ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of retroperitoneal laparoscopic approach combined with anterolateral mini-incision for lumbar spine tuberculosis. MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the cl inical data of 22 patients with lumbar spine tuberculosis undergoing focus clearance, fusion, and internal fixation by retroperitoneal laparoscopic approach combined with anterolateral mini-incision between June 2006 and June 2012. There were 14 males and 8 females, with an average age of 42.6 years (range, 26-57 years) and with a mean disease duration of 7.3 months (range, 3-10 months). There were 17 patients with single-level spinal tuberculosis (L1, 2 in 3, L2, 3 in 6, L3, 4 in 4, L4, 5 in 2, and L5 in 2) and 5 patients with double-level spinal tuberculosis (L1-3 in 2 and L2-4 in 3). The preoperative Cobb's angle of lumbar spine was 5-28° (mean, 20°). In 6 patients having compression symptom, 4 cases were rated as grade D and 2 as grade C according to Frankel classification. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications were recorded. At last follow-up, the neurologic function was assessed according to Frankel grade, the Cobb's angle after operation was measured on lumbar lateral X-ray film; the efficacy was evaluated according to Nakai criteria, and the fusion was evaluated according to Suk criteria. ResultsAll operations were successfully completed. The operation time was 110-250 minutes (mean, 140 minutes), and intraoperative blood loss was 120-280 mL (mean, 180 mL). The symptoms of femoral nerve injury and sympathetic nerve injury occurred in 1 case respectively and was relieved at 1-3 weeks after operation. All incisions healed by first intention. The patients were followed up 16-50 months (mean, 21 months). During the follow-up period, no loosening or breakage of implants and no tuberculosis recurrence were found. At last follow-up, the nerve function was recovered to grade E in the others except 1 case at grade D. The Cobb's angle was 2-16° (mean, 7.8°). According to Nakai criteria for efficacy evaluation, the results were excellent in 9 cases, good in 10 cases, and fair in 3 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 86.4%. The bony fusion rate was 95.5% (21/22) according to Suk criteria. ConclusionRetroperitoneal laparoscopic approach combined with anterolateral mini-incision for lumbar spine tuberculosis is a safe and effective approach with minimal invasion and less complications.
ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of pedicle screw fixation combined with non-fusion technology for the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture (AO type A) through Wiltse paraspinal approach. MethodsBetween March 2011 and December 2012, 35 cases of thoracolumbar fractures were treated with pedicle screw fixation combined with non-fusion technology by Wiltse paraspinal approach. There were 27 males and 8 females, aged from 19 to 51 years (mean, 39.7 years). The time from injury to operation varied from 3 to 15 days (mean, 5.9 days). The causes of injury were traffic accident in 17 cases, falling from height in 11 cases, and crush trauma in 7 cases. All fractures were single-segment fracture, including T8 in 1 case, T9 in 2 cases, T10 in 2 cases, T11 in 3 cases, T12 in 12 cases, L1 in 10 cases, L2 in 4 cases, and L3 in 1 case. According to AO classification, there were 17 type A1 fractures (compression fracture), 3 type A2 fractures (splitting fracture), and 15 type A3 fractures (burst fracture). Based on American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) spinal cord injury grade, all cases were in grade E before operation. Perioperative parameters were recorded; the anterior vertebral height and kyphotic Cobb angle of vertebral bodies were measured before and after operation to evaluate the effect of correction. ResultsThe mean operating time was 74 minutes; the mean blood loss was 125 mL; and the mean drainage volume was 51 mL. Skin necrosis of incision occurred in 2 cases and was cured after dressing change; primary healing of incision was obtained in the others. All patients were followed up 15-24 months (mean, 17.3 months). No loosening or breakage of internal fixation was found. The internal fixator was removed at 12-19 months after operation (mean, 15 months). There were significant differences in Cobb's angle and anterior vertebral body height between before operation and immediately after operation, before internal fixator removal as well as at last follow-up (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in anterior vertebral body height among the postoperative time points (P > 0.05). There was significant difference in Cobb's angle between immediately after operation and before internal fixator removal as well as at last follow-up (P < 0.05), but the difference was not significant between before internal fixator removal and at last follow-up (P > 0.05). The motion of fixed segment was restored after internal fixator removal. ConclusionIt is an effective method of pedicle screw fixation combined with non-fusion technology through Wiltse paraspinal approach for the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture (AO type A). The method has the advantages of simple operation and less trauma. It can effectively rebuild the height of vertebral body and correct kyphotic deformity.
