Objective To investigate the effectiveness of repairing hallux metatarsophalangeal skin and soft tissue defect with medial flap with double blood supply system in elderly patients. Methods Between June 2011 and March 2012, 9 cases (9 toes) of skin and soft tissue defect at hallux metatarsophalangeal joint were treated with medial flap with double blood supply system. There were 7 males and 2 females, aged 60-70 years (mean, 65.4 years). Injury included crush injury in 5 cases, traffic accident injury in 4 cases. The interval of injury and operation ranged from 3 hours to 5 days (mean, 35 hours). The patients had bone or tendon exposure with pollution of wounds. The size of defects ranged from 2.0 cm × 1.5 cm to 2.5 cm × 2.0 cm. The size of flaps ranged from 2.0 cm × 1.7 cm to 3.0 cm × 2.2 cm. Medial dorsal nerves were anastomosed with toe nerves to recover flap sensation. The donor site was repaired with skin grafting. Results All 9 flaps and skin grafting survived completely, and primary healing of wounds were obtained. Nine patients were followed up 6-8 months (mean, 7 months). The colour, texture, and contour of the flaps were good. The two-point discrimination of the flaps was 12-16 mm (mean, 14 mm) at last follow-up. The patients could walk normally. No scar contracture formed at donor site. No wear occurred. Conclusion The medial flap with double blood supply system can be used to repair hallux metatarsophalangeal skin and soft tissue defect in elderly patients because the flap can be easily obtained, has good blood supply, and has no injury to the main artery and nerve.
Objective To study the suitable operation method of elderly patients with acute cholecystitis. Methods The clinical data of 149 elderly patients with acute cholecystitis were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were divided into two groups according to the operation: open cholecystectomy group (OC group, n=76) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy group (LC group, n=73). Some clinical data were compared in this paper such as operation time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, time of resumption of food, time of intestinal function recovery and complications. Results No marked difference was found between OC group and LC group about basic data except WBC count and examination of gallbladder by B ultrasound（P＞0.05）. But there were significant difference in operation time, blood loss, time of resumption of food, time of intestinal function recovery, length of hospital stay and complications between OC group and LC group （P＜0.01）. Conclusion Individualized treatment should be emphasized on elderly patients with acute cholecystitis. Selection of OC or LC to these patients should be based on the clinical condition and taken the safety as the first principle.
Objective To determine the safety and efficacy of surgical biliary bypass on the elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic head cancer. Methods The clinical data of 55 cases with unresectable pancreatic head cancer treated with palliation methods from July 2002 to June 2009 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into three groups according to different age and therapeutic program: Nineteen patients, 65 years of age or older, were managed with surgical biliary bypass (group A), 19 patients under 65 years of age were treated by surgical biliary bypass (group B) and 17 patients with the age of 65 years or older received percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (group C). Then the therapeutic results were compared.Results With respect to the postoperative level of serum bilirubin, the incidence of early complications, postoperative hospitalization and mean survival time, no statistically significant difference was found between group A and B (Pgt;0.05). There was one case of recurrent jaundice and one case of gastric output obstruction in group B, while no one suffered postoperative complication in group A, and the difference was statistically significant (Plt;0.01). Compared with group A, the postoperative level of serum bilirubin, the number of patient readmitted, the rate of recurrent jaundice and gastric output obstruction were higher in group C (Plt;0.05 or Plt;0.01). The mean postoperative hospitalization and overall survival time were significantly shorter in group C than group A (Plt;0.05 or Plt;0.01, respectively). Conclusion Surgical palliation does not increase the morbidity rate, but it does improve the quality of life in elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic head cancer.
Objective To identify an evidence-based treatment for an elderly patient with intertrochanteric fractures. Methods Clinical problems were presented on the basis of the patient’s conditions, and evidence was collected from the NGC (2000 to 2009), The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2009), TRIP Database, PubMed (1966 to 2009) and CBM (1978 to 2009). Treating strategies were formulated in terms of the three-combination principle (best evidence, the doctor’s professional knowledge and the patient’s desire). Results Three guidelines and sixteen studies were included. The current evidence indicated that surgery was the preferred solution to intertrochanteric fractures of the elderly patient. The sliding hip screw (SHS) appeared superior to others. There was insufficient evidence to support the routine use of closed suction drainage in orthopedic surgeries. Early surgery was associated with shorter hospital stay and improved mortality. Antibiotic prophylaxis significantly reduced infections. In order to lower the risk of venous thromboembolism, pharmacological prophylaxis should be carried out when the patient was admitted to hospital and be assisted with mechanical prophylaxis after surgery. Nutritional supplementation was conducive to the recovery of the patient. Rehabilitation ought to be performed as soon as possible. Considering the patient’s condition, the treatment option was established according to the available evidence and guidelines. Short-term follow-up showed a good outcome. Conclusion Through the evidence-based method, an individual treatment plan could obviously improve the treatment effect and prognosis.
