目的 总结腹股沟疝无张力疝修补术的手术经验。方法 回顾性分析我院2002年2月至2009年1月期间126例腹股沟疝患者行无张力疝修补术的临床资料及手术方法。结果 本组126例患者无围手术期死亡者,并发症主要有局部肿胀、异物感、疼痛等,随访6个月～6年(平均38个月)有6例(4.8%)复发。结论 无张力疝修补术是治疗腹股沟疝较为理想的术式。
目的 分析改良区域阻滞麻醉法在腹股沟疝手术中的临床应用价值。方法 对2003年12月至2008年12月期间我院收治的168例腹股沟疝患者应用区域阻滞麻醉，对术中疼痛、肌松程度、手术时间、术后并发症、住院时间和住院费用方面进行临床观察。结果 所有患者麻醉效果满意,肌肉松弛,解剖层次清楚,除5例在牵扯精索时有轻微酸痛外,余无任何不适,术后无特殊并发症。平均手术时间40 min(包括麻醉),平均住院9 d,普通疝修补术平均费用1 480元,无张力疝修补术平均费用3 265元。结论 改良区域阻滞麻醉下行腹股沟疝手术麻醉效果满意、安全性高、简单易行、经济实惠,可作为各种腹股沟疝手术的麻醉方法,更适合在基层医院应用。
目的总结Millikan无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的经验。方法对笔者2008年1月至2010年1月期间完成的Millikan无张力疝修补术患者的临床资料进行总结、分析。结果本组 32例共35侧疝，按国内疝学组分型(2003年)，Ⅰ型2侧，Ⅱ型9侧，Ⅲ型21侧，Ⅳ型3侧。直疝6侧，斜疝29侧。其中行急诊疝修补术2例。术后发生尿潴留2例(6.25%),无切口感染、血肿、睾丸炎等并发症发生； 住院时间3~5 d，平均3.5 d。随访2~24个月，平均18个月，无复发及慢性疼痛者。结论Millikan手术是一种操作简便、安全、符合无张力疝修补原理的术式，适用于Ⅱ~Ⅳ型腹股沟疝的修补。
Objective To investigate the application of transverse fascia in inguinal hernia repair. Methods In this study, 617 patients underwent inguinal hernia repair between January 1990 and December 2005 in our hospital were included, which were divided into two groups according to different operative ways: transverse fascia method group (n=337) and Bassini method group (n=280). Then intraoperative results, postoperative complications, and rehabilitated results of patients in two groups were compared. Results Compared with Bassini method group, the patients in transverse fascia method group did not show significant difference in operative time and blood loss during operation (Pgt;0.05). The differences of severe postoperative pain, testicular swelling, the time of the body’s restore for normal activities, and recurrence rate of patients between two groups were significant (Plt;0.05), while the difference of hematoma of scrotum and infection of incisional wound (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion The strengthening of posterior wall by transverse fascia and reconstruction of inner ring is a simple and effective method for inguinal hernia repair.
目的:比较充填式和平片式无张力疝修补术的临床效果。方法:回顾分析用平片式及充填式无张力疝修补术治疗246例腹股沟疝的临床及随访资料。结果:246例患者尿潴留, 阴囊水肿和切口感染等并发症无明显差异(Pgt;0.05),随访6个月至2年,无1例复发。结论:同填充式无张力疝修补术比较,平片式无张力疝修补术具有简单,手术时间短、费用低廉的特点,更适合基层推广。
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effect of total extraperitoneal inguinal herniorrhaphy (TEP) with open and laparoscopic technique. MethodsThe clinical data of 148 patients with inguinal hernia or femoral hernia in this hospital from January 2012 to July 2013 were analyzed retrospectively, in which 74 patients received TEP with open technique (open TEP group), 74 patients received TEP with laparoscopic technique (laparoscopic TEP group). ResultsAll the operations were successfully completed.Compared with the laparoscopic TEP group, the operative time, intra-operative bleeding, and hospitalization expenses were significantly decreased in the open TEP group (P < 0.05).The post-operative exhaust time, postoperative hospital stay, and the postoperative complications rate had no significant differences between the open TEP group and the laparoscopic TEP group (P > 0.05).All the patients were followed up, no recurr-ence occurred during a 3-19 months of following-up. ConclusionsTEP with open and laparoscopic technique are both safe and efficient.The open technique has the advantages of shorter operative time, lower cost, so it is worth being widely used for primary hospital.
目的探讨应用超普疝修补装置（UHS）行无张力疝修补的效果和手术体会。 方法回顾性分析2012年6月至2013年11月期间笔者所在医院采用UHS施行腹股沟疝无张力修补术41例患者的临床资料，观察手术时间、伤口疼痛、住院时间、住院费用、并发症发生率以及复发率。 结果手术时间25～100 min，平均48 min；患者术后1 d下床活动；术后有10例患者使用止痛药物；全组切口均一期愈合，无切口感染发生，有2例出现阴囊水肿；术后住院时间4～10 d，平均6 d；住院费用9 249.33～18 976.49元，平均11 428.47元。术后随访1～6个月，平均3个月，无一例复发。 结论UHS技术是目前较为理想的治疗腹股沟疝的手术方式。