目的 探讨螺旋CT双期薄层增强扫描对胰头癌可切除性的评估价值。方法 回顾性分析24例经螺旋CT双期薄层增强扫描胰头癌的CT表现，观察肿块对邻近器官或组织侵犯情况，以及有无远处器官和淋巴结转移，据此判断肿块能否切除，并将其结果与手术病理结果相对照。结果 螺旋CT判断胰头癌可切除的敏感性为90.9%，特异性为84.6%，阳性预测值为83.3%，阴性预测值为91.7%，准确性为87.5%。结论 螺旋CT双期薄层增强扫描判断胰头癌可切除性的价值较高，对外科医生选择最佳治疗方案有较大的帮助。
ObjectiveTo compare surgical safety and postoperative efficacy of total mesopancreas excision (TMpE) with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and standard PD (Whipple).MethodsA total of 123 patients underwent PD in the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from August 2013 to December 2017 were included, including 47 patients with pancreatic head carcinoma and 76 patients with periampullary carcinoma, then were divided into a TMpE group and a Whipple group respectively. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization time, postoperative recovery time of gastrointestinal function, postoperative complications, and postoperative survival of patients with the same site between the Whipple group and the TMpE group were retrospectively compared.Results① There were no significant differences in the baseline data between the TMpE group and the Whipple group in the pancreatic head carcinoma and periampullary carcinoma (P>0.05). ② For the patients with pancreatic head carcinoma, there were no significant differences in the operative time, postoperative hospitalization time, and postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery time between the TMpE group and the Whipple group (P>0.05), but the intraoperative blood loss in the TMpE group was significantly higher than that in the Whipple group (P=0.038); For the patients with periampullary carcinoma, the above indexes had no significant differences between the TMpE group and the Whipple group (P>0.05). ③ The total incidence of complications in the TMpE group was significantly higher than that in the Whipple group for the patients with pancreatic head carcinoma (χ2=6.595, P=0.010), which had no significant difference between the TMpE group and the Whipple group for the patients with periampullary carcinoma (P>0.05). ④ The cumulative survival curve in the TMpE group was better than that in the Whipple group for the patients with pancreatic head carcinoma (χ2=9.597, P=0.002), which had no significant difference between the TMpE group and the Whipple group for the patients with periampullary carcinoma (χ2=0.844, P=0.358).ConclusionsFor patients with pancreatic head cancer, comparing with standard Whipple, although TMpE PD increases intraoperative blood loss and overall incidence of complications, it could significantly improve long-term survival and there are no significant differences in postoperative recovery time and operative safety between Whipple and TMpE; For patients with periampullary carcinoma, there are no significant differences in surgical safety, long-term survival rate, and survival time between TMpE and Whipple.
Forty-five pancreatoduodenectomies had been performed in our hospital from 1981 to 1994, of which 35 cases were diagnosed as carcinomas of Vater’s ampulla or pancreatic head, and 10 (cases) as benign lesions. Through analysis of misdiagnosed cases, the authors emphasize that it is important to take correct history of jaundiced patients in detail according to the character of the jaundice and associated symptoms before any operation done. Secondly, all clinical materials must be thoroughly collected and special examinations for diagnosis should be chosen scientifically to avoid relying only on one sort of examination result as diagnostic standard. Thirdly, during operation the area of pancreatic head should be explored carefully and any lesions in doubt should be examined pathologically by puncture biopsy and frozen section to avoid misdiagnosis and thus performing pancreatoduodenectomy.
目的探讨如何减少胰十二指肠切除术后并发症及提高胰头及壶腹周围癌的疗效。方法总结我院41例胰头及壶腹周围癌患者行胰十二指肠切除术治疗的经验。结果癌肿切除率为17.7%，手术并发症发生率为26.8%，手术死亡率为14.6%。而1990年后仅发生2例且无胆、胰瘘发生，亦无死亡。结论应用胰肠、胆肠吻合口处双管减压引流，防止了术后胰、胆瘘的发生，是降低并发症及死亡率的重要手段。
Objective To evaluate the long-term efficacy of extended and standard surgery for carcinoma of head of pancreas by using meta-analysis. Methods Related articls （1990-2012） were searched in Pubmed， WOS， Embase， WanFang， SinoMed， and CNKI. Study on quality of these literatures were evaluated by using the Jadad score. The patients with pancreatic head carcinoma underwent extended radical resection and standard radical resection were classified to treatment group and control group， respectively. The mortality， morbidity， and survival rates of 1-， 3-， and 5-year after operation in the two groups were evaluated by using meta-analysis. Results A total of 11 studies fitted the selection crit-eria， including 744 patients. Among them 357 cases were in standard radical resection group and 387 cases in the extended radical resection group. The results of meta-analysis showed that： ①The morbidity after operation did not significantly differed between the extended radical resection group and standard radical resection group （OR=1.360， 95% CI=0.990-1.870， P=0.050）. ②The mortality of the two groups did not significantly differed （OR=0.870， 95% CI=0.430-1.760，P=0.700）. ③There were no significant differences in survival rates of 1-， 3-， and 5-year between the two groups （OR=0.880， 95% CI=0.450-1.720， P=0.710；OR=0.940， 95% CI=0.590-1.480，P=0.710；OR=1.000， 95% CI=0.600-1.67， P=1.000）. Conclusion Compared with standard radical resection， extended radical resection can not improve the survival rates of 1-， 3-， and 5-year after operation， and can’t reduce the mortality and morbidity after operation
Objective To determine the safety and efficacy of surgical biliary bypass on the elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic head cancer. Methods The clinical data of 55 cases with unresectable pancreatic head cancer treated with palliation methods from July 2002 to June 2009 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into three groups according to different age and therapeutic program: Nineteen patients, 65 years of age or older, were managed with surgical biliary bypass (group A), 19 patients under 65 years of age were treated by surgical biliary bypass (group B) and 17 patients with the age of 65 years or older received percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (group C). Then the therapeutic results were compared.Results With respect to the postoperative level of serum bilirubin, the incidence of early complications, postoperative hospitalization and mean survival time, no statistically significant difference was found between group A and B (Pgt;0.05). There was one case of recurrent jaundice and one case of gastric output obstruction in group B, while no one suffered postoperative complication in group A, and the difference was statistically significant (Plt;0.01). Compared with group A, the postoperative level of serum bilirubin, the number of patient readmitted, the rate of recurrent jaundice and gastric output obstruction were higher in group C (Plt;0.05 or Plt;0.01). The mean postoperative hospitalization and overall survival time were significantly shorter in group C than group A (Plt;0.05 or Plt;0.01, respectively). Conclusion Surgical palliation does not increase the morbidity rate, but it does improve the quality of life in elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic head cancer.
