ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical effect of arthroscopic microfracture surgery combined with oral glucosamine hydrochloride in the treatment of early knee osteoarthritis. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 172 patients with knee osteoarthritis treated between March 2007 and August 2013. The patients were divided into observation group (n=82) and control group (n=90) according to their treatment. Patients in the control group only underwent arthroscopic debridement and cartilage defect microfracture surgery, while those in the observation group underwent arthroscopic microfracture surgery combined with oral glucosamine hydrochloride. The Lysholm knee functional scores, the Lequesne index and X ray image were used to compare the clinical efficacy between the two groups. ResultsThe postoperative symptoms of both the two groups were significantly alleviated. The Lequesne index was not significantly different between the two groups before surgery, and 1 and 3 months after surgery (P>0.05), but it was significantly difference between the two groups 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after surgery (P<0.05). Before surgery, the Lysholm score was not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05), and the score increased significantly after surgery in both the two groups (P<0.05). One and 3 months after surgery, the Lysholm score was not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05), but it was significantly higher in the observation group 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after surgery. ConclusionArthroscopic microfracture surgery combined with oral glucosamine hydrochloride is effective in treating patients with early knee osteoarthritis, and the clinical efficacy becomes more significant with the time of treatment.
目的:研究双醋瑞因联合盐酸氨基葡萄糖和双氯芬酸钠治疗骨性关节炎的可行性及安全性。方法:选取100例骨性关节炎患者,随机分入双醋瑞因组联合双氯芬酸钠组(A组)、盐酸氨基葡萄糖联合双氯芬酸钠组(B组)、单用双氯芬酸钠组(C组)和双醋瑞因组联合双氯芬酸钠和盐酸氨基葡萄糖组(D组)四组中,用药12周后观察治疗前后临床疗效和综合疗效评分。结果:1.四组治疗方案在VAS评分、关节疼痛度评分方面均有良好改善率;2D组治疗方案优于A、B、C三组。结论:双醋瑞因联合盐酸氨基葡萄糖和双氯芬酸钠治疗骨性关节炎是可行、安全、优效的方案。
目的 探讨康复治疗结合盐酸氨基葡萄糖治疗肩关节周围炎的临床疗效。 方法 将2009年3月－2011年11月在成都军区总医院康复医学科门诊和住院的90例肩关节周围炎患者随机分为两组，治疗组45例，采用运动疗法结合口服盐酸氨基葡萄糖治疗90 d；对照组45例，仅采用运动疗法治疗90 d。 结果 治疗90 d后，在临床疗效方面，治疗组总有效率86.7%；对照组总有效率66.7%，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。在康复疗效方面，两组患者肩关节疾患治疗成绩判定标准中疼痛、肌力、关节活动度（ROM）、日常生活能力（ADL）和关节稳定性5个方面均有明显改善（P＜0.01）；和对照组相比，治疗组在疼痛、ROM、ADL 3个方面改善更明显（P＜0.05）。 结论 康复治疗结合盐酸氨基葡萄糖治疗肩关节周围炎疗效比单独采用康复治疗要好。
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of glucosamine hydrochloride in the treatment of osteoarthritis. MethodsA total of 150 patients with osteoarthritis treated between April 2014 and April 2015 were randomly divided into control group and trial group with 75 in each. Patients in the trial group accepted oral glucosamine hydrochloride, while those in the control group were given diclofenac sodium. Lequesne index, total effective rate and the incidence of adverse reactions of both groups were calculated before and 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks after treatment, and 2 weeks after drug withdrawal. ResultsIn both groups, Lequesne index started to decrease after 2 weeks of treatment (P<0.05), and reached the minimum value at treatment week eight (P<0.05). The Lequesne index 2 weeks after drug withdrawal was still obviously lower than that before treatment (P<0.05). There was no significant differences in the total effective rate at treatment week eight (83.1% for the control group and 80.9% for the trial group) or the total effective rate 2 weeks after drug withdrawal (80.0% for the control group and 79.4% for the trial group) between the control group and the trial group (P>0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions of the trial group (6.7%) was significantly lower than that of the control group (21.3%) (P<0.05). ConclusionGlucosamine hydrochloride is effective and safe in the treatment of osteoarthritis, which is suitable for long-term treatment.
