目的:探讨并研究纤溶系统与纤维蛋白原在不稳定型心绞痛(UA)患者发病中的临床价值。方法:对108例不稳定型心绞痛患者和42稳定型心绞痛(SA)患者体内纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂-1(PAI-1)、组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(t-PA)、纤维蛋白原(FIB)水平进行检测,并与20例正常对照者进行对照,探讨其临床意义。结果:UA患者体内PAI-1、FIB水平明显高于SA患者和正常对照者,UA患者中有心血管事件发生者也明显高于无心血管事件发生者;UA患者体内t-PA水平明显低于SA患者和正常对照者,UA患者中有心血管事件发生者也明显低于无心血管事件发生者。结论:UA 患者纤溶系统功能异常和FIB水平升高程度较SA患者更加明显,并且UA患者的心血管事件发生可能与溶系统功能异常和FIB水平升高相关。
Objective To investigate the cardiovascular events (CVE) and survival status of patients with bronchiectasis (BE) during follow-up after acute exacerbation. Methods Prospective cohort study was used. Clinical data of 134 BE patients with acute exacerbation who were hospitalized from July 2016 to September 2020 were collected. The patients were followed up after discharge by phone or respiratory clinic every 3 months until November 2022. CVE or death was the endpoint event. Result During the follow-up period, 41 patients developed CVE, while 93 patients did not. Fifty-one patients died during the follow-up period, with a mortality rate of 38.06%. Among them, 41 cases of CVE resulted in 21 deaths, with a mortality rate of 51.22%; 30 cases died in 93 non-CVE patients, with a mortality rate of 32.26%. Logistic regression results showed significant influencing factors for CVE in BE patients were age, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and moderate to severe illness. The significant influencing factors for the death of BE patients were age, COPD, moderate and severe illness, and CVE events. The significant influencing factors for the death of CVE patients were age and receiving CVE treatment. The area under ROC curve (AUC) and 95%CI was 0.858 (0.729 - 0.970) for the warning model for CVE in BE patients. The AUC (95%CI) was 0.867 (0.800 - 0.927) for the warning model for death in BE patients. The AUC (95%CI) was 0.811 (0.640 - 0.976) for the warning model for death of CVE patients. Conclusions Population factors and comorbidities are risk factors for CVE in BE patients after acute exacerbation. The appearance of CVE worsens the long-term prognosis of BE patients. The corresponding warning models have high warning effectiveness with AUC>0.8.
Objective To compare the effectiveness and safety of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) for coronary heart disease (CHD). Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ARB vs. ACEI in treating CHD were collected in databases including MEDLINE, EMbase, BIOSIS Previews, The Cochrane Library, CBM, VIP, WanFang Data and CNKI from inception to July 2011, and the references of the included articles were also retrieved. In accordance with the Cochrane Handbook 5.0.1, two reviewers independently evaluated the quality of articles, and extracted and cross-checked the data. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1.1 software. Results A total of 18 RCTs (17 660 cases) were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences between the ARB group and the ACEI group in all-cause mortality (RR=1.04, 95%CI 0.98 to 1.11, P=0.20), cardiovascular mortality (RR=1.04, 95%CI 0.97 to 1.12, P=0.26), myocardial infarction (RR=0.98, 95%CI 0.92 to 1.05, P=0.59), hospitalization for heart failure (RR=1.14, 95%CI 0.97 to 1.32, P=0.11) and stroke (RR=0.93, 95%CI 0.80 to 1.08, P=0.34). However, the risk of adverse events causing drug discontinuation was significantly lower in the ARB group compared with the ACEI group (RR=0.77, 95%CI 0.67 to 0.89, P=0.000 3). Conclusion Current evidence suggests that ARB is as effective as ACEI in reducing the risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for heart failure and stroke in patients with coronary heart disease. Moreover, it is much better in tolerance. Because of the quality limitation and sampling size of the induced studies, this conclusion still needs to be further proved by more large-scale, multicenter and perspective clinical trials.
