目的 评价凋亡相关基因bcl-2、p53的表达与乳腺癌新辅助化学疗法（化疗）疗效的关系。 方法 计算机检索Cochrane、Pubmed、Embase、中国知网、万方、维普等数据库，2003年4月－2013年4月bcl-2、p53蛋白与乳腺癌新辅助化疗的病例对照研究，应用RevMan 4.2统计软件进行定量分析。 结果 共纳入15篇病例对照研究，bcl-2与乳腺癌新辅助化疗6篇，治疗有效279例，其中bcl-2表达阳性159例；治疗无效115例，其中bcl-2表达阳性57例。p53与乳腺癌新辅助化疗13篇，治疗有效679例，其中p53表达阳性249例；治疗无效341例，其中p53表达阳性195例。Meta分析结果显示，bcl-2表达的阳性率与乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效无统计学意义[OR=1.40，95%CI（0.89，2.18），P=0.14]，而p53表达的阳性率与乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效有统计学意义[OR=0.46，95%CI（0.26，0.80），P=0.007]。 结论 p53可以作为乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效敏感性的一个指标，对乳腺癌新辅助化疗有提示作用。
【Abstract】Objective Through using neoadjuvant chemotherapy of different circles combined colorectal cancer operations under multi-disciplinary team (MDT), we evaluate effective treatment strategies that suit to colorectal cancer patients in this country. Methods The retrospective study reviewed patients with colorectal cancer treated in general surgery department Ⅲ in West China Hospital of Sichuan University from October 2006 to April 2007. According to the circle times of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the patients were divided into single-circle group, double-circle group and triple-circle group. And comparing the difference of treatment time, effect index of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and operative results used these stratagies. Results The difference between the time from the end of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to the operation in three groups had no statistical significance （Pgt;0.05）, which were （5.64±2.00） d in single-circle group, (5.80±3.74） d in double-circle group, （6.22±2.76） d in triple-circle group. According to the treatment effects, CEA value decreased during pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy in each groups （Plt;0.01）. Subjective reception such as hemafecia, anal tenemus and defecation obstruction in double-circle group and triple-circle group were obviously improved than that in single-circle group （Plt;0.01）. Evaluating the tumor condition, the ratio of CR and PR in double-circle group and triple-circle group was higher than that in single-circle group （Plt;0.01）. According to the adverse effect, WBC value of double-circle group and triple-circle group decreased during pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy, their difference had statistical significance （Plt;0.01）. The difference of WBC pre- and post- neoadjuvant chemotherapy in single-circle group decreased fewer than that in double-circle group and triple-circle group （Plt;0.01）. Nausea and vomit response in triple-circle group were obviously more serious than that in single-circle group and double-circle group （Plt;0.01）. But abdominal distention and diarrhea response had no difference among three groups （Pgt;0.05）. Through our survey, used different neoadjuvant chemotherapy circle, patients in single-circle group and double-circle group were completely accepted within full confidence; but receptance of strategy in triple-circle group was 66.7％(12/18）. All operations were successful. The difference of postoperative aerofluxus time between single-circle group and double-circle group had statistical significance （Plt;0.05）. The difference of postoperative intake time, between triple-circle group and single-circle group, between triple-circle group and double-circle group, had statistical significance （Plt;0.05）. But wound recover time among three groups had no obvious difference （Pgt;0.05）. Conclusion Analyzing neoadjuvant chemotherapy circles, time between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and operation, treatment effect and operation results, it is a feasible and secure colorectal cancer multi-discipinary strategy for patients in West China that choose the treatment of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with double-circle and short preparation time.
