west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "急性胆囊炎" 17 results
  • 经皮经肝胆囊穿刺置管引流术治疗老年急性胆囊炎的疗效分析

    目的 观察经皮经肝胆囊穿刺置管引流术(PTGD)治疗老年(年龄>60 岁)急性胆囊炎的疗效。 方法 回顾性分析笔者所在医院 2014 年 12 月至 2016 年 12 月期间行 PTGD 治疗的 36 例老年急性胆囊炎患者的临床资料。 结果 全部患者均一次性穿刺置管成功。33 例患者在 PTGD 治疗后 72 h 内腹痛明显缓解,体温逐渐恢复正常,白细胞计数、碱性磷酸酶及总胆红素水平也均恢复至正常水平。术后有 2 例患者因引流管脱落而再次行 PTGD 治疗;1 例患者术后发生出血,经积极对症处理后缓解。36 例患者住院时间为(7.3±1.6)d,置管时间为(15.2±3.4)d。33 例合并结石患者中 4 例患者因身体差、合并疾病重而自行放弃后期的手术治疗,顺利拔管后出院并定期随诊;其余 29 例患者均择期行手术治疗。3 例无结石患者中 2 例经引流管胆道造影证实胆囊管闭锁,以无水乙醇反复冲洗毁损胆囊黏膜达到化学性切除,术后随访 1 年,未再发生胆囊炎症状,腹部超声检查证实胆囊腔完全闭锁;另 1 例患者顺利拔管后出院并定期随诊。 结论 本组病例的初步结果提示,对老年急性胆囊炎患者,采用 PTGD 是一种安全、简便、有效的治疗方法,能迅速缓解临床症状,为择期手术赢取时间。

    Release date:2017-12-15 06:04 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Effect of PTGBD combined with early LC in the treatment of elderly patients with high-risk acute cholecystitis

    ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) combined with early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in the treatment of elderly patients with high-risk acute cholecystitis.MethodsThe clinical data of 128 elderly patients with high-risk acute cholecystitis admitted to Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery in Dazhou Central Hospital from January 2015 to January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 62 patients underwent PTGBD combined with early LC treatment (PTGBD+early LC group), 66 patients underwent PTGBD combined with delayed LC treatment (PTGBD+delayed LC group). Comparison was performed on the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, conversion to laparotomy rate, postoperative indwelling time, postoperative hospitalization time, total hospitalization time, and complication.ResultsPTGBD was successfully performed in all patients, and the symptoms were relieved within 72 hours. There was no significant difference in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, conversion to laparotomy rate, postoperative indwelling time, postoperative hospitalization time, and total complication rate between the two groups (P>0.05), but the total hospitalization time of the PTGBD+early LC group was shorter than that of the PTGBD+delayed LC group (P<0.001). There was no second operation and death in both two groups. The 128 patients were followed-up for 2–50 months with a average of 19 months. Results of follow-up after operation showed that the patients did not complain of obvious abdominal pain, abdominal distension, chills, fever, jaundice, and other discomforts.ConclusionsFor elderly patients with high-risk acute cholecystitis, early LC is a safe and effective treatment for patients with good overall condition after PTGBD. It can not only shorten the total hospitalization time, but also significantly shorten the time of tube-taking and improve the quality of life of patients. It has important clinical application value.

    Release date:2019-09-26 10:54 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Selection Strategy of Elderly Patients with Acute Cholecystitis: Open vs. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

    Objective To study the suitable operation method of elderly patients with acute cholecystitis. Methods The clinical data of 149 elderly patients with acute cholecystitis were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were divided into two groups according to the operation: open cholecystectomy group (OC group, n=76) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy group (LC group, n=73). Some clinical data were compared in this paper such as operation time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, time of resumption of food, time of intestinal function recovery and complications. Results No marked difference was found between OC group and LC group about basic data except WBC count and examination of gallbladder by B ultrasound(P>0.05). But there were significant difference in operation time, blood loss, time of resumption of food, time of intestinal function recovery, length of hospital stay and complications between OC group and LC group (P<0.01). Conclusion Individualized treatment should be emphasized on elderly patients with acute cholecystitis. Selection of OC or LC to these patients should be based on the clinical condition and taken the safety as the first principle.

