目的：探讨阿托伐他汀治疗高脂血症患者的疗效分析。方法： 对70例确诊高脂血症的患者给予阿托伐他汀10 mg，每日一次，连服3个月，观察观察治疗前后的血脂、肝功能、肾功能,同时观察患者有无不良反应。结果：治疗3个月后,TC、TG、LDL-C均较治疗前显著下降(Plt;0.05),HDL-C较治疗前明显提高(Plt;0.05),TC、TG、LDL-C、HDL-C治疗3个月的总有效率分别是84.28%、74.6%、80%和62.26%,未见明显不良反应。结论：阿托伐他汀治疗高脂血症患者安全有效。
目的 探讨阿托伐他汀钙对颈动脉粥样硬化患者血管内皮的保护作用。 方法 选取2010年10月－2011年8月颈动脉粥样硬化患者80例，随机分为治疗组和对照组。对照组给予阿司匹林肠溶片0.1 g，早饭后口服1次；治疗组在此基础上给予阿托伐他汀钙20 mg，每晚口服1次，10个月为1个疗程。分别在治疗前后进行颈动脉彩色多普勒超声检测颈动脉中膜厚度及颈动脉粥样硬化斑块面积，测定甘油三酯（TG）、总胆固醇（TC）、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇（LDL-C）、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇（HDL-C）、一氧化氮（NO）、血管内皮素-1（ET-1）水平。两组患者在1个疗程治疗结束后停药12周，测定TG、TCH、LDL-C、HDL-C、NO、ET-1水平。 结果 与治疗前比较，治疗组患者的TG、TC、LDL-C、ET-1水平显著降低，HDL-C、NO水平显著升高（P＜0.01）。颈动脉中膜厚度和颈动脉粥样硬化斑块面积明显变小（P＜0.05）。对照组无明显变化。治疗组停药12周后与停药时比较，TG、TC、LDL-C、ET-1水平显著升高，HDL-C、NO水平明显降低（P ＜0.05）。对照组无明显变化。 结论 阿托伐他汀钙能显著改善颈动脉粥样硬化斑块患者的血管内皮功能、血脂水平，稳定颈动脉粥样硬化斑块，促进斑块逆转，且需要长期坚持服用。
【摘要】 目的 探讨阿托伐他汀强化降脂治疗和左旋氨氯地平联用对高血压患者血压的影响。 方法 选择2009年1月-2010年11月住院及门诊原发性高血压合并高脂血症患者196例，均给予左旋氨氯地平和阿托伐他汀治疗8周后，复查血脂，从其中选择血脂正常者120例，随机分为对照组（单用左旋氨氯地平组）和治疗组（继续左旋氨氯地平联用阿托伐他汀），继续治疗20周后的血压情况。 结果 两组治疗20周后，治疗组收缩压和舒张压均较对照组下降明显，组间差异有统计学意义（Plt;0.01），治疗组优于对照组。 结论 高血压合并高脂血症患者，使用左旋氨氯地平降压和阿托伐他汀降脂治疗时，在血脂降至正常后，继续同时左旋氨氯地平降压和阿托伐他汀强化降脂治疗，降压效果优于单用左旋氨氯地平。【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the effects of levamlodipine combined with atorvastatin on blood pressure in patients with primary hypertension. Methods Between January 2009 and November 2010, 196 patients with hypertension and hyperlipidemia in the outpatient and inpatient departments of our hospital were given levamlodipine and atorvastatin for 8 weeks, after which 120 patients with normal blood lipid were chosen and randomly divided into the control group (treated only by levamlodipine) and the treatment group (treated by levamlodipine combined with atorvastatin). After 20 weeks of the treatment, we observed their blood pressure. Results After twenty weeks of treatment, the diastolic and systolic pressure was significantly lower in the treatment group than that in the control group (Plt;0.01). Conclusion For patients with hypertension and hyperlipidemia who have undergone the treatment by levamlodipine and atorvastatin, after their blood lipid level decreases to normal, the continuous enhanced treatment by the two drugs has a better efficacy compared with the therapy of single levamlodipine in decreasing the blood lipid.
