ObjectiveTo compare the effects of piriformis muscle release versus preservation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) via supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip (SuperPATH) approach on muscle injury. MethodsForty-nine patients undergoing initial THA via SuperPATH approach between June 2022 and June 2023 were randomly divided into two groups, with 24 patients in trial group and 25 patients in control group. The trial group received piriformis muscle release intraoperatively, whereas the control group underwent muscle preservation. There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, body mass index, disease type, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grading, and preoperative muscle infiltration, muscle atrophy, muscle injury serological indicators, Harris score, etc. (P>0.05). The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total blood loss, hospital stay, preoperative and postoperative 1-day muscle injury serological indicators [including creatine kinase (CK) and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH)], and incidence of complications between two groups were recorded. Harris score was used to evaluate the recovery of hip joint function. MRI was used to evaluate the extent of hip muscle injuries (gluteus minimus, gluteus medius, piriformis, obturator internus, quadratus femoris), including tendon integrity, degree of muscle fat infiltration, and degree of muscle atrophy preoperative and 1 year postoperatively. ResultsThe operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and total blood loss in the trial group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incision length and length of hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). Both groups showed a significant increase in serum CK and LDH levels on postoperative day 1 compared to preoperative levels (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up, the follow-up time for the trial group and the control group was (14.8±2.8) and (15.1±3.0) months, respectively, with no significant difference (t=−0.400, P=0.691). Incisions healed by first intention in both groups, with 1 case in the trial group and 2 cases in the control group experiencing venous thrombosis in the calf muscle space. There was no complication such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, hip dislocation, prosthesis loosening, or periprosthetic infection in the lower limbs. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). At 1 year after operation, both groups of patients showed a significant increase in Harris scores compared to preoperative levels (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with preoperative results, both groups showed significant fat infiltration in the piriformis and obturator muscles at 1 year after operation (P<0.05), while there was no significant fat infiltration in the gluteus minimus, gluteus medius, and quadratus femoris muscles (P>0.05). At 1 year after operation, except for the higher incidence of piriformis muscle fat infiltration in the control group compared to the trial group (P<0.05), there was no significant difference in the incidence of other muscle infiltrations between the two groups (P>0.05). At 1 year after operation, both groups of piriformis and obturator muscles showed significant muscle atrophy compared to preoperative levels (P<0.05). The gluteus minimus and gluteus medius showed mild atrophy compared to preoperative levels, while the maximum transverse diameter of the quadriceps muscle slightly increased, but the differences were not significant (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the maximum cross-sectional diameter or cross-sectional area changes of each muscle between the two groups (P>0.05). At 1 year after operation, the continuity of the gluteus medius and quadratus femoris muscles in both groups was intact. Both groups had some patients with incomplete continuity of the piriformis muscle, obturator internus, and gluteus minimus, but the difference was not significant (P>0.05). ConclusionThe SuperPATH approach THA may cause injury to the piriformis, gluteus minimus, and obturator internus. The piriformis muscle release does not increase muscle injury, but it can shorten the operation time and reduce bleeding.
Objective To systematically evaluate the difference in leg length discrepancy (LLD) between robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) and traditional THA. Methods The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, EMbase, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and CBM databases were searched by computer to collect cohort studies of robot-assisted and traditional THAs from inception to August 11th, 2021. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 10 high-quality cohort studies were included. The results of Meta-analysis showed that compared with traditional THA, LLD after robot-assisted THA was smaller [MD=−1.64, 95%CI (−2.25, −1.04), P<0.001], Harris scores at 3 and 12 months after operation were higher [MD=1.50, 95%CI (0.44, 2.57), P=0.006; MD=7.60, 95%CI (2.51, 12.68), P=0.003]. However, the operative time was longer [MD=8.36, 95%CI (4.56, 12.17), P<0.000 1], and the postoperative acetabular anteversion angle was larger [MD=1.91, 95%CI (1.43, 2.40), P<0.001]. There was no significant difference in Harris score at 6 months, amnesia index (Forgotten joint score, FJS), postoperative acetabular abduction angle, and incidence of complication between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Robot-assisted THA is superior to traditional THA in postoperative LLD.
