Objective To compare the effect of sciatic nerve block (SNB) combined with continuted femoral nerve block (FNB) or continuted adductor canal block (ACB) on pain and motor function after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods A total of 60 patients with TKA-treated osteoarthritis of the knee who met the selection criteria were enrolled between November 2020 and February 2021 and randomised allocated into the study group (SNB combined with continuted ACB) and the control group (SNB combined with continuted FNB), with 30 cases in each group. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass, height, body mass index, preoperative Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, femoral tibial angle, and medial proximal tibial angle between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, the initial time to the ground, the initial walking distance, and the postoperative hospital stay were recorded. At 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after operation, the numerical rating scale (NRS) score was used to evaluate the rest pain around the knee joint, the quadriceps femoris muscle strength was evaluated by the freehand muscle strength method, and the knee flexion and extension angles were measured. Results There was no significant difference in the operation time and initial walking distance between the two groups (P>0.05); the initial time to the ground and postoperative hospital stay of the study group were significantly shorter than those of the control group (P<0.05). Except for the 48-hour postoperative NRS score of the study group, which was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05), there was no significant difference in the NRS scores between the two groups at the remaining time points (P>0.05). The quadriceps femoris muscle strength from 4 to 24 hours postoperatively and the knee extension angle from 2 to 6 hours postoperatively of the study group were significantly better than those of the control group (P<0.05); the differences in the quadriceps femoris muscle strength and knee extension and flexion angles between the two groups at the remaining time points were not significant (P>0.05). Conclusion SNB combined with either continuted ACB or continuted FNB can effectively relieve pain in patients after TKA, and compared with combined continuted FNB, combined continuted ACB has less effect on quadriceps femoris muscle strength, and patients have better recovery of knee flexion and extension mobility.
Objective To compare the anesthetic effects of traditional digital block with single-injection digital block in digital injury patients for subcutaneous digital blocks. Methods Patients with one or two digits injured were randomized to the traditional digital block group and single-injection digital block group. All of the blocks were conducted by one investigator. The patients and outcome assessor were blinded to the treatment allocation. Both of the per-protocol-population (PP) analysis and the intention-to-treatment (ITT) analysis were performed to compare the two block techniques in terms of the pain during infiltration, the onset time of anesthesia and the failure rate of anesthesia. Results A total of 93 patients (109 digits) were included with 51 (61 digits) in the traditional block group and 42 (48 digits) in the single-injection block group.Two patients (3 digits) dropped out. Both of the PP analysis and ITT analysis showed that no significant difference between the two groups were detected in terms of the pain during infiltration, the onset time of anesthesia and the failure rate of anesthesia (P﹥0.05). Conclusions The subcutaneous single-injection digital block is as effective as the traditional digital block, but is much easier to perform. This technique is indicated for the digital anesthesia of palmar aspect distal to the proximal digital crease and dorsal aspect of the distal and middle phalanxes.
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of sequential treatment with adductor canal nerve block (ACNB) and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) selective inhibitor (parecoxib and celecoxib) after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MethodsBetween January 2015 and December 2015, 90 osteoarthritis patients who met the inclusion criteria were treated, and randomly divided into 3 groups:ACNB+COX-2 group (group A, n=30), COX-2 group (group B, n=30), and control group (group C, n=30). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, side, and osteoarthritis duration between groups (P > 0.05), and the data were comparable. ACNB was used in group A at the end of TKA. Intravenous injection of parecoxib (40 mg per 12 hours) was administrated at the first three postoperative days, and followed by oral celecoxib (200 mg per 12 hours) until 6 weeks after operation in groups A and B; while placebo was given at the same time point in group C. Oral tramadol or intravenous morphine, as remedial measures, were introduced when patients had a visual analogue scale (VAS) score more than 4. The following indicators were compared between groups:the operative time, drainage volume at 24 hours after operation, length of hospital stay, and incidence of side effect; VAS pain scores, morphine consumption, range of motion (ROM) of the knee joint, and inflammatory cytokines levels at pre-operation and at 1 day, 2 days, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks after operation; morphine consumption within first 24 hours and at 24 hours to 6 weeks after operation; the American Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score at 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks after operation; and the serum coagulation parameters at pre-operation, and at 1, 3, and 14 days after operation. ResultsThe length of hospital stay was significantly shorter and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in groups A and B than group C (P < 0.05). The VAS scores at rest (VASR) of groups A and B were significantly lower than that of group C at 1, 2, and 3 days after operation (P < 0.05); difference in the VAS scores at walking (VASW) was significant between groups at 1 day after operation (P < 0.05), and group A had the lowest VASW; and the VASW of groups A and B were significantly lower than that of group C at 2 and 3 days and at 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks after operation (P < 0.05). The difference in morphine consumption was significant between groups within the first 24 hours after operation (P < 0.05), and group A exhibited the lowest consumption; and the morphine consumption in groups A and B was significantly lower than that in group C at 24 hours to 6 weeks after operation (P < 0.05). Significant difference was found in HSS scores between groups at 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks after operation, and group A showed the highest score (P < 0.05). At 1 and 2 days after operation, group A showed the highest ROM (P < 0.05), and ROM of groups A and B was significantly higher that of group C at 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks after operation (P < 0.05). Groups A and B were significantly lower than group C in the serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate at 2 days, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks, in C-reactive protein levels at 1, 2, and 3 days, in interleukin 6 (IL-6) and TNF-α levels at 1 day to 6 weeks, and in IL-8 level at 2 and 3 days (P < 0.05). The drainage volume within the first 24 hours and the serum coagulation parameters within the 2 weeks after operation showed no significant difference between groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionSequential treatment with ACNB and COX-2 selective inhibitor is a safe and effective approach for postoperative pain management after primary TKA, and it can alleviate postoperative pain, promote the joint function recovery, and reduce the risk of adverse reactions.
