The treatment of aortic dissection has already shifted to endovascular strategies. However, with the evolution of this disease and a deeper understanding of it, experts from various countries have developed a series of innovative endovascular techniques and devices in areas such as lumen reconstruction, false lumen embolization, entry sealing, and branch arteries reconstruction, targeting the long-term complication of chronic post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. The past few decades have seen that Chinese vascular surgeons have gradually emerged on the world stage and contributed multiple “Chinese solutions” for post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. The author in this review intends to provide an overview of these techniques and devices mentioned above.
1990年阿根廷医生Parodi的首次成功的经股动脉植入腔内移植物治愈一例腹主动脉瘤，在此后10余年中，腔内技术的发展使主动脉疾病的治疗模式发生了巨大的改变，例如腹主动脉瘤的治疗，在发达国家的多数血管外科中心利用腔内移植物进行的腔内隔绝术已经替代了一半以上的开腹手术，在主动脉夹层和胸主动脉瘤的治疗中，腔内技术的使用也日益普及。
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of varicose great saphenous vein (GSV) treatment alone versus combined treatment with iliac vein compression (IVC) intervention in improving lower extremity symptoms and prognosis among the patients with varicose GSV complicated by IVC. MethodsBased on inclusion and exclusion criteria, the patients with varicose GSV complicated by IVC treated at the Day Service Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from May 2022 to January 2025 were retrospectively enrolled. The patients were assigned into two groups according to the treatment strategies: the varicose GSV treatment alone group (control group) and the combined treatment group for varicose GSV and IVC (observation group). The primary endpoints included the closure rate of the GSV trunk, venous clinical severity score (VCSS), and venous insufficiency epidemiological and economic study quality of life/symptom (VEINES-QOL/Sym) questionnaire score at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The significance level was set at α=0.05. ResultsA total of 264 patients with left lower extremity varicose GSV complicated by IVC were included. The observation group comprised 32 patients, while the remaining 232 patients underwent 1∶3 propensity score-matching, resulting in 96 matched patients in the control group. The baseline characteristics, including gender, age, and comorbidities, showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups (P>0.05). At 12 months postoperatively, the GSV trunk closure rate was 100% in both groups. Within-group comparisons revealed significant improvements in the VCSS and VEINES-QOL/Sym points at 6 and 12 months as compared with preoperative (on admission) values (P<0.05). Between-group comparisons showed that the observation group had greater improvement in the VEINES-QOL/Sym score at 6 months (P=0.028), but no significant difference in the VCSS (P=0.775); At 12 months, the observation group demonstrated significantly better the VCSS (P<0.001) and VEINES-QOL/Sym points (P<0.001) as compared with the control group. ConclusionsFor patients with left lower extremity GSV varicosities complicated by IVC, both treatment strategies significantly improve symptoms. Results of short-term follow-up (6 months) demonstrate early advantages in quality of life improvement with concurrent IVC intervention, while results of 12-month follow-up indicate superior efficacy in both symptom relief and quality of life enhancement. Therefore, concurrent IVC intervention may provide greater clinical benefits for mid- to long-term prognosis for patients with left lower extremity GSV varicosities complicated by IVC.
ObjectiveTo evaluate efficacy and safety of treatment of Kommerell diverticulum with endovascular technique.MethodThe retrospective analysis was made on the preoperative clinical data, surgical treatment, and postoperative status of patient with Kommerell diverticulum who underwent the endovascular treatment in the Department of Vascular Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University.ResultsAccording to the different types and clinical symptoms, the effective endovascular treatment was adopted. The thoracic endovascular aortic repair and coil embolization of Kommerell diverticulum were successfully performed. The postoperative aortic blood flow was unobstructed and the aneurysmal lesion was completely isolated. No endoleakage and intracranial and upper limb ischemia were occurred. The operation time was 55 min and the blood loss was 20 mL. The patient was discharged on day 6 after the operation. No endoleakage, dizziness, and upper limb numbness were found following-up for 12 months.ConclusionFor patient with different types of Kommerell diverticulum and different symptoms, who could be treated by appropriate endovascular treatment and it is effective and safety.
Artificial intelligence in robot system is mainly divided into two types: endoscopic robot system and intracavitary robot navigation system. The endoscopic robot system can effectively shorten the time of vascular anastomosis and occlusion during vascular bypass surgery, while the intracavitary robot navigation system has good localization and real-time observation function. Moreover, it has significant advantages in complex lesions and special anatomical locations. High cost and complicated equipment debugging are the main factors that limit the wide application of robot systems. Artificial intelligence represented by robot system has obvious advantages and broad prospects in the field of vascular surgery, but more research is needed to improve its shortcomings and to further clarify its standard operation and long-term results.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment for chronic thoracoabdominal aortic dissection. MethodsThe patients with chronic thoracoabdominal aortic dissection who underwent total endovascular treatment at Shanghai City First People’s Hospital between December 2021 and March 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into single-trunk group and double-trunk group according to the treatment methods. Clinical data including demographic characteristics, preoperative risk factors, surgical details, postoperative complications and long-term follow-up data were collected. Outcome measures mainly included surgical success rate, in-hospital mortality, endoleak rate and incidence of branch restenosis. ResultsThirty-four patients with thoracoabdominal aortic dissection were treat with total endovascular treatment. That success rate of operation was 100%. The in-hospital mortality was 2.94%. the incidence of paraplegia was 0.00%. the incidence of cerebral infarction was 2.94%. The incidence of type Ⅲ endoleak was 5.88%. The incidence of branch artery stenosis was 8.82%. The incidence of dissection progression was 8.82%. The reintervention rate was 14.71%. In the aspect of reconstruction of splanchnic artery branches, fenestration stent was the main method in the single-trunk group, and branch stent was the main method in the double-trunk group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in perioperative and mid-term follow-up results between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionTotal endovascular treatment is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with thoracoabdominal aortic dissection.