ObjectiveTo observe the clinical effect of combined traditional Chinese and Western medicine in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). MethodsA total of 180 KOA patients treated between January 2012 and June 2015 were randomly assigned to 3 groups: Chinese medicine group (group A, n=60) with acupuncture and irradiation therapy of specific electromagnetic wave therapeutic apparatus , western medicine group (group B, n=60) with oral glucosamine hydrochloride tablets and knee joint cavity injection of sodium hyaluronate, and integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine group (group C, n=60) with treatments combining those in both group A and B. The treatment course was 6 weeks. The Western Ontario & McMaster University (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index score and total effective rate were evaluated before treatment and 2 weeks after treatment, end of treatment and 5 months after treatment. ResultsAfter treatment, the average improvement of WOMAC scores in the three groups was significantly different (P ＜ 0.05) . The total effective rate was 78.33% in group A, 83.33% in group B, and 91.67% in group C. The difference of total effective rate between group C and A, and between group C and B was statistically significant (P＜0.05) ; and it was also statistically significant between group A and B (P ＜ 0.05) . There were two cases of adverse reactions in group A, two in group B, and two in group C, and the reactions were all relatively mild without any serious adverse events. ConclusionsChinese medicine and western medicine are both effective and safe for the treatment of KOA. When they are combined, the effect is further enhanced with no increase of adverse reactions.
目的 观察盐酸氨基葡萄糖治疗膝骨关节炎（KOA）的临床疗效。 方法 2010年5月－2012年7月将130例经膝关节镜清理术后的KOA患者随机分成A、B两组，每组65例。A组联合口服盐酸氨基葡萄糖胶囊750 mg，2次/d，6周为1个疗程，治疗3个疗程；B组联合口服尼美舒利胶囊0.1 g，2次/d，服用12周。采用Lequesne指数作为疗效评定指标，观察治疗前后膝关节体征及症状变化，休息痛、运动痛、压痛、肿胀、晨僵和行走能力的改善情况。 结果 B组患者在治疗早期症状改善优于同期A组，且在第3个月有统计学意义（P＜0.05），随着治疗时间的延长，A组患者总有效率在1、3、6个月分别为70.8%、76.9%和92.3%，均呈逐渐上升趋势，且第6个月疗效较前2个时间点差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。分别停药后继续随访至1年，两组患者总有效率均有所下降，但A组疗效仍优于B组，且有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。A组出现不良反应2例，B组4例，均较轻微，无严重不良事件发生。 结论 盐酸氨基葡萄糖在改善OA患者膝关节症状等方面效果肯定，且疗效较稳定，安全性良好；但远期疗效仍需随访观察。
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of arthroscopic debridement combined with oral glucosamine hydrochloride tablets in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. MethodsSixty-two patients with knee osteoarthritis treated between January 2013 and April 2015 were chosen to be our research subjects. They were randomly divided into trial group (n=31) and control group (n=31). The control group was treated with arthroscopic debridement, and the trial group was given glucosamine hydrochloride tablets for treatment, apart from arthroscopic debridement. We evaluated the clinical effects by visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Lysholm knee joint function score before, and 1 week, 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after surgery. ResultsOne week after surgery, the VAS score and Lysholm knee joint function score were not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). Four weeks, 3 months and 6 months after surgery, the VAS score of the trial group was respectively 3.08±0.91, 2.46±0.87, and 1.45±0.66, and was 5.47±1.02, 3.55±1.20, and 2.37±0.53 in the control group; the Lysholm score of the trial group was 80.55±2.24, 85.35±1.79, and 89.74±4.58, respectively, and of the control group was 72.55±4.47, 74.68±2.94, and 76.69±5.63. The VAS score and the Lysholm score of the trial group were both better than those of the control group (P<0.05). ConclusionArthroscopic debridement can alleviate the symptoms of knee osteoarthritis, and oral administration of glucosamine hydrochloride tablets after surgery has obvious effects.
