目的 探讨外伤性脾破裂手术适应证和方法。方法 对77例外伤性脾破裂进行保脾手术治疗,按姜洪池脾损伤四级分类法: Ⅰ级8例,Ⅱ级41例,Ⅲ级18例,Ⅳ级10例。附加脾动脉结扎术6例。结果 死亡4例; 2例并粘连性肠梗阻。获随访45例,随访时间3个月至3年,仅4例儿童有反复上呼吸道感染,无1例发生脾切除后凶险感染(OPSI)。结论 根据脾损伤的部位和程度,可采用两种以上的联合保脾术式,对控制伤脾出血及保留脾脏功能有重要价值。
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical efficacy and experience of laparoscopic partial splenectomy. MethodsThe clinical data of 11 cases of splenic space occupying lesions in the author's hospital from January 2011 to May 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Laparoscopic partial splenectomy were carried out in 11 patients. ResultsEleven patients were successfully completed the laparoscopic partial resection of spleen. Operative timewas 2.0-3.5 h, the average operative time was (2.5±0.3) h. Intraoperative blood loss was 155-320 mL, the average blood loss was (200.3±55.1) mL. Eleven patients who ride smoothly, there was no case of pancreatic injury, gastrointestinal injury, major bleeding and other complications. Postoperative patients recovered well, 24 h after operation gastrointestinal function recovery, and can get out of bed activities. Silicone drainage tube placement time was 3-5 d, the average for placing time was (4.0±1.3) d. about 60-100 mL, the average (70.3±15.8) mL. The average length in hospital was 5-8 d, patients with an average of (6.3±1.5) d, all of the patients without postoperative complications such as infection, splenic infarction. Postoperative pathologic results suggested 6 cases were spleen hemangioma, 3 cases were pseudocyst of spleen, and 2 cases were true epithelial cyst. Conciusions Laparoscopic partial spleen resection should fully grasp the operative indication, fully understand the pathological changes and the structure of door of the spleen, in earnest and patient, under the operation of laparoscopic spleen resection is safe, feasible, and the clinical curative effect is satisfied, worthy of clinical popularization and application.
ObjectiveTo analyze risk factors of intraoperative massive hemorrhage in patients with pancreatitis-induced sinistral portal hypertension (SPH) and to explore its strategies of treatment.MethodsThe clinical data of patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH admitted to the West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2015 to March 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The intraoperative massive hemorrhage was defined as the blood loss exceeding 30% blood volume. The factors closely associated with the intraoperative massive hemorrhage were analyzed by the forward logistic regression model.ResultsA total of 128 patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH were enrolled in this study, including 104 males and 24 females, with an average age of 47 years old and a median intraoperative bleeding volume of 482 mL. Among them, 93 patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH caused by the pancreatic pseudocyst after acute pancreatitis and 35 caused by the chronic pancreatitis. There were 36 patients with history of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and 46 patients with hypersplenism. Thirty-six patients suffered from the massive hemorrhage. Among them, 30 patients underwent the distal pancreatectomy concomitant with splenectomy, 1 patient underwent the duodenum- preserving resection of pancreatic head, and 5 patients underwent the pseudocyst drainage. The univariate analysis showed that the occurrence of intraoperative massive hemorrhage in the patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH was not associated with the gender, age, body mass index, albumin level, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, hypersplenism, type of pancreatitis, course of pancreatitis, number of attacks of pancreatitis, size of spleen, maximum diameter of lesions in the splenic vein obstruction site, or number of operation (P>0.05), which was associated with the diameter of varicose vein more than 5.0 mm (χ2=19.83, P<0.01), the intraperitoneal varices regions (χ2=13.67, P<0.01), the location of splenic vein obstruction (χ2=5.17, P=0.03), the operation time (t=–3.10, P<0.01), or the splenectomy (χ2=17.46, P<0.01). Further the logistic regression analysis showed that the varicose vein diameter more than 5.0 mm (OR=6.356, P=0.002) and splenectomy (OR=4.297, P=0.005) were the independent risk factors for the intraoperative massive hemorrhage in the patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH.ConclusionsSplenectomy and having a collateral vein more than 5.0 mm in diameter are independent risk factors for intraoperative massive blood loss in surgeries taken on patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH. Attention should be paid to dilation of gastric varices and choice of splenectomy.
ObjectiveTo study the indication and means in dissection lymph nodes of the No.10 and No.11 without splenectomy in radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. MethodsAccording to the location, type of pathology, clinical and pathological classification, lymphatic drainage and spread of gastric carcinoma togather with the immunological function of spleen, selection of operative procedure without splenectomy should be considered, so the related literatures were reviewed. ResultsRetained spleen had been shown to improve 5year survival of patients with gastric cancer of stage Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ,splenectomy had been shown to improve 5year survival of patients with gastric cancer of stage Ⅳ,whose carcinoma was infiltrating splenic and the lymph nodes of the No.10. The complications of different means of dissection of the lymph nodes made no difference.Conclusion Dissection of the lymph node without retained spleen or allogenic spleen transplantation is indicated for the patients with cancer of stage Ⅳ,whose spleen is invaded by the tumor.
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility and safety of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SpDP), and to discuss the indications and techniques of SpDP. MethodsThe clinical data of seven patients underwent SpDP between January 2004 and December 2007 in Xinhua Hospital were analyzed retrospectively. ResultsOut of the seven cases, one case received the SpDP combined with partial splenic vessel resection, while the other cases received the SpDP with splenic vessel preservation. The operation time was (2.93±0.38) h and the intraoperative blood loss was (392.86±109.65) ml. Only one case suffered from pancreatic fistula, who finally recovered after medicine therapy and percutaneous drainage. There was no other complication or operative mortality. The postoperative platelet count was (273±43.76)×109/L and the postoperative hospital stay was (17.86±8.07) d. For six cases of patients, no recurrence and metastasis was found after the followup (49.2±14.4) months (30-72 months). ConclusionSpDP is a safe and feasible procedure, which is worthy for selected cases such as benign neoplasm of the body and tail of the pancreas.