ObjectiveTo measure the total factor productivity and its component changes of public secondary general hospitals in China from 2012 to 2018.MethodsFrom February to September in 2019, stratified systematic sampling method was used to collect the panel data of input and output indicators from 2012 to 2018 of 511 public secondary general hospitals in 5 provinces of China (Shandong, Hubei, Hainan, Anhui, and Shanxi), and Bootstrap-Malmquist-data envelopment analysis was used to calculate the total factor productivity and its component changes of the hospitals.ResultsFrom 2012 to 2018, the total factor productivity of the 511 public secondary general hospitals decreased by 0.22%, technical efficiency decreased by 5.24%, technical changes increased by 5.29%, pure technical efficiency decreased by 1.40%, and scale efficiency decreased by 3.89%, respectively.ConclusionsIn the past 7 years, the total factor productivity of public secondary general hospitals in China has declined slightly, mainly due to the decline of scale efficiency and pure technical efficiency, and the technological progress is the main reason for its improvement. The implications for the public secondary general hospitals are three folds: avoiding blind expansion and exploring optimum scale of beds, strengthening the internal fine management to improve the management practice and technical efficiency, and promoting technological progress by healthcare cooperating organizations.
West China Hospital of Sichuan University has explored and established an intelligent assistant evaluation mechanism for professional titles based on the personnel information system, which makes the evaluation more convenient, more efficient, and the whole process more open and transparent. This paper aimed to introduce it and to provide references for evidence-based decision-making of medical institutions.
Efficient disciplinary management in hospitals plays an important role in improving the level of medical services, promoting talent development, elevating research levels, and enhancing the overall strength of hospitals. At present, large comprehensive hospitals are facing increasingly complex challenges and problems in disciplinary construction and management. Bibliometrics, as a tool for literature analysis and evaluation, can assist hospitals in carrying out disciplinary management. This article explores the application and value of bibliometrics in hospital disciplinary management from the perspectives of disciplinary planning, optimizing resource allocation, evaluating disciplinary level, and exploring hot topics and development trends in disciplinary fields, and hopes to provide reference and ideas for peers.
Objective To explore the effects of the centralized management of bed use in a large-scale integrated hospital. Methods We selected the staff with good quality for centre work after setting up the bed use centralized management centre in the West China Hospital. Then, we formulated unified an admission principle and incorporated it into the systematic management and control, made a short instructional video for rolling show in the centre so as to let the patient know basic conditions of this hospital before admission; and regulated the admission process for patients’ convenience. Results After more than one year, the centre simplified the in-patient admission procedures, regulated the process, saved nursing manpower (24 persons), and increased patients’ satisfaction (from 89.30% to 93.25%). Meanwhile, the bed use rate was increased and the average length of stay was shortened the to some extent, which improved the order in wards. Conclusion Unified bed use management centre established in large-scale integrated hospitals, can save nursing manpower, simplify the admission process of patients, and meet the need for the development of hospitals, which is worthy of promoting application.
This consensus aims to systematically standardize the establishment and management of multidisciplinary specialized disease centers within general hospitals. Based on the "1+5+7" framework (one core condition, five essential conditions, and seven enabling conditions), it clarifies the classification of centers by focusing on specific diseases, organs, or symptoms. The consensus emphasizes interdisciplinary coordination, integration of clinical specialties, and the advancement of specialized disease management, while also prioritizing improvements in patient care experience and the development of professional talent teams. It covers the full lifecycle of center development—including organizational structure, clinical services, teaching and research, and evaluation and management—providing a standardized operational pathway for the construction of specialized disease centers in general hospital settings.
ObjectiveTo investigate prevalence of anxiety and depression in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in order to increase the awareness of physicians on this comorbidity.MethodsPatients were from a multicenter prospective cohort study and 13 institutions or hospitals participated in the study. Four hundred and ten patients with a prior diagnosis of COPD were prospectively recruited from January 2017 to January 2019, and baseline date were analyzed. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale was used to identify anxiety and depression.ResultsThe cohort had a mean age of (60.7±10.0) years with 76.8% males and 74.3% smokers. Seventy-nine patients (19.3%) had anxiety or depression. Among them, 36 subjects (8.8%) had anxiety, and 64 patients (15.6%) were with depression, and 21 patients (5.1%) with anxiety and depression. The prevalence of severe anxiety (2.7%) and severe depression (2.4%) was low. Compared to patients without anxiety or depression, patients with anxiety or depression had significantly higher CAT scores (17.8±9.3 with anxiety, 17.4±8.4 with depression, 12.5±7.3 without anxiety or depression, P 0.002 and 0.000 respectively). The risk of acute exacerbations was higher in patients with depression (37.5% vs. 22.7%, P=0.016). Proportion of patients categorized into GOLD group D was higher in patients with depression (P=0.001).ConclusionsAbout 20% COPD patients has anxiety or depression. Prevalence of depression is two times that of anxiety. The prevalence of severe anxiety or severe depression is low. Patients with depression have lower quality of life, higher risk of acute exacerbations, and higher proportion of patients categorized into GOLD group D.