【摘要】 目的 比较单次股神经阻滞和关节腔内单次注射罗哌卡因对膝关节镜检术后镇痛效果，为临床应用提供试验依据。 方法 2009年1月-2010年7月，选择美国麻醉医师协会（ASA）Ⅰ～Ⅱ级、年龄18~65岁、拟行择期单侧下肢膝关节镜手术患者180例，随机分为股神经阻滞组和关节腔内用药组，每组90例，分别于术前1 h行股神经阻滞（0.15%罗哌卡因20 mL）和手术结束时在膝关节腔内注入0.6%罗哌卡因20 mL。于术后4、8、24 h采用视觉模拟评分法（visual analog scale，VAS）行静止和运动时疼痛评分，记录术后患者满意度、不良反应发生率，术后使用镇痛药物情况。 结果 关节腔内用药组术后镇痛药物使用率（41.11%）明显高于股神经阻滞组（20.00%）（Plt;0.005）。两组患者术后24 h静止时及术后8、24 h运动时的VAS评分关节腔内用药组均明显高于股神经阻滞组（Plt;0.001），其余各时点差异无统计学意义（Pgt;0.05）。 结论 股神经阻滞可提供更加有效的术后镇痛效果，并且用药量小，安全系数高，值得临床推广。【Abstract】 Objective To compare the effect of single-injection femoral nerve block and local anesthetic intraarticular injection for analgesia after knee arthroscopy, in order to provide the experimental base for clinical application. Methods From January 2009 to July 2010, 180 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II patients, aged from 18 to 65 years old, and scheduled for elective single knee arthroscopy were randomly divided into two groups: femoral nerve block group and local anesthetic intraarticular injection group with 90 patients in each group. For the patients in the former group, 20 mL of 0.15% ropivacaine was injected 1 hour before operation. For the latter group, 20 mL of 0.6% ropivacaine was injected into the articular cavity after operation. Pain intension scores at rest and in motion were measured 4, 8, and 24 hours after operation by visual analog scale (VAS). The degree of patients’ satisfaction, adverse reaction incidence rate and information of taking pain-killers were also recorded. Results The rate of using pain-killers in the intraarticular injection group (41.11%) was dramatically higher than the femoral nerve block group (20.00%) (Plt;0.005). The VAS scores of patients in the intraarticular injection group at rest 24 hours after operation and in motion 8 hours and 24 hours after operation were significantly higher than the femoral nerve block group (Plt;0.001), while there was no significant difference at other points between the two groups. Conclusions Femoral nerve block is more efficient for analgesia after knee arthroscopy compared with local anesthetic intraarticular injection. It is a safe procedure requiring only a relatively small dose of medicine, and is worth being popularized.
Objective To systematically evaluate effectiveness and safety of nerve block therapy for neck pain. Methods Databases including CENTRAL, PubMed, Ovid, ISI, EBSCO, CBM and CNKI were searched from the date of their establishment to November 2011, and relevant references were also retrieved manually to collect both domestic and abroad randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about nerve block therapy for neck pain. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two researchers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the included studies. Then the meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 10 studies involving 625 participants were included. The results of qualitative analysis showed that: a) The short-term effectiveness of the nerve block therapy group was markedly superior to the placebo group, the cognitive therapy group and the transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) group; and b) The short-term effectiveness of the combined nerve block therapy was markedly superior to the single nerve block therapy. The results of meta-analysis demonstrated that: a) There was no significant difference between the greater occipital nerve (GON) block group and the C2/3 nerve block group in neither short-term (SMD=−0.13, 95%CI −0.58 to 0.32, P=0.58) nor medium-term effectiveness (SMD=−0.01, 95%CI −0.46 to 0.44, P=0.98); and b): There was no significant difference between the injection with steroids group and the injection without steroids group in both short-term (SMD=0.16, 95%CI −0.13 to 0.44, P=0.28) and long-term effectiveness (SMD=0.27, 95%CI −0.02 to 0.55, P=0.07). Conclusion Current evidence shows nerve block therapy for neck pain is safe and especially good in short-term effectiveness. The combined nerve block therapy is probably more effective, but the effectiveness is not obviously improved by injection with or without steroids, and by different block methods. Due to the limitation of quality, quantity and total sample size of the included studies, this conclusion still needs to be proved by conducting more high quality and large scale studies.
