west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "股骨干骨折" 22 results
  • 股内收肌群痉挛致老年严重骨质疏松患者股骨干再骨折一例

    Release date:2017-04-12 11:26 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 股骨干骨折术后不愈合25例临床分析

    【摘 要】 目的 总结股骨干骨折术后不愈合的原因及再手术方法。 方法 1999 年2 月- 2007 年1 月,收治股骨干骨折术后不愈合患者25 例。男18 例,女7 例;年龄27 ~ 61 岁,平均42 岁。车祸伤14 例,坠落伤6 例,跌摔伤5 例。股骨干骨折部位:上段4 例,中段18 例,下段3 例。原固定方法:国产加压钢板内固定12 例,进口AO 加压钢板内固定4 例,髓内钉固定7 例,外固定架固定2 例。入院X 线片检查无连续骨痂,骨折线明显。骨折至本次手术时间8 ~ 16 个月。术中采用AO 股骨交锁髓内钉固定16 例,AO 加压钢板内固定7 例,AO 单管单臂架外固定2 例。 结果 患者术后切口均Ⅰ期愈合。25 例均获随访6 ~ 14 个月,平均9.4 个月。骨折愈合时间为4 ~ 12 个月,平均7.2 个月。根据Tohner-Wrnch 标准证定临床疗效;优14 例,良9 例,差2 例,优良率92%。 结论 采用恰当内固定方式、术中操作仔细、术后进行正确功能锻炼是治疗股骨干骨折术后不愈合的关键。

    Release date:2016-09-01 09:12 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • ELECTROMAGNETIC NAVIGATION INTERLOCKING INTRAMEDULLARY NAIL TECHNOLOGY FOR TREATMENT OF FEMORAL SHAFT FRACTURES

    Objective To explore the value of electromagnetic navigation interlocking intramedullary nail in the treatment of femoral shaft fracture. Methods Between July 2012 and October 2013, 53 cases of femoral shaft fracture were treated. There were 40 males and 13 females, aged 16-52 years (mean, 38.3 years). The causes of injury were traffic accident in 28 cases, falling from height in 11 cases, falling in 7 cases, crush injury in 4 cases, and other in 3 cases. Of 53 cases, there were 3 cases of open fracture (Gustilo I degree) and 50 cases of closed fracture. Fracture was located in the proximal femur in 17 cases, middle femur in 29 cases, and distal femur in 7 cases. According to Winquist classification, 7 cases were rated as type I, 8 cases as typeⅡ, 22 cases as typeⅢ, and 16 cases as type IV; according to AO classification, 18 cases were rated as type 32-A, 28 cases as type 32-B, and 7 cases as type 32-C. The time from injury to operation was 3-11 days (mean, 5 days). Distal interlocking intramedullary nail was implanted using electromagnetic navigation. Results The distal locking nail operation with interlocking intramedullary nail was successfully completed under electromagnetic navigation; the one-time success rate of distal locking nail operation reached 100%; and the locking nail time was 5.0-9.5 minutes (mean, 7.0 minutes). Healing of incision by first intention was obtained after operation, and no complication of skin necrosis, infection, and sinus tract occurred. Fifty-three cases were all followed up 5-12 months (mean, 9 months). One case had hip pain and weaken middle gluteal muscle strength, and the symptoms disappeared after removing the nail. During the follow-up period, no broken nails, nail exit, infection, or re-fracture occurred. All fractures achieved clinical healing, and the healing time was 8-22 weeks (mean, 14.5 weeks). In 49 patients followed up 8 months, the Lysholm score was excellent in 44 cases, good in 4 cases, and acceptable in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate of 98%. Conclusion Electromagnetic navigation system is safe and reliable, with the advantages of high positioning accuracy, short operation time, and no radiation, the clinical application of the system for distal locking nail operation can obtain excellent short-term effectiveness.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 交锁髓内钉动力化治疗股骨干骨折不愈合

    目的 总结交锁髓内钉动力化固定对骨折愈合的影响,分析动力化固定后可达到正常愈合的类型。 方法回顾性分析2005年6月-2010年8月30例初始行静力锁定后再行动力化固定患者临床资料。男25例,女5例;年龄18~60岁,平均34岁。股骨干骨折26例,转子下骨折4例。均为闭合损伤。根据AO分型:A1型2例,A2型2例,A3型1例,B1型5例,B2型6例,B3型2例,C1型8例,C2型4例。根据骨折或不愈合端的力学稳定性和生物活性分型:稳定/增生型8例、稳定/萎缩型5例、不稳定/增生型9例、不稳定/萎缩型8例。于初次静力钉术后6~18周,平均14周后行髓内钉动力化固定。 结果术后患者切口均Ⅰ期愈合。30例均获随访,随访时间6~18个月,平均12个月。24例骨折于动力化固定后3~6个月完全愈合,4例于7~11个月延迟愈合,2例不愈合。3例不稳定/萎缩型患者出现明显股骨短缩,1例不稳定/萎缩型患者出现旋转移位。 结论髓内钉动力化治疗股骨干骨折不愈合疗效确切,但不稳定/萎缩型患者行动力化固定术后并发症较多。

