ObjectiveTo overview the systematic reviews on the timing of different surgical interventions for severe multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis patients.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, WanFang Data and CNKI databases were searched for systematic reviews about the timing of different surgical interventions for severe multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis patients from inception to December, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, evaluated the reporting and methodological qualities using the PRISMA checklist and the AMSTAR tool. After re-extraction of individual RCT data from included systematic reviews, meta-analysis was performed by Stata10.0 software.ResultsA total of 11 systematic reviews were included. The average methodological quality score was 8.13 in AMSTAR , the reporting quality score was from 19.5 to 25 in PRISMA. Re-performed meta-analysis showed that, the total success rate of operation was 93.3% (95%CI 92.9 to 93.8), the failure rate was 3.7% (95%CI 3.3 to 4.0), the mortality rate was 2.0% (95%CI 1.8 to 2.2), and the loss rate was 1.0% (95%CI 0.8 to 1.2). The cure rates of different surgical methods were all over 80%, among which single lobectomy (98.47%) and compound lobectomy (98.94%) had the higher cure rates than others. For the time of different surgical interventions, cure rate could be improved obviously in patients receiving surgery treatment after 1 months (OR=1.58, 95%CI 1.29 to 1.94, P=0.000 12), 1-8months (OR=1.66, 95%CI 1.30 to 2.12, P=0.000 05) and 9-24 months (OR=1.48, 95%CI 1.15 to 1.90, P=0.002) of anti-tuberculosis therapy compared with 0 month.There were significant differences between two groups.ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that operation is an effective way for severe multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. Operative opportunity should be selected after 1-24 months of anti-tuberculosis drug treatment when the operation time depending on whether the tuberculosis has turned negative or not. Operative mode should be decided by the location and the scope of the lesion, which ensures the maximum excision of lesions and retention of lung function.
The new effective systemic treatment strategy has "created" many long-term stage Ⅳ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) survivors, and surgeons should pay attention to those individual ineffective lesions of long-term survivors. Besides, the new effective systemic treatment strategy may have changed the original concept and population of oligometasis. To intervene the oligo-progression lesions of long-term stage Ⅳ survivors, particularly after effective systemic treatment, at appropriate time with appropriate way might be the main task of surgery in the future.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical efficacy of surgical intervention combined with endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage in the treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN). MethodsA retrospective, historical control study was conducted. A total of 98 patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) complicated with IPN who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were admitted to the Third People’s Hospital of Chengdu from June 2016 to January 2023 were selected as the research objects. The endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage was carried out in our hospital in June 2020. In this study, patients treated before May 2020 were divided into the non-EUS group (52 cases), and patients treated after June 2020 were divided into the EUS group (46 cases). The baseline data, surgical intervention, length of hospital stay, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, infection time, incidence of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), survival situation, short-term and long-term complications, and other indicators were compared between the two groups. ResultsThe number of percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD, 1.0 vs. 1.0), the number of PCD drainage tube (1.0 vs. 2.0), the number of retroperitoneal debridement drainage (1.0 vs. 2.0), the total length of hospital stay (42.0 d vs. 45.5 d), the length of ICU stay (11.0 d vs. 14.0 d), the length of infection time (10.5 d vs. 18.5 d), the incidences of MODS [43.5% (20/46) vs. 67.3% (35/52)] and residual infection [28.3% (13/46) vs.48.1% (25/52)] in the EUS group were shorter (or lower) than those in the non-EUS group (P<0.05); but there were no significant differences in the number of endoscopic pancreatic stent implantation, the number of laparotomy, the number of laparoscopic surgery, and the incidences of abdominal bleeding, gastrointestinal fistula, gastrointestinal obstruction, chronic pancreatic fistula, chronic pancreatitis and incisional hernia between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionFor patients with AP complicated with IPN, surgical intervention combined with endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage can reduce the number of PCD and drainage tube, shorten the total length of hospital stay, the length of ICU stay and infection, as well as reduce the incidences of MODS and residual infection.
Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) not only have disruption of the patients by seizure, but also influence the quality of life, cognitive function and social association, as well as development delay even retrogression for children. Epilepsy surgery is the only curative treatment currently available for focal lesional pharmacoresistant epilepsy, five years complete seizure freedom rates was around 60% after surgery. The criterion of surgical intervention at present is achievement for the diagnosis of DRE, thereafter consideration of early epilepsy surgery, but these maybe a long-term duration. Recent advance in examine methods and surgical techniques have improved the surgical treatment of epilepsy, to such patient with focal lesional structure abnormality, before the DRE emergence, under the discussion of the multidisciplinary team. Children under 3 years old, the brain have greater neural plasticity, early surgical treatment is expected at allow the healthy brain to recover and develop the language function and quality of life. Numerous cause may pose abstracts to the delay of surgical intervention: (1) diagnosis delay; (2) patient himself and their familiar recognize that there have same risk of surgical treatment; (3) the primary doctor firmly believe that epilepsy surgery is the ultimate methods; (4) special problems of the patient, such including: age, comorbidity, and the location of symptom, EEG as well as imaging non-conformation.