Objective To investigate the effect of the sequence of intermediate instrumentation with long screws and distraction-reduction on mild to moderate thoracolumbar fractures treated by posterior open and short-segmental fixation. MethodsThe clinical data of 68 patients with mild to moderate thoracolumbar burst fractures who met the selection criteria between January 2016 and June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into group ISDRF (intermediate screws then distraction-reduction fixation, 32 cases) and group DRISF (distraction-reduction then intermediate screws fixation, 36 cases) according to the different operation methods. There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, gender, body mass index, fracture segment, cause of injury, and preoperative load-sharing classification score, thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score, vertebral canal occupational rate, back pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, anterior height of fractured vertebra, and Cobb angle (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, and fracture healing time were recorded and compared between the two groups. The vertebral canal occupational rate, anterior height of fractured vertebra, kyphosis Cobb angle, and back pain VAS score before and after operation were used to evaluate the effectiveness. Results There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss and operation time between the two groups (P>0.05). No vascular or spinal nerve injury and deep infections or skin infections occurred in both groups. At 1 week after operation, the vertebral canal occupational rate in the two groups was significantly improved when compared with that before operation (P<0.05), no significant difference was found in the difference of vertebral canal occupational rate before and after operation and improvement between the two groups (P>0.05). The patients in both groups were followed up 18-24 months, with an average of 22.3 months. All vertebral fractures reached bone union at 6 months postoperatively. At last follow-up, there was no internal fixation failures such as broken screws, broken rods or loose screws, but there were 2 cases of mild back pain in the ISDRF group. The intra-group comparison showed that the back pain VAS score, the anterior height of fractured vertebra, and the Cobb angle of the two groups were significantly improved at each time point postoperatively (P<0.05); the VAS scores at 12 months postoperatively and last follow-up were also improved when compared with that at 1 week postoperatively (P<0.05). At last follow-up, the anterior height of fractured vertebra in the ISDRF group was significantly lost when compared with that at 1 week and 12 months postoperatively (P<0.05), the Cobb angle had a significant loss when compared with that at 1 week postoperatively (P<0.05); the anterior height of fractured vertebra and Cobb angle in DRISF group were not significantly lost when compared with that at 1 week and 12 months postoperatively (P>0.05). The comparison between groups showed that there was no significant difference in the remission rate of VAS score between the two groups at 1 week postoperatively (P>0.05), the recovery value of the anterior height of fractured vertebra in ISDRF group was significantly higher than that in DRISF group (P<0.05), the loss rate at last follow-up was also significantly higher (P<0.05); the correction rate of Cobb angle in ISDRF group was significantly higher than that in DRISF group at 1 week postoperatively (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the loss rate of Cobb angle between the two groups at last follow-up (P>0.05). ConclusionIn the treatment of mild to moderate thoracolumbar burst fractures with posterior short-segment fixation, the instrumentation of long screws in the injured vertebrae does not affect the reduction of the fracture fragments in the spinal canal. DRISF can better maintain the restored anterior height of the fractured vertebra and reduce the loss of kyphosis Cobb angle during the follow-up, indicating a better long-term effectiveness.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of short segmental pedicle screw fixation with and without fusion in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture. MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 57 patients with single segment thoracolumbar burst fractures, who accorded with the inclusion criteria between February 2012 and February 2014. The patients underwent posterior short segmental pedicle screw fixation with fusion in 27 cases (fusion group) and without fusion in 30 cases (non-fusion group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, time between injury and admission, fracture segment and classification, and neurologic function America Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) classification between 2 groups, which had the comparability (P > 0.05). The operative time, blood loss, and hospitalization days were compared between 2 groups. The height of the injured vertebra, the kyphotic angle, and the range of motion (ROM) were measured on the X-ray film. The functional outcomes were evaluated by using the Greenough low-back outcome score and the visual analogue scale (VAS) for back pain. The neurologic functional recovery was assessed by ASIA grade. ResultsThe operative time was significantly shortened and the blood loss was significantly reduced in the non-fusion group when compared with the fusion group (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was found in hospitalization days between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The patients were followed up for 2.0-3.5 years (mean, 3.17 years) in the fusion group and for 2-4 years (mean, 3.23 years) in the non-fusion group. X-ray films showed that 2 cases failed bone graft fusion, the fusion time was 12-17 weeks (mean, 15.6 weeks) in the other 25 cases. Complication occurred in 2 cases of the fusion group (1 case of incision deep infection and 1 case of hematoma at iliac bone donor site) and in 1 case of the non-fusion group (fat liquefaction); primary healing of incision was obtained in the others. The Cobb angle, the height of injured vertebrae showed no significant difference between 2 groups at pre-operation, immediate after operation, and last follow-up (P > 0.05). The ROM of injured vertebrae showed no significant difference between 2 groups at 1 year after operation (before implants were removed) (P > 0.05). The implants were removed at 1 year after operation in all cases of the non-fusion group, and in 11 cases of the fusion group. At last follow-up, the ROM of injured vertebrae in the non-fusion group was significantly higher than that in the fusion group (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was found in Greenough low-back outcome score, VAS score, and ASIA grade between 2 groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionFusion is not necessary when thoracolumbar burst fracture is treated by posterior short segmental pedicle screw fixation, which can preserve regional segmental motion, shorten the operative time, decrease blood loss, and eliminate bone graft donor site complications.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of body mass index (BMI) on the outcome of posterior 360° fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative diseases. MethodsA retrospective study was carried on 302 cases of singlelevel lumbar degenerative diseases treated with posterior 360° fusion between September 2009 and September 2013. All patients were divided into 3 groups according to BMI: normal weight (BMI<24 kg/m2) in 105 cases (group A), overweight (24 kg/m2≤BMI< 28 kg/m2) in 108 cases (group B), and obese (BMI≥28 kg/m2) in 89 cases (group C). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, disease patterns, affected segments, preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and Oswestry disability index (ODI) among 3 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and complications were recorded. The lumbar function was assessed by JOA score and ODI at pre- and post-operation (at 3, 6, and 24 months). ResultsThe operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay of group C were significantly more than those of groups A and B (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between group A and group B (P>0.05). The patients were followed up 24-45 months. Postoperative JOA score and ODI showed significant improvements in each group when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference among groups at each time point after operation (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of total complications among 3 groups (χ2=3.288, P=0.193). The incidence of incision-related complications (infection and poor healing) in group C was significantly higher than that of groups A and B (P<0.05), but no significant difference was shown between group A and group B (P>0.05). However, there was no significant difference in cerebrospinal fluid leak, pseudarthrosis formation, and revision among 3 groups (P>0.05). ConclusionPosterior 360° fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative diseases can obtain good effectiveness in patients with different BMI, but patients whose BMI was ≥28 kg/m2 have longer operation time, more intraoperative blood loss, longer hospital stay, and higher incidence of postoperative incision-related complications.