Objective To investigate clinical significanceand surgical protocols about the balance of the lower limb lengths in the total hip arthroplasty. Methods Forty-eight patients undergoing the unilateral primary total hip arthroplasty from March 2000 to October 2004 were retrospectively studied. In 12 hips, the prostheses were of the cement type; in 36 hips, of the mixture type. Thirty patients with an equal limb length had a fractured femoral neck, 10 patients had a shortened (1.0-2.0 cm) limb, 6 patients had a shortened (2.0-4.0 cm)limb, and 2 patients had a shortened (4.0-6.0 cm) limb. Based on the clinical measurement and radiographic examination, the surgical protocols were designed, the hip prosthesis type was chosen, and the neck length of the femoral prosthesis and the position of osteotomy were estimated. By the wearing of the acetabula properly, the best rotation point was found out during the operation. The cut plane of the femoral neck was adjusted according to the results of the radiographic and other examinations. The neck length was readjusted after the insertion of the prosthesis so as to achieve an intended limblength equalization. Results All the patients were followed up for 3-42 months.According to the Harris scoring system, clinical results were excellent in 30 patients, good in 12, fair in4, and poor in 2. Of the 30 patients with an equal limb before operation, 5 were lengthened 1.0-2.0 cm in their lower limbs, and 1 lengthened 2.5 cm postoperatively. Of the 18 patients with shortened limbs before operation, 10 returned to the same lengths in their lower limbs, 6 were lengthened 1.0-2.0 cm in their lower limbs, but 2 with seriously-shortened lower limbs for congenital dysplasia of the hipjoint were still shortened 2.0-3.0 cm in the limb length after operation. The Harris hip scores revealed an average of 92.3 points in the patients with an equal limb length, and 88.6 points in the patients with shortened limbs. 〖WTHZ〗Conclusion Many factors, such as surgical protocols, prosthesis type designs, and the management techniques during the operation, can affect the limb length after operation. As the limb length discrepancy will make the patients feel disappointed, the clinical measurements are very important before operation. Application of the comprehensive appraisal methods during the operation, use of the soft tissuebalance method, and skills for obtaining an equal limb length during the total hip arthroplasty are also important for improving the surgical result further.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the accuracy of using smartphone to measure the angle of acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty (THA). MethodsBetween June 2012 and September 2015, the acetabular abduction and anteversion angles were measured in 50 patients undergoing THA. There were 24 males and 26 females, aged 37 to 83 years (mean, 71 years). The left hip was involved in 22 cases and the right hip in 28 cases. Of 50 patients, 34 suffered from fracture of the femoral neck, and 16 suffered from avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Acetabular dysplasia was excluded in all cases. A smartphone was used to measure the acetabular abduction and anteversion angles during operation; standard Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) was used to measured the acetabular abduction and anteversion angles on the X-ray film at 1 week after operation. It was defined as positive that the component angle values by PACS measurement were greater than those by the smartphone measurement, whereas as negative. The two measurement methods were compared, and intra-observer variability was assessed by analyzing the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the Mann-Whitney U-test was used to analyze difference. ResultsThe ICC was 0.84 in the acetabular component angles by smartphone and PACS measurement methods. The acetabular component abduction angle was (44.02±1.33)° and the anteversion angle was (17.62±2.20)° by smartphone measurement. The acetabular component abduction angle was (44.74±4.05)° and the anteversion angle was (17.22±5.57)° by PACS measurement. There was no significant difference between two measurement methods (Z=-1.977, P=0.482; Z=-0.368, P=0.713). The acetabular component angle was in the safe zone in 44 cases; and the acetabular component anteversion angle was beyond safe range of 1 to 5°, and the abduction angle was beyond safe range of 1 to 3° in 6 cases. Intra-measurement variability was -21 to +10° for the anteversion angle and -10 to + 9° for the abduction angle, indicating that the acetabular component anteversion angle by smartphone measurement was greater than that by the PACS measurement, and the abduction angle was less than that by PACS measurement. ConclusionSmartphone is a convenient tool to measure the acetabular component angle in THA.
