Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of intravenous polymyxin B alone and intravenous drip combined with nebulized inhaled polymyxin B in treatment of patients with carbapenem-resistant organism (CRO) pneumonia. Methods The clinical data of 85 patients with CRO pneumonia admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from September 2020 to June 2023 were collected using a retrospective study. According to the different ways of administration of polymyxin B, the patients receiving polymyxin B intravenous drip therapy alone were included in group A, and the patients receiving polymyxin B intravenous drip therapy combined with nebulized inhalation therapy were included in group B. The therapeutic effective rate, bacterial clearance rate, 30-day all-cause mortality and the level of infection indexes before and after the use of medication were compared between the two groups. The occurrence of acute kidney injury during the use of drugs in the two groups was observed and recorded. Results The pathogenicity culture results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P=0.144). Serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein were significantly lower in the two groups after drug administration compared with those before drug administration (both P<0.05). The therapeutic efficiency and bacterial clearance rate in group B were higher than those in group A (both P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day all-cause mortality between the two groups (P=0.664). And there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P=0.650). Conclusion When polymyxin B is used to treat patients with CRO pneumonia, the intravenous drip combined with nebulized inhalation regimen is superior to intravenous drip therapy alone and does not increase the risk of developing nephrotoxicity.
目的:评价足量布地奈德溶液雾化治疗重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者的临床应用价值。方法: 90例30%≤FEV1lt;50%的重度COPD急性加重期患者随机分为3组: 布地奈德组给予布地奈德溶液雾化吸入2mg/次,每8小时1次;甲泼尼龙组给予口服甲泼尼龙片24mg /次,1/日;对照组不使用任何糖皮质激素。疗程10d,观察3组患者治疗后肺功能,动脉血气和呼吸困难评分变化,以及糖皮质激素主要不良反应。结果: 与对照组相比,吸入布地奈德组和口服甲泼尼龙组在FEV1,PaO2,PaCO2和呼吸困难评分改善值方面,有显著差异性(Plt;005);吸入布地奈德组和口服甲泼尼龙组两组各项指标改善程度相似(Pgt;005);吸入布地奈德组和对照组的不良反应少于口服甲泼尼龙组 (Plt;005)。〖HTH〗结论:〖HTSS〗足量布地奈德溶液雾化治疗与口服糖皮质激素疗效相近,全身副作用小,安全性好,是重度COPD急性加重期糖皮质激素的有效选择。
ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical effects of nebulized lidocaine anesthesia and anesthesia with lidocaine and midazolam in patients with preoperative bronchoscopy. MethodsTotally, 136 inpatients between May 2002 and June 2013 with preoperative bronchoscopy were included in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to experimental group and control group with 68 patients in each. For patients in the experimental group, 8 mL of 2% lidocaine was administered through inhalation anesthesia, followed by 2-3 mg bolus of midazolam, and subsequently 0.5 mg of midazolam was administered every 2 minutes depending on patients' awareness. Patients in the control group accepted lidocaine alone for anesthesia. The clinical efficacy and adverse effects of both the two ways of anesthesia were observed. ResultsThe time of sustained and effective anesthesia was (24.5±2.8) minutes in the experimental group, as compared with (16.8±2.1) minutes in the control group (P<0.01). The average amount of consumption of lidocaine was (12.4±1.3) mL in the experimental group, as compared with (16.8±1.5) mL in the control group (P<0.01). The heart rate at 5 min after operation was (81.5±19.5) beats/min in the experimental group, as compared with (94.6±34.6) beats/min in the control group (P<0.01). The mean pulse oxygen saturation at 5 min after operation was (93.5±3.6)% in the experimental group, as compared with (88.2±13.3)% in the control group (P<0.01). ConclusionCombined application of lidocaine and midazolam before bronchoscopy is simple and feasible for anesthesia, which has higher success rate, lesser side effects and other reactions such as body movement and coughing.
