ObjectiveTo analyze the occurrence of arrhythmia in patients during the recovery period of anesthesia, in order to take appropriate measures in nursing care to ensure the safety of patients. Method We carried out a retrospective analysis of 18 931 general anesthesia post-operative patients (aged 16-84 years old) transferred to anesthesia recovery from September 2012 to July 2013, and we observed the incidence rate of arrhythmia, and documented the clinical manifestations of the patients. ResultsDuring the anesthesia recovery, out of 18 931 general anesthesia postoperative patients, 269 cases of arrhythmia occurred, and the incidence rate was 1.42%. Twenty minutes after nursing intervention and use of medication, the difference of systolic blood pressure, bradycardic heart rate, and tachycardic heart rate of the patients were statistically better than those beofre the treatment (P＜ 0.05) . ConclusionEarly discovery and analysis of arrhythmia in patients during anesthesia recovery, along with timely provision of analgesic and antiarrhythmic treatment can effectively improve the circulation status of the patients, thus ensure the safety of the patients during anesthesia recovery.
ObjectiveTo observe the incidence of hypotension in general anesthesia patients in post anesthesia care unit (PACU), compare the blood pressure before and after treatment, and analyze hypotension causes. MethodBetween September 2012 and July 2013, data of 18 931 patients in PACU after general anesthesia were retrospectively analyzed for the incidence of hypotension. At the same time, the change of blood pressure was also detected before and after treatment. ResultsSixty-two patients had hypotension during the anesthesia recovery period after general anesthesia. The incidence was 0.33%. The proportion was the highest among patients who underwent abdominal surgery, reaching 41.9%. Systolic pressure and diastolic pressure improved significantly after treatment (P<0.05). ConclusionsIt is important to perform comprehensive evaluation of vital signs, closely observe disease conditions and vital sign changes, find out and manage low blood pressure for patients in PACU, which secure their safety.
Objective To investigate the safety and effectiveness of perventricular device closure (PDC) for congenital ventricular septal defects (VSD) by a meta-analysis.Methods PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase and China Biology Medicine (CBM) databases were searched for studies on PDC of VSD up to October 2018 by computer. We included studies only with more than 80% patients diagnosed with perimembranous VSD. A meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled estimates of success rate and incidences of complications with 95% confidence interval (CI). Subgroup analysis stratified by percentage of perimembranous VSD was performed. Risk difference (RD) was used in the comparison of perioperative data with follow-up data. Results Fifteen studies (2 randomized controlled trials, 3 retrospective cohorts, and other 10 retrospective single-arm studies) involving 4 164 patients (3 848 patients with perimembranous VSD) were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled success rate was 95.4%. Incidences of residual shunt, aortic insufficiency, tricuspid insufficiency, and third-degree atrioventricular block were 5%, 0.1%, 3%, and less than 0.001% respectively. Improvements of residual shunt and aortic insufficiency were confirmed in follow-up patients. Conclusion PDC of congenital perimembranous VSDs is safe and yields good results. Because some limitations can not be overcomed, multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm our results.