ObjectiveTo investigate clinical efficacy and advantages and disadvantages of primary closure with two endoscopes (1aparoscope+choledochoscope) or three endoscopes (laparoscope+choledochoscope+duodenoscope) through the cystic duct for treatment of gallbladder stone with secondary common bile duct (CBD) stones.MethodsThe clinical data of 83 patients with gallbladder stones with secondary CBD stones treated by two or three endoscopes combined with CBD exploration and lithotomy and primary closure through cystic duct from January 2017 to December 2018 in the Chengdu Second People’s Hospital were collected retrospectively. Among them, 41 patients were treated by two endoscopes mode (two endoscopes group), 42 cases were treated by three endoscopes mode (three endoscopes group).ResultsThere were no significant differences in the general conditions such as the gender, age, preoperative diameter of CBD, chronic diseases, etc. between the two and three endoscopes group (P>0.05). All 83 cases underwent the operations successfully and recovered well. The success rate of operation, stone clearance rate, drainage volume of abdominal drainage tube on day 1 after the operation, time of abdominal drainage tube removal after the operation, and hospitalization time had no significant differences between these two groups (P>0.05). The time of operation, intraoperative bleeding volume, and the postoperative pancreatitis rate in the three endoscopes group were significantly more (or higher) than those in the two endoscopes group (P<0.05), but the condition of liver function recovered after the operation was better than that in the two endoscopes group (P<0.05).ConclusionsWith the strict control of the operation indications, it is safe and feasible to use two or three endoscopes through the cystic duct pathway and primary closure of CBD for treatment of gallbladder stone with secondary CBD stones. However, the choice of operative methods of two or three endoscopes should be based on the general situation of the patients before and during the operation.
目的探讨腹腔镜胆道再次手术的适应证、手术方法及临床效果。方法回顾性分析我院2003年2月至2010年11月期间46例腹腔镜胆道再次手术患者的临床资料，对术中及术后结果进行总结。结果本组45例在腹腔镜下完成手术，1例中转开腹。手术时间为45～270 min(平均120 min)，残株胆囊切除时间为(40±10) min，胆总管切开取石+T管引流时间为(150±50) min，胆总管切开取石+等离子碎石+T管引流时间为(180±40) min，术后出血及漏胆腹腔镜探查术时间为（40±15）min。结石一次性取尽23例，术后残余结石2例，住院4～21 d，平均8.6 d。胆管残余结石患者在术后1个月后经T管瘘道用胆道镜取石。术中十二指肠球部损伤3例，及时发现修补; 术后出现右侧胸腔积液4例、肺部感染2例和漏胆1例，均经非手术治疗痊愈。术后电话随访6～24个月（平均15个月），未见异常。结论腹腔镜胆道再次手术可行，并具有创伤小、恢复快等优点，但术前应严格掌握手术适应证，对手术医生的技术要求也较高。
Objective To explore the indications for liver transplantation among patients with hepatolithiasis. Methods Data from 1431 consecutive patients with hepatolithiasis who underwent surgical treatment from January 2000 to December 2006 were retrospectively collected for analysis. Surgical procedures included T-tube insertion combined with intraoperative cholangioscopic removal of intrahepatic stones, hepatectomy, cholangiojejunostomy, and liver transplantation. Results Nine hundred and sixty-one patients who had a stone located in the left or right intrahepatic duct underwent hepatectomy or T-tube insertion combined with intraoperative cholangioscopic removal of intrahepatic stones. The rate of residual stones was 7.5% (72/961). Four hundred and seventy patients who had a stone located in the bilateral intrahepatic ducts underwent surgical procedures other than liver transplantation; the rate of residual stones was 21.7% (102/470). Only 15 patients with hepatolithiasis underwent liver transplantation; they all survived. According to the degree of biliary cirrhosis, recipients were divided into 2 groups: a group with biliary decompensated cirrhosis (n=7), or group with biliary compensated cirrhosis or noncirrhosis group (n=8). There were significant differences in operative times, transfusion volumes and blood losses between 2 groups (P＜0.05). In the first group, 6 of 7 patients experienced surgical complications, and in the second, 8 recipients recovered smoothly with no complications. Health status, disability and psychological wellness of all recipients (n=15) were significantly improved in 1 year after transplantation as compared with pretransplantation (P＜0.05). Conclusion Liver transplantation is a possible method to address hepatolithiasis and secondary decompensated biliary cirrhosis or difficult to remove, diffusely distributed intrahepatic duct stones unavailable by hepatectomy, cholangiojejunostomy, and choledochoscopy.
To study the relationship between the activity of endogenous β-glucuronidase (β-G) in hepatic tissue and the formation of bilirubin stone. We assessed the β-G activity in hepatic tissue of 44 cases of bilirubin stone, 8 cases of cholesterol stone and 25 cases of liver injury by using immunohistochemistry. Results: The cell percentage of β-G positive reaction in bilirubin stone group (49.2%±4.6%) was significantly higher than those in cholesterol stone group (32.5%±3.8%) and liver injury group (27.8%±4.2%), Ｐ＜0.05. There was no relationship between cell percentage of β-G positive reaction and age, patient history, size of stone. Conclusions: The activity of endogenous β-G is closely related to the formation of bilirubin stone. The difference of activity between individuals is possibly the intrinsic factor which may influence the formation of bilirubin stone.
目的探讨Mirizzi综合征的诊断和治疗选择。方法对1982～2000年经手术证实的36例Mirizzi综合征进行回顾性分析。结果术前确诊仅8例(22.2%)，其中5例经ERCP确诊。36例分别选择性地施行了胆囊切除术、胆囊大部切除术、胆管瘘口修补术以及胆肠RouxenY吻合术。32例术后一期愈合，4例出现并发症，其中2例并发胆管狭窄而再次手术。结论B超结合ERCP检查可以提高Mirizzi综合征的术前确诊率， 手术治疗是其主要治疗方法，手术方式取决于局部病理损伤程度和解剖变异。
目的:探讨B超监测下输尿管镜治疗输尿管结石的临床疗效及可行性。方法:2007年12月~2008年12月采用B超监测下输尿管镜治疗输尿管结石患者34例,结石位于上段4例,中段11例,下段19例。结果:一次性碎石治愈者33例,一次性碎石成功率97%,手术时间(40±15)min,术后2~7天排尽结石,术后住院平均时间3.5(2～5)天。结论:B超监测下输尿管镜治疗输尿管结石对于手术操作者易于随时动态观察结石情况,对于大于0.4 cm的碎石块无遗漏,增加术中一次碎石成功率,可行性高。
目的探讨嵌顿性胆囊结石行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的经验。方法回顾性分析我院1998年1月至2004年12月期间用LC治疗嵌顿性胆囊结石365例的临床资料。结果358例成功施行LC,7例中转开腹,2例术后发生胆瘘,无胃肠道、胆管损伤等并发症,无死亡病例,全部患者均痊愈出院。结论随着腹腔镜技术日臻完善，嵌顿性胆囊结石选择LC，一次性切除病灶，术后恢复快，并发症少。