ObjectiveTo evaluate the 3-year efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). MethodsThis is a retrospective, uncontrolled case series study. Thirty-two eyes of 29 patients with PCV were enrolled. All patients were primarily treated with the first conventional PDT. For the eye with active polypoida, residual or exudative lesions in 6 month after PDT, PDT combined with intravitreal anti vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)or simple vitreous injection of anti VEGF therapy were used. All the patients were followed up for at least 3 years with the mean follow-up duration of 43.64±10.84 months. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after the primary PDT, PCV recurrence rates and number of treatments were followed and analyzed. The BCVA was converted into a logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) for statistical analysis. ResultsDuring the 1, 3, 6, 12 months after the primary PDT, the mean BCVA were all improved with statistically significant difference(t=2.27, 4.57, 3.77, 2.37; P<0.05). During the 24 and 36 months after PDT, the mean BCVA was decreased without statistically significant difference(t=-1.29, -0.81; P>0.05). On the final evaluation at 36 months, the mean BCVA was improved in 6 eyes(18.75%), stable in 14 eyes(43.75%), and decreased in 12 eyes(37.50%). During the follow-up time, recurrence of PCV in 24 eyes (75.00%), no recurrence in 8 eyes (25.00%). There was 1 recurrence in 12 eyes (50.00%), 2 recurrences in 9 eyes (37.50%), 3 recurrences in 3 eyes (12.50%). Initial recurrences were noted in 4 eyes (16.67%) within 12 months of baseline PDT treatment; in 11 eyes (45.83%) between 13 and 24 months; in 9 eyes (37.50%) between 25 and 36 months. The mean number of PDT and anti-VEGF was 1.86±1.04 and 4.95±3.92 in all patients, respectively. ConclusionThe 3-year efficacy of PDT in patients with PCV was poor with low improvement of visual acuity and high recurrence rate of PCV.
Objective To observe the characteristics of optical coherence tomography（OCT）in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) before and after photodynamic therapy (PDT), and investigate its relationship with visual acuity. Methods Thirty-four PCV patients (40 eyes) diagnosed by fundus fluoresce angiography and indocyanine green angiography who had underwent the treatment of PDT, were enrolled in this study. The logMAR corrected visual acuity (CVA) were detected and the height and the base diameter of retinal pigment epithelium detachment (PED）and retinal detachment (RD), central subfield thickness (CST), macular volume (MV) were measured by OCT before and after treatment. Before the treatment, the mean logMAR CVA was 0.66plusmn;0.32 and visible PED and RD were seen on OCT images. The OCT characteristics and relationship with visual acuity were comparatively analyzed. Results One, three, six and 12 months after treatment, the mean logMAR CVA were 0.58plusmn;0.27, 0.48plusmn;0.38, 0.51plusmn;0.37 and 0.50plusmn;0.36. The differences of CVA were statistically significant between beforetreatment and three, 12 months after treatment(t=2.32,2.10; P＜0.05),but not between beforetreatment and one,six months after treatment (t=1.22,1.961;P＞0.05). The differences of the height and the base diameter of PED were statistically significant between before treatment and six,12 months after treatment (t=2.34,2.03;P＜0.05),but not between before treatment and one, three months after treatment (t=1.07,1.50;P＞0.05). The differences of the height (t=2.22,2.99,3.30,3.95) and the base diameter (t=2.55,3.33,3.11,3.92) of RD were statistically significant between before treatment and one, three, six and 12 months after treatment (P＜0.05). The differences of CST (t=2.71,3.55,3.81,3.21) and MV (t=2.10,3.30,3.62,4.18) were statistically significant between before treatment and one, three, six and 12 months after treatment (P＜0.05). CVA had negative correlation with the base diameter of PED, the height and the base diameter of RD, CST and MV (r=-0.88,-0.89,-0.92,-0.86,-0.94;P＜0.05), no correlation with the height of PED (r=-0.70,P＞0.05). Conclusions The height and the base diameter of PED and RD, CST, MV of PCV are decrease after PDT. There is a negative correlation between CVA and the base diameter of PED,the height and the base diameter of RD,CST and MV.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy (PDT) and intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors in the treatment of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), and to investigate the primary treatment tentatively. MethodsA systematic search of Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and the Wanfang Data was performed to identify all comparative studies that compared the outcomes of PDT alone, intravitreal VEGF inhibitors alone and combined intravitreal VEGF inhibitors and photodynamic therapy. Outcomes of interest included the regression and recurrence rate of polypoidal lesions, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), therapeutic times, and the occurrence rate of adverse events. 2 randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 19 non-RTCs were identified. According to treatment methods, the data extracted was classified to 3 groups, analyzed with odds ratio (OR), weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95%confidence interval (95%CI). ResultsMeta-analysis suggests that the regression rate of polypoidal lesions (OR=0.34, 0.07; 95%CI=0.13-0.88, 0.02-0.36) and BCVA (WMD=0.25, 0.11; 95%CI=0.14-0.36, 0.01-0.21) in combined therapy group were significantly better than those in PDT group and intravitreal VEGF inhibitors group (P < 0.05). The recurrence rate of polypoidal lesions in PDT group was significantly lower than intravitreal VEGF inhibitors group (OR=0.35, 95%CI=0.16-0.74, P=0.006). BCVA (P=0.025) and the occurrence rate of adverse events (OR=60.36, 95%CI=6.04-603.50, P=0.000 5) in intravitreal VEGF inhibitors group were significant better than PDT group. ConclusionsCombined treatment appeared to be superior to PDT alone or intravitreal VEGF inhibitors alone. Combined treatment takes priority over all others in the primary treatment of PCV.
