Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is one of the most common chronic inflammatory diseases. It mainly involves joints, as well as extra-articular organs. The extra-articular manifestations (EAM) are more common in patients with severe active disease, and the mortality of RA patients with EAM is 2.5 times of RA patients without EAM. Renal damage is rare in EAM, which mainly includes renal damage associated with RA itself, renal amyloidosis, and drug-induced secondary renal damage. In recent years, researches on RA renal damage have gradually increased, and mainly focused on therapy and prognosis. The recent research progress of RA renal damage are summarized in this review.
Objective To report the clinical experience of using Ilizarov wrist joint distraction technique in the treatment of a case of rheumatoid arthritis of the wrist. Methods In January 2019, a 49-year-old female patient with rheumatoid arthritis of the left wrist, complicated by ulnar impaction syndrome, was admitted for treatment. Preoperatively, the active range of motion of the left wrist was as follows: extension 0°-flexion 0°, pronation 65°-supination 35°, and grip strength of 4.0 kg. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 9, and the Cooney wrist function score was 15, indicating poor function. As conservative treatment failed to achieve symptom relief, Ilizarov wrist joint distraction surgery was performed. Postoperatively, joint distraction was applied at 2 mm increments on postoperative days 2 and 7, in 4 separate sessions. Results Postoperative X-ray film examination at 7 days revealed a distraction of 3.6 mm in the affected wrist joint compared to the contralateral side. The external fixator was removed 2.5 months postoperatively. At 22 months postoperatively, X-ray film and MRI examinations revealed that the joint space of the left wrist had returned to near-normal, with significant reduction in joint effusion and synovial proliferation. The active range of motion of the left wrist improved to extension 15°- flexion 30°, pronation 90°-supination 90°, with a grip strength of 18.0 kg. The wrist pain VAS score decreased to 0, and the Cooney wrist function score improved to 90, indicating excellent function. At 50 months postoperatively, follow-up X-ray film, MRI, and functional assessments showed the results similar to those at 22 months. Conclusion Ilizarov wrist joint distraction may be a viable treatment option for rheumatoid arthritis of the wrist.
Objective To evaluate the surgical treatment and effectiveness of rheumatoid forefoot reconstruction with arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint and arthroplasty of lesser metatarsal heads. Methods Between January 2007 and August 2009, 7 patients with rheumatoid forefoot were treated by reconstruction with arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint and arthroplasty of lesser metatarsal heads. They were all females with an average age of 62 years (range, 56-71 years) and with an average disease duration of 16 years (range, 5-30 years). All patients manifested hallux valgus, hammer toe or mallet toe of 2-5 toes, 5 feet complicated by subluxation of the second metatarsophalangeal joint. The improved American Orthopaedic Foot amp; Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was 36.9 ± 6.4. The hallux valgus angle was (46 ± 5)°, and the intermetarsal angle was (12 ± 2)° by measuring the load bearing X-ray films preoperatively. Results All incisions healed by first intention after operation. The X-ray films showed bone fusion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint at 3-4 months after operation. Seven patients were followed up 2.9 years on average (range, 2-4 years), gait was improved and pain was rel ieved. The hallux valgus angle decreased to (17 ± 4)° and the intermetarsal angle was (11 ± 2)° at 3 months postoperatively, showing significant differences when compared with preoperative values (P lt; 0.05). The improved AOFAS score was 85.3 ± 5.1 at 2 years postoperatively, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative score (t=4.501, P=0.001). One patient had recurrent metatarsalgia at 4 years after operation. Conclusion Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint and arthroplasty of lesser metatarsal heads for rheumatoid forefoot reconstruction can correct hallux valgus, remodel the bearing surface of the forefoot, and rel ieve pain, so it can be considered as a procedure that provides improvement in the cl inical outcome.
Objective To explore the technique of the soft tissue balancing in the total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for the patients of rheumatoid arthritis with flexion contracture. Methods From November 1997 to May 2006, 38 patients with rheumatoid arthritis with flexion contracture underwent primary bilateral TKA and balancing of the soft tissues, among whomthere were 8 males and 30 females, aged 48-71 years old (58.2 on average). The course of disease was 28 months-16 years (7.6 years on average). The preoperative flexion contracture was (38.2 ± 11.3)°. The average range of motion (ROM) and HSS score were (49.1 ± 17.8)° and 23.9 ± 16.9, respectively. According to the preoperative flexion-contracture degree of the knees, these patients were divided into 3 levels: 5 patients with ≤ 20°, 26 patients with 20-60° and 7 patients with ≥ 60°. During the TKA procedure, based on the correct osteotomy, different methods of soft tissue balancing were used for different degrees of flexion contracture. The TKA soft tissue treatment was summed up as the releasing of posterior structures and the balancing between medial collateral ligaments (MCL) and lateral collateral ligaments (LCL), etc. Results The flexion contractures in 38 cases were all improved after the operation, among which 33 patients had a complete correction and only 5 patients had a residual flexion contracture of 5-10°. Eight knees suffered from complications within 1 week after operation, among which 3 had subcutaneous superficial infection and 5 had deep vein thrombus (DVT). These patients obtained good heal ing after active treatment. All the 38 patients were followedup for 10 months to 8 years with the median time of 37 months. The postoperative flexion deformity declined to (2.4 ± 5.7)°, and the ROM and HSS scores were (96.3 ± 14.6)° and 81.7 ± 10.4, respectively. There was statistical difference (P lt; 0.05). According to the HSS score, 27 patients (71.05%)were rated as excellent, 6 good (15.79%) and 5 fair (13.16%), and the choiceness rate was 86.84%. Conclusion The balancing of the soft tissue is a major treatment for correction of the flexion contracture, which can avoid bone over-resection during the surgery of TKA. The proper balancing of the soft tissue can not only achieve an obvious correction of the flexion contracture but also effectively improve the range of motion and the functional recovery of the knee joint after TKA.
