Myopic foveoschisis (MF) has mild early symptoms, however, its course is progressive. When the secondary macular detachment or macular hole occurs, it can cause severe vision loss. Therefore, it is generally believed that MF patients should undergo surgical intervention early after the onset of symptoms to prevent them from further developing into a macular hole or macular hole retinal detachment.It is generally believed that the traction of the vitreous cortex and posterior scleral staphyloma to the retina plays an important role in the occurrence and development of MF. The operation mode is divided into vitreoretinal surgery and macular buckling, the former release the retinal traction via the vitreous body and the latter reattaches the retina via the extrascleral approach. There is no consensus on whether to perform internal limiting membrane peeling and gas tamponade in vitreoretinal surgery and the fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling has become a hot topic in recent years. Compared with vitreoretinal surgery, macular buckling can release the traction of the retina caused by posterior scleral staphyloma, but it cannot relieve the traction in the tangential direction of the retina. Vitreoretinal surgery and extrascleral surgery seems to make up the shortcomings of both, however, the effect of treatment on patients still needs further verification. In clinical work, it is necessary to conduct individualized analysis of MF patients, weigh the advantages and disadvantages of each operation, and choose the most suitable operation mode for patients with different conditions. In the future, the emphasis of our work is to develop operation mode with great curative effect and less complications.
ObjectiveTo investigate the factors correlated with the visual outcome of idiopathic macular holes (IMH) after vitreoretinal surgery. MethodsA total of 57 eyes of 57 patients with IMH were included. There were 43 females (43 eyes) and 14 male (14 eyes), mean age was (60.46±4.79) years. All the eyes underwent best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), slit-lamp microscope, three-mirror contact-lens and optical coherence tomography (OCT) examinations. BCVA were examined with interactional visual chart and recorded with logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) acuity. The minimum diameter and base diameter of macular holes and central retinal thickness (CRT) were detected by OCT. The average logMAR BCVA of 57 eyes was 0.98±0.41. The minimum diameter and base diameter of macular holes were (479.53±164.16) μm and (909.14±278.65) μm. All the patients underwent pars plana vitrectomy combined with phacoemulsification cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation. The mean follow-up period was (173.44±147.46) months. The relationships between final BCVA and these parameters were examined by single and multiple regression analysis. The valuable influence factors were filtrated and formulated using multiple linear regression models. ResultsAt the final follow-up, the logMAR BCVA of 57 eyes was 0.44±0.31, the CRT was (158.79±86.96) μm. The final BCVA was positive related to minimum diameter of macular holes and preoperative BCVA (r=0.420, 0.448; P=0.001, 0.000), negative related to postoperative CRT (r=-0.371, P=0.004). There was no relationship between the final BCVA and base diameter of macular holes, age and follow-up (r=0.203, -0.015, 0.000; P=0.130, 0.913, 0.999). The incidence of preoperative BCVA for postoperative BCVA was bigger than preoperative minimum diameter of macular holes (P=0.008, 0.020). ConclusionThe preoperative minimum diameter of macular holes and BCVA are related to postoperative BCVA in IMH eyes.
Refractory macular holes typically represent macular holes larger than 400 μm, macular holes in pathological myopic eyes or complicated with myopic schisis, chronic holes longer than 6 months, persistent macular holes after surgeries, and some subtypes of secondary macular holes. A routine pars plana vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane peeling yielded a lower closure rate and unsatisfying visual rehabilitation in patients with refractory macular holes, which raised concerns among vitreoretinal surgeons. This editorial reviewed the new upcoming surgical techniques which were reportedly to improve the anatomical and visual prognosis of major subtypes of refractory macular holes. Although with a great variability, these surgical techniques are based the following surgical strategies: firstly, to sufficiently unravel the epi-macular tractional force; secondly, to bridge the defect of neurosensory retina by tissue insertion or implantation and stimulate wound healing process; thirdly, proper tamponade of gas or silicone oil so that the surface tension can stabilize the inserted or implanted tissue and encourage closure of the holes. In conclusion, surgical strategies for refractory macular holes should be made after a comprehensive consideration and a customized design.
