west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "引流管" 33 results
  • Single Chest Tube Application Promotes Fast Track Recovery after Lung Cancer Resection

    ObjectiveTo compare clinical results between single and double chest tube applications after lung cancer resection, and explore the role of single chest tube in postoperative fast track recovery. MethodNinety-three patients with lung cancer who underwent lobectomy between March and December of 2009 in West China Hospital of Sichuan University were included in this study. All the patients were divided into a single-tube group including 46 patients (39 males and 7 females) with their age of 58.4±9.5 years, and a double-tube group including 47 patients (32 males and 15 females) with their age of 58.2±9.0 years. Drainage amount, duration, postoperative hospital stay, and incidences of pneumothorax and pleural effusion after removal of chest tubes were compared between the 2 groups. ResultsThe percentage of patients undergoing complete video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) of the double-tube group was significantly higher than that of the single-tube group, and the percentage of patients undergoing thoracotomy of the double-tube group was significantly lower than that of the single-tube group (P < 0.05). Drainage amount of the double-tube group was significantly larger than that of the single-tube group (824.4±612.5 ml vs. 510.7±406.7 ml, P < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in drainage duration, postoperative hospital stay, the incidences of subcutaneous emphysema, pneumothorax, pleural effusion or re-insertion of chest drain between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionClinical results of single chest tube is better than or equivalent to those of double chest tubes after lung cancer resection, and drainage duration of single chest tube application might be shorter.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 隧道式胸腔引流管在恶性胸腔积液患者中的应用

    摘要: 目的 介绍隧道式胸腔引流管(tunnelled pleural catheter,TPC)治疗恶性胸腔积液(MPE)的方法,探讨其临床应用价值。 方法 分析美国西南医学中心St.Paul医院自2002年10月至2005年11月共对112例MPE患者植入TPC的临床资料,其中男69例,女43例;年龄58.5±6.7岁。主要原发病为原发性肺癌、转移性肺肿瘤(原发癌为淋巴瘤、乳腺癌、卵巢癌)、胸膜间皮瘤;分析MPE患者TPC植入的效果。 结果 在3年观察期内,112例MPE患者共应用125例次TPC治疗,其中10例为对侧植入TPC,4例为同侧再次植入TPC。随访2周后有48例次症状完全缓解,62例次症状部分缓解,5例次症状未缓解,有5例次植管失败,5例次TPC植入术后2周内失去随访。 120例次成功植入TPC患者中有51例发生继发性胸膜炎,仅5例在管道拔除后需要再次胸腔治疗。随访2周中单胸腔积液量lt;20%。导管留置时间平均为56 d。所有TPC植入术后患者随访期的生存时间平均为144 d,随访1个月和1年的病死率分别为128%和836%。 结论 对具有门诊治疗条件、需要姑息治疗的MPE患者,TPC是有效的方法之一。

    Release date:2016-08-30 06:03 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Application of dual ultrafine 8F drainage tubes in single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy/segmentectomy: A retrospective cohort study

    Objective To examine the application effectiveness of dual 8F ultrafine pigtail drainage tubes versus a single 28F large-bore chest tube in single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy/segmentectomy. Methods Clinical data of patients who underwent single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy/segmentectomy within our medical group from January 2020 to August 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. They were categorized into two groups based on postoperative drainage methods: a dual 8F ultrafine pigtail tubes group and a single 28F large-bore chest tube group. Comparative analysis was performed on perioperative data for the two groups of patients. Results The dual 8F ultrafine pigtail tubes group comprised of 68 patients, with 41 females and 27 males, and an average age of (54.72±13.34) years, while the single 28F large-bore chest tube group comprised of 80 patients, with 40 females and 40 males, and an average age of (57.60±11.04) years. There were statistical differences between the two groups in terms of postoperative drainage volume on day 1, day 2, and day 3, total postoperative drainage volume, postoperative tube placement time, postoperative pain score at 48 hours, maximum postoperative pain score, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications related to drainage tubes, and emergency use of pain-relieving medication after surgery (P<0.05). Conclusion After single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy/segmentectomy, the application of dual ultrafine 8F pigtail drainage tubes can lead to a reduction in postoperative drainage volume and shorten the duration of postoperative drainage tube placement and hospital stay, thereby decreasing postoperative pain and the frequency of emergency pain-relieving medication. Moreover, it lowers the incidence of drainage tube-related complications. In alignment with current enhanced recovery after surgery principles, this approach is advantageous for postoperative recovery.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 自制三腔三套引流管在胆道手术中的应用(附615例报告)