Objective To discuss the relationship between recovery of anatomical integrity and functional outcome in elderly patients with distal radius fractures by comparing the effects of open reduction and closed reduction. Methods The cl inical data were retrospectively analyzed from 78 elderly patients with distal radius fractures treating with nonoperation andoperation from February 2005 to March 2009. Thirty-seven patients underwent closed reduction and spl intlet fixation or cast appl ication (non-operation group), and forty-one patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation (operation group). In non-operation group, there were 15 males and 22 females with an average age of 73 years (60-83 years). According to the AO classification system for fracture, there were 8 cases of type A2, 7 cases of type A3, 7 cases of type B1, 4 cases of type B2, 2 cases of type B3, 4 cases of type C1, 2 cases of type C2, and 3 cases of type C3. The time from injury to admission was between 30 minutes and 3 days with a mean time of 1 day. In operation group, there were 18 males and 23 females with an average age of 71 years (62-80 years). According to the AO classification system for fracture, there were 5 cases of type A2, 7 cases of type A3, 7 cases of type B1, 6 cases of type B2, 3 cases of type B3, 4 cases of type C1, 5 cases of type C2, and 4 cases of type C3. The time from injury to admission was between 30 minutes and 7 days with a mean time of 1 day. There were no significant differences (P gt; 0.05) in sex, age, disease course and fracture classification between two groups. Results All incisions obtained heal ing by first intention after operation in operation group. All patients were followed up for 9-36 months (20 months on average). Fracture heal ing was achieved within 8 to 15 weeks, with an average of 11 weeks. There were no significant differences (P gt; 0.05) in fracture heal ing time between non-operation group [(10.8 ± 2.0) weeks] and operation group [(11.7 ± 2.5) weeks]. At last follow-up, thepalmar tilt angle was (5.6 ± 2.0)° and (8.6 ± 3.0)°, the radial incl ination angle was (19.1 ± 4.9)° and (21.8 ± 2.0)°, and the radial length was (8.3 ± 1.3) mm and (10.4 ± 1.4) mm in non-operation group and operation group, respectively; showing significant differences (P lt; 0.05) between two groups. According to the Gartland-Werley score, the results were excellent in 9 cases, good in 21 cases, fair in 5 cases, and poor in 2 cases in non-operation group, the excellent and good rate was 81.1%; in operation group, the results were excellent in 13 cases, good in 25 cases, fair in 2 cases, and poor in 1 case, the excellent and good rate was 92.7%, showing no significant difference (P gt; 0.05) between two groups. There were no significant differences (P gt; 0.05) in flexion and extension activity of wrist, radioulnar partial activity, pronation-supination activity, grip and pinch strength between two groups. Conclusion Open reduction and closed reduction can achieve satisfactory functional outcomes, but closed reduction was inferior to open reduction in anatomic reduction for treating distal radius fractures in elderly patients.
ObjectiveTo investigate perioperative safety of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) in elderly patients (age ≥70 years old).MethodsThe retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathologic data of the patients underwent LPD and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) in the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from January 2016 to December 2019 were collected. The patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were divided into LPD with aged ≥70 years old group (group A), OPD with aged ≥70 years old group (group B), and LPD with aged <70 years old group (group C). The baseline data, intraoperative situations, and postoperative situations were compared between the group A and group B, and between the group A and group C, respectively.Results① There were no statistic differences in the age, gender, body mass index, hemoglobin, albumin, and total bilirubin, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, and comorbidity index before operation between the group A and group B (P>0.05). However, there were statistic differences in the hemoglobin, albumin, ASA grade, and comorbidity index before operation between the group A and group C (P<0.05). ② There were no significant differences in the operation time between the group A and group B (P>0.05), but the intraoperative blood loss of the group A was significantly less than the group B (P<0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and conversion rate had no significant differences between the group A and group C (P>0.05). ③ There were no significant differences in the pathological pattern, tumor size, R0 resection rate, reoperative rate, and postoperative 90 d mortality between the group A and group B, and between the group A and group C, respectively. For the elderly patients, cases in the ICU, overall complications, specific complications (except for delayed gastric emptying) and Clavien-Dindo classification of complication after operation had no significant differences between the group A and group B (P>0.05), but there were more harvesting lymph nodes, lower postoperative pain score, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and less delayed gastric emptying cases in the group A than the group B (P<0.05). For the patients accepted LPD, there were no significant differences in the harvesting lymph nodes, postoperative pain score, postoperative hospital stay, and specific complications (except for pulmonary infection rate) between the group A and the group C (P>0.05), but the postoperative cases in the ICU were more, pulmonary infection rate was higher, overall complications rate and the ratio of Clavien-Dindo Ⅲ–Ⅳ classification of complication were higher in the group A as compared with the group C (P<0.05). ConclusionCompared with OPD, LPD might have some advantages in blood loss, harvesting lymph nodes, and recovery after surgery, even though perioperative safety of LPD in elderly patients is inferior to younger patients.