Objective To explore perioperative outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting （CABG） using the radialartery as the second arterial graft. Methods Clinical data of 175 consecutive patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting （OPCAB） in General Hospital of Shenyang Military Command from August 2011 to April 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. All the 175 patients were divided into two groups. There were 75 patients including 49 male and 26 female patients with their age of 56.8±8.2 years in group 1，who received radial artery as a graft vessel. There were 100patients including 66 male and 34 female patients with their age of 57.7±8.1 years in group 2，who received great saphenousvein but not radial artery as the graft vessel. The use of left internal mammary artery as a graft vessel was 100% in both groups. Perioperative cardiovascular events and other clinical results were compared between the two groups. Results All the patients survived OPCAB and there was no 30-day death. There was no statistical difference in operation time，thoracic drainage within the first 24 hours after surgery or postoperative hospital stay between the two groups（P＞0.05）. Length of postoperative ICU stay and mechanical ventilation time of group 1 were shorter than those of group 2，although the differencewas not statistically significant. The percentage of patients receiving prolonged postoperative inotropic therapy of group 2 was higher than that of group 1 ［16% （16/100） vs. 12% （9/75）］，although the difference was not statistically significant. Postoperatively，there was no patient in group 1 who had new-onset myocardial ischemia or received intra-aortic balloon pump （IABP） support for hemodynamic instability. In group 2，3 patients had new-onset myocardial ischemia and 2 patientsreceived IABP support after OPCAB. Conclusion Radial artery can partly replace great saphenous vein as a graft vesselfor OPCAB，which does not increase the risk of perioperative cardiovascular events but is beneficial for postoperativerecovery to some degree. Radial artery can be more extensively used in CABG.
ObjectiveTo investigate the predictive value of the triglyceride glucose (TyG) index in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. MethodsA retrospective collection of patients with coronary atherosclerotic heart disease who underwent CABG treatment in the Department of Cardiac Surgery Ward 1, the 7th People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou, from 2015 to 2024 was conducted. The X-tile software was used to calculate the nearest cutoff value of the TyG index, and patients were divided into groups based on this optimal cutoff value. The association between the TyG index and MACE was explored through univariate analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis, and Cox regression analysis. The predictive ability of the TyG index was evaluated by important factor ranking and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). ResultsA total of 998 patients were included, with 630 patients having a TyG index ≤8.80, including 438 males and 192 females, with a median age of 55 (60, 65) years; and 368 patients with a TyG index >8.80, including 236 males and 132 females, with a median age of 57 (63, 69) years. Cumulative survival curves showed that the incidence of MACE in the TyG≤8.80 group was significantly lower than in the TyG>8.80 group (log-rank test, P<0.001). Cox regression analysis indicated that TyG>8.80 was an independent risk factor for MACE [HR=2.581, 95%CI (1.201, 5.549), P<0.001]. In the important factor ranking, the TyG index had the greatest impact on MACE. The TyG index could enhance the predictive ability of the MACE prediction model, with the AUC increasing from 0.712 to 0.872. ConclusionThe TyG index can serve as an effective predictive indicator for MACE after CABG surgery.
Objective To investigate the efficacy of LDL-C lowering treatment on NSTE-ACS, and to analyze the target LDL-C level for clinical treatment. Methods PubMed, EMbase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science databases were searched up to January 2016 for randomized controlled trials assessing the effects of LDL-C lowering therapy on major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with NSTE-ACS. Two reviewers independently screened litertures, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, and then meta-analysis was performed by using Stata12.0 and RevMan 5.3 software. Result A total of 12 RCT including 4 702 individuals with NATE-ACS were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the control group, the statin group could significantly reduced the risk of MACE (RR=0.68, 95% CI 0.549 to 0.834,P=0.000). With 18.68 months of follow-up, patients in target LDL-C level from over 70 mg/dL to less than 100 mg/dL group had lower risk of MACE than other LDL-C level group. When LDL-C lower 20% to 40% than baseline with 28.99 months follow-up, patients in target of LDL-C level from over 70 mg/dL to less than 100 mg/dL group had lowest risk of MACE (RR=20.143, 95% CI 6.946 to 58.414,P=0.000). Conclusion LDL-C lower treatment can lower the risk of MACE in patients with NSTE-ACS. Patients in target LDL-C level from over 70 mg/dL to less than 100 mg/dL group have relatively low risk of MACE, in which patients who lower 20% to 40% LDL-C than baseline will get more benefits from LDL-C lowering therapy.
