【Abstract】ObjectiveTo investigate whether abnormal expression of β-catenin and high expression of c-myc have played a possible role in hilar cholangiocarcinoma carcinogenesis.MethodsBy using immunohitochemical staining (SP method), the authors detected the expression of β-catenin and c-myc in 42 paraffin-embedded samples of hilar cholangiocarcinoma and 10 benign bile duct disease tissue, and then analyzed the relationship of them with clinical data. Resultsβ-catenin was normally expressed in 10 benign bile duct disease tissue, while expression of c-myc was negtive. In hilar cholangiocarcinoma tissue, the positive expression rate of β-catenin （71.4%） was significantly correlated to the lymphoid node metastasis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (χ2=4.75，P＜0.05),but was not statistically correlated to the tumor size，the extent of differentiation and infiltration (χ2=3.35，3.45，4.32，Pgt;0.05); the expression rate of c-myc (76.2%) was correlated with the extent of differentiation(χ2=4.87, P＜0.05),but not with the size, infiltration, lymphoid metastasis（χ2= 3.47，4.12，2.76， Pgt;0.05). The abnormal expression of β-catenin had relevance to the high expression of c-myc with hilar cholangiocarcinoma （r=0.324,P＜0.01）. ConclusionThe expression of beta-catenin and c-myc is significantly altered in hilar cholangiocarcinoma, and correlate with biological features of cholangiocarcinoma.The abnormal expression of beta-catenin is one of the mechanisms for the spread of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
ObjectiveTo summarize the clinical experience of 58 operations for biliary malignant tumor with da Vinci surgical system. MethodsFrom January 2009 to October 2010, 180 patients with hepatopancreaticobiliary and gastrointestinal disease underwent robotic surgeries by using da Vinci surgical system, including 58 patients with biliary malignant tumor. The case distribution, intra and postoperative data were analyzed. ResultsOf 58 patients, 3 patients with intrahepatic bile duct cystadenocarcinoma received wedge resections of liver. In 36 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma, anatomical left hemihepatectomies were performed in 3 cases, resection of extrahepatic duct and gallbladder bridge type biliary revascularization in 3 cases, resection of extrahepatic duct and biliary-enteric Roux-en-Y anastomosis in 14 cases, tumor resection and revascularization of hepatic portal bile duct in 1 case, palliative external drainage of intrahepatic bile duct in 5 cases, and Y-internal drainage of hepatic portal in 10 cases. In 10 patients with gallbladder carcinoma, resection of extrahepatic duct and gallbladder and biliaryenteric Roux-en-Y anastomosis in 2 cases, cholecystectmy in 3 cases, cholecystectmy and external drainage of intrahepatic bile duct in 1 case, cholecystectmy and Y-internal drainage by suspension of hepatic portal in 4 cases. A patient with middle bile duct cancer received radical resection of cholangiocarcinoma and biliary-enteric Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Of 8 patients with distal bile duct cancer, Whipple procedure were performed. Of 58 patients, 2 cases converted to hand-assistant procedure (3.4%). For all patients, operation time was (6.18±1.71) h, blood loss was (116.66±56.06) ml, blood transfusion was (85.55±38.28) ml, ambulation time was (9.10±2.91) h, feeding time was (14.95±4.35) h, and hospital stay was (12.81±4.29) d. Postoperative complications occurred in 8 cases (13.8%), including bile leakage (3 cases), wound bleeding (1 case), pancreatoenteric anastomotic leakage (2 cases), pulmonary infection (1 case), and renal failure (1 case). Of these 8 cases, 6 cases recovered smoothly and 2 cases die of severe pulmonary infection and renal failure after conservative treatment (3 or 4 weeks), therefore, the mortality of patients was 3.4%. In 36 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma, 19 cases died (on 2 monthes 4 cases, on 6 monthes 5 cases, on 10 monthes 8 cases, and on 12 monthes 2 cases after operation), 11 cases survival well (gt;26 monthes 4 cases, gt;22 monthes 3 cases, and gt;19 monthes 4 cases), and 6 cases required hospitalization. Of 10 patients with gallbladder carcinoma, 7 cases died (on 3 monthes 1 case, on 5 monthes 1 case, on 8 monthes 1 case, on 11 monthes 3 cases, and on 12 monthes 1 case after operation) and 3 cases survival (gt;17 monthes 2 cases, gt;13 monthes 1 case). In 8 cases undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy, 5 cases died (on 4 monthes 2 cases, on 6 monthes 2 cases, and 10 monthes 1 case after operation) and 3 cases survived well over 2 years. Three patients with intrahepatic bile duct cystadenocarcinoma survived over 1 year. Conclusionsda Vinci surgical system can carry out all kinds of surgery for biliary malignant tumor, especially prominent in the complicated surgeries for hepatic portal, which breaks through the restricted area of laparoscope in hepatobiliary malignant tumor.