Objective To scientifically evaluate the nosocomial infection prevention and control ability of respiratory infectious diseases in general hospitals, and to construct a set of quantitative assessment system for the prevention and control ability of respiratory infectious diseases in general hospitals. Methods Papers, standards and guidelines online related to respiratory hospital infections published between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2023 were selected, and infection control experience was summarized to build a pool of evaluation pionts. Then, this study used experts consultation to select the evaluation pionts, to calculate the weight coefficient and reached a consensus on the quantitative evaluation methods of each evaluation point. Results A total of 27 articles were included. The evaluation system included 17 evaluation points in 4 categories: “Basic management capacity” “Basic conditions of facilities and equipments” “The prevention and control capacity of nosocomial infection” and “The emergency response capacity”. Each evaluation point contained 3 quantitative evaluation indicators. The Cronbach’s α coefficients of the expert questionnaire consultation were 0.914 and 0.883, respectively. The scale-level content validity index was 0.932, and the item-level content validity index ranged from 0.823 to 1. Conclusions The evaluation system constructed in this study can be used for quantitative evaluation and quality self-examination of the prevention and control ability of respiratory infectious diseases in general hospitals. It also contributes to the continuous improvement of the quality of nosocomial infection prevention and control.
ObjectiveTo investigate the current situation of orthopedic quality control and management in county-level regional general hospitals in Guangdong, and to provide a scientific basis for further standardizing the procedures of orthopedic quality control and management in county-level regional general hospitals and continuously improving the work of provincial orthopedic quality control center.MethodsFrom June 2019 to July 2020, online and offline questionnaire survey and field survey were used to investigate the quality control and management of orthopedic departments in 22 county-level regional general hospitals in Guangdong.ResultsAmong the overall scores of the surveyed hospitals, the highest score was 96.5, the lowest score was 72.0. There were 6 hospitals with a total score of “excellent” (accounting for 27.3%). The “facilities and equipment” and “medical quality” of the surveyed hospitals were relatively valued. Taking Guangzhou, the capital of Guangdong as the center, the districts and counties were divided into the east, the south, the west and the north regions, and the difference in overall scores of orthopedics among the four regions was statistically significant (F=6.299, P=0.004). The unqualified rates of department setting, key technology development, average hospitalization days of representative diseases, equipment allocation, personnel allocation, department management and building layout were relatively high, which were 77.3%, 63.6%, 45.5%, 40.9%, 40.9%, 36.4% and 36.4%, respectively. Most hospitals had set up special debridement rooms in orthopedic department (95.5%), and the management and monitoring of the use of antibacterial drugs was mostly reasonable (90.9%). In terms of the level of orthopedic medical treatment, only 3 hospitals with sufficient key technologies reached the standard, accounting for 13.6%, and only 7 hospitals reached the standard of scientific research capacity, accounting for 31.8%. In terms of quality control, the numbers of hospitals with qualified medical record sampling (72.7%), perfect management and supervision mechanism (86.4%) and quality management team in departments (77.3%) were the least. In addition, among the investigated hospitals, beds were in short supply in orthopedic departments, with 12 hospitals accounting for 54.5% being deducted; 16 hospitals (72.7%) were deducted for unqualified doctor-patient ratio and 11 hospitals (50.0%) were deducted for unqualified nurse-patient ratio.ConclusionsThe overall level of orthopedics construction and management in the surveyed hospitals is uneven. The medical professional and technical level is insufficient. It is difficult to meet the practical needs, and there is an imbalance in the ratio of medical personnel. In the future, it is necessary to strengthen the quality control of orthopedic medical care, strengthen the medical technology training of county-level regional general hospitals and increase the medical and health resources and capital investment, so as to improve the quality control of county-level regional general hospitals.
With the development of rehabilitation medicine being promoted as a national strategy, the rehabilitation medicine has developed rapidly in China, and the number of rehabilitation medicine departments in tertiary general hospitals has increased greatly. However, the discipline development faces some problems, such as unreasonable physical condition setting, nonstandard clinical path of rehabilitation technology, inaccurate discipline positioning, loopholes in safety management, inadequate rehabilitation quality control, and imperfect talent construction system. This paper attempts to discuss the strategic thinking of the development of rehabilitation medicine from six dimensions: foundation, technology, system, safety, quality control, and talents, so as to provide a reference for discipline builders.