ObjectiveTo explore the expression of alpha B-crystallin (CRYAB) in human gastric cancer tissue and the influence of chemotherapeutics on expression of CRYAB mRNA.Methods① The gastric cancer tissues and corresponding adjacent tissues of 76 patients underwent radical resection from April 2018 to March 2020 in The First Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University and the Sichuan Mianyang 404 Hospital were collected, the expression of CRYAB protein in the gastric cancer tissues and corresponding adjacent tissues of 76 patients with gastric cancer were detected by immunohistochemistry SP technique. The relation between the expression of CRYAB protein and clinicopathologic features was analyzed. ② Twenty-one gastric tissues of patients accepted neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 26 gastric tissues of patients with no neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the The First Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University were collected from November 2018 to March 2020, the expression of CRYAB mRNA was detected by real time-PCR.ResultsThe expression of CRYAB protein in gastric cancer tissues was positive in 51 cases (67.1%) and in the corresponding adjacent tissues was positive in 32 cases (42.1%), the positive rate was higher in gastric cancer tissues (χ2=9.581, P=0.002). The over-expression of CRYAB protein in the gastric cancer tissues was correlated with the TNM stage, Borrmann typing, degree of differentiation, lymph node metastasis, depth of invasion of the patients, and Lauren classification (P<0.05), but not correlated with the age, gender, tumor sitation, and diameter (P>0.05). The expression of CRYAB mRNA in the gastric cancer tissues with neoadjuvant chemotherapy was significantly higher than that in the gastric cancer tissues without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (t=8.37, P<0.001).ConclusionsThe over-expression of CRYAB protein is closely related to the invasion and progression of gastric cancer, they may be involved in the progression of gastric cancer and play a crucial role. Moreover, the expression of CRYAB mRNA increases after chemotherapy, it suggests that chemotherapy drugs can activate the self-protection mechanism of tumor cells to some extent, and influence the effect of chemotherapy by increasing expression of CRYAB protein.
Objective To explore the intervention effect on colorectal cancer operation by neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in multi-disciplinary team. Methods To analyze retrospectively the data of patients diagnosed definitely as colorectal cancer in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University from July 2007 to December 2007, and the planned and actual operative strategy were compared between MDT group and non-MDT group. Results According to the inclusion criteria, 251 colorectal cancer patients were included which had 183 rectal cancer and 68 colon cancer. The baseline between MDT group and non-MDT group was equal, and there was no difference of planned operative strategy between two groups. For patients planned undergoing standard ano-saving radical procedure, the ratio of actual procedure same to the planned and the ratio of radical procedure changed to expansive ano-saving radical procedure showed no significant differences between MDT group and non-MDT group (Pgt;0.05), whereas the difference of the ratio of radical procedure changed to local radical procedure between two groups was statistically significant (Plt;0.01). And the constituent ratio of actual procedure between two groups for patients which planned accepted non-ano-saving procedure didn’t have any significant difference (Pgt;0.05). For the cancer focus, the relief differences of complete remission and partial remission were statistically significant between two groups (P＜0.01), but the difference of the constituent ratio of T staging change was not statistically significant (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion The value of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy should not be limited to decrease the stage of cancer, and it is important to pay more attention to the high quality of combined therapy. Further research should be carried out to find the contribution of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy to mini-invasive surgery.
Objective To investigate the advances and clinical efficacy evaluation method on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer. Methods Literatures on the advances and clinical efficacy evaluation method on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer were reviewed and analyzed. The agreement between computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) and the results of histopathology and survival was analyzed.Results CT and EUS were the method of efficacy evaluation commonly used at present, but the evaluation indexes and criteria were controversial, and the criteria for solid tumors seemed to be not feasible for gastric cancer. Diffusionweighted imaging (DWI) method needed more investigation, while PET held advantage in early selection of patients without response accurately.Conclusion There is no uniform standard for clinical efficacy evaluation yet, so an integration of diverse imaging methods may be the best choice to improve the accuracy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer.
Objective To explore the clinical effect of neo-adjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy combined with operation on colorectal cancer patients in the multi-disciplinary team (MDT). Methods The data were collected retrospectively from January to December in 2007. The patients were classified as non-adjuvant chemotherapy group and adjuvant chemotherapy group according to the treatment strategy. Non-adjuvant chemotherapy group had accepted only surgery followed by preoperative neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy group had taken postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and operation. The clinical effect of two groups were compared. Results Totally 789 patients were treated among 2007, and 195 patients who were firstly diagnosed as colorectal cancer were included, and there were 109 males and 86 females, 59 colonic cancers and 136 rectal cancers. Average age was 59.98 years old. All of the included patients were followed up for 5-17 months. Three cases missed, no recurrence and no death happened. The baseline between non-adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy group was nearly same. There were no differences between two groups about the internal medicine complications, the cancer related obstruction, preoperative transfusion or not (P＞0.05). Whether the patients were transfused or not during the procedure and Dukes stage were significantly different between two groups(P＜0.05), while the other surgical and pathological index didnt show any statistical significance (P＞0.05). After operation, more patients in non-adjuvant chemotherapy group had accepted transfusion (P＜0.05). However, the postoperative rehabilitative indexes during hospitalization were not different between two groups. And the differences about the postoperative complications and defecation were not significant (P＞0.05). The values of CEA and CA19-9 were greatly different between two groups in the 1st and 3rd month follow-up. Conclusion The strategy of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy/operation/adjuvant chemotherapy didnt affect the rehabilitation and increase the risk of complications, however, more researches were necessary to prove whether the clinical effect were improved or not.