Objectives To systematically review the efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol (CZP) plus methotrexate (MTX) for active rheumatoid arthritis. Methods The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on CZP plus MTX vs. MTX plus placebo for active rheumatoid arthritis from inception to May, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, data were analyzed by using Stata 11.0 software. Results Seven RCTs were included. The results of meta-analysis showed the CZP plus MTX group was superior to MTX plus placebo group in ACR20 (CZP400 mg: RR=2.86, 95%CI 1.70 to 4.79, P<0.001; CZP200 mg: RR=3.76, 95%CI 2.59, 5.46, P<0.001), ACR50 (CZP400 mg: RR=3.91, 95%CI 2.10 to 7.27, P<0.001; CZP200 mg: RR=4.86, 95%CI 3.20 to 7.39, P<0.001), and ACR70 (CZP400 mg: RR=5.65, 95%CI 1.99 to 16.06, P=0.001; CZP200 mg: RR=10.08, 95%CI 5.11 to 19.89, P<0.001). The CZP plus MTX group was also superior to MTX plus placebo group in swollen joint counts (SMD=–12.72, 95%CI –15.39 to –10.06,P<0.001), tender joint counts (SMD=–11.54, 95%CI –13.97 to –9.11,P<0.001), doctor's global assessment of disease activity (SMD=–11.78, 95%CI –13.81 to –9.75,P<0.001), patient's global assessment of disease activity (SMD=–9.62, 95%CI –11.09 to –8.15,P<0.001), and patient's assessment of pain (SMD=–9.10, 95%CI –10.91 to –7.30,P<0.001) and HAQ (SMD=–7.74, 95%CI –8.99, –6.49,P<0.001), respectively. However, the incidence of adverse events in CZP plus MTX group was higher than that in MTX plus placebo group. Conclusions CZP plus MTX is superior to MTX plus placebo for treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis but with higher adverse events. Due to limited quantity and quality of the included studies, the above conclusions are still needed to be verified by more high-quality studies.
Objective To analyse the results of posterior cruciate l igament-retained mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to solve the problems often encountered during surgery. Methods From February 1999 to August 2005, the cl inical data from 73 patients with RA undergoing TKA were analysed retrospectively. In 73 patients, 38 patients were treated with posterior cruciate l igament-retained mobile-bearing prosthesis (group A), while 35 patients were treated with posterior stabil ized fixed-bearing prosthesis (group B). Another 70 patients with osteoarthritis (OA) treated with an posterior cruciate l igament-retained mobile-bearing prosthesis served as controls (group C). In group A, there were 8 males and 30 females with an average age of 56.5 years and an average diseasecourse of 16.8 years. In group B, there were 6 males and 29 females with an average age of 57.3 years and an average disease course of 17.1 years. In group C, there were 37 males and 33 females with an average age of 65.4 years and an average disease course of 10.8 years. There was no significant difference (P gt; 0.05) in general data between groups A and B, but there were significant differences (P lt; 0.05) when compared with group C. Results In groups A and B, 2 cases (5.3%) and 1 case (2.9%) had poor heal ing of incision, respectively; in group C, all cases had good heal ing of incision. There were significant differences in heal ing rate of incision between groups A, B and group C (P lt; 0.05). All patients were followed up 7.6 years on average (range, 3.5-10.5 years). Deep infection occurred in 1 case respectively in 3 groups, showing no significant difference (P gt; 0.05). Posterior instabil ity occurred in 1 case (2.6%) 5 years after operation in group A and 2 cases (2.9%) 9 years after operation in group C, and no posterior instabil ity occurred in group B; showing significant differences between groups A, C and group B (P lt; 0.05). There were significant differences (P lt; 0.05) in knee score, Feller patellar score, and anterior knee pain score between pre- and postoperative values among groups A, B, and C. There were significant differences (P lt; 0.05) in the function scores between pre- and post-operative values in 3 groups, between groups A, B and group C pre- and post-operatively. Conclusion Posterior cruciate l igament-retained mobile-bearing TKA can yield satisfactory cl inical results in treatment of RA at intermediate-term followup. This mobile-bearing prosthesis has a low prevalence of posterior instabil ity and a good outcome for anterior knee function without patellar resurfacing.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab for rheumatoid arthritis failing to respond to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Methods The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, VIP and Wanfang (from the date of their establishments to June 2010) were searched, and journals of relevant fields were retrieved to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The data were analyzed by using RevMan 5.0 software. Results Four RCTs were included, all of which were from abroad and with good methodological quality. The baseline data of each trial were comparable. Meta-analyses showed that there was a significant difference between the adalimumab and the placebo in terms of ACR20, ACR50, ACR70, tender joint count, swollen joint count, patient assessment of pain, patient global assessment of disease activity, doctor global assessment of disease activity, and disability index of the HAQ. There was no difference between the adalimumab and the placebo in terms of serious adverse events, intractable adverse events and serious infection. Conclusion Adalimumab can treat rheumatoid arthritis failing to respond to DMARDs, but clinically the doctor should balance the benefit and the risk of the adalimumab.