Objective To observe the short-term intraocular pressure after 25G+ pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and analyze the possible influencing factors in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) eyes. Methods This is a retrospective case-control study. A total of 160 patients (163 eyes) of RRD and PDR who underwent 25G+ PPV were enrolled in this study. There were 88 males (89 eyes) and 72 females (74 eyes), with the mean age of (50.37±13.24) years. There were 90 patients (92 eyes) with RRD (the RRD group) and 70 patients (74 eyes) with PDR (the PDR group). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and intraocular pressure (IOP) were performed on all the patients. The BCVA was ranged from hand motion to 0.6. The average IOP was (12.61±4.91) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa). There were significant differences in crystalline state (χ2=9.285, P=0.009), IOP (χ2=58.45, P=0.000), history of PPV (χ2=4.915, P=0.027) and hypertension (χ2=24.018, P=0.000), but no significant difference in sex (χ2=0.314, P=0.635) and age (χ2=5.682, P=0.056) between the two groups. A non-contact tonometer has been used to measure IOP on postoperative day 1 and 3. The postoperative IOP distribution has been divided into five groups: severe ocular hypotension (≤5 mmHg), mild ocular hypotension (6 - 9 mmHg), normal (10 - 21 mmHg), mild ocular hypertension (22 - 29 mmHg), severe ocular hypertension (≥30 mmHg). Logistic regression analysis has been used to analyze the risk and protective factors. Results On the first day after surgery, there were 21 eyes (12.9%) in mild ocular hypotension, 96 eyes (58.9%) in normal, 22 eyes (13.4%) in mild ocular hypertension and 24 eyes (14.7%) in severe ocular hypertension. On the first day after surgery, there were 18 eyes (11.0%) in mild ocular hypotension, 117 eyes (71.7%) in normal, 23 eyes (14.1%) in mild ocular hypertension and 5 eyes (3.1%) in severe ocular hypertension. There was no significant difference of IOP distribution between the two groups (Z=−1.235, −1.642; P=0.217, 0.101). The results of logistic regression analysis showed that silicone tamponade was a risk factor for ocular hypertension in PDR eyes on the first day after surgery [odds ratio (OR)=15.400, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.670 - 64.590; P＜0.001], while intraocular lens was the risk factor for ocular hypotension in PDR eyes on third day after surgery (OR=19.000, 95%CI 1.450 - 248.2; P=0.025). As for RRD eyes, the ocular hypotension before surgery was a risk factor for ocular hypertension on the third day after surgery (OR=3.755, 95%CI 1.088 - 12.955; P=0.036). For all eyes, silicone tamponade (OR=0.236, 95%CI 0.070 - 0.797), air tamponade (OR=0.214, 95%CI 0.050 - 0.911) and inert gas tamponade (OR=0.092, 95%CI 0.010 - 0.877) were protective factors for ocular hypotension on the first day after surgery (P=0.020, 0.037, 0.038); silicone tamponade was protective factor for ocular hypotension on the third day after surgery (OR=0.249, 95% CI 0.066 - 0.94, P=0.040); while aphakic eyes was the risk factor for ocular hypotension on third day after surgery (OR=7.765, 95% CI 1.377 - 43.794, P=0.020). The ocular hypotension before surgery was a risk factor for ocular hypertension on the third day after surgery (OR=4.034, 95% CI 1.475 - 11.033, P=0.007). Conclusions The abnormal IOP is common after 25G+ PPV with a rate from 28.3% to 31.1%. Silicone tamponade, air tamponade and inert gases tamponade are protective factors for postoperative ocular hypotension, aphakic eye is risk factor for postoperative ocular hypotension. Ocular hypotension before surgery and silicone oil tamponade are risk factors for postoperative ocular hypertension.
Objective To evaluate the anatomic outcome after lenssparing vitrectomy (LSV) or scleral buckle (SB) for stage 4 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). MethodsThe clinical data of 39 infants (50 eyes) with 4a (20 eyes) or 4b (30 eyes) were retrospectively analyzed. The age ranged from two to 18 months, with a mean of (6.0±3.4) months. The gestational age ranged from 26 to 33 weeks, with a mean of (30.0±1.6) weeks. The birth weight ranged from 800 to 1900 g, with a mean of (1404.5±237.6) g. Nineteen eyes underwent SB and 31 eyes underwent LSV. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 84 months, with a mean of (26.0±21.7) months. The anatomical and refractive results were reviewed at the final follow-up. ResultsThe anatomic success of SB was 100.0% (19 of 19 eyes) and that of LSV was 87.1% (27 of 31 eyes). Among the patients in whom treatment failed, 4 were in the LSV group (4/31, 12.9%). The buckles of 5 eyes (5/19, 26.3%) were removed. At the end of the followup, the mean myopic refraction was (-4.46±2.49) diopters (ranging from -1.25 to 11.00 diopters) in the LSV group, and (-3.21±1.96) diopters (ranging from -1.25 to 9.25 diopters) in the SB group. There was no significant difference between two groups (F=2.76, P=0.103). ConclusionThe anatomic outcome after LSV or SB for stage 4 ROP was excellent.