    Release date:2016-08-31 04:05 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 克氏针提拉复位髓内钉固定治疗粉碎性股骨干骨折

    目的 总结克氏针提拉闭合复位、交锁髓内钉内固定治疗粉碎性股骨干骨折的临床疗效。 方法 2008 年4 月- 2010 年3 月,采用克氏针提拉闭合复位、交锁髓内钉内固定治疗新鲜粉碎性股骨干中段骨折23 例。其中男19 例,女4 例;年龄27 ~ 55 岁,平均35 岁。致伤原因:交通事故伤18 例,重物砸伤5 例。左侧10 例,右侧13 例。骨折按Winquist-Hansen 分级:Ⅰ级11 例,Ⅱ级6 例,Ⅲ级3 例,Ⅳ级3 例。受伤至手术时间2 ~ 5 d。 结果 手术时间40 ~ 90 min,平均55 min;术中出血量100 ~ 500 mL,平均310 mL。术后切口均Ⅰ期愈合。23 例均获随访,随访时间13 ~ 30 个月,平均16 个月。X 线片示22 例骨折愈合良好,愈合时间8 ~ 17 个月,平均13 个月;1 例Ⅳ级骨折患者因活动过多,骨折愈合迟缓,经予以制动4 个月后愈合。无深静脉血栓形成、断钉、感染等并发症发生。末次随访时按刘兴炎等股骨干骨折疗效评定标准,获优22 例,良1 例,优良率达100%。 结论 克氏针提拉闭合复位交锁髓内钉内固定治疗粉碎性股骨干骨折,手术方法简便、并发症少、骨折愈合率高。

    Release date:2016-08-31 05:42 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • BIOMECHANICAL IMPACT OF OBLIQUE LOCKING PLATE ON FIXATION OF FEMORAL SHAFT FRACTURES

    ObjectiveTo investigate the biomechanical influence of the oblique locking plate on the fixation of femoral shaft fracture. MethodsForty imitation artificial femur model with mechanical properties similar to human femur were selected and randomly divided into groups A, B, C, and D, 10 in each group; the femur fracture model was made by transverse osteotomy at 15 cm and 17 cm below the lesser trochanter of the femur and fixed with locking plate with 12 holes and cortical bone screws. The plate was placed in the middle of the longitudinal axis of the femur in group A, and was placed at 5, 10, and 15° angle axis in groups B, C, and D respectively. The axial compression, three-point bending, torsion tests were carried out to measure the strain. ResultsWith the compressive load and bending load increasing, the medial and lateral strains were significantly increased in each group (P<0.05); but no significant difference was found in strains under compressive load and bending load among 4 groups (P>0.05). With increasing torque, the strain was significantly increased in each group (P<0.05). At 10 N·m torque, there was no significant difference in the strain values among 4 groups (P>0.05); the strain value was significantly higher in groups C and D than groups A and B (P<0.05) and in group D than group C (P<0.05) at torque of 20 and 50 N·m, but no significant difference was found between groups A and B (P>0.05). ConclusionUnder different stress, the strain will be significantly increased when the plate is placed at >10° angle axis.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Research progress of augmentation plate for femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nail fixation

    ObjectiveTo review the history, current situation, and progress of augmentation plate (AP) for femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nail fixation.MethodsThe results of the clinical studies about the AP in treatment of femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nail fixation in recent years were widely reviewed and analyzed.ResultsThe AP has been successfully applied to femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nail fixation since 1997. According to breakage of the previous nailing, AP is divided into two categories: AP with retaining the previous intramedullary nail and AP with exchanging intramedullary nail. AP is not only suitable for simple nonunion, but also for complex nonunion with severe deformity. Compared with exchanging intramedullary nail, lateral plate, and dual plate, AP has less surgical trauma, shorter healing time, higher healing rate, and faster returning to society. However, there are still some problems with the revision method, including difficulty in bicortical screw fixation, lack of anatomic plate suitable for femoral shaft nonunion, and lack of postoperative function and quality of life assessment.ConclusionCompared with other revision methods, AP could achieve higher fracture healing rate and better clinical prognosis for patients with femoral shaft nonunion. However, whether patients benefit from AP in terms of function and quality of life remain uncertain. Furthermore, high-quality randomized controlled clinical studies are needed to further confirm that AP are superior to the other revision fixations.

    Release date:2019-12-23 09:44 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • COMPARISON OF PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL ANTIROTATION AND RECONSTRUCTION NAIL FOR IPSILATERAL FRACTURES OF HIP AND FEMORAL SHAFT