Objective To explore the clinical effect of PSIS-A robot-assisted percutaneous screw in the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture. Methods Patients with thoracolumbar fracture who were hospitalized in Mianyang Orthopedic Hospital between August 2022 and January 2024 and required percutaneous pedicle screw f ixation were selected. Patients were divided into robot group and free hand group by random number table. Operative time, intraoperative bleeding, intraoperative radiation dose and time, implant accuracy rate, small joint invasion rate, Visual Analogue Scale score for pain and other indexes were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 60 patients were included. Among them, there were 28 cases in the robot group and 32 cases in the free hand group. On the third day after surgery, the Visual Analogue Scale score of the robot group was better than that of the free hand group (P=0.003). Except for intraoperative bleeding and radiation frequency (P>0.05), the surgical time, average nail implantation time, and intraoperative radiation dose in the robot group were all lower than those in the free hand group (P<0.05). The accuracy and excellence rate of nail planting in the robot group were higher than those in the free hand group (94.6% vs. 84.9%; χ2=7.806, P=0.005). There was no statistically significant difference in the acceptable accuracy rate (96.4% vs. 91.1%; χ2=3.240, P=0.072) and the incidence of screw facet joint invasion (7.2% vs.14.1%; χ2=3.608, P=0.058) between the two groups. Conclusion The application of PSIS-A type robot assisted percutaneous minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar fr actures is promising.
OBJECTIVE: To study the changes of neural electrophysiology properties of cauda equina under double level compression and dynamic burdens, and to clarify the mechanisms of intermittent neurogenic claudication. METHODS: Thirty SD rats were divided into 5 groups (6 in each group). The laminectomy of L5 was performed in control group. In the experimental groups, the silicon sheets were inserted into the spinal canal of L4 and L6 to cause double level compression of cauda equina by 30%. Two hours after onset of compression, no dynamic burden was introduced in experimental group 1. Only high frequency stimulation(HFS) was introduced for 6 minutes in experimental group 2. Both HFS and additional increased compression were introduced for 6 minutes in experimental group 3. While only additional increased compression was introduced for 6 minutes in experimental group 4. After 6 minutes of dynamic burdens, all were returned to the status of static compression for another 30 minutes and then electrical examination was made. RESULTS: After 2 hours of compression, motor and sensory nerve conduction velocity (NCV) of all the four experimental groups decreased significantly (P lt; 0.05), but there was no significant difference between them. There was no significant change in the control group. There was no significant change of NCV in experimental group 1 during the last 30 minutes of experiment. NCV in the other three experimental groups decreased after introduction of dynamic burdens, especially in the experimental group 3. CONCLUSION: The above results showed that NCV of cauda equina decreased significantly under dynamic burdens during static compression. Two kinds of dynamic burdens introduced at the same time can cause more profound change than a single one.
Objective To elucidate the new development, structural features and appl ication of the lumbar interspinous process non-fusion techniques. Methods With the review of the development course and important research works in the field of the lumbar inter-spinous process non-fusion techniques, the regularity summary, science induction, and prospect were carried out. Results The lumbar inter-spinous process non-fusion technique was a part of non-fusion insertof spinal division posterior surface. According to the design, it could be divided into two major categories: dynamic and static systems. The dynamic system included Coflex and device for intervertebral assisted motion; the static system included X-STOP, ExtenSure and Wall is. The lumbar inter-spinous process non-fusion technique was a new technique of spinal division, it could reserve the integrated function of intervertebral disc and zygapophysial joint, maintain or recover the segmental movement to a normal level, and have no adverse effect on the neighboring segments. A lot of basic and cl inical researches indicated that lumbar inter-spinous process insert had extensive appl ication to curatio retrogression lumbar spinal stenosis, discogenic low back pain, articular process syndrome, lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion and lumbar instabil ity and so on. Conclusion With the matures of lumbar inter-spinous process non-fusion techniques and the increased study of various types of internal fixation devices, it will greatly facil itate the development of treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. But long-term follow-up is needed to investigating the long-term efficacy and perfect operation indication.