Objective To systematically review the effectiveness and safety of Zhibitai vs. atorvastatin in the treatment of hyperlipidemia. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about Zhibitai vs. atorvastatin for hyperlipidemia were electronically retrieved in databases of PubMed, CENTRAL (Issue 7, 2010), CBM,CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data from inception to July, 2012. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality. Then, meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.2 software. Results A total of 4 RCTs involving 519 cases were included. The results of meta-analysis showed, Zhibitai was superior to atorvastatin in reducing TG levels after 8-week treatment (MD= −0.12, 95%CI −0.23 to −0.01, P=0.03) and increasing HDL-C levels after 8-week treatment (MD= −0.16, 95%CI −0.22 to −0.11, P=0.000 01). But there was no significant difference in decreasing TC levels and LDL-C levels after 4-week treatment and 8-week treatment as well as decreasing TG levels after 4-week treatment between the two groups. No obvious adverse reaction occurred in the two groups, but atorvastatin may impair liver function. Conclusion Current evidence with weak strength shows that, Zhibitai is superior to atorvastatin in reducing TG levels, and increasing HDL-C levels after 8 weeks. However, they are alike in other blood-fat index and safety. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high quality RCTs are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of migration and expression from chemokine receptor 4 (chemokine receptor-4, CXCR4) of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) which were pretreated by atorvastatin (ATV) in vitro.MethodsIsolated, cultivated, identified the BMSCs, pretreated P4-P6 of BMSCs with different concentrations of ATV for 12 hours. The experimental group was divided into control group, 0.1 nM/L (group 0.1 nM), 1 nM/L (1 nM group), 10 nM/L (10 nM group), 100 nM/L (100 nM group), 1 000 nM/L (1 000 nM group). The mRNA and protein of CXCR4 were determined by real time-polymerase chain reaction and Western blot. Immunofluoreseence assay were used to detect the expression levels of CXCR4. The migration ability of BMSCs were measured by transwell chamber.ResultsImmunofluoreseence assay showed the protein level of CXCR4 of group 1 nM and 10 nM were significantly higher than the other group. RT-PCR and Western blot showed the protein and mRNA level of CXCR4 in 10 nM was higher than that in group 1 nM. The migration ability of group 10 nM was higher than 1 nM and control group.ConclusionsATV can be dose-dependent promote expression levels of CXCR4 of BMSCs cultivated in vitro.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the influence of nifedipine combined with atorvastatin on hypertension in patients with hypertension.MethodPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of nifedipine combined with atorvastatin on hypertension in patients with hypertension from inception to November 20th, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using Stata 12.0 software.ResultsA total of 17 RCTs involving 1 838 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis indicated that nifedipine combined with atorvastatin was superior to nifedipine alone on SBP (MD=−8.937, 95%CI−11.913 to −5.962, P<0.001), DBP (MD=−3.702, 95%CI−6.626 to −0.778, P=0.013) and total effective rate (RR=1.24, 95%CI 1.07 to 1.44, P=0.003). There was no significant difference between two groups in the incidence of adverse reactions (P>0.05).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that nifedipine combined with atorvastatin can significantly improve total effective rate, decrease the level of SBP and DBP, and increasing of dose not increase the incidence of adverse reactions. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of nine lipid-lowing agents in the national essential drug list (2000) and provide evidence for the adjustment and selection of essential drugs. Methods Based on principles of health technology assessment (HTA) and evidence-based medicine, we searched for all published clinical studies about these drugs from the following databases: MEDLINE (1966-2002.8), The Cochrane Library, EMBASE (1974-2002), CBMdisk (1979-2002.8) and VIP (1989-2002.8), the database of National Center for Adverse Drug Reaction(ADR) Monitoring of China and the database of WHO Uppsala drug monitoring center. Included studies were appraised, analyzed and compared for the reduction of triglyceride (TC) or low density lipoprotein (LDL-C), the prevention for the coronary events and the incidence of ADR. Results The results from comparative trials for lipid-lowing agents showed that the equivalent dose of statins for 25% reduction of LDL-C was atorvastatin 10 mg/d, simvastatin 20 mg/d, pravastatin 40mg/d, lovastatin 40 mg/d, cerivastatin 0.3 mg/d and fluvastatin 80 mg/d. It was difficult to compare fenofibrate with gemfibrozil, acipimox with statins or fibrates based on available data. The study on the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events showed that pravastatin and lovastatin were effective in primary prevention, and long-term use could reduce the incidence of cardiovascular disease.Gemfibrozil could reduce the mortality from coronary heart disease (CHD) but the overall mortality was not changed. Pravastatin, simvastatin, atorvastatin, fluvastatin, gemfibrozil and fenofibrate had a confirmed effect in secondary prevention. Data from large-scale clinical trials and the reports from ADR monitoring center of England, America, Canada and Australia suggested that the statins which had rare ADR were safe and tolerated. Rhabdomyolysis was rare but had a serious adverse reaction associated with statins. The rate of fatal rhabdomyolysis related to cerivastatin was the highest among 6 statins. The safety of simvastatin, lovastatin and atorvastatin was lower than cerivastatin but higher than simvastatin and atorvastatin. The number of ADR reports of fenofibrate was fewer than that of gemfibrozil. Conclusions At present, the best evidence focused on pravastatin, simvastatin and lovastatin are widely used and have a confirmed safety and efficacy. Atorvastatin, fluvastatin and fenofibrate still need more data to confirm their effects on coronary heart disease prevention. The drugs which were shown to be inferior or insufficient evidence are cerivastatin, gemfibrozil and acipimox.