    Release date:2016-09-08 11:05 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Clinical Control Study of Emergent Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Emergent Open Cholecystectomy

    Objective To summarize the clinical therapeutic efficacy of emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and emergent open cholecystectomy (OC). Methods One hundred and thirty-three patients with acute cholecystitis from March 2011 to June 2012 in this hospital were randomly divided into emergent LC (ELC) group and emergent OC (EOC) group. The examination and treatment before and after operation were the same. The clinical data before and during operation, postoperative complications, and recovery conditions were observed and compared. Results There was no obvious difference of the clinical data before operation between the ELC group and EOC group (P>0.05). Also, there were no significant differences of the operation time, biliary duct injury rate, postoperative bleeding rate, and reoperation rate in two groups (P>0.05). The time of postoperative anal exsufflation, time of out-of-bed activity, and postoperative hospital stay in the ELC group were significantly shorter than those in the EOC group (P<0.05), the poor incision healing rate in the ELC group was significantly lower than that in the EOC group (P<0.05), and the intraoperative blood loss in the ELC group was significantly less than that in the EOC group (P<0.05). Conclusions ELC as compared with EOC, are less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative complications, more rapid recovery, and do not increase operation time. In a hospital with skilled LC technique, ELC is safe and feasible, has obvious advantages of minimal invasion.

    Release date:2016-09-08 10:24 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • [1] 胡三元. 腹腔镜外科学[M]. 济南: 山东科学技术出版社, 2006: 121-122. [2] 陈建尧, 蔡秀军. 急性胆囊炎腹腔镜切除术79例临应床分析[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2004, 4 (1): 69-70.

    【摘要】 目的 总结腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)治疗结石嵌顿性急性胆囊炎的疗效。 方法 2001年8月-2009年11月,采用LC治疗187例结石嵌顿性急性胆囊炎。 结果 179例顺利完成 L C手术;8例术中改为开腹手术。其中3例术后发生胆瘘,均经乳胶管引流胆汁,7~14 d后拔管;其余患者均痊愈出院。 结论 LC治疗结石嵌顿性急性胆囊炎安全可行,但应遵循个体化原则,熟练镜下操作技巧及正确处理方法是获得满意疗效关键。

    Release date:2016-08-26 02:21 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Diagnostic Value of CT and MRI on Acute Cholecystitis

    Objective  To investigate the diagnostic value of CT scanning and MR imaging on acute cholecystitis. Methods The CT or MR imaging data of 21 patients with proved acute cholecystitis were retrospectively reviewed. Eleven patients were examined with contrast-enhanced multi-detector-row spiral CT scanning and other 10 cases underwent contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Results Nineteen patients showed obscure gallbladder outlines (90.5%). The gallbladder wall demonstrated even thickening in 15 patients (71.4%) and irregular thickening in 6 cases (28.6%). All patients showed inhomogeneous enhancement of the gallbladder wall (100%). The bile was hyper-dense or hyper-intense on T1W image in 11 cases (52.4%). Ten cases had free peri-cholecystic effusion (47.6%), and 16 cases had peri-cholecystic adhesive changes or fat swelling (76.2%). Patchy or linear-like transient enhancement of the adjacent hepatic bed in the arterial phase was seen in 16 cases (76.2%). Twelve patients developed pleural effusion, or ascites, or both (57.1%). Gallbladder perforation complicated with peritonitis was seen in one case, micro-abscess formation and pneumocholecystitis was observed in another case, and one case had gallbladder diverticulum. Conclusion Wall blurring, pericholecystic adhesion or fat edema, and transient enhancement of adjacent hepatic bed in the arterial phase are the imaging findings specifically associated with acute cholecystitis, which are readily appreciated on contrast-enhanced multi-phasic CT and MR scanning.

    Release date:2016-09-08 11:47 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY FOR ACUTE AND SUBACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS

    Four hundred and twenty six laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC)were peformed on patients with acute and subacute cholecystitis,including ①emergency LC(59 patients),②selected LC(215 patients following administration of antibiotic and antispasmotic drugs for 10-15days),and ③selected LC(152 patients with mild biliary colic without any medication).Operative findings were ①congestion and edema of the gallbladder(208cases,11 of them were achieved laparocystectomy),②impaction of stones in the cystic infundibulum or duct with hydrops of gallbladder(142 cases,14 of them were achieved by laparocystectomy),and ③gangrene or empyema of gallbladder(76 patients,20 of them were achieved by laparocystectomy).LC was done successfully on 377 cases,conversion to open surgery was 45 cases (10.6%),severe complication occured on 4 patients for LC(reoperation,0.9%).The quthors believe that LC for patients with acute and subacute cholecystitis issafe and suitable,but LC cannot replace the classical laparocystectomy.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Evidence-Based Evaluation and Selection of Essential Medicine for Township Health Centre in China: 10. Acute Cholecystitis

