Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of melatonin as an adjuvant therapy for the tumor patients receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Methods Such databases as MEDLINE (1980 to Jan. 2010), The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2009), WanFang Data (1980 to Jan. 2010), CBM (1980 to Jan. 2010), CNKI (1980 to Jan. 2010), ELSEVIER ScienceDirect (SDOS, 1980 to Jan. 2010), Nature (1980 to Jan. 2010) and ongoing clinical trials (www.clinicaltrials.gov and www.controlled-trials.com) were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The data were extracted and the quality of the included RCTs was assessed by two reviewers. Then meta-analyses were performed by using Stata 10.1 software. Results Eight RCTs were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that melatonin significantly improved the remission rate for tumor patients (RR=1.98, 95% CI 1.52 to 2.58) and the one-year survival rate (RR=1.90, 95%CI 1.28 to 2.83), and significantly reduced the toxic effects of bone marrow suppression caused by chemotherapy or radiotherapy (RR=0.12, 95%CI 0.06 to 0.27). No reports of adverse events were associated with melatonin. Conclusion The existing evidence reveals that the melatonin, as an adjuvant therapy drug for tumor, plays a certain role in improving disease remission rate, reducing the toxicity of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and prolonging the life. It requires more high-quality RCTs for further verification because of the limitation of the included studies.
直肠癌围手术期辅助治疗的提出缘由是直肠癌发病率和死亡率仍不断上升。全球结、直肠癌发病率平均每年递增2%，在欧美国家其死亡率仍居癌症死亡第二位。我国情况亦相似，以上海为例，发病率每年递增4.2%，比全球平均递增速度还要高。1990～1992年我国十分之一人口的抽样调查显示，结、直肠癌平均调整死亡率为4.54/10万人口，居癌症死亡第五位。而直肠癌在美国占结、直肠癌的40%，在中国占50%以上。更甚的是，直肠癌治疗效果还不够理想，近30多年来提高并不显著。美国癌症协会Cutler统计分析25 000例结、直肠癌资料，其中外科治疗直肠癌5年生存率自1940～1960年由44%提高到50%。英国牛津大学临床试验研究中心收集1960～1987年世界各地所有结、直肠癌临床随机治疗资料共计97组154项研究，包含32 000余例，其中直肠癌3年和5年生存率分别为65.0%和45.1%。迄今，大宗直肠癌病例报告的术后5年生存率都徘徊在50%左右，扩大手术范围生存率提高不多，但随之而来的却是更大的手术损伤、合并症增加。术后远处转移，特别是局部复发是直肠癌治疗失败的原因，如何防止局部复发和肝转移，一直是困扰医学家们的临床课题。此外，随着社会进步和科学技术水平的提高，人们对生活质量要求也提高，更多直肠癌患者要求保留肛门。
ObjectiveTo analyze the relation between the age of patients with colorectal cancer and neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) regimen decision-making and outcomes in the current version of the Database from Colorectal Cancer (DACCA). MethodsThe version of DACCA selected for this analysis was updated on January 5, 2022. The patients were enrolled according to the established screening criteria and then assigned to 3 age groups: ≤45, 45–65, and ≥65 years old groups. The differences in the NAT regimen decision-making and changes of symptom, imaging, and cancer markers in these 3 age groups were analyzed. ResultsA total of 4 882 data that met the screened criteria were enrolled. The results of statistical analysis showed that the difference in the constituent ratio of patients chosen NAT strategies among 3 age groups was not statistically significant (χ2=8.885, P=0.180). There was a statistical difference in the constituent ratio of patients chosen combined target drug among 3 age groups (χ2=8.530, P=0.014), it was found that the proportion of the patients with ≤45 years old adopting combined target drug regimen was higher. Although the changes of symptom (H=12.299, P=0.056), image (H=1.775, P=0.412), and cancer markers (H=11.351, P=0.183) had no statistical differences of the 3 age groups after NAT, it was found that the proportions of patients with ≥65 years old with progresses of symptom and imaging changes and elevated cancer markers after NAT were higher, and the proportions of patients with ≤45 years old with complete and partial remissions of symptom and imaging changes and with normal cancer markers after NAT were higher. ConclusionsThrough analysis of DACCA data, it is found that in the selection of NAT strategy for colorectal cancer, the lower age group, the higher proportion of patients adopting combined target drug regimen. Although it is not found that age is related to changes of symptoms, imaging, and cancer markers after NAT, it still shows a trend of better outcomes in younger patients.
There is still a lack of experience in the perioperative strategy for esophageal cancer patients in China during the epidemic of COVID-19. In December 2022, a 59-year-old male patient with esophageal cancer was admitted to our department. He received 2 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy before surgery, and developed COVID-19 perioperatively. After treatment, the infection symptoms of the patient were improved, and the postoperative recovery was satisfactory.
ObjectiveTo review and summarize the research progress of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) in staging, surgical treatment, endoscopic treatment and adjuvant therapy in recent years, so as to provide reference and help for the follow-up research and treatment of this disease.MethodLiterature review was used to review the literatures on AEG treatment in various databases.ResultsThe incidence of AEG had increased rapidly in recent years, with high malignancy and poor prognosis. Siewert typing had allowed researchers to gain insight into the disease, and treatments were increasingly diversified. At present, the main treatment was still radical surgery. Because AEG was adjacent to the esophagus and stomach, there were many controversies about its staging, surgical approach, resection range, digestive tract reconstruction, adjuvant treatment and so on, especially Siewert type Ⅱ.ConclusionsThe surgical approach, resection range, and laparoscopic surgery of Siewert typeⅡcan choose according to esophageal involvement distance judgment, pathological staging is uncertain, still need several studies to reach a consensus. With the application of laparoscopy and adjuvant therapy, how to select individualized treatment options that require multidisciplinary collaboration for further study.
ObjectiveTo analyze the relationship between occupational type of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and decision-making and curative effect of neoadjuvant therapy in the current version of the Database from Colorectal Cancer (DACCA). MethodsThe eligible CRC patients were collected from June 29, 2022 updated DACCA according to the screening criteria, in which the data items analyzed included: gender, age, BMI, blood type, marriage, occupation, neoadjuvant therapy, symptomatic changes, imaging changes, and tumor regression grade (TRG), and the occupations were classified into the mental labour group, physical labour group, and the unemployed and resident groups according to the type of labour, then compared the decision-making and curative effect of neoadjuvant therapy among the 3 groups. ResultsA total of 2 415 eligible data were screened, of which 1 160 (48.0%) were the most in the manual labour group, followed by 877 (36.3%) in the unemployed and resident group, and finally 378 (15.7%) in the mental labour group. The proportion of those who did not use targeted drugs was higher in both patients ≤60 years old and >60 years old [75.6% (958/1 267) vs. 82.5% (947/1 148)], with both differences being statistically significant (P=0.004 and P=0.019), and among patients >60 years old, the different occupational types were associated with symptomatic changes and imaging changes after neoadjuvant therapy, with the highest number of both changes to partial remission [71.5% (161/225) vs. 66.7% (148/222)], both differences being statistically significant (P=0.001 and P=0.017). ConclusionThe analysis results of DACCA data reveal that the occupational type of CRC patients was associated with the choice of neoadjuvant therapy, and that different occupational types were associated with changes in curative effect before and after neoadjuvant therapy in CRC patients >60 years old, which needs to be further analysis for the reasons.