目的:观察经鼻内镜检查引导下通过改良三腔二囊管加沙氏导丝引导支撑,结合内镜下硬化剂治疗肝硬化食管静脉曲张破裂出血的疗效。方法:14例肝硬化食道静脉曲张破裂出血患者经过经鼻内镜检查后通过改良的三腔二囊管加沙氏导丝支撑下,结合内镜下硬化剂治疗食管静脉曲张破裂出血,观察止血效果以及并发症。结果:14例患者均1次止血成功,1例患者治疗后8h再次出血,行急诊TIPSS手术治疗。主要反应为胸骨后疼痛,持续时间为2～7d,对症处理后消失,3、6个月后再次复查食道胃底曲张静脉明显改善,3例10d左右行内镜下再次硬化治疗(因第1次硬化剂量少或治疗不完全)。结论:经鼻内镜检查行改良三腔二囊管加沙氏导丝引导支撑下,结合内镜下硬化剂治疗肝硬化食管静脉曲张破裂出血是一种有效的治疗方法。
目的:讨论胃镜检查中更加舒适的一种镇静镇痛方法。方法:芬太尼-异丙酚为Ⅰ组,咪唑安定-异丙酚组为Ⅱ组。观察记录各组术中的反应、胃镜操作时间、麻醉药物起效时间、苏醒时间和清醒时间,检查前中后BP、HR和SpO2的变化,及术后问卷调查。结果:Ⅰ组药物的起效快,受检者苏醒及清醒时间短,术中不适反应少,与Ⅱ组比较有统计学意义(Plt;0.01)。结论:镇静无痛苦胃镜检查中芬太尼-异丙酚联合用药更舒适。
【摘要】 目的 探讨经鼻胃镜在食管狭窄扩张和支架置入术中的作用。 方法 2007年10月-2009年3月对28例癌性食管狭窄以及并发食管-气管瘘的患者行PENTAX（EG-1580K）超细经鼻电子胃镜检查，计算插入深度，并进行扩张和支架治疗，在胃镜直视下调节输送器内支架上端的位置，观察扩张效果、支架放置成功率、定位的准确性以及并发症情况。 结果 全部患者均行扩张治疗，效果良好，支架一次性放置全部成功，定位准确，自膨满意，最狭窄处的内径由（4.8±1.2）mm扩至（12.5±1.5）mm，食管气管瘘被覆盖治疗效果好，患者的吞咽困难评级由3.25±0.58降至0.94±0.59。 结论 在食管狭窄扩张和支架置入术中应用经鼻超细胃镜患者依从性好，方法简便，安全有效。【Abstract】 Objective To explore the role of nasal endoscopy in the esophagostenosis expansion and esophageal stent. Methods PENTAX (EG-1580K) ultrafine nasal endoscopy was used in 28 patients (October 2007-March 2009) with esophageal cancer complicated with esophagostenosis and fistula to check the e-calculated insertion depth, stent expansion and the average diameter expansion. The endoscopy was carried under the direct vision with the location of the top bracket in order to ensure the accurate stent placement, all without X-ray assist. The success rates of stent placement, positioning accuracy, as well as complications were evaluated. Results The expansion treatments were successful in all patients with one-off operation. The narrowest part increased from (4.9±1.6) mm to (12.7±1.5) mm, and the esophageal fistula was covered. The rating of dysphagia decreased from 3.15±0.68 to 0.91±0.49. Conclusion Nasal endoscopy is simple, safe and effective in the treatment of ultrafine expansion for esophagostenosis and stent implantation with good compliance.
Objective To summarize the research progress of magnetic-controlled capsule endoscopy (MCCE) in application for gastric diseases. Method By searching the literatures in domestic and foreign database, the latest literatures on the application of MCCE for gastric diseases were reviewed. Results Compared with traditional gastroscopy, the diagnostic accuracy of MCCE was comparable to that of traditional gastroscopy, and there was no serious complications had been reported in use of MCCE. In addition, MCCE had advantages of comfort, safety, and prevention of cross-infection. However, it could not be used for biopsy and treatment. With the constant technical innovation, application of MCCE would be more extensive in future. Conclusions The diagnostic accuracy of MCCE in gastric diseases is high. Compared with traditional gastroscopy, it has more advantages. The shortcomings of MCCE can be improved with the development of science and technology, and it can be used for the initial screening of gastric diseases.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical effect of lidocaine mucilage diluent and simethicone emulsion in gastroscopy examination, in order to provide effective drugs for gastroscopy. MethodsWe selected 201 outpatients and the inpatients who underwent gastroscopic examination between August and October 2014 as the research subjects. Based on the kind of drug, the patients were randomly divided into research group (n=100) and control group (n=101). Patients in the research group accepted lidocaine mucilage diluent, while those in the control group received simethicone emulsion. Then we observed and compared the definition of gastroscopy, adverse drug reactions, examination time and drug price between the two groups. ResultsThe frequencies of high, medium, and low definition of gastroscopy were respectively 63.00%, 34.00% and 3.00% among the patients in the research group, and 69.31%, 26.73% and 3.96% among patients in the control group; there was no significant differences between the two groups (Z=-0.854, P=0.393). The adverse reaction rates, testing time, and drug prices for the two groups were 0.99% vs.1.00% (P>0.05), (6.5±2.1) minutes vs.(6.6±2.0) minutes (t=0.458, P>0.05), and RMB (9.0±1.2) yuan vs.(42.8±2.8) yuan (t=227.644, P<0.05), respectively. ConclusionLidocaine mucilage diluent and simethicone emulsion both have good effect for gastroscopic examination, which can raise the gastroscopic definition, promote endoscopic operation and observation by doctors, shorten examination time, and reduce adverse drug reactions. Both are of great value in clinical application, and lidocaine hydrochloride mucilage diluent is cheaper, which can be widely used and promoted clinically.