    Objective To evaluate and select essential medicine for acute cholecystitis using evidence-based methods based on the burden of disease. Methods By means of the approaches, criteria, and workflow set up in the second article of this series, we referred to the recommendations of evidence-based or authority guidelines from inside and outside China, collected relevant evidence from domestic clinical studies, and recommended essential medicine based on evidence-based evaluation. Data were analyzed by Review Manager (RevMan) 5.1 and GRADE profiler 3.6 to evaluate quality of evidence. Results (1) Three guidelines were included (two foreign guidelines, one domestic guideline; two based on evidence, one based on expert consensus). (2) Results of two RCTs (n=200, low quality) and two CCTs (n=230, low quality) indicated efficiencies of ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, ciprofloxacin combined with metronidazole, and ceftazidime combined with metronidazole were 92.5%, 92.6%, 92.5% and 91.3%. A result of three RCTs (n=661, low quality) indicated that lavofloxacin had efficiencies of 82.2% to 95.8% which were 84.4% to 94.7% when combined with metronidazole. A result of three RCTs (n=553, low quality) indicated that for acute cholecystitis, ceftriaxone had an efficiency of 90.0%, cefuroxime 73.7% and cefoperazone/sulbactam 95.6% (Efficiency: ceftriaxone 93.3%, cefuroxime 82.5% and cefoperazone/sulbactam 92.3%, when combined with metronidazole). A result of one RCT (n=72, low quality) indicated that cephazoline had an efficiency of 70.9% with bacteria resistance rates of 70% for G+ and 87% for G. Conclusion (1) We offer a b recommendation for piperacillin/tazobactam and cefoperazone/sulbactam used in the treatment of acute cholecystitis (mild, moderate and severe). We offer a b recommendation for meropenem, imipenem/cilastatin and metronidazole as alternatives for severe acute cholecystitis. (2) We offer a weak recommendation for ceftazidime and cefepime used in the treatment of severe acute cholecystitis and a weak recommendation for cefotiam, ampicillin/sulbactam and cefuroxime used in the treatment of acute cholecystitis (mild and moderate). We offer a weak recommendation for lavofloxacin and ciprofloxacin used in the treatment of acute cholecystitis (mild and severe) and a weak recommendation for ceftriaxone used in the treatment of acute cholecystitis (mild, moderate and severe). (3) We make a recommendation against cephazoline as routine use. (4) More large-scale, multi-center, double-blinded RCTs are needed in clinical and pharmacoeconomic studies of acute cholecystitis and outcome indicator should be improved in order to produce high-quality local evidence.

    Release date:2016-09-07 11:00 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Application of Clinical Pathways in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Contemporary, Case-matched, Clinical Controlled Study

    ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of clinical pathway (CP) in patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). MethodsA retrospective, case-matched, and clinical controlled study was applied. We selected patients with acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) who were hospitalized in 363 Hospital and underwent LC between September 2012 and August 2013, and divided them into two groups (non-CP vs. CP:2 to 1) according to sex, age (±5), nation and complications. The indicators including length of stay (LOS), antibiotic usage and per-average hospital expenses were compared between groups. Data were analyzed using SPSS 13.0 software. ResultsA total of 1 044 patients were included, of which 348 were assigned to CP management (CP group), while the other 696 patients were 2 to 1 matched with those in the CP group. Compared to the non-CP group, the pre-operation LOS and total LOS in the CP group were shortened by 1.23 days and 2.08 days, respectively (P < 0.05); the per-average hospital expenses and per-average expenses of drugs in the CP group were decreased by ¥604.7 yuan and ¥287.5 yuan, respectively (P < 0.05); and the rate of antibiotic and non-restricted antibiotic usage in the CP group were dropped by 4.4% and 7.0%, respectively (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in efficiency, hospital-related infection rate, the incidence of adverse events, the restricted and special antibiotic usage rate (P > 0.05). The variation coefficient of patients included in the CP group was 15.8%, and the time which did not meet the admission requirement of CP was the main reason for this variation (27, 49.1%). ConclusionClinical pathway could shorten the LOS and cut down the total hospital expenses. However, multidisciplinary cooperation is still needed, and we should optimize the CP processes continuously and enhance the flexibility of CP, so as to improve the quality of medical service.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • The Application of Laparoscopy for Acute Cholecystitis Complicated with Incarcerated Gallstones

    目的:探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)治疗急性结石嵌顿性胆囊炎的可行性。方法:总结分析2007年10月至2009年6月36例急性结石嵌顿性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的经验体会,包括手术适应证及手术技巧等。结果:35例(972%)成功完成腹腔镜胆囊切除术,1例(28%)中转开腹,无胆管、肠管损伤,无术后出血及围手术期(术后30天)死亡等并发症,均获治愈。术后随访4月~23月无手术并发症。结论:在术者熟练的操作技巧,合理选择中转开腹时机的前提下,急性结石嵌顿性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术安全、可行。

    Release date:2016-08-26 02:21 Export PDF Favorites Scan
2 pages Previous 1 2 Next

Format

Content