ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of anatomical landmark method (ALM) versus ultrasound (US)-guided internal jugular vein (IJV) catheterization in pediatric patients. MethodsDatabases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 10, 2016), CNKI, CBM, WanFang Data and CNKI were searched from inception to October 2016 to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of landmark-guided versus ultrasound-guided IJV catheterization in pediatric patients who underwent elective surgery. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then RevMan 5.3 software was used to perform meta-analysis. ResultsA total of 13 RCTs involving 1 026 pediatric patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, the overall success rate (RR=1.21, 95%CI 1.09 to 1.34, P=0.000 5) and arterial puncture rate (RR=0.19, 95%CI 0.07 to 0.50, P=0.000 7) of US-guided IJV catheterization were both significantly superior to the ALM group. Whereas there was no significant difference between two groups as for the incidence of hematoma formation (RR=0.35, 95%CI 0.09 to 1.31, P=0.12). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that, for IJV catheterization of pediatric patients, both the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided technique are better than the landmark-guided. Since the quantity and quality of included studies are limited, the conclusion of this study needs more high quality studies to verify.
ObjectiveTo investigate various methods and strategies of lowering central venous pressure (CVP) during hepatectomy.MethodThrough literature review, the definition, implementation, related complications, and prognosis of low CVP were reviewed and summarized and the most appropriate CVP in the liver surgery was also summarized.ResultsThe low CVP had been widely applied in the different clinical settings. Its effect of reducing hemorrhage and transfusion had been recognized. There were many techniques to intraoperatively reduce the CVP such as the volatile anesthetics, vasoactive agents, fluid restrictive strategy, inferior vena cava clamping, low tidal volume, etc. However, there was no consensus on the best strategy to reduce the CVP and there were no studies focusing on the prognosis of patients underwent the low CVP hepatectomy. Maintaining the CVP between 2.1–3 mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa) intraoperatively might be appropriate, once the section had been made normal hemodynamic state of the patient should be restored immediately.ConclusionsApplication of low CVP could reduce blood loss and transfusion in hepatectomy. Prognosis of patients receiving low CVP is not clear. Application of low CVP in specific population should be cautious.
The concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is composed of multidisciplinary, multimodal, and evidence-based approaches, providing a safe and cost-effective method for perioperative management to improve patient prognosis without increasing the incidence of complications. At present, ERAS for cardiac surgery has developed slowly. This article provides a review of the application and prospects of ERAS concept in the perioperative period of cardiac surgery. The measures for applying ERAS concept to the perioperative period of cardiac surgery are divided into three parts: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative. The aim is to provide information for the perioperative management of cardiac surgery patients and assist in their rapid recovery during the perioperative period.
ObjectiveTo investigate the current status of routine practice and perspective of anesthesiologists regarding ventilation strategies during cardiac surgery, and to analyze whether there is a gap between the clinical application and theoretical understanding of lung-protective ventilation (LPV) strategies. MethodsWe conducted a multi-institutional cross-sectional survey of anesthesiologists working at high-volume (>1000 cardiac procedures each year) Chinese hospitals. The electronic questionnaire was designed and distributed from September 2021 to February 2022. ResultsA total of 323 replies were collected and 297 (92.0%) replies were valid. Among the respondents, 84.8% (252/297) performed the combination of low tidal volume (VT), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and alveolar recruitment maneuver (ARM) during non-CPB period. The vast majority of respondents (90.6%, 269/297) ventilated patients with the VT of 6-8 mL/kg. 92.3% (274/297) of respondents applied PEEP, among those 57.9% (172/297) set a PEEP level <5 cm H2O. Most of the respondents (67.3%, 200/297) performed intraoperative ARM, and manual ARM was used by 86.2% (256/297) of anesthesiologists. During CPB, 89.9% (267/297) of respondents withdrew mechanical ventilation, and 29.6% (88/297) performed ARM. ConclusionThis national survey in China showed that the majority of anesthesiologists adopted LPV strategy with the combination of low VT, PEEP and ARM during cardiac surgery. Except VT, the intraoperative ventilator settings varied widely from one anesthesiologist to another. Meanwhile, there is a gap between the clinical practice and theoretical understanding of LPV.
Objective To evaluate the association between anesthesia regimen (volatile or intravenous anesthetics) and postoperative infection in adult cardiac patients undergoing cardiac surgery. MethodsThe clinical data of 496 elective adults undergoing cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass from June 2019 to June 2020 in West China Hospital of Sichuan University were retrospectively analyzed, including 251 females and 245 males with an average age of 54.1±11.4 years. American Society of Anesthesiologists grade was Ⅰ-Ⅲ. There were 243 patients in a volatile group with sevoflurane or desflurane, and 253 patients in an intravenous anesthesia group with propofol. The primary outcome was the incidence of infection within 30 days after cardiac surgery, including pulmonary infection, surgical site infection, sepsis, and urinary tract infection. The secondary outcomes were duration of mechanical ventilation, incidence of reintubation, ICU stay, postoperative length of hospital stay and total hospitalization cost. Results A total of 155 (31.3%) patients developed postoperative infection within 30 days, with an incidence of 32.9% in the volatile group and 29.6% in the intravenous anesthesia group. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of infection (RR=1.111, 95%CI 0.855 to 1.442, P=0.431) or the secondary outcomes (P>0.05) between the two groups. Conclusion The anesthesia regimen (volatile or intravenous anesthetics) has no association with the risk of occurrence of postoperative infection in adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.