Objective To explore the clinical value of preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) combined with laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) with multiple surgical approaches in the treatment of borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer. Methods The clinicopathologic data of 35 patients with critical resectable pancreatic head carcinoma admitted to the Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery of Luoyang Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University and the Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery of the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2017 to June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received NAC before operation (AG protocol). At the end of the course of treatment, according to the type of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) [venous invasion type (BRPC-V type) and arterial invasion type (BRPC-A type)], take the individualized surgical approach for LPD (BRPC-V type: inferior mesenteric vein approach; BRPC-A type: left posterior approach, medial uncinate process approach, anterior approach, or lower mesocolon approach). The intraoperative condition, R0/R1 resection rate, lymph node dissection, postoperative complications, average hospital stay, recovery, follow-up and survival were recorded. Results① Efficacy evaluation of NAC: 13 patients were partially relieved , 17 patients were stable and 5 patients were progressive after 4 weeks of treatment. Five progressive patients continued to receive comprehensive internal medicine treatment, and the remaining 30 patients underwent LPD. ② Intraoperative situation: LPD were successfully completed in 30 patients, 2 patients underwent extended pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with superior mesenteric vein (or) portal vein reconstruction among them. Among the 30 patients with LPD, there were 10 cases of inferior mesenteric vein approach, 10 cases of left posterior approach, 6 cases of medial uncinate process approach, 1 case of left posterior approach+medial uncinate process approach, 2 cases of anterior approach, and 1 case of inferior mesocolon approach. The mean operative time was (379.4±77.3) min, the intraoperative blood loss was (436.9±95.1) mL. ③ Postoperative situation: The incidence rate of postoperative surgery-related complications was 33.3% (10/30), including 4 cases of Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅰ [biliary fistula in 1 case (3.3%), A-grade pancreatic fistula in 1 case (3.3%), gastric draining dysfunction in 1 case (3.3%), diarrhea in 1 case (3.3%)], 5 cases of grade Ⅱ [pulmonary infection in 2 cases (6.6%), B-grade pancreatic fistula in 2 cases (6.6%), abdominal infection in 1 case (3.3%)], and 1 case of grade Ⅲ [gastroduodenal artery stump bleeding (3.3%)]. Among the 10 patients with complications, 9 cases recovered after symptomatic treatment, and 1 case died, with a fatality rate of 3.3% (1/30). The mean postoperative hospital stay was (17.3±5.5) days. ④ Excision rate and pathological results: R0 resection rate was 90.0% (9/10) in 10 patients with BR-PV type LPD, and R1 resection was performed in 1 patient. R0 resection rate was 75.0% (15/20) in 20 patients with BR-A type, and R1 resection was performed in 5 patients (2 patients with medial uncinate process approach; Left posterior approach in 2 cases; Submesocolon approach was used in 1 case). In 30 patients with LPD, the total R0 removal rate was 80.0% (24/30), the number of lymph nodes dissected was (11±5). Pathological type: There were 26 cases (86.7%) of ductal adenocarcinoma in 30 patients, 1 case of adeno-squamous carcinoma (3.3%), 1 case of mucinous carcinoma (3.3%), 2 cases of acinocytic cell carcinoma (6.7%). 23 cases (76.7%) of medium-high differentiation and 5 cases (16.6%) of low differentiation, two cases (6.7%) were undifferentiated. ⑤ Postoperative follow-up and survival: 30 patients were completely followed-up for 6-39 months, with a median follow-up time of 17 months. The median survival time of BRPC-V and BRPC-A patients was 24.0 months and 17.0 months, respectively. The overall survival rates of 30 patients at 1, 2 and 3 years after operation were 77.3%、46.5% and 13.7%, respectively. Conclusion The selection of preoperative NAC combined with individualized surgical approach for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer is beneficial to improve the radical resection rate and clinical therapeutic effect, and has good clinical application value.