ObjectiveTo observe the effects of personalized clinical therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). MethodsEighty-six eyes of 79 patients with PCV were enrolled in this study. There were 60 males (65 eyes) and 19 females (21 eyes). The average age was (64.48±13.15) years old. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), slit lamp ophthalmoscopy, fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and/or indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) were measured. The average BCVA was 0.19±0..20. There were three groups in this study including photodynamic therapy (PDT) group (group A, 45 eyes), PDT and intravitreal ranibizumab injection group (group B, 31 eyes), and PDT combined with sub-Tenon's capsule triamcinolone acetonide injection group (group C, 10 eyes). Follow up begun at 1 month after the treatment. 40 eyes in group A were followed up for 1 to 12 months with the average 3.27 months.28 eyes in group B were followed up for 1 to 36 months with the average 6.68 months. 9 eyes in group C were followed up for 1 to 12 months with the average 5.67 months. Patients with recurrent or worsen lesions were followed by FFA or ICGA. Pre- and post-treatment BCVA and retinal thickness of the fovea were comparatively analyzed. ResultsAll eyes (100.0%) in group A, 20 eyes (64.52%) in group B and 9 eyes (90.00%) in group C received treatment only once. The mean BCVA at 1 month after treatment was significantly increased than the pre-treatment BCVA in all 3 groups (t=2.061, 3.262, 3.258; P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between the 3 groups (t=1.345, 0.683, 0.168; P>0.05). Compared to pre-treatment measures, the mean retinal thickness of the fovea was significantly decreased in group A and group B (t=2.239, 4.334; P<0.05), but not changed in group C (t=2.286, P>0.05) at 1 month after treatment. Thirteen eyes in group A were followed by FFA and (or) ICGA, which showed that there were 3 eyes with complete closed PCV and alleviated pigment epithelial detachment (PED), 4 eyes with partial closed PCV, 3 eyes with stable PCV and 3 eyes with worsen PCV. Ten eyes in group B were followed by FFA and (or) ICGA, which showed that there were 3 eyes with complete closed PCV, 3 eyes with partial closed PCV, 4 eyes with recurrence PCV. Five eyes in group C were followed by FFA and (or) ICGA, which showed that there were 4 eyes with complete closed PCV, 1 eyes with recurrence PCV. ConclusionAll 3 therapy strategies can stop or reduce PCV leakage and improve the visual acuity in some degree.