    Release date:2016-08-29 09:20 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 肝移植术后危重患者腹部不同引流装置护理的对比研究

    目的探讨肝移植术后危重患者不同时期使用不同引流装置对患者腹部引流管堵管发生率的临床影响。 方法2013年6月-2014年6月在全身麻醉下施行肝移植术术后转入重症加强护理病房监护的86例肝移植患者,按照术后转入重症加强护理病房的先后顺序分入对照组和观察组。对照组术后引流装置使用一次性普通引流袋,观察组术后使用一次性便携式手动引流瓶。比较两组患者肝移植术后不同时期引流管堵管发生率。 结果观察组术后1~3 d引流管堵管发生率低于对照组(P<0.05),对照组术后3 d后引流管堵管发生率低于观察组(P<0.05)。 结论肝移植术后危重患者术后早期使用一次性便携式手动引流瓶有利于保持引流管引流通畅,可降低腹部引流管堵管发生率;中后期使用一次性普通引流袋有利于保持引流管引流通畅,可减少人为手动挤压造成血凝块堵塞引流管,从而降低引流管堵管发生率。

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Effect of 16F gastric tube as thoracic drainage tube on pain relief in patients after lung cancer resection: A controlled trial

    Objective To explore the effect of 16F gastric tube on pain relief in postoperative lung cancer patients. Methods A total of 118 lung cancer patients were treated with radical resection of lung cancer in our hospital between January 2015 and May 2016. The patients were assigned into two groups: a 16F gastric tube group (16F group, 60 patients, 30 males and 30 females at age of 41-73 (52.13±7.83) years and a 28F drainage tube group (28F group, 58 patients, 25 males and 33 females at age of 45-75 (55.62±4.27) years. Clinical effects were compared between the two groups. Results There was no statistical difference in drainage time (4.47±1.03 dvs. 4.24±1.16 d, P=0.473), drainage amount (560.37±125.00 mlvs. 656.03±132.45 ml, P=0.478), incidences of pneumothorax (5/60 vs. 2/58, P=0.439), pleural effusion (6/60 vs. 3/58, P=0.522), and subcutaneous emphysema (3/60 vs. 1/58, P=0.635) between the two groups (P>0.05). The pain caused by the drainage tube in the16F group was less than that in the 28F drainage tube group with a statistical difference (F=4 242.996, P<0.001). The frequency of taking analgesics in the 16F group was significantly less than that in the 28F group (12/60vs. 26/58, P<0.001). Conclusion The effects of draining pleural effusions and promoting lung recruitment are similar between the 16F group and the 28F group. However, the wound pain caused by 16F gastric tube is significantly less than that by 28F drainage tube.

    Release date:2017-12-29 02:05 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 新型结直肠灌洗引流管在肠漏合并伤口感染中的应用

    目的观察新型结直肠灌洗引流管在肠漏合并伤口感染患者治疗中的使用效果。 方法选择2013年3月-12月术后肠漏合并伤口感染患者7例,采用新型一次性结直肠冲洗引流管进行结直肠持续灌洗,伤口局部采用银敷料抗感染。 结果6例患者采用新型一次性结直肠灌洗引流管进行结直肠持续灌洗治疗后伤口感染及肠漏口愈合,愈合时间为15~82 d,平均36.78 d;1例患者因肠漏口较大,预计短期内难以愈合而行横结肠造瘘术,3个月后行二期手术还纳,伤口愈合时间为21 d。 结论在泌尿手术后肠漏合并伤口感染的处理方法中,使用新型一次性结直肠灌洗引流管进行结直肠灌洗可有效促进肠漏口及伤口愈合,且经济实用,效率高,患者痛苦小,可有效减少护理工作量,提高工作效率。

