随着人口老龄化，与老年病相关的慢性伤口护理越来越受重视。1962年，Winter［1］提出了“湿润环境促进伤口愈合”，为伤口换药奠定了现代创面换药的理论基础。20世纪80年代以来，针对各型创面研发了大量的新型敷料，如高分子薄膜敷料、泡沫敷料、水凝胶和水胶体敷料、海藻酸盐敷料、生物活性药物敷料等。正确选用敷料能加快创面修复、减少感染机会、缩短住院时间及降低医疗费用。现结合下肢静脉性溃疡的创面换药问题就如何选用各种医用敷料作一讨论……
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical effects of wet dressing in treating non-healing wound caused by gout stone curettage. MethodsFifteen patients with non-healing wound after hand and foot gout curettage between April 2010 and January 2014 were included in our study. Medication, diet management, lifestyle changes, and health guidance were carried out before and after surgery to control patients' uric acid concentration. Through evidence-based method and considering the characteristics of gout stone curettage wound, we selectively used wet dressing to deal with the wound during the three processes of wound healing:debridement, hyperplasia, and maturing. The curative effect and patients' recovery were observed. ResultsAll the 15 cases of wound were cured, and the average treatment time was (40±5) days No recurrence occurred. ConclusionWet dressing can promote healing of gout stone curettage wound. With comprehensive treatment method, it can restore patients' health as soon as possible.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effects of nine different dressings in the treatment of diabetic foot (DF). MethodsDatabases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2016), Web of Science, EMbase, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data were searched to collect randomized control trials (RCTs) about the effects of dressings for the DF from inception to April 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then network meta-analysis was performed using WinBugs 1.4.3 and Stata 13.0 softwares. ResultsA total of 29 RCTs involving 2 393 patients were included. The network meta-analysis showed that silver ion was superior to alginate, hydrogel, honey, sterile gauze and povidone-iodine gauze; Alginate was superior to sterile gauze and povidone-iodine gauze; Hydrogel was superior to povidone-iodine gauze; Honey was superior to sterile gauze and povidone-iodine gauze; Foam was superior to silver ion, alginate, hydrogel, honey, sterile gauze, povidone-iodine gauze and antibacterials gauze; Chitosan was superior to hydrogel, sterile gauze and povidone-iodine gauze; Antibacterials gauze was superior to sterile gauze and povidone-iodine gauze. All of the differences were statistically significant. Probability ranking according to SUCRA showed that there was a great possibility for foam and chitosan in the treatment of DF. ConclusionBased on the results of network meta-analysis and rank, foam dressing and chitosan dressing are superior to other dressings in the treatment of DF. More attentions should be made regarding comparisons directly of different dressing and reporting of cost-effective analysis.
ObjectiveTo review the application status and research progress of alginate dressings. MethodsThe related home and abroad literature was reviewed, and the relevant product standards and regulations were summarized. ResultsAlginate dressings have been widely used in clinical because of the characteristics of anti-infection and promoting wound healing. It is mainly used on the wound surface and filled in the wound. Pure alginate dressing is limited in promoting wound healing. A large number of studies are devoted to promoting the activity with other polymer composite to get better dressing. In addition, the industry standards and regulation of alginate dressing products are also gradually improved and standardized. ConclusionAlginate dressing, as an advanced bio-dressing, whose effectiveness has been confirmed, its derivative dressings are also continuously expanding.
5–20 wt% trimethoxysilylpropyl octadecyldimethyl ammonium chloride (QAS) was used to modify Poly (ε-caprolactone) (PCL)-gelatin hybrid to fabricate non-leaching antibacterial nanofiber membranes (PG-Q) by electrospinning. The results from scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) indicated that the QAS leaded to phase separation between the QAS and PCL. Hydrophilic test demonstrated that the PG-Q nanofiber membranes had hydrophobic surface, which was help for peeling off the dressing from the wound. Additionally, the physical and chemical cross-linking between the QAS/PCL and QAS/gelatin were confirmed by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), which were good for long lasting antibacterial effect. The PG-Q membranes also showed excellent cell-biocompatibility. Furthermore, compared with pure PCL nanofiber membrane, the PG-Q nanofiber membranes, especially PG-Q15 (QAS: 15 wt%) and PG-Q20 (QAS: 20 wt%), showed a considerable increase in the bacteriostatic rate of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa (more than 99% after 12 h). Therefore, electrospinning non-leaching antibacterial nanofiber membranes could be an optimal choice for antibacterial wound dressing.
Objective To observe clinical effects of burn wounds treatment with bovine amnion and to screen the best method of preparing and storing of bovine amnion. Methods From January 2004 to January 2005,We selected randomly 58 patients with superficial Ⅱ° wound, deepⅡ° wound, autografting area for removal of eschars and tangential excision, fetching skin area or residual burn wound . Using auto-control, every burn wound was divided into 3 parts and was treated with 3 dressings: bovine amnion dealt with by 0.1% chlorhexidine（group A）, bovine amnion dealt with by 0.4% glutaraldehyde（group B） and vaseline gauze dressing（group C as control）. The clinical effects were compared between different groupsand the method of preparing and storing bovine amnion was evaluated. Results The dressing texture of group A was softer than that of group B, and its flexibility was fine. The pretreatment was not necessary for dressing in group A. When the dressing was used on burn wounds in groups A and B, painwas slight, but pain was obvious in group C; healing time in groups A and B was much less than that in group C, showing statistically significant difference(P＜0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in healing time between groups A and B (P＞0.05). The infection ratio of burn wound in deepⅡ° wound and residual burn wound of groups A and B is much lower than that of group C, showing statistically significant difference (P＜0.05); in theother burn wounds there was no significant difference (P＞0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between groups A and B (P＞0.05). Conclusion Bovine amnion could make benefit on burn wounds healing, reduce infection ratio of burn wounds, could be used on different kinds of burn wounds. The clinical effect between bovine amnion dealt with by glutaraldehyde and by chlorhexidine is similar. Whereas the latter is more easy to be popularized.
ObjectiveTo review the research progress of modern biological dressings. MethodsThe related literature at home and abroad was reviewed, analyzed, and summarized in the progress of biological dressing situation and various types of biological dressing research. ResultsCompared with the traditional dressing, the biological dressing can greatly promote wound healing. Biological dressings are mainly divided into the natural materials, artificial synthetic materials, and drug loaded dressings. The natural material dressings are mainly the alginate dressing, this kind of dressing can promote wound healing, which has been confirmed by a large number of studies. The artificial synthetic materials include film dressings, liquid, water colloids, gels, and foam, each has its own advantages and disadvantages, which can be chosen according to need. The drug dressing can play the role of drug loading, and further promote the wound healing; using microcapsule technology to construct the dressing and choosing Chinese medicine as drugs is the research direction of load. ConclusionThe experiment and clinical application of biological dressing are many types, clinical application prospect is wide, but each has its own advantages and disadvantages, further study is needed to improve its efficacy.