【摘要】目的 探讨胃食反流管病(GERD)患者牙周疾病的发生情况,以及GERD与牙周炎之间的关系。方法2008年7月2009年6月对360例GERD患者,396名正常人进行牙周健康状况和全身一般情况检查,牙周检查以社区牙周指数(CPI)和附着丧失(AL)作为诊断标准。结果GERD患者牙周炎患病率及严重程度、牙列缺损率及缺牙数目均高于正常人, GERD患者无牙颌比例高于正常人。结论长期患GERD可能是牙周病的危险因素。
Objective We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of H.pylori infection and the prevalence of cagA+ strains in patients with and without Barrett’s esophagus. Methods A full literature search to February 2008 was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE and EMbase databases to identify case-control studies or cohort studies evaluating the prevalence of H.pylori in patients with or without Barrett’s esophagus. Summary odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated by RevMan 4.2.8. Results Nineteen studies were identified (16 case-controlled studies and 3 cohort studies). In case controlled studies, the prevalence of H.pylori infection significantly decreased in patients with Barrett’s esophagus as compared subjects with normal endoscopic appearance, with a overall OR of 0.56 (95%CI 0.40 to 0.79). The prevalence of H.pylori infection was no statistically significant difference in patients with Barrett’s esophagus as compared to those with gastroesophageal reflux disease, with a overall OR of 0.86 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.00). In cohort studies, the prevalence of H. pylori was no statistically significant difference in patients with Barrett’s esophagus as compared to patients with normal endoscopic appearance or patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, with a overall OR of 1.12 (95%CI 0.77 to 1.61) and 1.10 (95%CI 0.32 to 3.83). When the analysis was stratified by the status of cagA, the prevalence of cagA positive strains significantly decreased in patients with Barrett’s esophagus as compared both to subjects with normal endoscopic appearance with OR 0.30 and 95% CI 0.12 to 0.74, and to those with gastroesophageal reflux disease (OR 0.55; 95%CI 0.33 to 0.94). Irrespective of the presence of intestinal metaplasia, similar magnitude for the reduction of H.pylori infection was observed for patients with Barrett’s esophagus and those with normal endoscopic appearance. While accompared with the presence of intestinal metaplasia, Barrett’s esophagus was associated with a significantly reduction as compared to the patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (OR 0.81, 95%CI 0.68 to 0.98). When stratified analyses were performed, a significant reduction of H.pylori infection was observed only in patients with long-segment Barrett’s esophagus (OR 0.54; 95%CI 0.35 to 0.82), but not in those with short-segment Barrett’s esophagus (OR 0.72; 95%CI 0.43 to 1.20). Conclusion This meta-analysis indicated that the prevalence of H.pylori infection, especially the prevalence of cagA positive strains was significantly lower in patients with Barrett’s esophagus than in subjects with normal endoscopic appearance. However, the prevalence of H. pylori infection was no statistical difference in patients with Barrett’s esophagus as compared to those with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Colonization with cagA positive strains may be protective against the formation of Barrett’s esophagus.
ObjectiveTo summarize basic research progress and current status of clinical diagnosis and therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease. MethodRelated literatures were collected to review the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis and therapy of gastroesophageal reflux disease. ResultsGastroesophageal reflux disease was caused by many factors, such as hiatus hernia, hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter pressure, acid pocket, prolonged esophageal clearance, and delayed gastric emptying. Extra-esophageal symptoms was a common clinical presentation to gastroesophageal reflux disease. The diagnosis methods for gastroesophageal reflux disease included the symptom observation, gastroscopy examination, 24 h pH monitoring of esophageal, proton pump inhibitor test, questionnaire of gastroesophageal reflux disease and so on. The laparoscopic fundoplication could essentially treat the pathophysiologic abnormalities of gastroesophageal reflux disease, which had an obvious curative effect and wide application prospect. ConclusionPathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy of gastroesophageal reflux disease are associated with multiple factors, which is still controversial and remains to be further studied.
Objective To analyze the relationship between neuroticism and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) using the Mendelian randomization (MR) method. Methods Exposure and outcome data were downloaded from the Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) database in August 2023, including summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for neuroticism (n=374 323) and GERD (n=602 604). MR was conducted using the weighted median method, MR-Egger method, inverse variance weighted method, weighted mode method, and simple mode method. The causal relationship between the two was assessed using odds ratio (OR), and sensitivity analyses were performed to ensure the accuracy of the results. ResultsNeuroticism was associated with an increased risk of GERD [OR=1.229, 95%CI (1.186, 1.274), P<0.001]. Similarly, GERD was associated with an increased risk of neuroticism [OR=1.786, 95%CI (1.623, 1.965), P<0.001]. Conclusion There is a bidirectional causal relationship between neuroticism and gastroesophageal reflux disease.