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Feasibility Analysis of Early Removing Nasogastric Tube Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy:A Retrospective Comparative Study of Homochronous Patients

    ObjectiveTo assess the safety for removing nasogastric tube(NGT)within postoperative 24 h in Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD)patients. MethodsThe clinical data of 310 patients performed classic Whipple PD from January 2008 to March 2013 in this hospital were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into early (≤24 h after operation)removing NGT group and late( > 24 h after operation)removing NGT group according to the time of NGT duration. The ratio of NGT reinsertion, time of solid diet tolerance, hospital stay, mortality, and major complications associated with PD were compared between two groups. Results①The demography and preoperative comorbidities characteristics were similar(P > 0.05).②There was no statistical difference of ratio of NGT reinsertion between two groups(P=0.450).③The differences of rates of major complications associated with PD and mortality were not statistically different(P > 0.05)by univariate analysis, but the rate of total complications in the early removing NGT group was significantly lower than that in the late removing NGT group (P=0.014)by multivariate analysis.④The average time of solid diet tolerance(P=0.013)and average hospital stay(P < 0.001)in the early removing NGT group were significantly shorter than those in the late removing NGT group. ConclusionFor patients comfort, NGT following PD should be removed as early as possible even immediately after extubation for selective patients.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 腹腔引流管拔除困难的原因分析及处理方法(附22例报道)

    目的探讨腹腔引流管拔除困难的原因及临床处理方法。 方法回顾性分析笔者所在医院2003年7月至2015年5月期间22例腹部手术后腹腔引流管拔除困难患者的临床资料,总结分析其原因及处理方法。结果本组患者中引流管拔除时间为术后4~7 d者6例,7~10 d者16例。引流管拔除困难的原因1例为固定引流管的缝线从引流管穿过,4例为腹壁戳孔偏小,2例为引流管扭曲,9例为组织嵌入引流管内口或引流管侧孔(其中5例为纤维条索,4例为大网膜),6例无法确定原因。5例通过持续均匀用力牵引拔除,1例拆除缝合固定线拔除,8例通过旋转、来回牵拉或推送引流管拔除,8例应用持续重力牵引法拔除,无并发副损伤。 结论灵活应用各种方法来处理难以拔除的引流管,持续重力牵引法适宜于常规方法不能拔除的引流管。减少不必要的引流管放置,放置引流管时注意其细节和及时拔除引流管可避免引流管的拔除困难。

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Clinical research on the feasibility of single mediastinal drainage tube after thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy

    Objective To explore the feasibility of single mediastinal drainage tube in treatment of esophageal carcinoma after thoracoscopic combined with laparoscopic surgery. Methods There were 90 esophagus cancer patients treated by surgery in our hospital between June 2015 and October 2016. The patients were allocated into two groups including a single-drainage tube group and a two-drainage tube group. There were 45 patients with 24 males and 21 females at age of 48-78 years in the two-drainage tube group and 45 patients with 23 males and 22 females at age of 45-84 years in the single-drainage tube group.The clinical effect of the two groups was compared. Results There was no statistical difference in gender and age, bleeding amount and surgical duration in operation, thoracic drainage amount, incidence of atelectasis, pneumothorax, and encapsulated effusion between the two groups(P<0.05). Discussion Single-drainage tube group displays less postoperative pain, faster recovery, and more convenient clinical care without complication.

    Release date:2017-12-29 02:05 Export PDF Favorites Scan
4 pages Previous 1 2 3 4 Next

Format

Content