and VAS score at 7 days after surgery (MD=-1.18, 95%CI -2.42 to 0.07, P=0.06). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows, single-incision VATS is superior in the surgical trauma to conventional multiple ports VATS in the treatment of lung cancer, However, due to the limited quality and quantity of included studies, more large-scale, high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
目的 探讨改良的经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床可行性。 方法 回顾性分析2009年2月－2012年4月75例患者行改良经脐单孔腹腔镜手术的临床资料。其中39例胆囊结石，20例胆囊息肉，急性胆囊炎14例，急性胆囊炎伴穿孔2例。 结果 73例手术均成功完成，2例转为传统三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术后顺利完成手术，无中转开腹。平均手术时间为54.4 min （23～120 min）。术中出血量5～30 mL，平均(14.9 ± 5.10) mL。术后疼痛轻，恢复快，3 d后出院。随访1～10个月，未出现出血、漏胆、胆管损伤、消化道损伤、切口疝等并发症。且瘢痕隐蔽，不易发现。 结论 改良后的经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术安全可行，具有微创、经济、恢复快等优点，具有推广价值。
ObjectiveTo analyze safety and feasibility of transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic assisted ventriculoperitoneal shunting. MethodsThe clinical data of 36 patients who diagnosed as hydrocephalus underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunting from May 2013 to August 2015 in this hospital were collected. Twelve patients were performed transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic assisted ventriculoperitoneal shunting (laparoscopy group) and 24 patients were performed laparotomy ventriculoperitoneal shunting (laparotomy group). The abdominal operation time, postoperative exhaust time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative pain score, and postoperative complications rate were compared between the laparoscopy group and the laparotomy group. ResultsAll the operations were completed successfully. Compared with the laparotomy group, the abdominal operation time (P < 0.05), postoperative exhaust time (P < 0.05), and postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.05) were significantly shorter, the postoperative pain score was significantly less (P < 0.05) in the laparoscopy group. The postoperative complications rate had no significant difference between the laparoscopy group and the laparotomy group (P > 0.05). ConclusionsThe preliminary results of limited cases in this study show that transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic assisted ventriculoperitoneal shunting is safe and feasible, with better cosmetic. more comparative studies or randomized controlled trials are required to make a confirmed conclusion.