ObjectiveTo evaluate laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery for treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).MethodsA total of 20 patients with GERD and COPD underwent laparoscopic anti-reflux procedure in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2016 to December 2017. The reflux diagnostic questionnaire, pulmonary function, COPD assessment test scale, 24-hour esophageal pH-impedance monitoring and esophageal pressure measurement were performed in all patients. All drug-refractory patients underwent the laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery. After 12 months follow-up, the parameters of COPD and GERD were evaluated again.ResultsTwenty patients with COPD and GERD were successfully performed laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery, no hernia patch repair patient and death patient occurred. There was no esophageal rupture, bleeding, infection, and other serious postoperative complications. Although 8 patients had the different degree dysphagia and 10 patients had the different degree abdominal distention, they all relieved themselves. Twenty patients with GERD and COPD were followed up for 1 year. Compared with the values before treatment, the GERD symptom score, reflux times, DeMeester score, and COPD assessment test score of the patients were significantly reduced (P<0.05), the lower esophageal sphincter pressure, percentage of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) in the predicted value and FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) were significantly increased (P<0.05) after the treatment. According to the grading standard of The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD), 5 cases of grade Ⅰ, 2 cases of grade Ⅱ and 1 case of grade Ⅲ were cured; 1 case of grade Ⅰ, 4 cases of grade Ⅱ and 4 cases of grade Ⅲ were improved; 1 case of grade Ⅰ, 1 case of grade Ⅱ and 1 case of grade Ⅳ were ineffective. The total effective rate was 85% (17/20).ConclusionsCOPD is closely related to GERD. Laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery can not only effectively treat GERD, but also markedly improve COPD.
ObjectiveTo explore and analyze the clinical diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) which is manifested mainly as stubborn pharyngitis. MethodsFrom February 2010 to December 2012, 79 cases were diagnosed as stubborn pharyngitis and otolaryngology standard treatment was invalid. GERD questionnaire ratings and conventional endoscopy were performed for patients with obvious manifestations of stubborn pharyngitis shown on the laryngoscopy. They were randomly divided into treatment group (n=40) and control group (n=39). Patients in the treatment group accepted esomeprazole 40 mg, qd, for 12 weeks; and patients in the control group had sucralfate suspension 15 mL bid for 12 weeks. At the three observation points which are 4, 8, and 12 weeks after treatment began, clinical symptom score and pharyngeal inflammatory changes were recorded, and at the end of the treatment, all patients underwent endoscopy, and esophageal mucosal healing was observed. ResultsThere was no significant difference between the two groups of patients in terms of general data. After the treatment, the symptom scores were significantly decreased in the treatment group at the three observation points (P<0.05). The same situation happened also in the control group, but the difference was not significant (P>0.05). The symptom scores between the two groups after treatment were significantly different (P<0.5). And the effective rate for local pharyngeal infection was 83.9% and 41.4% in the treatment group and the control group respectively (P<0.05). ConclusionSome atypical GERDs feature by the symptoms of stubborn pharyngitis. Clinically, patients with long-term stubborn pharyngitis should be screened to exclude the possibility of GERD. esomeprazole therapy can significantly improve the pharyngitis symptoms and relieve local inflammation.
ObjectiveTo analyze the effect and prognosis of laparoscopic patch repair of esophageal hiatal hernia.MethodsFrom October 2014 to January 2019, 100 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease undergoing laparoscopic esophageal hiatus hernia repair were randomly divided into the patch group and the non-patch group. All patients underwent laparoscopic repair of esophageal hiatal hernia plus fundoplication (Nissen’s method). On that basis, the patients in the patch group used special mesh for esophageal hiatal hernia repair, while the ones in the non-patch group did not. All the patients were followed up for a long time. The operative effect, postoperative complication rate, recurrence rate, and satisfaction rate of the patients between the two groups were compared.ResultsA total of 98 patients were successfully followed up for more than one year, including 68 in the patch group and 30 in the non-patch group. One year after surgery, the differences between the patch group and the non-patch group in the improvements of reflux attack, heartburn, dysphagia, and food intake were statistically significant (P<0.05); there was no significant difference between the patch group and the non-patch group in satisfaction rate (82.4% vs. 73.3%, P>0.05); the differences in recurrence rate (2.9% vs. 26.7%) and incidence of dysphagia (47.0% vs. 6.7%) between the patch group and the non-patch group were statistically significant (P<0.05).ConclusionFor the patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease caused by esophageal hiatal hernia, the laparoscopic repair of esophageal hiatal hernia + Nissen fundoplication on the basis of reasonable selection of special mesh for esophageal hiatal hernia can obtain satisfactory clinical effect.