    Objective To compare the effectiveness of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and reconstruction nail with minimally invasive technique for ipsilateral femoral shaft and extracapsular hip fractures in young and middle-aged patients. Methods Sixty-nine young and middle-aged patients with ipsilateral femoral shaft and extracapsular hip fractures were treated between January 2000 and August 2010, and their data were analyzed retrospectively. Of them, fractures were fixed by reconstruction nail in 44 cases (reconstruction nail group) and by PFNA in 25 cases (PFNA group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, weight, injury cause, fracture type, or disease duration between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The operation time, blood loss, fracture healing time, complications, and functional outcomes were compared between 2 groups to evaluate the effectiveness. Results The operation time and blood loss in the PFNA group were significantly less than those in the reconstruction nail group (P lt; 0.05). The follow-up time was 12-38 months (mean, 20 months ) in the PFNA group and was 12-48 months (mean, 22 months) in the reconstruction nail group. No complication occurred as follows in 2 groups: wound infection, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, breakage of the implants, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, or serious rotation and shortening deformity of lower limbs. In the PFNA group and the reconstruction nail group, 1 patient underwent technical difficulty in nail implant and 7 patients underwent technical difficulty in proximal locking screw, respectively; 3 patients and 6 patients had intra-operative iatrogenic fracture of femoral shaft, respectively; and delayed union of femoral shaft was observed in 1 patient and 2 patients, respectively. The complication rate was 20% (5/25) in the PFNA group and 34% (15/44) in the reconstruction nail group, showing no significant difference (χ2=1.538, P=0.215). No significant difference was found in fracture healing time between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in Harris hip score and Evanich knee score between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion PFNA or reconstruction nail with minimally invasive technique is a good method to treat ipsilateral femoral shaft and extracapsular hip fractures, but the PFNA is superior to the reconstruction nail because of simple operation.

    Release date:2016-08-31 04:24 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • APPLICATION OF AUTO-CONTROL MICRO-MOTION INTRAMEDULLARY LOCKING NAIL IN THE TREATMENTOF FEMORAL SHAFT FRACTURES

    【Abstract】 Objective The auto-control micro-motion intramedullary locking nail (AMLN) is designed, to reducethe incidence of delayed union and non-union of femoral shaft fractures fixed by interlocking intramedullary nails, and toobserve the cl inical effect of self-design AMLN in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures. Methods The distal and promixalnails were connected by the micro-motion locking structure, which could cause 1.0-1.5 mm axial micro-motion between fracture gaps. It could produce physical stimulus and conduction between fracture gaps in the course of fracture union. From December 2003 to May 2006, 32 cases of femoral shaft fractures were treated with AMLN, including 21 males and 11 females with the average age of 31.2 years (ranging from 20 years to 43 years). The trauma resulted from fall wounds in 3 cases, crash injuries in 1 case and car accidents in 28 cases. Twenty-nine cases were fresh fractures in different parts of the femoral shaft with transverse, obl ique, spiral and comminuted fractures of type I, II, III and IV. Three cases were old non-union fractures. The fresh fractures were treated by closed AMLN fixation, while the old fractures were treated by open AMLN nails after routine implantation of self bone. Results All the 32 cases were followed up for the average time of 11.5 months (rangeing from 8 months to 22 months). The X-ray films showed the fractures were healed 4.0 to 7.5 months after the operation, with the mean time of 5.1 months, and no break of the nail happened. One nail mildly bent in the comminuted fracture, and 2 patients felt sl ightly unwell at the needl ing point. According to the Klemm criterion for function, 26 cases were excellent, 5 good, 1 fair, and the choiceness rate was 96.88%. Conclusion With a suitable design, AMLN is easy to perform and helpful to quicken fracture union, and it is effective to treat femoral shaft fractures.

    Release date:2016-09-01 09:12 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • FEMORAL SHAFT FRACTURE TREATED WITH CLOSED REDUCTION AND INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING

    【Abstract】 Objective To discuss the techniques and advantages of closed reduction and intramedullary nail ing intreating femoral shaft fracture without cannulated femoral reamer. Methods From January 2006 to June 2007, 24 cases offemoral shaft fracture were treated with closed reduction and intramedullary nail ing. Among them, there were 14 males and 10 females, with the average age of 38.3 years (ranging from 18 years to 63 years), with 7 left legs and 17 right legs. The average course of the disease was 7.6 days (ranging from 3 days to 20 days). According to the AO typing, there were 5 cases of type A, 6 of type B, 7 of type C1, 2 of type C2 and 4 of type C3. Closed reduction was achieved with manipulation and reaming of femoral canal was instructed by fluoroscopy. Results The operation time lasted from 100 minutes to 170 minutes, with the average time of 128.3 minutes. One patient was given a transfusion of 400 mL, and others were not. Twenty cases were followed up with the average time of 13.1 months (ranging from 6 months to 24 months). A mild to large amount of bony callus was showed on X-ray films 6 to 12 weeks postoperatively. Walking without crutches began at the average week of 22.2 (ranging from 15 to 30) postoperatively. Range of motion of the knee was 0° to 145.5°. No infection or break of the internal fixator occurred. Myositis ossificans with pain and insufficient flexion of hip (120°) happened in 1 case and the pain disappeared after non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs were taken. Nonsymptomatic myositis ossificans occurred in 2 cases and no treatment was needed. Conclusion Closed reductionand intramedullary nail ing can help to protect the blood supply of fracture fragments and provide central fixation. The operation process will be more compl icated if cannulated femoral reamer is not available.

    Release date:2016-09-01 09:12 Export PDF Favorites Scan
3 pages Previous 1 2 3 Next

Format

Content