ObjectiveTo determine the predictive value of preoperative systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII) regarding the development of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after abdominal surgery.MethodsThisretrospective study involved 433 patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery. Logistic regression risk model was used to evaluate the prognostic value of SII. We drew the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calculated the area under the ROC curve to compared the predictive ability of SII, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and monocyte-to- lymphocyte ratio (MLR).ResultsThe independent risk factors of PPCs were preoperative respiratory diseases, preoperative history of chronic liver disease, maintenance of intravenous or inhalation anesthesia, and intraoperative infusion of more colloid (P<0.05). However, SII, PLR, NLR, and MLR did not predict the occurrence of PPCs, and they also did not predict ≥3 grade of PPCs (AUC<0.60, P>0.05).ConclusionsPreoperative SII is not a prognostic biomarker of PPCs occurrence in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery. Other biomarkers, such as PLR, NLR, and MLR, also have no predictive value for the PPCs in these patients.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the association of intraoperative ventilation modes with postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in adult patients undergoing selective cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).MethodsThe clinical data of 604 patients who underwent selective cardiac surgical procedures under CPB in the West China Hospital, Sichuan University from June to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 293 males and 311 females with an average age of 52.0±13.0 years. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the ventilation modes, including a pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guarantee (PCV-VG) group (n=201), a pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) group (n=200) and a volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) group (n=203). The association between intraoperative ventilation modes and PPCs (defined as composite of pneumonia, respiratory failure, atelectasis, pleural effusion and pneumothorax within 7 days after surgery) was analyzed using modified poisson regression. ResultsThe PPCs were found in a total of 246 (40.7%) patients, including 86 (42.8%) in the PCV-VG group, 75 (37.5%) in the PCV group and 85 (41.9%) in the VCV group. In the multivariable analysis, there was no statistical difference in PPCs risk associated with the use of either PCV-VG mode (aRR=0.951, 95%CI 0.749-1.209, P=0.683) or PCV mode (aRR= 0.827, 95%CI 0.645-1.060, P=0.133) compared with VCV mode. ConclusionAmong adults receiving selective cardiac surgery, PPCs risk does not differ significantly by using different intraoperative ventilation modes.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of driving pressure-guided lung protective ventilation strategy on lung function in adult patients under elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.MethodsIn this randomized controlled trial, 106 patients scheduled for elective valve surgery via median sternal incision under cardiopulmonary bypass from July to October 2020 at West China Hospital of Sichuan University were included in final analysis. Patients were divided into two groups randomly. Both groups received volume-controlled ventilation. A protective ventilation group (a control group, n=53) underwent traditional lung protective ventilation strategy with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cm H2O and received conventional protective ventilation with tidal volume of 7 mL/kg of predicted body weight and PEEP of 5 cm H2O, and recruitment maneuver. An individualized PEEP group (a driving pressure group, n=53) received the same tidal volume and recruitment, but with individualized PEEP which produced the lowest driving pressure. The primary outcome was oxygen index (OI) after ICU admission in 30 minutes, and the secondary outcomes were the incidence of OI below 300 mm Hg, the severity of OI descending scale (the Berlin definition), the incidence of pulmonary complications at 7 days after surgery and surgeons’ satisfaction on ventilation.ResultsThere was a statistical difference in OI after ICU admission in 30 minutes between the two groups (273.5±75.5 mm Hg vs. 358.0±65.3 mm Hg, P=0.00). The driving pressure group had lower incidence of postoperative OI<300 mm Hg (16.9% vs. 49.0%, OR=0.21, 95%CI 0.08-0.52, P=0.00) and less severity of OI classification than the control group (P=0.00). The incidence of pulmonary complications at 7 days after surgery was comparable between the driving pressure group and the control group (28.3% vs. 33.9%, OR=0.76, 95%CI 0.33-1.75, P=0.48). The atelectasis rate was lower in the driving pressure group (1.0% vs. 15.0%, OR=0.10, 95%CI 0.01-0.89, P=0.01).ConclusionApplication of driving pressure-guided ventilation is associated with a higher OI and less lung injury after ICU admission compared with the conventional protective ventilation in patients having valve surgery.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of standardized multimodal analgesia (SMA) on opioid consumption after major upper abdominal surgery under enhanced recovery after surgery pathway. MethodsPatients who underwent major upper abdominal surgery in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University between August and November 2020 were included prospectively. The patients were divided into two groups: SMA group (n=175) and control group (n=632). The SMA was defined as preoperative and postoperative use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, combined with regional anesthesia, local anesthetic wound infiltration or intrathecal opioid. The postoperative opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents, the pain scores on movement and at rest, the postoperative rehabilitation were recorded and compared between the two groups. ResultsPatients in the SMA group had a lower opioid consumption during the first 72 h compared to patients in the control group (median: 51 mg vs. 85 mg, P<0.001). The pain scores on movement and at rest at 24, 48, 72 h after surgery in the SMA group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Time to first flatus, time to first ambulation, postoperative hospital stay in the SMA group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05), and the quality of life scores at 5 d after surgery increased significantly (P<0.05). The satisfaction with analgesia and the incidence of adverse effects on day 5 after surgery had no statistical significances between the two groups (P>0.05). After controlling for confounding factors, multiple linear regression analysis showed that SMA was associated with less opioid consumption on hour 72 after surgery (P<0.001). ConclusionSMA can reduce postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgery.