目的 以问卷调查形式了解患者对就医现状及医患关系的认知度，以期为医疗机构管理者完善医疗服务行为，构建和谐医患关系提供参考依据。 方法 2009年8月－11月，采用自制问卷对6所不同医院因伤/病住院治疗终结患者进行调查，并对调查结果进行统计分析。 结果 大多数被调查者认为目前“看病贵”，且收入水平对医疗服务的选择有影响；医患信任程度与医患沟通呈正相关；被调查者对医患纠纷的认知主要来自于媒体的报导，且认为媒体报导是公正的。 结论 医疗机构管理者应强化医护人员“以人为本”的理念，加强医患沟通，以防范服务性医患纠纷；政府应深化医药卫生体制改革，以解决“看病贵”问题；媒体应加大力度宣传普及医疗相关法律法规及知识，以引导人民群众尽可能正确客观看待医疗结果，摒除不切实际的医疗高期待。
目的 分析心脏手术相关医疗纠纷的临床及法医学特点，并就发生原因进行剖析及提出相应防范措施。 方法 对2002年1月－2011年12月四川华西法医学鉴定中心受理的四川省各级医疗机构发生的17例与心脏手术相关的医疗纠纷法医学鉴定资料进行回顾性分析。 结果 17例心脏手术相关医疗纠纷中，12例进行了尸体解剖死因鉴定，死亡原因有心脏传导系统出血，术后感染，低心排量综合症、肺动脉高压、失血性休克致死等。其余5例加上尸体解剖2例在内共7例进行了医疗过错鉴定，存在的医疗过错包括术前检查不完善，告知不充分，手术操作不细致，术后观察、处理不足，医疗记录不完整等。 结论 心脏手术相关医疗纠纷与术后并发症关系密切，医护人员应重视对心脏术后并发症的防治。尸体解剖对解决心脏术后死亡引起的医疗纠纷具有重要意义。
ObjectiveTo understand the cognition and mediation tendencies of health care workers in terms of third-party mediation for medical disputes, analyze the factors influencing the trust of both doctors and patients on third-party mediation, and propose suggestions on building third-party mediation mechanisms for medical disputes. MethodsBetween August and December 2012, we made the cognition questionnaire on third-party mediation for medical disputes based on the past medical literature, and the knowledge of doctor-patient relationship as well as third-party mediation agency's organizational structure (including locations and management authorities), staffing, mediation basis, validity sources and fund ensuring. We performed the random cluster sampling survey on all health care workers in five hospitals of different levels. The original data were put into the computer for statistical analysis by SPSS 18.0. ResultsThe knowledge of health care workers on third-party mediation was high. They believed that the best place for solving medical disputes should be the court or judicial administrative department, and the management authorities should be health administrative departments. In case of mediation failure, the majority of health care staff chose to continue to solve the dispute through legal channels. For the effectiveness of mediation conclusion, most health care workers tended to believe in the form of arbitration. They thought that mediators should have professional background of medicine and law; the majority of those surveyed doctors tended to accept forensic conclusions as a basis for mediation. For determining the compensation, doctors were in favor of Applicable Regulations for Medical Malpractice. Over 40% of medical staff believed that third-party mediation should be financed by government financial allocation, and more than half of the medical staff believed that it should be paid by the insurance company. ConclusionThird-party mediation should be set in and managed by the court or judicial and administrative departments. Mediator group should be formed by professionals of law and medical sciences. In the mediation process, it is recommended that the focus of controversy should be identified by forensic identification in order to form a clear division of responsibilities and high mediation efficiency. We recommend that the government introduce in financial allocations at all levels on the basis of medical liability insurance system, and force medical institutions to purchase medical liability insurance through the regulations of law, in order to provide funding support for the operation of third-party mediation organizations. Meanwhile, medical liability insurance companies should be operated under strict supervision to avoid their interference on the mediation work.