Blood pressure variability (BPV) refers to the fluctuations of blood pressure in a certain period of time. In recent years, BPV is becoming a predictive marker for cardiovascular events. Given the hemodynamic and internal environmental change brought by hemodialysis as well as the complex complications, hemodialysis patients always have complex BPV. Nowadays there is no consensus on an optimal standard to evaluate BPV in hemodialysis population. Metrics usually used are as follows: blood pressure change during a certain period of time, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, variation independent of mean, average real variability, weighted mean of daytime and night-time standard deviation, residual derived from generalized linear models, and residual standard deviation. Impact factors of BPV in hemodialysis patients include age, ultrafitration volume, hemodialysis frequency and time length, peripheral vascular disease, serum calcium, antihypertensive drugs and so on. Recent studies showed significant associations between both long-term and short-term BPV with prognosis of hemodialysis patients. This review focuses on the evaluation methods, the influencing factors and the impact on prognosis of BPV.
ObjectiveTo provide the best evidence for an old diabetic patient who combined with frailty syndrome with the goal of glycemic control, treatment strategy and their prognosis. MethodsPubMed, MEDLINE (Ovid), EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 11, 2015) and CNKI were searched from their inception to Nov. 2015, to collect evidence about the management of glycemic control. Evidences were analyzed by the way of evidenced-based criterions. ResultsOne clinical guideline, one meta-analysis, three RCTs, seven cohort studies and four case-control studies were included. Evidence showed that compared with patient uncombined with frailty, old diabetic patients with frailty had a higher prevalence of dementia, cardiovascular diseases and death; Aggressive glycemic control could not reduce the prevalence of cardiovascular events and the risk of death, while it could increase the risk of falling. Glycemic control was more comprehensive which would be taken frailty into consideration. Diet rich in protein (especially leucine), resistance exercise and reasonable medications based on comprehensive geriatric assessment were proved benefit for the old diabetic patient. ConclusionThe incidence of cardiovascular events, hypoglycemia and mortality are increased in this old diabetic patient who combined with frailty. Maintaining HbA1c around 7.5% is reasonable and diet with enough calorie and rich in protein (especially leucine), resistance exercises should be recommended for the person.
Objective To perform a systematic review on the safety (i.g. cardiovascular, mortality and gastrointestinal bleeding) of clopidogrel versus clopidogrel combined with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the patients with coronary heart disease. Methods Such databases as The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, SSCI, VIP, CNKI, and CBM were searched from the date of their establishment to September 2010. The bibliographies of the retrieved articles were also checked. The data was extracted and evaluated by two reviewers independently. The RevMan 5.0 software was used for meta-analyses. Results A total of 29 studies were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that the use of clopidogrel combined with PPIs was associated with increasing the risk of cardiovascular events (RR=1.27, 95%CI 1.09 to 1.47), as well as myocardial infarction (RR=1.45, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.76), total mortality (RR=1.23, 95%CI 1.06 to 1.43), and rethrombosis (RR=1.37, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.86). However, there was no enough evidence to reach the conclusion that the combination use could benefit the situation of gastrointestinal bleeding (RR=0.84, 95%CI 0.47 to 1.50). Conclusion?Compared with clopidogrel, the combination use of clopidogrel and PPIs increases cardiovascular events, mortality, and the risks of myocardial infarction and rethrombosis. However, more clinical studies are required to assess the effect of reducing gastrointestinal bleeding.