目的 了解单纯胆囊切除术患者围手术期抗菌药物的使用情况及合理性，促进临床合理用药。 方法 对昆明医学院第二附属医院2004年7～9月期间出院的661例单纯胆囊切除术患者应用抗菌药物的合理性进行回顾性分析。结果 胆囊切除患者抗菌药物应用共涉及9大类39个品种，使用率为100%。预防用药380例（57.49%），其中单用38例(10.00%)，平均用药6.55 d，平均住院时间10.79 d； 两联281例(73.95%)，平均用药6.49 d，平均住院时间12.30 d； 三联57例(15.00%)，平均用药6.52 d，平均住院时间11.75 d； 四联4例(1.05%)，平均用药6.75 d，平均住院时间9.00 d。感染治疗281例(42.51%)，其中单用10例(3.56%)，平均用药9.60 d，平均住院时间15.10 d； 两联206例(73.31%)，平均用药11.25 d，平均住院时间15.79 d； 三联56例(19.93%)，平均用药15.23 d，平均住院时间15.23 d； 四联9例(3.20%)，平均用药13.00 d，平均住院时间21.78 d。结论 单纯胆囊切除术患者抗菌药物使用存在一些不合理现象，应按围手术期给药方案进行。加强抗菌药物使用的管理和监督，不仅减少耐药菌株及不良反应的产生，而且对降低医药费用具有积极的意义。
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility, safety, cost, and patient satisfaction of ambulatory laparo-scopic cholecystectomy(ALC). MethodsThe clinical data of patients who divided into ALC group(678 cases) and in-patient laparoscopic cholecystectomy(IPLC) group(1 534 cases) in our hospital from April 2011 to December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The operative time, conversion rate, complication rate, hospitalization time, cost of hospi-talization, rehospitalization rate, and patient satisfaction were analyzed and evaluated. ResultsThere were no significant differences of the operative time, postoperative complication rate, and rehospitalization rate between the 2 groups(P > 0.05). The conversion rate(0.44%), and hospitalization time[(1.2±0.5)d] of the ALC group were significantly lower or shorter than those of IPLC group[3.19%, (4.8±1.3) d], P < 0.05. The direct, indirect health care costs, and the total costs of the ALC group were (6 555.6±738.7), (230.0±48.0), and (8 856.0±636.0) yuan, respec-tively; and lower than those of the IPLC group[(7 863.71, 014.6), (973.0±136.5), and(8 856.0±636.0)yuan], P < 0.05. ConclusionALC is safe and feasible, and could shorten the hospitalization time, lower the medical cost, speed up the bed turnover, and increase the efficiency in the use of health resource.
目的探讨腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗胆囊及胆总管结石的临床疗效。 方法回顾性分析2010年1月至2013年1月期间收治于笔者所在科室的96例胆囊及胆总管结石患者的临床资料，根据手术方式分为开腹组、腹腔镜联合胆道镜＋T管引流术组和腹腔镜联合胆道镜＋放置鼻胆管一期缝合组3组。对3组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、肛门排气时间、住院时间、残石率、复发率、并发症发生率、手术有效率及术后淀粉酶和肝功能指标水平进行对比分析。 结果微创手术组与开腹组比较，患者的出血量、肛门排气时间、住院时间、残石率、复发率及并发症发生率均减少、缩短或降低，同时手术的有效率提高（P＜0.05）；腹腔镜联合胆道镜＋放置鼻胆管一期缝合组术后淀粉酶和肝功能指标的水平较其他2组明显降低（P＜0.05）。 结论微创手术创伤小，残石率及复发率低，并发症少，患者术后恢复快，是一种安全有效的治疗方式，值得临床推广应用。
The authors invrstigated whenther samll dose of ursodeoxycholic acif treatment influences biliary concentration, nucleation time and gallbladder empting. 3 patients with cholesferd gallstones receired 400 mg ursodeoxychilic acid per prior to cholecystectomy. Treatment with small dose of ursodeoxycholic acid decreased the gallbladder chlesterol saturation index and prolonged the nucleation time ,bur had no effect on gallbladder empyting. We bilieve that snall dose of ursodeoxyxholic acis mat prevent the gallstone formation by decreasing xholecterol saturation index and lengthening the nucleation time.