肝门部胆管癌（hilar cholangiocarcinoma），又称Klaskin癌，是指起源于左右肝管、分叉部和肝总管上段胆管上皮的恶性肿瘤，约占胆管癌的60%~70%［1］。由于其临床表现隐匿，早期难以被发现。目前根治性手术是最有效的提高其生存率的治疗方式，随着肝门部胆管癌R0切除率的不断升高，5年生存率不断提高［2，3］，但仍有不少问题有待于解决……
ObjectiveTo analyze effect of percutaneous transhepatic choledochus drainage (PTCD) for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. MethodsClinical data of 67 cases of hilar cholangiocarcinoma who treated in our hospital from Jan. 2005 to Dec. 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsOf the 67 cases, 30 cases were performed PTCD, 20 cases were performed radical surgery after PTCD, and 17 cases were performed palliative surgery after PTCD. There were 59 cases who were followed-up for 3-30 months, and the median time was 9.3 months. The median survival time of patients who underwent PTCD, radical surgery, and palliative surgery were 10.2, 21.4, and 8.9 months respectively. The survival of patients who underwent radical surgery was better than those of underwent PTCD (χ2=13.6, P=0.000 4) and palliative surgery (χ2=15.2, P=0.003 8), and survival of patients who underwent PTCD was better than patients underwent palliative surgery (χ2=5.3, P=0.040 1). ConclusionsPTCD is contribute to preoperative diagnosis and evaluation, in addition, it can reduce unnecessary surgical exploration, guarantee the safety of the radical surgery, and provide follow-up care for palliative operation channel which is favorable for local internal radiation therapy.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical significance of hepatectomy combined with vascular reconstruction in hilar cholangiocarcinoma with vascular invasion. MethodsThe clinical data of 62 cases of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with vascular invasion in Suqian People's Hospital of Nanjing Drum-Tower Hospital Group from January 2006 to January 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. All cases were divided into two groups according to assessment of surgical trauma tolerance, nutritional status, and family's wishes. Thirty-three cases underwent hilar cholangiocarcinoma radical operation and hepatic artery combined with portal vein resection and reconstruction (combined resection group), while 29 cases of hilar cholangiocarcinoma underwent palliative surgery for treating jaundice in synchronization (palliative operation group). ResultsThe median survivals in combined resection group and palliative operation group was 26.3 and 9.6 months, respectively. The survival rates of 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year between combined resection group and palliative operation group were 84.85% vs. 26.32%, 66.67% vs. 15.79%, and 42.42% vs. 0, respectively, there were significant differences between both groups in survival time and survival rate (t=4.470, P=0.000; χ2=28.338, 20.348, and 15.891, P=0.000). Among of 33 cases in combined resection group, postoperative complications occurred in 9 cases, the rate of complications was 27.27% and the mortality rate in perioperative period was 3.03%; while postoperative complications in palliative operation group occurred in 5 cases, the rate of complications was 17.24%, no case died in the perioperative period. There were no significant difference between both groups in the rate of postoperative complications and the mortality rate in perioperative period (χ2=0.888, P=0.346; χ2=0.893, P=0.345). ConclusionsHepatectomy combined with vascular resection and reconstruction can significantly improve the radical resection (R0) rate of HCCA, and greatly increase the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year survival rates of patients. Furthermore, complications can be controlled, and the mortality rate in perioperative period does not increase.
ObjectiveTo explore the advantages and disadvantages of preoperative biliary drainage, the timing of preoperative biliary drainage, and the characteristics of various drainage methods for resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma.MethodsBy reviewing relevant literatures at home and abroad in the past 20 years, the controversies related to the preoperative biliary drainage, surgical biliary drainage, and various drainage methods for resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma were reviewed.ResultsThere is still a great deal of controversy about whether preoperative bile duct drainage is required for resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma routinely, but there is a consensus on the timing of preoperative biliary drainage, and various drainage methods have their own characteristics.ConclusionsThe main treatment for hilar cholangiocarcinoma is radical surgical resection, but cholestasis is often caused by malignant biliary obstruction, which makes it difficult to manage perioperatively. A large number of prospective studies are needed to provide more evidence for the need for routine preoperative biliary drainage in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma who can undergo resection.