目的 从法医学角度探讨儿科医疗纠纷案件特点及成因。 方法 对四川华西法医学鉴定中心2002 年1月－2011年12月受理的184例儿童死亡并进行尸检的儿科医疗纠纷案件的法医学鉴定资料进行回顾性研究。 结果 儿科医疗纠纷呈逐年升高趋势，年龄以新生儿为主，死因以呼吸系统疾病为主；临床-尸检符合率低（55.23%），医疗过错率高（60.47%），且两者呈负相关。 结论 儿科医疗纠纷临床-尸检符合率比所有年龄段人群低，医疗过错率比所有年龄段人群高，且呈现出临床-尸检诊断符合率越低，医疗过错率越高的特征。
【摘要】 目的 探讨新生儿死亡医疗纠纷中临床及法医病理学特点,启示儿科医护人员在防范此类医疗纠纷时应注意的相关问题。方法 对四川大学华西基础医学与法医学院法医病理教研室1998年1月—2007年12月的60例新生儿死亡尸检案例进行回顾性统计分析。结果 60例中除3例非正常死亡外,57例为自然性疾病死亡。其中出生后24 h死亡32例(56.1%),死亡男婴40例(70.2%)。死亡原因主要为胎粪吸入综合征、肺透明膜病、肺出血等窒息性疾病(49.1%)。其中医疗过失性纠纷21例(36.8%),医疗过失的原因主要为观察不仔细、处理不及时、误诊漏诊、产前检查或助产处理不当、告知不足等。涉及纠纷的医院以市级医院居多(58.7%)。结论 医护人员应严格遵守诊疗常规和操作规范,对新生儿加强监护,及时抢救,同时应积极与家属沟通,以减少医疗纠纷的发生。
Objective To identify and analyze all medical injury liability disputes lawsuits pertaining to inferior vena cava filters (IVCF) in “Lexis®China” database, the causes and outcomes of litigation of the cases were clarified with a view, and to provide suggestions for preventing potential medical patient dispute lawsuits and improving the clinical diagnosis and treatment level of doctors. Method The term “inferior vena cava filter” was searched in Lexis®China, and spanning from 2011-01-01 to 2022-12-31. Results A total of 221 cases of medical injury liability disputes were found, after screening and exclusion, a total of 179 relevant cases were included in this study for analysis. All first instance lawsuits were brought by patients against hospitals and had a high rate of compensation awarded (91.6%). Forty four cases were entered second instance litigation, and the proportion of maintaining the original judgment was high (68.2%). The main content involving the modification of the judgment was to increase the compensation amount (85.7%). In the 14 lawsuits related to the failure to place IVCF by the medical authority, the litigation points were all disputes arising from the hospital’s improper diagnosis and treatment of VTE patients, which led to the failure to place IVCF, with the highest proportion (92.3%) of improper diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE). For PE and deep vein thrombosis patients with clear indications for IVCF implantation but not placed, leading to litigation, the hospital bore different liability for compensation (18%–100%) depending on the fault factors of the hospital’s negligence in diagnosis and treatment. The hospital could also be held responsible for inadequate informed disclosure to affect patient judgment (23.1%). In 165 lawsuits related to the placement of IVCF, the vast majority of IVCF implants were for the diagnosis and treatment of VTE in patients (73.9%). However, such unplanned operations caused additional injuries and expenses to patients, and VTE occurred most frequently during hospitalization (76.2%). This type of embolism was most commonly secondary to fracture incision and fixation surgery (31.2%), and the average liability of hospitals for compensation varied due to different secondary factors. The occurrence of intraoperative and postoperative complications related to IVCF implantation could also lead to litigation (18.8%), and the proportion of dead patients in litigation was relatively high (32.3%). The most common complication leading to litigation was PE recurrence or exacerbation (22.5%), while intraoperative complications were vascular injury during interventional procedures (2/3). The overall trend of IVCF-related lawsuits reserves between 2011 and 2020 showed an overall upward trend, reaching a peak of 37 cases in 2020; the average amount of damages exceeded 100 000 yuan per case in 10 of the 12 years included in the statistics. Conclusions In China’s IVCF-related medical liability lawsuits, patients most often sue their doctors, who are often sued for failure to insert a filter due to untimely diagnosis and treatment of VTE, inadequate notification of informed consent for IVCF insertion, unplanned IVCF insertion due to the presence of VTE and IVCF-related complications, and the outcome is often unfavourable to the doctors. In addition, the number of IVCF related lawsuits and hospital compensation amounts have remained high in recent years.