ObjectiveTo compare postoperative analgesic efficacy and motor function recovery between ultrasound guided adductor canal block (ACB) and Femoral nerve block (FNB) in patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MethodsFrom March to April 2014, 40 patients chosen to receive TKA under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to FNB group and ACB group with 20 in each group. Opioids consumption during and after operation, pain score in rest and movement, the force of quadriceps femoris, activity of knee and complications after surgery were recorded. ResultsNo differences were found in opioids consumption during and after operation, pain score in rest and movement after operation. Patients of ACB group were superior to those of FNB group in motor function recovery. At hour 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 after operation, the force of quadriceps femoris was higher in patients of ACB group than those of FNB group (P<0.05). Activity of knee was higher in patients of ACB group than those of FNB group postoperatively. ConclusionACB and FNB have equal postoperative analgesic effect for TKA patients. But ACB has less influence on the force of quadriceps femoris than FNB. Therefore, patients of ACB group are superior to those of FNB group in motor function recovery, showing better activity of knee and early time of first straight leg raising.
ObjectiveTo determine the effectiveness of continuous intercostal nerve block for pain relief after thoracotomy.MethodsFrom November 2017 to October 2018, 120 patients who received thoracotomy procedure in our hospital were collected, including 60 males and 60 females aged 40-77 (58.10±7.00) years. The patients were randomly allocated into three groups by digital table including a continuous intercostal nerve block group (group A, n=40), a single intercostal nerve block group (group B, n=40), and an epidural analgesia group (group C, n=40). All the groups received the same basic analgesia. The pain scores and rescue analgesic doses were compared.ResultsOn postoperative day (POD) 0, all groups achieved effective pain control, and the visual analogue score was 2.02±0.39 points in the group A, 2.13±0.75 points in the group B and 2.03±0.69 points in the group C (P>0.05). On POD 0-2 and POD 3-4 (without basement analgesia), there was no significant difference between the group A and group C in the pain scores (2.08±0.28 points vs. 1.93±0.53 points, 3.20±0.53 points vs. 3.46±0.47 points, P>0.05), however, the difference between POD 0-2 and POD 3-4 in each group was stastically different (group A, 2.08±0.28 points vs. 3.20±0.53 points; group B, 2.42±0.73 points vs. 5.45±0.99 points; group C 1.93±0.53 points vs. 3.46±0.47 points, P<0.05). In terms of the rescue analgesic doses, there was no significant difference between the group A and group C (220.00±64.08 mg vs. 225.38±78.85 mg, P>0.05); it was larger in the group B than that in the group A and group C (343.33±119.56 mg vs. 220.00±64.08 mg; 343.33±119.56 mg vs. 225.38±78.85 mg, P<0.05).ConclusionMultimodal analgesia is an optimal choice in the initial stage after thoracotomy surgery. Continuous intercostal nerve block is an effective way to pain management in patients with thoracotomy.
Objectives To overview the systematic reviews/meta-analyses of safety of femoral nerve block (FNB) used as a postoperative analgesic technique in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods We searched databases including The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP from inception to July, 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and used AMSTAR to evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies. The major indexes used to evaluate the safety of FNB were the incidence rates of symptoms including nausea, vomiting, sedation, retention of urine, dizziness, pruritus, hypotension, falls, nenous thromboembolism and deep infection. Results A total of 12 systematic reviews/meta-analyses were included.They assessed the safety of FNB compared with local infiltration analgesia (LIA), periarticular multimodal drug injection (PMDI), epidural analgesia (EA), patient-controlled intravenous analgesia of opioids (PCA) and adductor canal block (ACB), respectively. The methodological quality of included studies were medium, with the scores between 3 to 10. The results of overview indicated that: FNB had lower incidence rates of nausea and vomiting compared with EA and PCA, but had higher than ACB. FNB had lower incidence rates of sedation and retention of urine compared with EA and PCA. FNB had lower incidence rates of dizziness compared with EA and PCA, and lower incidence rate of hypotension compared with EA. Conclusion Current evidence suggests that FNB is safer than EA and PCA. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, the above conclusions are needed to be verified by more high-quality studies.
目的:观察相同剂量不同浓度的罗哌卡因用于腰丛坐骨神经联合阻滞的临床效果。方法:择期行单侧下肢手术的患者90例,年龄18~65岁,ASAⅠ或Ⅱ级,随机分为3组(n=30):A组给予0.3 ％的罗哌卡因腰丛36 mL、坐骨神经24 mL,B组给予0.36 ％的罗哌卡因腰丛30 mL、坐骨神经24 mL,C组给予0.4％罗哌卡因腰丛27 mL、坐骨神经18 mL。分别于给药后2、5、10、15、20、25、30、35 min测定下肢的感觉、运动评分以及感觉阻滞的时间和运动阻滞的时间。结果:三组患者阻滞起效时间无明显差别,高容量组完全阻滞的持续时间短于低容量组;高容量低浓度组患者完全阻滞率高于低容量组,但达到完全阻滞时间长于低容量组。结论:在剂量相同时罗哌卡因的浓度和容量会影响腰丛和坐骨神经的阻滞 效果;高容量罗哌卡因更有利于达到良好的感觉阻滞。