目的 探讨单用和联用盐酸氨基葡萄糖与非甾体抗炎药（NSAID）在椎间盘源性腰痛（DLBP）治疗中的有效性。 方法 2011年1月－12月72例DLBP患者，男42例，女30例；年龄22～71岁；体重43～84 kg；病程0.5～10年。通过随机数字表的方法，将患者分为3组。A组给予盐酸氨基葡萄糖胶囊750 mg，2次/d，同时给予尼美舒利分散片100 mg，2次/d；B组给予盐酸氨基葡萄糖胶囊750 mg，2次/d；C组给予尼美舒利分散片100 mg，2次/d。3组均用药8周后停药，用药期间停用其他活血化瘀类药物及物理治疗。选取治疗前及治疗后第4、8、16周4个时间点，运用疼痛数字评价量表（NRS）、Oswestry功能障碍指数（ODI）、生活质量评价量表SF-36分别对3组患者的腰痛、腰部功能及生活质量进行评价。 结果 63例获得随访，失访率12.5%。各组患者NRS评分、ODI评分、SF-36评分在治疗前后比较差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05），A组疗效明显优于B、C两组，B组治疗后各项数据较治疗前明显改善（P＜0.05）。 结论 单用盐酸氨基葡萄糖治疗DLBP有效，且在停药后，仍有一定疗效，联用NSAID效果更佳；远期疗效有待进一步随访。
【摘要】 目的 观察盐酸氨基葡萄糖治疗腰椎关节突关节骨性关节炎（lumbar zygapophyseal joint osteoarthritis，LZOA）的临床疗效及安全性。 方法 2009年1月-2010年1月，对90例LZOA患者随机分成治疗组和对照组，各45例。治疗组口服盐酸氨基葡萄糖，6周为1个疗程，治疗3个疗程，前2周均加用洛索洛芬钠；对照组患者仅给予洛索洛芬钠口服12周。比较两组治疗后2、6周及3、6、12个月的疗效及安全性。 结果 治疗后6周、3个月，治疗组与对照组症状均明显改善，对照组改善更明显。治疗6个月后，治疗组评分持续下降，到12个月时与治疗前比较差异有统计学意义（Plt;0.01）；而对照组评分则逐渐增高，到12个月时与其治疗前比较差异无统计学意义（Pgt;0.05）。两组的不良反应率分别为6.67%、15.56%，差异有统计学意义（Plt;0.01）。 结论 盐酸氨基葡萄糖治疗LZOA疗效确切，且安全性良好。【Abstract】 Objective To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of glucosamine hydrochloride on lumbar zygapophyseal joint osteoarthritis (LZOA). Methods From January 2009 to January 2010, 90 patients with LZOA were randomly divided into therapeutic group and comparative group, with 45 patients in each group. Patients in therapeutic group were treated with oral administration of glucosamine hydrochloride for 3 courses (6 weeks for one course; adding loxoprofen for the early 2 weeks). Patients in comparative group were treated with oral administration of loxoprofen for 12 weeks. The efficacy and safety between the two groups was compared. Results Symptoms in both group were relieved after 6-week and 3-month treatment. More obvious relief was observed in the comparative group. The scoring of therapeutic group kept decreasing after 6-month treatment. The efficacy showed significant improvement after 12-month treatment compared with which before the treatment was significant（Plt;0.01）. The scoring in comparative group kept increasing, which showed no significant difference after 12-month treatment（Pgt;0.05）. The adverse effect rate was 6.67% and 15.56% respectively in two groups, which was significant different（Plt;0.01）. Conclusions Glucosamine hydrochloride provides good efficacy and safety for patients with LZOA.