ObjectiveTo explore technical essentials and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) guided by gallbladder ampulla localization on an imaginary clock for cholecystitis.MethodsA retrospective study of 8 707 continuous patients with mild cholecystitis who underwent LC from July 1998 to February 2018 at a single institution was conducted. Among them, 3 168 patients were treated by the traditional LC from July 1998 to February 2007 (a traditional LC group), 5 539 patients were treated by the LC with the guidance of the gallbladder ampulla localization on an imaginary clock from March 2007 to February 2018 (a gallbladder ampulla localization group). The conversion to open surgery, bile duct injury, return to the operating room due to postoperative massive abdominal bleeding, bile leakage without bile duct injury, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative hospital stays were compared between the traditional LC group and the gallbladder ampulla localization group.ResultsThere were no significant differences in the gender, age, course of disease, and type of cholecystitis between these two groups (P>0.050). The rates of conversion to open surgery, bile duct injury, return to the operating room due to postoperative massive abdominal bleeding, bile leakage without bile duct injury and the operative time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hospital stays in the traditional LC group were 3.00% (95/3 168), 0.13% (4/3 168), 0.09% (3/3 168), 0.03% (1/3 168), (43.6±12.6) min, (18.7±3.3) mL, (3.6±2.7) d, respectively, which in the gallbladder ampulla localization group were 0 (0/5 539), 0 (0/5 539), 0 (0/5 539), 0 (0/5 539), (32.2±10.5) min, (12.4±3.5) mL, (3.5±2.8) d, respectively. The differences of conversion to open surgery, bile duct injury, return to the operating room due to postoperative massive abdominal bleeding rates, and the operative time and intraoperative blood loss were statistically significant between these two groups (P<0.050). The differences of the bile leakage without bile duct injury rate and postoperative hospital stays were not statistically significant between the two groups (P>0.050).ConclusionThis study shows that gallbladder ampulla localization on an imaginary clock is useful for ductal identification so as to reduce bile duct injury and improve safety of LC in case of no conversion to open surgery.
目的探讨腹腔镜与开腹胆囊切除术对患者肝功能及免疫功能的影响。 方法根据手术方式将84例胆囊良性病变患者分为腹腔镜胆囊切除术组（LC组，50例）及开腹胆囊切除术组（OC组，34例），比较2组患者手术前后肝功能及免疫功能指标的变化。 结果2组患者肝功能在手术前后不同时间点的差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；LC组患者术后免疫功能各指标与术前比较无明显变化（P＞0.05），OC组CD3+、CD4+及CD4+/CD8+在术后1 d及3 d均较术前明显降低（P＜0.05），术后7 d恢复至术前水平（P＞0.05）。 结论LC术可引起患者术后肝功能短暂异常，但对免疫功能无明显影响，可作为胆囊切除的首选术式。
Objective In order to study the mechanism of cholesterol gallstone formation through rabbit model which was induced by high cholesterol diet (HCD)Methods the activities of the high density lipoprotein receptor (HDLR) and low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) of hepatocytes were investigated. Results The results were as follows: The HDLR activity increased significantly after taking HCD for one week, at the same time, the LDLR activity only increased slightly. Thereafter, the activities of HDLR and LDLR all decreased markedly. As the time of animals taking HCD went on, serum total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and hepatic cholesterol increased, but bile acids of biliary tract decreased gradually. Conclusion The results suggest that the changes of HDLR and LDLR activities of hepatocytes had no significant effect on bile cholesterol and the decreased HDLR and LDLR activities may cause the reduction some of substrate for bile acids synthesise and play an important role in the formation of gallstone.
ObjectiveTo compare the effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) combined with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis in elderly patients and non-elderly patients. MethodsThe clinical data of 185 cases of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis who treated in our hospital from September 2010 to November 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. Then the 185 cases of holecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis were divided into elderly patients group (n=74) and the non-elderly patients group (n=111). The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative exhaust time, postoperative activity time, abdominal drainage time, postoperative hospital stay, total hospital stay, hospitalization cost, incidence of complications, unplanned analgesia, stone-free rate, rate of conversion to laparotomy, recurrence of stone, and mortality were compared between the two groups. Results① Intraoperative and postoperative indexes. No significant difference was noted in operative time and intraoperative blood loss (P > 0.050), but the postoperative exhaust time, postoperative activity time, abdominal drainage time, postoperative hospital stay, total hospital stay, hospitalization cost, and ratio of indwelling T tube of elderly patients group were all higher or longer than corresponding index of non-elderly patients group (P < 0.050). ② Postoperative complications and unplanned analgesia. There was no striking discrepancy in incidence of complications (including biliary leakage, peritonitis, haemorrhage, vomit, ectoralgia, and fever), and Clavien-Dindo grade (P > 0.050), except unplanned analgesia (P=0.007), the rate of unplanned analgesia in elderly patients group was higher than that of non-elderly patients group. ③Surgical effect. There was no significant difference in the stone-free rate, rate of conversion to laparotomy, and rate of recurrence of stone between the 2 groups (P > 0.050). ConclusionLC+LCBDE is also safe and effective in treatment of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis in elderly patients, it's worthy to be expanded and be used broadly.