Objective To review research advances of revision surgery after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) for patients with Crowe type Ⅳ developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Methods The recent literature on revision surgery after primary THA in patients with Crowe type Ⅳ DDH was reviewed. The reasons for revision surgery were analyzed and the difficulties of revision surgery, the management methods, and the related prosthesis choices were summarized. Results Patients with Crowe type Ⅳ DDH have small anteroposterior diameter of the acetabulum, large variation in acetabular and femoral anteversion angles, severe soft tissue contractures, which make both THA and revision surgery more difficult. There are many reasons for patients undergoing revision surgery after primary THA, mainly due to aseptic loosening of the prosthesis. Therefore, it is necessary to restore anatomical structures in primary THA, as much as possible and reduce the generation of wear particles to avoid postoperative loosening of the prosthesis. Due to the anatomical characteristics of Crowe type Ⅳ DDH, the patients have acetabular and femoral bone defects, and the repair and reconstruction of bone defects become the key to revision surgery. The acetabular side is usually reconstructed with the appropriate acetabular cup or combined metal block, Cage, or custom component depending on the extent of the bone defect, while the femoral side is preferred to the S-ROM prosthesis. In addition, the prosthetic interface should be ceramic-ceramic or ceramic-highly cross-linked polyethylene wherever possible. Conclusion The reasons leading to revision surgery after primary THA in patients with Crowe type Ⅳ DDH and the surgical difficulties have been clarified, and a large number of clinical studies have proposed corresponding revision modalities based on which good early- and mid-term outcomes have been obtained, but further follow-up is needed to clarify the long-term outcomes. With technological advances and the development of new materials, personalized prostheses for these patients are expected to become a reality.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical outcomes of acetabular revision using a metal reconstruction cage. MethodsBetween October 2006 and October 2013, 16 patients (16 hips) underwent acetabular revision with a metal reconstruction cage. There were 4 males and 12 females, with the mean age of 62.7 years (range, 49-78 years). The time from total hip arthroplasty to revision was 3-15 years (mean, 8.2 years). The causes for revision were aseptic acetabular loosening in 15 cases, and femoral periprosthetic fracture (Vancouver type B3) in 1 case. According to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) classification, there were 12 cases of type III and 4 cases of type IV; according to the Paprosky classification, there were 12 cases of type IIIA and 4 cases of type IIIB. Harris score was used for hip function evaluation, and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain in the thigh. X-ray films were taken for imaging evaluation. ResultsHealing of incision by first intention was obtained in all patients. Deep venous thrombosis occurred in 1 patient, and was cured after anticoagulation therapy. No complications of infection, neurovascular injury, and prosthetic dislocation were found. Sixteen patients were followed up 6.8 years on average (range, 2-9 years). The Harris score was significantly increased from preoperative 42.44±4.66 to 91.88±3.28 at last follow-up (t=–106.30, P=0.00). Two patients had mild pain in the thigh, but pain disappeared at 1 year after operation. At immediate after operation, the abduction angle was 37-54° (mean, 42.9°). The distance between acetabular rotation centre and teardrop line was (33.67±12.19) mm for preoperative value and was (20.67±9.63) mm for postoperative value, showing significant difference (t=–9.60, P=0.00). The distance between acetabular rotation centre and lateral teardrop was (34.98±12.30) mm for preoperative value and was (40.04±6.61) mm for postoperative value, showing significant difference (t=–3.15, P=0.00). X-ray film results showed bony fusion at the osteotomy sites at 4 to 12 months after operation. No continuous radiolucent line, prosthetic dislocation, or osteolysis was found, and bony ingrowth was observed in all patients. No patient received re-revision due to prosthetic loosening. ConclusionThe metal reconstruction cage for acetabular revision can achieve good effectiveness for patients with serious bone defect.
Objective To investigate the morphological changes of the proximalfemur and their implication to the total hip arthroplasty in patients with Crowe Ⅱ/Ⅲ developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Methods The experimental gr oup was composed of 15 hips in 14 patients (Crowe Ⅱ, 9 hips; Crowe Ⅲ, 6 hips ) with osteoarthritis secondary to Crowe Ⅱ/Ⅲ DDH (2 males, 12 females; age, 35-61 years). None of the patients had accepted any osteotomy treatment. The control group was composed of 15 normal hips in 15 patients with unilateral DDH (3 males, 12 females; age, 35-57 years). Twelve hips came from the experimental group and the other 3 came from the patients with unilateral Crowe Ⅰ DDH. The femurswere examined with the CT scanning. The following parameters were measured: theheight of the center of the femoral head (HCFH), the isthmus position (IP), theneckshaft angle(NS), the anteversion angle, the canal flare index, and the canal width. Then, the analysis of the data was conducted. Results HCFH and IP in theexperimental group and the control group were 50.1±6.7 mm, 50.1±7.4 mm, and 107.4±21.5 mm, 108.7±18.1 mm，respectively, which had no significant differencebetween the two groups（Pgt;0.05）. In the experimental group and the control group, the NS were 138.3±10.0° and 126.7±5.7°，the anteversion angles were 36.5±15.9° and 18.8±5.4°, and the canal flare indexes were 4.47±0.40and 5.01±0.43. There was a significant difference between the two groups in the above 3 parameters （Plt;0.05）. As for the canal width of the femur, therewasa significant difference in the interior/exterior widths and the anterior/posterior widths at the level of 2 cm above the lesser trochanter and 4 cm belowthe lesser trochanter between the two groups （Plt;0.05）; however, there was nosignificant difference in the canal width of the femur at the isthmus between the two groups（P＞0.05）. Conclusion It is necessary to evaluate the morphology of the proximal femur before the total hip arthroplasty performed in patients with Crowe Ⅱ/Ⅲ DDH. The straight and smaller femoral prosthesis should be chosen and implanted in the proper anteversion position duringoperation.