There has been ongoing progress in the new technique and equipment in vitreoretinal surgery in recent years, contributing to the improvement of treatment of various vitreoretinal diseases. The application of 3D heads-up display viewing system (3D viewing system) has been one of the most fascinating breakthroughs in vitreoretinal surgery. Unlike the traditional method in which the surgeons have to look through the microscope eyepieces, this system allows them to turn their heads up and operate with their eyes on a high-definition 3D monitor. It provides the surgeons with superior visualization and stereoscopic sensation. And increasing studies have revealed it to be as safe and effective as the traditional microscopic system. Furthermore, the surgeons can keep a heads-up position in a more comfortable posture and lesson the pressure on cervical spine. Meanwhile, 3D viewing system makes it easier for the teaching and learning process among surgeons and assistants. However, there are still potential disadvantages including the latency between surgeon maneuver and visualization on the display, learning curves and cost. We hope that the 3D viewing system will be widely used and become a useful new tool for various vitreoretinal diseases in the near future with rapid development in the technology and constant upgrade of the system.
ObjectiveTo observe the different changes of macular microstructure in patients with large idiopathic macular hole (IMH) treated with vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane (ILM) transplantation or not. MethodsForty eyes in 40 consecutive patients with giant IMH (≥500 μm) were included in the study. Twenty eyes received vitrectomy with ILM transplantation (ILM transplantation group) and others with ILM peel off (ILM removal group). During the operation, a proper size of the ILM was removed and filled in the bottom of the macular hole. The age, duration of disease and the ocular laterality of the two groups of patients were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Minimum resolution angle in logarithmic (logMAR) best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and frequency domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) scan were examined. There was no statistically significant difference in logMAR BCVA, average defect diameter of photoreceptor ellipsoid (IS/OS) and average defect diameter of external limiting membrane (ELM) between two groups (t=0.128, 1.452, 1.321; P>0.05). The logMAR BCVA and SD-OCT were examined on 1, 3, 6, 12 months postoperatively. ResultsOn 1 month after the surgery, there was no statistically significant difference in logMAR BCVA, average defect diameter of IS/OS and average defect diameter of ELM between two groups (t=1.226, 1.435, 1.018; P>0.05). On 3, 6, 12 months after the surgery, compared with ILM removal group, the logMAR BCVA (t=2.059, 2.871, 2.415) increased and the average defect diameter of IS/OS (t=2.070, 2.110, 2.121) and ELM (t=2.034, 3.647, 3.556) significantly reduced in ILM transplantation group (P<0.05). On 1 month after the surgery, there was statistically significant difference in CRT between two groups (t=2.113, P<0.05). On 3, 6, 12 months after the surgery, there was no statistically significant difference in CRT between two groups (t=0.428, 0.847, 0.849; P>0.05). ConclusionCompared with vitrectomy combined with ILM peeling surgery, the diameter of IS/OS and ELM defect were significantly decreased after vitrectomy combined with ILM transplantation in the patients with large IMH.
The main treatment methods of macular edema (ME) are intravitreal injection of anti-vacular endothelial growth factor drugs, corticosteroids, retinal laser photocoagulation and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). However, recurrent ME, epiretinal membrane formation and drug resistance have occurred to a part of patients, which is called refractory ME (RME). PPV with internal limiting membrane peeling (ILMP) has the potential of treating and relieving RME. PPV combined with ILMP can treat and relieve RME by removing the posterior vitreous cortex, or removing the epiretinal membrane or internal limiting membrane at the same time during surgery to relieve the traction between the vitreous body and the retina. However, due to the complex pathogenesis of ME, the therapeutic effects of PPV combined with ILMP on ME caused by different etiologies still need clinical studies to explore the best surgical methods for ME caused by different etiologies.