【摘要】 目的 观察根除幽门螺杆菌对糖尿病胃轻瘫（DGP）的治疗作用。 方法 选择2008年3月-2010年1月100例幽门螺杆菌阳性DGP患者。随机分为A、B两组。A组给予莫沙比利5 mg，3次/d，4周，及根除幽门螺杆菌治疗（埃索美拉唑 20 mg+克拉霉素 500 mg+阿莫西林1.0 g，12次/d）2周。B组采用莫沙比利5 mg，3次/d，4周。记录患者治疗前、治疗4周及停药4周时的症状积分。 结果 92例完成实验。A组症状积分治疗4周后明显下降（Plt;0.01），与停药4周后相比差异无统计学意义（Pgt;0.05），二者均明显低于B组同期（Plt;0.05、lt;0.01）。B组症状积分治疗4周后明显下降（Plt;0.01），停药4周后明显高于治疗4周后（Plt;0.05），但仍低于治疗前（Plt;0.05）。A组治疗4周及停药4周后显效率及总有效率分别为57.4%及91.5%、40.4%及83%，明显高于B组35.6%及75.6%、15.6%及53.3%（Plt;0.05）。 结论 对幽门螺杆菌阳性的DGP患者根除幽门螺杆菌可明显提高疗效，并有效防止停药后症状复发。【Abstract】 Objective To explore the therapeutic effect of helicobacter pylori (H.pylori) eradication on diabetic gastroparesis (DGP) patients. Methods A total of 100 DGP patients with H.pylori infection diagnosed between March 2008 and January 2010 were included and randomly divided into two groups. The patients in group A underwent the treatment with mosapride 5 mg (thrice per day) for four weeks and H.pylori eradication therapy (esomeprazole 20 mg, twice per day; clarithromycin 500 mg, twice per day; amoxicillin 1.0 g, twice per day for two weeks). The patients in group B was administered with mosapride 5 mg (thrice per day) for four weeks. The symptom scores (SS) were recorded pretreatment, 4 weeks later and 4 weeks after stopping treatment. Results Ninety-two patients finished the study. The SS in group A decreased significantly (Plt;0.01) 4 weeks after the treatment and didn’t differ much from that 4 weeks after stopping the treatment. Both of the SS were lower than those in group B at the same time. In group B, compared with that before the treatment, the SS were much lower than that 4 weeks after the treatment (Plt;0.01) and 4 weeks after stopping the treatment (Plt;0.05); the former was significantly lower than the latter (Plt;0.05). The marked efficacy rate and total efficacy rate in group A were higher than those in group B (4-week treatment: 57.4% and 91.5% vs. 35.6% and 75.6%, 4 weeks after stopping the treatment: 40.4% and 83% vs. 15.6% and 53.3%) (Plt;0.05). Conclusion H.pylori eradication can increase the therapeutic effect on H.pylori positive patients with DGP and reduce the recurrence of the symptoms remarkably.
【摘要】目的探讨幽门螺杆菌(Hp)感染的根除与治疗糖尿病性胃轻瘫疗效的关系。方法 采用碳14呼气试验测定出67例糖尿病性胃轻瘫并Hp感染患者,经正规抗Hp治疗后进行疗效分析。结果67例中,Hp根除41例,症状明显改善33例,症状无明显改善8例;Hp未根除26例,症状明显改善17例,症状无明显改善9例。结论 糖尿病性胃轻瘫并Hp感染者经有效抗Hp治疗,对提高该病疗效有明显作用
Objective To systematically review the relationship between helicobacter pyloric (HP) infection and ischemia stroke. Methods We searched MEDLINE, BIOSIS, VIP, and China Full Text Journal databases to identify the studies that studied the relationship between HP infection and ischemia stroke. All the studies were strictly screened according to the inclusion criteria, and meta-analyses were performed for the included studies using RevMan 4.2 software.Results Eleven case-control studies involving 1 530 patients with ischemia stroke and 1 451 health controls were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that there was a significant difference in the infection ratio of HP between the patients with ischemia stroke and health controls (OR=1.77, 95%CI 1.38 to 2.28, Plt;0.0001), but this difference was not been found after adjusting some related risk factors (1.22, 95%CI 0.93 to 1.59, P=0.15). The results of subgroup meta-analyses showed these differences were only found in the LAA (large-artery atherosclerosis) subgroup (OR=3.65, 95%CI 2.58 to 5.17) and the SAA (small-artery atherosclerosis) subgroup (OR=1.74, 95%CI 1.30 to 2.34), but was not found in the CE (cardiogenic cerebral embolism) subgroup (OR=1.08, 95%CI 0.58 to 2.02). Conclusion HP infection is associated with ischemia stroke, but the relationships between HP infection and the subtypes of ischemia stroke are different. The association between HP and LAA is ber than that between HP and the other subtypes. More evidence is needed to prove whether Helicobacter pyloric infection is an independent risk factor of ischemia stroke.