ObjectiveTo study the latest progress of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. MethodsLiteratures of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer, involving with theoretical basis, clinical significance, indications, drugs, predictors, and its relationship of breastconserving surgery, sentinel lymph node biopsy were reviewed. ResultsNeoadjuvant chemotherapy could reduce the clinical stage, increase opportunity of breast-conserving surgery, learn the sensitivity of drugs, prevent distant metastases, but the impact of the sentinel lymph node biopsy was still in dispute. ConclusionNeoadjuvant chemotherapy is an important part of a systemic treatment for breast cancer, but how to select sensitive drugs, develop individualized treatment programs and forecast the outcome needs further study.
Objective To discuss the influence of the progress and result in rectal cancer operation through application of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in multi-disciplinary team (MDT). Methods The patients treated in MDT model and non-MDT model between June to September 2007 were respectively analyzed, and the index about pathologic change, histologic transform and operative result between the two groups were compared.Results In the index of pathologic change, the incidence of abdominal adherence (13.5%, 7/52), ascites (7.7%, 4/52) and latent malignant intestinal obstruction (5.8%, 3/52) in MDT model group were obviously less than non-MDT model group (P=0.000). In the index of histologic transform, texture of mesentery in MDT model group was more fragile than non-MDT model group (P=0.000). The incidence of edema of pelvic tissues in MDT model group were more than non-MDT model group (P=0.000). However, the differences between the incidence of edema of pelvic peritoneum and adherence of mesorectum in two groups were insignificant (Pgt;0.05). In the index of operative results, the operative duration and intra-operative bleeding in MDT model group were less than non-MDT model group (P=0.000). And the protection of pelvic autonomic nerve in MDT model group was better than non-MDT model group (P=0.000). Meanwhile, accuracy rate in prediction of radical resection with anus-preserving in both groups were in high level (92.3% vs 76.2%). Conclusion Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy has certain influence in rectal cancer operation, but the successful operations are performed by standard and correct procedures. Therefore, optimizing combined therapy in MDT model and constructing preoperative evaluation system with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, would be the next important focus.
Objective To evaluate the risk of management decision combined neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with operation for colorectal cancer by means of the colorectal cancer model of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI-CCM). Methods One hundred and eighty-one eligible patients (102 male, 79 female, mean age 58.78 years), which were pathologically proved colorectal cancer in our ward from July to November 2007, involved 62 colonic and 119 rectal cancer. The enrollment were assigned into multi-disciplinary team (MDT) group (n=65) or non-MDT group (n=116), according to whether the MDT was adopted, and the operative risk was analyzed by ACPGBI-CCM. Results The baseline characteristics of MDT and non-MDT group were coherent. The watershed of lower risk group (LRG) and higher risk group (HRG) was set as predictive mortality=2.07%. The time involving extraction of gastric, urethral and drainage tube, feeding, out-of-bed activity after operation in MDT group, whatever in LRG or HRG, were statistically earlier than those in non-MDT group (P＜0.05). The resectable rate in LRG was statistically higher than that in HRG (P＜0.05), and the proportion of Dukes staging was significantly different (P＜0.05) between two groups; Moreover, predictive mortality in HRG was statistically higher than that in LRG (P＜0.05), while actually there was no death in both groups. Conclusion Dukes staging which is included as an indispensable option by ACPGBI-CCM is responsible for the lower predictive mortality in LRG.Hence, the value of ACPGBI-CCM used to asses the morbidity of complications within 30 days postoperatively would be warranted by further research. The postoperative risk evaluation can serve as a novel routine to comprehensively analyze the short-term safe in the MDT.