Objective To study the effect and mechanism of atorvastatin on improving airway function of mice with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) by inhibiting the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). Methods Wild type (WT) mice were randomly divided into WT control group, WT+COPD group, WT+COPD+atorvastatin group, NC lentivirus group, NC lentivirus+COPD group, NC lentivirus+COPD+atorvastatin group, and iNOS lentivirus+COPD+atorvastatin group. Lung specific iNOS knockout (KO) mice were randomly divided into KO control group and KO+COPD group. The COPD model was established by passive inhalation of cigarette smoke. Atorvastatin (10 mg·kg–1·d–1) was given by gavage, and the negative control (NC) lentivirus or iNOS lentivirus was given by tail vein injection. The lung function indexes including peak inspiratory flow (PIF) and peak expiratory flow (PEF), the number of neutrophils (N), eosinophils (E), lymphocytes (L) and Interleukin-1β (IL-1β), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), the expression levels of iNOS, endothelium nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and neural nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) in lung tissue were measured. Results Compared with WT control group, the levels of PIF and PEF decreased, typical pathological changes of COPD appeared in lung tissue, the numbers of N, E, L and the contents of TNF-α, IL-1β in BALF, the expression of iNOS, eNOS and nNOS in lung tissue increased in WT+COPD group (all P<0.05). After atorvastatin intervention, the levels of PIF and PEF increased, the pathological changes of COPD in lung tissue ameliorated, the numbers of N, E, L and the contents of TNF-α, IL-1β in BALF, the expression of iNOS in lung tissue decreased in WT+COPD+atorvastatin group (all P<0.05). After specific knockout of iNOS in lung tissue, the levels of PIF and PEF increased, the pathological changes of COPD in lung tissue ameliorated, the numbers of N, E, L and the contents of TNF-α, IL-1β in BALF decreased in KO+COPD group (all P<0.05). After overexpression of iNOS by tail vein injection of lentiviral, the levels of PIF and PEF decreased, the pathological changes of COPD in lung tissue aggravated, the numbers of N, E, L and the contents of TNF-α, IL-1β in BALF increased in iNOS lentiviral+COPD+atorvastatin group (all P<0.05). Conclusion The effect of atorvastatin on improving airway function and inflammatory response of COPD mice is related to the inhibition of iNOS expression.
ObjectiveTo observe and analyze the short-term efficacy of different statins on acute myocardial infarction in patients with premature coronary heart disease. MethodWe selected 70 patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted into our hospital for treatment of premature coronary artery disease between January 2012 and June 2013. The patients were randomly divided into experimental group (n=35) and control group (n=35). The experimental group were treated with rosuvastatin, and the control group of patients were given atorvastatin. We observed the rate of overall efficiency within 6 months after treatment, and total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), hepersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), left ventricular ejction fraction (LVEF), and flow-mediated dilation (FMD) were also observed before and after treatment. ResultsThe overall efficacy rate in the experimental group at 6 months was 94.3% and in the control group was 88.6% with no significant difference between each other (P>0.05). TG and FMD of patients in the experimental group at 6 months did not significantly change (P>0.05), while LVEF of the experimental group was significantly higher (P<0.05), and hs-CRP, TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C of the experimental group were significantly lower than the control group (P<0.05). ConclusionsShort-term comprehensive efficacy of rosuvastatin for treatment of premature coronary artery disease in patients with acute myocardial infarction is superior to atorvastatin.
Objective To explore the effects of aggressive lipid lowering therapy and its influence on cardiovascular events using lipitor (20 mg daily) for Chinese people after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods We did a double-blind and randomized controlled trial. From July 2005 to June 2006, 120 patients with PCI procedure who were discharged from the Shanghai Chest Hospital were randomly divided into aggressive lipid lowering group (atorvastatin 20 mg daily, n=60) and an ordinary lipid lowering group (atorvastatin 10 mg daily, n=60). The trial treatment was administered from the day of PCI to the third month after PCI. Atorvastatin at 10 mg daily was then used until one year after PCI. Blood biochemistry, cardiovascular events and drug adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results Among the 120 patients, 5 discontinued treatment and 4 more withdrew from the study. Therefore 115 and 111 were included in our main analyses [Comment from Mike: it is not ITT if the 5 who discontinued treatment are excluded] and a per-protocol (PP) analysis, respectively. Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The reduction in TG and the increase in HDL-C were similar between the two groups (Pgt;0.05), but the reductions in LDL-C and TC were significantly different between the two groups (Plt;0.05). This was observed from the beginning of follow-up to the third month after PCI. In the PP analysis, the percentage of patients whose LDL-C met the predefined requirement at the third month in the 20 mg group was significantly higher than in the group receiving the lower dose (87.03% vs. 70.17%, P=0.031). A similar result was also obtained if the patients who withdrew were retained in the analysis (P=0.044). The change in C reaction protein (CRP) from baseline at the first and the third month was significantly different between the two groups (Plt;0.05), but become relatively stable at the sixth month (Pgt;0.05). The mean follow-up duration was 6.5±3.0 months in the higher dose group, with 1 case of recurring angina pectoris and 1 case of revascularization were identified. It was 7.2±3.6 months in the 10 mg daily group, with 3 cases of recurring angina pectoris, 1 case of nonfatal myocardial infarction, 2 cases of revascularization and 1 case of sudden cardiogenic death. The difference in the Kaplan-Meier event curves was of borderline statistical significance from the fourth month (P=0.048). Drug adverse reactions were mild and myopathy was not identified in any patients. Conclusions After PCI procedure, the use of atorvastatin 20 mg daily for aggressive lipid lowering was safe and effective.