ObjectiveTo investigate the causal relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with its typical symptoms (snoring and daytime sleepiness) by using Mendelian randomization (MR). MethodsThe inverse-variance weighted method was used as the main analysis method to assess the causal effect. Sensitivity and pleiotropy analyses were carried out using leave-one-out and MR-Egger analysis, and then heterogeneity tests were conducted. ResultsIn the MR analysis, genetically predicted GERD was associated with a greater risk of OSA (IVW: OR=1.528, 95%CI 1.374 to 1.699, P=5.315E‒15). Additional MR results were consistent with the IVW results, and no pleiotropy or heterogeneity was found. We also discovered a significant causal relationship between GRED and snoring (IVW: OR=0.959, 95%CI 0.949 to 0.969, P=1.507E‒15), and daytime sleepiness (IVW: OR=1.024, 95%CI 1.021 to 1.036, P=4.580E‒5), with no evidence of pleiotropy. ConclusionThe MR study supports a causal effect between GERD and OSA with its typical symptoms (daytime sleepiness and snoring).
Objective To investigate the inhibitory effects and related mechanisms of NOD like receptor protein 3 (NLRP-3) inflammasome inhibitor MCC950 on oxidative stress, inflammation, and pyroptosis in human esophageal epithelial cells (HEECs). MethodsHEECs cells were passaged and divided into blank control group, acid stimulation group (stimulated 3 times a day with pH 4 acidic medium for 15 minutes each time, cultured for 48 hours), bile salt stimulation group (stimulated 3 times a day with 400 μmol/L bile salt mixture for 15 minutes each time, cultured for 48 hours), lipopolysaccharide (LPS) group (stimulated with 10 μL of 100 ng/mL LPS for 48 hours), MCC950 group (stimulated with 10 μL of 7.5 ng/mL MCC950 for 4 hours, then stimulated with acid, bile hydrochloric acid, and LPS for 48 hours), and N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) group (stimulated with 1 mmol/L NAC for 4 hours, then stimulated with acid, bile hydrochloric acid, and LPS 48 hours). Three culture dishes were used in each group to detect the mRNA and protein expression levels of oxidative protein/antioxidant protein [Nox-4 (NADPH oxidase 4), nuclearfactor erythroidderived 2-like 2 (Nrf-2), heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1)], NLRP-3 signaling pathway [NLRP-3/caspase-1/intereukin (IL)-1β/IL-18], and cell apoptosis pathway [caspase-4/caspase-5/GSDMD] using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Western blotting experiments. Cell apoptosis were observed through Hoechst33342 staining. ResultsMCC950 intervention (0.023) and NAC intervention (0.031) effectively inhibited HEECs apoptosis induced by acid (0.042), bile salt (0.047), and LPS (0.054). The results of RT-PCR experiments showed that MCC950 intervention and NAC intervention significantly inhibited the high expression of Nox-4 mRNA (MCC950: 1.68; NAC: 1.62) in HEECs cells induced by acid (2.40), bile salt (3.07), and LPS (3.52), and significantly upregulated the mRNA expression levels of antioxidant proteins Nrf-2 (MCC950: 0.72; NAC: 0.57) and HO-1 (MCC950: 0.74; NAC: 0.57). MCC950 intervention and antioxidant NAC intervention effectively inhibited the mRNA expression levels of NLRP-3 (MCC950: 1.58; NAC: 1.47), ASC (MCC950: 1.56; NAC: 1.93), caspase-1 (MCC950: 1.64; NAC: 1.96), IL-1β (MCC950: 1.66; NAC: 1.82), IL-18 (MCC950: 1.58; NAC: 1.84) in HEECs cells induced by acid stimulated, bile salt stimulated, and LPS. MCC950 intervention and antioxidant NAC intervention effectively inhibited the mRNA expression levels of apoptosis pathway markers such as caspase-4 (MCC950: 1.51; NAC: 1.61), caspase-5 (MCC950: 1.38; NAC: 1.64), and GSDMD (MCC950: 1.41; NAC: 1.54) induced by acid stimulation, bile salt stimulation, and LPS in HEECs cells. The electrophoresis results were similar with RT-PCR. ConclusionAcid, bile salt, and LPS can all induce the overexpression of oxidative stress markers in HEECs, reduce the expression of antioxidant proteins, and activate the NLRP-3 inflammasome signaling pathway and cell pyroptosis pathway, promoting cellular inflammatory damage, but MCC950 has a protective effect.
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common, chronic disease of the digestive system. In recent years, endoluminal therapy for GERD has become a research hotspot. The reduced anti-reflux barrier function plays an important role in the occurrence of GERD. Peroral endoscopic therapy can improve the defect of anti-reflux barrier function. According to the involved layers, the endoscopic therapy can be classified as transmural which represented by transoral incisionless and transoral incisionless fundoplication, and non-transmural which represented by peroral endoscopic cardia constriction and radiofrequency ablation. This article reviews the progress of endoscopic non-full-thickness therapy for GERD in recent years, and introduces the action mechanism of peroral endoscopic therapy of GERD, the therapy of the mucosal layer and muscle layer of anti-reflux barrier, and other treatments. The purpose is to provide a reference for further exploring suitable endoscopic treatment of GERD.