ObjectiveTo discuss the etiological factors and risk factors for peptic ulcer hemorrhage with negative Helicobacter pylori (HP). MethodsA total of 182 patients with peptic ulcer treated in our hospital from January 2010 to December 2012 were chosen in our study. There were 85 cases of hemorrhage among them, with 50 HP positive and 35 HP negative ones. The other 97 patients were without hemorrhage. Etiological factors and correlated risk factors for peptic ulcer hemorrhage with HP negative were analyzed. ResultsHP negative rate of the hemorrhage group was 41.2%, while that rate of the non-hemorrhage group was 14.4%, and the difference was significant (P<0.05). The patients with peptic ulcer hemorrhage with negative HP had correlations with age, sex, wine drinking, taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medicine and so on. ConclusionPeptic hemorrhage is easily complicated with peptic ulcer with negative HP, and it is intimately correlated with patients' age, sex, wine drinking history, and taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medicine, etc.
Objective To analyze the relationship between helicobacter pylori (HP) and gastric cancer. Methods We searched CNKI (Jan.1995-Dec.2005) and Wangfandatabase (Jan.1995-Dec.2005). Case-control studies on relationship of helicobacter pylori infection and gastric cancer were collected. Meta-analysis method was used to sum up the odds ratio (OR) and 95%CI of these studies.Results We identified 14 case-control studies with 11 studies of healthy adults versus gastric cancer patients and 4 studies of gastritis versus gastric cancer patients. The results of subgroup analyses based on patients resource showed: statistical difference was founded between healthy adults and gastric cancer patients with pooled OR 2.00 and 95%CI 1.25 to 3.20; no statistical difference was founded between gastritis patients and gastric cancer patients with pooled OR 1.54 and 95%CI 0.68 to 3.50. The results of subgroup analyses based on locations of gastric cancer showed: statistical difference was founded between the non-cardiac gastric cancer patients and the control with pooled OR 3.60 and 95%CI 1.25 to 10.36; no statistical difference was found between cardiac gastric cancer patients and control with pooled OR 0.88 and 95%CI 0.56 to 1.39.Conclusion HP infection can be associated with gastric cancer, and the different conclusions of the 14 reports may be attributed to the locations of gastric cancer and the selection of controls.
ObjectiveTo study the relationship between cholecystectomy and Helicobacter pylori （Hp） infection. MethodsOne hundred and eleven patients with cholecystolithiasis were chosen as the investigation group, while 577 patients with upper digestive tract symptoms without cholecystolithiasis as the control group. All the patients took the 13C breath test to determine whether they were infected by Hp. All the patients with Hp infection continued eradical therapy for Hp infection for one course after cholecystectomy and were followed up on outpatient basis. ResultsThe infection rate in the investigation group was 45.9%, while 27.4% in the control group. During the 3 to 6 months of followup for the patients undergoing eradical therapy for Hp infection, we found no patient complaining of epigastric pain, malaise, belching and nausea. ConclusionThe infection rate of Hp in patients with cholecystolithiasis is high, Hp may be one of the factors causing “postcholecystectomy syndrome”. Eradical therapy for Hp after cholecystectomy will help improve the effects of operation.
Objective To investigate the efficacy of pantoprazole and omeprazole as part of triple therapy in treatment of duodenal ulcer. Methods Seventy-eight patients with duodenal ulcer and HP-positive were randomized to two groups. A random number table was used to generate random sequence. The sequence was not concealed. No blinding was used. Thirty-nine patients received pantoprazole 40 mg + amoxicillin 1.0 g + clarithromycin 0.5 g (PAC group) and 39 patients received omeprazole 20 mg + amoxicillin 1.0 g + clarithromycin 0.5 g (OAC group), twice daily with duration of 7 days. The follow-up time was 4 to 6 weeks. Results At the end of the treatment, 38 patients completed the study, and 1 patient lost to follow-up in the PAC group; thirty-seven patients completed the study, two patients lost to followup in the OAC group. The results of intention-to-treat analysis and per-protocol analysis showed that the HP eradication rates were 87.2%/89.5% in the PAC group and 87.2%/91.9% in the OAC group (P＞0.05); the clinical improvement rates were 79.4%/81.6% in the PAC group and 82.0%/86.5% in the OAC group (P＞0.05). The side effect rates were 10.6% in the PAC group and 8.1% in the OAC group (P＞0.05). No significant difference was found between the two groups (P＞0.05). Conclusions The PAC group is therapeutically effective for eradication of HP and improves symptoms and has an equivalent effect to OAC group for patients with HP-positive duodenal ulcer. Both drugs are well tolerated.