Objective To study the effect of simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty in a single procedure. Methods From October 1999 to March 2004, 15 patients (30 hips) underwent simultaneous sequential bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THAs) in a single procedure. Of the 15 patients, 11 were male (22 hips) and 4 were female (8 hips). Their ages ranged from 35 to 70 years. Their courses of disease ranged from 1 year to 50 years (4.8 years on average). The Harris scores of the joint function before the operation ranged from 12 to 45 points (27 points on average). Five were done with Smith-Peterson and 10 were done with Moore. Results The operative time was 3 hours and 25 minutes to 5 hours (4 hours and 10 minutes on average). The volume of blood transfusion during operation was 400 to 2 400 ml (1 160 mlon average). All the 15 patients were followed up for 3 to 35 months (18 monthson average). The Harris scores of the joint function after the operation rangedfrom 70 to 100 points (86 points on average). There was significant difference in the scores between before and after operations (Plt;0.05). There was only 1death within 1 months of the operation and no serious between complications such as infection, pulmonary embolism, and deep vein plug. All the patients were still ambulant in the community and gained significant pain relief. Conclusion Simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty in a single procedure is a safe and effective method. However, the decision of performing singlestage bilateral total hip arthroplasty should be carefully made and preoperative preparation should be sufficiently made.
Objective To investigate the impact of joint capsule repair and external rotators suture on the prognosis in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) by posterolateral approach. Methods Between January 2006 and June 2009, 159 patients with femoral neck fracture underwent primary THA by posterolateral approach, and were divided into 4 groups according to different treatments: joint capsule repair and external rotators suture were given in group A (n=38), only joint capsule repair in group B (n=39), only external rotators suture in group C (n=41), and no joint capsule repair or external rotators suture in group D (n=41). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injure, disease duration, type of fracture, combined medical disease, or prosthesis selection among 4 groups (P gt; 0.05). The bleeding volume, drainage, postoperative hip dislocation rate, hip Harris score, and the hip range of motion (ROM) in internal rotation and external rotation were compared. Results There was no significant difference in operative time, bleeding volume, or drainage among 4 groups (P gt; 0.05). Postoperative hip dislocation occurred in 0, 0, 4 (9.8%), and 4 (9.8%) cases of groups A, B, C, and D, respectively, showing significant difference in incidence of postoperative hip dislocation among 4 groups (χ2=7.910, P=0.048). The hip Harris scores were significantly improved after operation when compared with preoperative scores in 4 groups (P lt; 0.05). Significant differences were found in hip Harris score at 6 weeks and 6 months after operation among 4 groups (P lt; 0.05); group D was significantly lower than groups A, B, and C, and groups B and C were significantly lower than group A (P lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in the hip ROM in internal rotation among 4 groups at 6 weeks and 6, 12 months after operation (P gt; 0.05); but the hip ROM in external rotation were significantly bigger in groups A and C than in groups B and D at 6 weeks and 6 months after operation (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion Joint capsule repair and external rotators suture in primary THA by posterolateral approach do not increase the bleeding volume and drainage, but can reduce the early postoperative hip dislocation risk, increase the Harris score, and recover the external rotation function of involved hip. So joint capsule and external rotators should be repaired in THA by posterolateral approach.
Objective To systematically review the clinical efficiency and safety after topical administration of tranexamic acid in total hip arthroplasty. Methods Relevant randomized controlled trials were identified from databases such as Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase and CNKI from the establishment of the database to August, 2017. A systematic review was performed to compare total blood loss, the rate of transfusion and thromboembolism events between the tranexamic acid group and the control group. And the patients in tranexamic acid group were treated with tranexamic acid for hemorrhage after total hip arthroplasty, while the patients in the control group were not treated with tranexamic acid or used isotonic saline. Analysis was carried out using Review Manager version 5.2.0 software. Results Eight studies were incorporated into the Meta-analysis. The results of Meta-analysis showed that there was significant difference in total blood loss between two groups [weighted mean difference (WMD)=–360.27 mL, 95% confidence interval (CI) (–412.68, –307.87) mL, P<0.000 01]. There was significant difference in the rate of transfusion between two groups [ (odds ratio,OR)=0.22, 95%CI (0.14, 0.33), P<0.000 01]. There was no significant difference in complications between two groups [OR=1.48, 95%CI (0.41, 5.34), P=0.55]. Conclusion Topical administration of tranexamic acid could significantly reduce total blood loss and transfusion requirements in primary total hip arthroplasty, and would not increase thromboembolic complications.