ObjectiveTo observe the clinical efficacy of triple aerosol inhalation of pulmicort respules,ipratropine and ventolin in treatment of severe acute asthma exacerbations in adults. Methods46 cases of severe asthmatic patients with acute exacerbations admitted between May 2011 and May 2013 were recruited in the study.They were randomly divided into a treatment group and a control group,23 cases in each group.The control group received aminophylline and methylprednisolone intravenously,while the treatment group received triple aerosol inhalation of pulmicort respules,ipratropine and ventolin on the basic treatment of the control group.The clinical efficacy,the score of asthma symptom of the day and night,the time of disappearance of symptoms and wheezing sound,the glucocorticoid dosage and the incidence of adverse reactions of each group were compared. ResultsComparison of clinical efficacy of two groups drew significant differences (P<0.05) after 7 days.The score of asthma symptom of the day and night in the treatment group was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05).Except cough,the duration of wheezing,breathlessness,chest distress and extinction time of wheezing sound in the treatment group were shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05).The triple inhalation therapy can reduce the dosage and shorten the period of intravenous glucocorticoid treatment with slight adverse reactions (P<0.05). ConclusionIn the treatment of severe asthmatic patients with acute exacerbations,the clinical efficacy of triple aerosol inhalation of pulmicort respules,ipratropine and ventolin on the base of intravenous treatment is satisfactory with rapid onset,which can also reduce the glucocorticoid dosage and the incidence of adverse reactions.So the combination therapy is worthy of clinical use.
ObjectiveTo analyze the effect of different nebulization methods in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) requiring non-invasive ventilators (NIV). MethodsOne hundred and two patients with AECOPD were selected according to the standard, and randomly divided into a control group, a trial group I, and a trial group II according to the random number table. The patients in the control group received NIV intermittent oxygen-driven nebulization; the patients in the trial group I received NIV simultaneous oxygen-driven nebulization; and the patients in the trial group II received NIV simultaneous air-driven nebulization. The dynamic fluctuations of transcutaneous partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PtCO2), arterial blood gas indexes (PaCO2, PaO2, pH), vital signs and pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) fluctuations were compared. ResultsPtCO2 at 15min of nebulization in the trial group II were lower than the other groups (P<0.05). PtCO2 at 15min of nebulization was higher than the other time points in the control group (P<0.05); there was no statistical difference of PtCO2 at different time points in the trial group I (P>0.05); PtCO2 gradually decreased with time in the trial group II (P<0.05). The difference before and after nebulization of PtCO2 (dPtCO2) was larger in trial group II than the other groups (P<0.05). PtCO2 at 0min and 5min after the end of nebulization in trial group II were lower than the other groups (P<0.05); there were no statistical differences of PtCO2 at 10min and 15min after the end of nebulization among three groups (P>0.05). There were statistical differences of the PtCO2 at each time point in the control group except for the PtCO2 at 10 min and 15min after the end of nebulization, all of which decreased with time; PtCO2 at each time points of nebulization decreased with time in the trial group I (P<0.05). PtCO2 only at 5min after the end of nebulization was lower than that at 0min after the end of nebulization in trial group II (P< 0.05), there were no statistical differences in other times (P>0.05). PaCO2, pH at the 4th day of treatment was lower than the pre-treatment in the control group (P<0.01); there were statistical differences of PaCO2 between the pre-treatment and the rest time points in the trial group I and group II (P<0.05). The number of abnormal fluctuations in vital signs and SpO2 during nebulization in three groups was not statistically different (P>0.05). ConclusionsThree groups can achieve good therapeutic effects. NIV intermittent oxygen-driven nebulization can make PtCO2 rise during nebulization; NIV simultaneous oxygen-driven nebulization can make PtCO2 remain stable during nebulization; NIV simultaneous air-driven nebulization can make PtCO2 fall during nebulization.