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) alone or in combined with ranibizumab versus ranibizumab monotherapy (intravitreal injection, IVR) in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). Methods80 eyes of 72 patients with PCV were enrolled into this retrospective and comparative study according to their therapeutic plan. 30 eyes of 28 patients, 28 eyes of 30 patients and 22 eyes of 21 patients were divided into PDT group, ranibizumab 0.5 mg group (IVR group) or the combination group, respectively. The patients with PCV were diagnosed according to clinical symptoms, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fluorescent indocyanine green angiography (ICGA). The baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before treatment was more than 0.05, and there was no retinal fibrosis and scar for all patients. There was no statistical difference of age (F=0.187), gender (χ2=0.423), average BCVA (F=1.120) and central retinal thickness (CRT) (F=0.431) among three groups (P > 0.05). They had not received any treatment before. Patients received verteporfin PDT in PDT group, 3 consecutive monthly IVRs starting day 1 in IVR group, and 3 IVRs after 3 days, 1 month, 2 months of PDT starting day 1 in combination group. Re-treatment was considered 3 months later if the follow up shown no changes in fundus photography, OCT and ICGA. The average follow-up time was 19 months. BCVA at baseline and follow-up visit at 1, 3, 6, 12 months was measured, and the proportion of patients with ICGA-assessed complete regression of polyps at month 6 was recorded as primary outcome. The CRT was measured at baseline and 6 months as secondary outcome. ResultsThere were significant difference of BCVA at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months among three groups(F=5.480, 5.249, 3.222, 4.711; P < 0.05). The average BCVA was significantly better at 1, 3, 6, 12 month than that at baseline(t=-6.632, -4.127, -3.904, -4.494; P < 0.05) in combination group, and was significantly better at 3, 6, 12 months than that at baseline (t=-5.636, -3.039, -3.833; P < 0.05) in IVR group. However there was no significant difference of the average BCVA in PDT group between follow-up at 1, 3, 6, l 2 months and baseline (t=1.973, 0.102, -0.100, -0.761; P > 0.05). The proportion of patients with complete regression of polyps at 6 months was higher in PDT (76.7%) or combination group (68.2%) than IVR group (35.7%) (χ2=0.003, 0.025; P < 0.05). There was no significant difference of CRT among 3 groups at baseline (P=0.651). The mean CRT decreased in all 3 treatment groups over 6 months (t=5.120, 3.635, 5.253; P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference of CRT among 3 groups (F=1.293, P > 0.05). ConclusionsThree therapies could effectively decrease CRT. IVR or IVR combined with PDT are both more effective than PDT therapy to improve vision of PCV patients. PDT or PDT combined with IVR was superior to IVR pnly in achieving complete regression of polyps in 6 months in PCV patients.
ObjectiveTo further compare the effect of intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (IVB) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) for the treatment of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to pathologic myopia by meta-analysis. MethodsPertinent publications were identified through systemic searches of PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrance Controlled Trials Register. All clinical comparative studies of IVB or PDT as initial treatment for CNV secondary to pathologic myopia were included. Meta analysis of these clinical trials was performed to analyze the effect of IVB and PDT for CNV secondary to pathologic myopia. Measurements included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT). ResultsA total of 6 comparative studies involving 351 eyes were included. There were 196 eyes in IVB group and 215 eyes in PDT group. Funnel plots, Egger linear regression and Begg method did not show publication bias. Compared with PDT group, at 3, 6 and 12 months after IVB treatment, BCVA significantly increased . However, change of CFT at 3, 6 and 12 months did not vary significantly between IVB group and PDT group (3 months: WMD=-22.49, 95% CI=-93.49 to 48.52, P=0.53; 6 months: WMD=-17.34, 95% CI=-56.00 to 21.31, P=0.38; 12 months: WMD=-5.32, 95% CI=-56.37 to 45.74, P=0.84). ConclusionPatients with CNV secondary to pathologic myopia experienced a significant benefit of visual improvement after IVB, but reduction in CFT after the IVB or PDT did not vary significantly.
ObjectiveTo observe the efficacy and safety of combined photodynamic therapy (PDT) with intravitreal ranibizumab injection in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). MethodsTwenty-four PCV patients (24 eyes) were enrolled in this retrospective case study.All patients were assessed by the examinations of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart, color fundus photography, fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) and optic coherence tomography (OCT). The mean visual acuity was (33.41±19.43) letters; the mean macular retinal thickness was (343.63±88.60) μm. Patients received PDT first, and intravitreal injected ranibizumab 0.5 mg (0.05 ml) 72 hours later. Treatments were repeated as a single intravitreal injection of ranibizumab combined with or without PDT if the monthly follow-up indicated that it was necessary. The average follow-up period was 13.1 months. The average treatment times were analyzed for each eye. Systemic and ocular adverse events were observed. Visual acuity, macular retinal thickness and leakage of PCV before and after the treatment were analyzed. ResultsIntravitreal ranibizumab injections was repeated (2.8±1.6) times per eye on average, and intravitreal injection of ranibizumab combined with PDT was repeated (0.4±0.5) times per eye on average. No systemic and ocular adverse effects were found during and after combined therapy. In the last follow-up, the mean visual acuity of ETDRS was (44.21±17.24) letters, improved by 10.8 letters (t=-4.77, P<0.01).Visual acuity was improved in 11 eyes (45.8%) and stable in 13 eyes (54.2%). FFA and ICGA showed complete closed PCV in 17 eyes (70.8%), partial closed PCV in 7 eyes (29.2%). OCT image showed that the retinal edema was disappeared in 19 eyes (79.2%) and alleviated in 5 eyes (20.8%). The mean macular retinal thickness was (171.33±38.06) μm, which was 172.30 μm less than that of pre-treatment values (t=11.96, P<0.05). ConclusionPhotodynamic therapy combined with intravitreal ranibizumab injections for PCV is safe and effective, with visual acuity improvement, reduction of retinal edema and PCV leakage.