Objective To evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic rectal resection (LR) in elderly and younger patients with rectal cancer. Methods From January 2008 to March 2009, 76 patients with rectal cancer undergoing elective rectal resection were included in this study. Older than 70 years named elderly group, in which LR was given to 16 cases, and open resection (OR) to 18 cases. Younger than 70 years named younger group, in which LR was performed in 23 cases, and OR in 19 cases. The results after LR and OR in rectal cancer between 2 groups of patients were compared. Results No surgery-assisted death occurred in either group. In 2 groups, ventilation time, intake food time and hospitalization after operation in LR were shorter than those of OR (P＜0.05， P＜0.01); intraoperative blood loss and the proportion of postoperative analgesia in LR were less than those of OR in 2 groups (P＜0.01); there were no significant differences between LR and OR (Pgt;0.05) in mean operation time or number of lymph node resected. In addition to the incision infection rate, the other complications rates and the postoperative life self-care rate between LR and OR were no significantly different in younger group (Pgt;0.05). In the elderly group, every complication rates of LR were lower than those of OR (P＜0.05), oppositely, the postoperative life self-care rate was higher (P＜0.01). Conclusions LR of rectal cancer can be applied to both elderly and younger patients. It is suggested that advanced age should not be the contraindication for LR, and by contrary elderly patients may be particularly indicated for lower postoperative complications rate compared to open surgeries.
ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress on the impact of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy on frailty, cognitive function, and quality of life in older patients with breast cancer.MethodCollected literatures about the impact of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy on frailty, cognitive function, and quality of life in older patients with breast cancer to make an review.ResultsElderly breast cancer patients were likely to benefit from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy without undergoing significant impairment of frailty, cognitive function, and quality of life. However, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy might cause an aggravation of the frailty in patients who was already with it.ConclusionWe should develop personalized treatment plans for elderly breast cancer patients after multidisciplinary assessment.
ObjectiveTo compare the long-term prognosis of elderly patients with stageⅠnon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after lobectomy or segmentectomy. MethodsData of elderly patients with stageⅠNSCLC between 2010 and 2020 were collected from the SEER database. According to the resection method, patients were divided into a lobectomy group and a segmentectomy group. The overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) of the two groups were compared by propensity score matching (lobectomy : segmentectomy=2 : 1). ResultsA total of 9990 patients were included, including 5840 (58.46%) females and 4150 (41.54%) males, with an average age of (70.48±6.47) years. Among them, 9029 patients were in the lobectomy group and 961 patients were in the segmentectomy group. After propensity score matching, a total of 2883 patients were matched, including 1 922 patients in the lobectomy group and 961 patients in the segmentectomy group. There was no statistical difference in baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). The 10-year OS rate and LCSS rate of the lobectomy group were higher than those of the segmentectomy group (OS: 51.15% vs. 38.35%, P<0.01; LCSS: 79.68% vs. 71.52%, P<0.01). Subgroup analysis showed that the survival advantage of lobectomy was found in patients aged 60-<70 years and ≥80 years; for patients 70-<80 years, there was no statistical difference in OS or LCSS between the two surgical methods (P>0.05). In addition, for patients with tumor diameter ≤2 cm (stages ⅠA1-ⅠA2), lymph node dissection number≥10, and receiving adjuvant radiotherapy/chemotherapy, segmentectomy could also achieve a similar prognosis as lobectomy. ConclusionOverall, for elderly patients with stage ⅠNSCLC, lobectomy can achieve better OS and LCSS. However, individual differences, tumor characteristics, and perioperative treatment plans should be considered comprehensively to determine the surgical method for elderly patients with stageⅠNSCLC.