Objective To evaluate the effects of midazolam intravenous drip combined with lidocaine via nebulization on patients during mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit ( ICU) . Methods 60 thoracic patients required postoperative mechanical ventilation in ICUwere randomized into 2 groups. The patients in therapeutic group received lidocaine 1 mg/kg via nebulization and midazolam intravenous drip 0. 1 mg·kg- 1·h- 1 . The patients in control group received 0. 9% NaCl 1 mg/kg via nebulization andmidazolam0. 1 mg·kg- 1 ·h- 1 . According to the scale of Ramsay, the additional midazolam and fentanyl were injected to maintain sedation and inhibit cough in both groups. During ventilation, calm score, the number and the severity of cough, the mean arterial pressure ( MAP) , heart rate ( HR) , and the consumption of midazolam and fentanyl were record. Results The number and severity of cough, the scale of MAP and HR in the therapeutic group were all significant lower than those in the control group ( P lt; 0. 05) . Theconsumption of midazolam and fentanyl in the therapeutic group were also significantly lower than that in the control group ( P lt; 0. 05) .Conclusion Midazolam intravenous drip combined with lidocaine via nebulization can reduce the side effects and requirement of sedative and opioids drug in ICU patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of inhaled amphotericin B ( AmB) in prophylaxis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis ( IPA) in both animal studies and clinical researches. Methods MEDLINE, ISI, EMBASE and Wanfang Periodical Databases were searched until march 2011 for case-control study on the efficacy and safety of inhaled AmB in prophylaxis of IPA. The articles were evaluated according to inclusion criteria. Poor-quality studies were excluded, and RevMan 4. 22 sofeware was applied for investigating the heterogeneity among individual studies and calculating the pooled odds ratio ( OR) and 95% confidence interval ( CI) . Results Five animal studies with a total of 626 animals were included. The overall survival rate of the immunosuppressed animals with pulmonary aspergillosis treated with nebulized AmB was increased ( 38.3% vs. 9.7% , OR=13.93, 95% CI 7.46 ～26.01, Plt;0. 000 01) . Six clinical trials including 1354 patients were considered. Our meta-analysis showed that inhaled AmB could significantly reduce the incidence rate of IPA ( 2.6% vs. 9.2% , OR=0.27, 95% CI 0.16 ～0.46, P lt;0. 000 01) , but had no definite benefit on mortality. Four studies evaluated the potential side effects of nebulized AmB and showed that there were no significant adverse events. Conclusions Empirical inhaled AmB is associated with a lower rate of IPA but no significant
Objective To evaluate therapeutic efficacy and safety of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) inhalation in patients with recurrent pulmonarv alveolar proteinosis (PAP). Methods Three cases of recurrent PAP were treated by GM-CSF inhalation after whole lung lavage. The clinical data of the pulmonary function and SpO 2, the clinical symptoms and pulmonary lesions were compared before and after treatment. Results The pulmonary function and manifestations were improved obviously after GM-CSF inhalation. Also the ground-glass opacity was improved in high-resolution CT. The pulmonary function and SpO 2 increased obviously after received GM-CSF inhalation. There were no any adverse reactions in 3 cases. Conclusion GM-CSF inhalation therapy is effective and safe in recurrent PAP, but the long-term effect remains to be seen.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical manifestation, radiological, pathological features and treatment of organizing pneumonia (OP) induced by aerosolized recombinant super compound interferon (rSIFN-co). MethodsClinical features and related laboratory examinations of a patient with OP developing after initiation of rSIFN-co for treatment of lung adenocarcinoma were analyzed, and the relevant literature was reviewed. ResultsA 48-year-old man developed cough, fevers, shortness of breath and weight loss, shortly half a month after initiation of therapy with rSIFN-co for lung adenocarcinoma. Chest high resolution computerized tomography (HRCT) showed multiple lung infection diseases. However, the anti-infection treatment was invalid. Lung tissue biopsy by bronchofibroscope was consistent with OP. After discontinuation of rSIFN-co and receiving pulse corticosteroid therapy followed by oral methylprednisolone, the pneumonic symptoms and chest manifestations markedly improved. After eight-month follow-up, the patient's condition was stable. The relative literature screening from Pubmed and Wanfangdata was implemented, but there was no report about OP caused by aerosolized rSIFN-co for lung adenocarcinoma. ConclusionThis report suggests that treatment with aerosolized rSIFN-co for lung adenocarcinoma may induce OP, a rare complication, and clinicians should have vigilance on it.