ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of multidisciplinary doctor-nurse collaboration team on the perioperation management of geriatric patients with hip fractures.MethodsThe clinical data of 489 geriatric patients with hip fractures (femoral neck fracture and intertrochanteric fracture) between January 1st 2016 and January 1st 2018 was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 279 patients were treated with the multidisciplinary doctor-nurse collaboration care (observation group) and 210 patients were treated with the conventional therapeutics and nursing care (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, type and classification of fracture, the interval between injury and admission, and Charlson index between the two groups (P>0.05). The surgery rates, time from hospitalization to operation, length of stay, and the incidences of perioperative complications were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe surgery rate was 90.32% (252/279) in observation group and 80.48% (169/210) in control group, showing significant difference between the two groups (χ2=9.703, P=0.002). The time from hospitalization to operation and length of stay in observation group [(5.39±2.47), (10.56±3.76) days] were significant shorter than those in control group [(6.13±2.79), (12.27±3.11) days] (t=−3.075, P=0.002; t=−5.330, P=0.000). The incidence of respiratory complications was 46.15% in control group and 30.56% in observation group; the incidence of cardiovascular system complications was 69.23% in control group and 51.19% in observation group; the incidence of cerebrovascular system complications was 20.12% in control group and 11.11% in observation group; the incidence of deep venous thrombosis was 40.24% in control group and 25.40% in observation group. The incidences of perioperative complications were significantly lower in observation group than in control group (P<0.05).ConclusionMultidisciplinary doctor-nurse collaboration team is conducive not only to improve the surgery rates, but also to reduce perioperative complications as well as shorten the length of stay and preoperative waiting time.
目的 探讨老年髋部骨折围手术期的治疗策略。 方法 回顾性分析2004年1月-2009年1月手术治疗的96例老年髋部骨折患者的临床资料。 结果 术前81.25%(78/96)合并内科疾病的患者，均安全度过手术期。术后发生并发症20例，发生率为20.83%。术前有并存疾病者手术治疗优良率为84.61%，术前无并存疾病者手术治疗优良率为94.44%；术前有无并存疾病患者的手术优良率比较，差异有统计学意义(Plt;0.05)。 结论 老年髋部骨折患者术前合并疾病较多，应视其个体情况，采取积极恰当的围手术期处理，积极控制和治疗合并疾病，才能降低围手术期并发症的发生率，取得优良的治疗效果。
Objective To compare the effectiveness of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and reconstruction nail with minimally invasive technique for ipsilateral femoral shaft and extracapsular hip fractures in young and middle-aged patients. Methods Sixty-nine young and middle-aged patients with ipsilateral femoral shaft and extracapsular hip fractures were treated between January 2000 and August 2010, and their data were analyzed retrospectively. Of them, fractures were fixed by reconstruction nail in 44 cases (reconstruction nail group) and by PFNA in 25 cases (PFNA group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, weight, injury cause, fracture type, or disease duration between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The operation time, blood loss, fracture healing time, complications, and functional outcomes were compared between 2 groups to evaluate the effectiveness. Results The operation time and blood loss in the PFNA group were significantly less than those in the reconstruction nail group (P lt; 0.05). The follow-up time was 12-38 months (mean, 20 months ) in the PFNA group and was 12-48 months (mean, 22 months) in the reconstruction nail group. No complication occurred as follows in 2 groups: wound infection, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, breakage of the implants, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, or serious rotation and shortening deformity of lower limbs. In the PFNA group and the reconstruction nail group, 1 patient underwent technical difficulty in nail implant and 7 patients underwent technical difficulty in proximal locking screw, respectively; 3 patients and 6 patients had intra-operative iatrogenic fracture of femoral shaft, respectively; and delayed union of femoral shaft was observed in 1 patient and 2 patients, respectively. The complication rate was 20% (5/25) in the PFNA group and 34% (15/44) in the reconstruction nail group, showing no significant difference (χ2=1.538, P=0.215). No significant difference was found in fracture healing time between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in Harris hip score and Evanich knee score between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion PFNA or reconstruction nail with minimally invasive technique is a good method to treat ipsilateral femoral shaft and extracapsular hip fractures, but the PFNA is superior to the reconstruction nail because of simple operation.
ObjectiveTo introduce the clinical pathway for geriatric hip fracture regulated by our hospital and report the five-year outcomes after the implementation of the pathway. MethodsThe geriatric hip fracture patients treated between September 2003 and August 2012 were followed up. We did not implement the clinical pathway until January 2007. Statistical analysis was done to evaluate the effect of the clinical pathway on patient outcomes by comparing rate of complication, mortality, and length of hospital stay before and after the implementation of the clinical pathway. ResultsAfter the implementation of the pathway, the in-hospital mortality, one-year mortality and the rate of complication were significantly lower. Besides, the time from admission to operation and the total length of stay in hospital were obviously shortened. ConclusionThe use of clinical pathway for geriatric hip fracture can reduce the rate of complication and mortality, and shorten hospital stay, and the five-year outcomes after the implementation of the pathway are satisfying.
Objective To systematically analyze the relevant research on the application of preoperative exercise training in the pre-rehabilitation of elderly hip fracture patients, identify the specific content, outcome indicators, and application effects of exercise intervention, in order to provide reference for medical staff to carry out relevant interventions. Methods Computer searches were conducted on domestic and foreign databases such as China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, China Biomedical Literature Database, VIP, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science. The search period was from the establishment of the database to January 2024. The scoping review method was used to screen, summarize, and analyze the included studies. ResultsA total of 10 studies were included, including 3 randomized controlled trial, 1 quasi experimental study, 5 retrospective studies and 1 case report. Preoperative exercise preparation includes completing relevant examinations and providing sufficient pain relief. The types of exercise include adaptive training, resistance training, and aerobic exercise. Monitor the patient’s symptoms, signs, and adverse reactions throughout the exercise process. Outcome measures include physical activity and function, pain, average length of hospital stay, and perioperative complications. Conclusions Preoperative exercise training has a positive effect on elderly patients with hip fracture. Elderly patients with hip fracture should be well prepared for preoperative exercise, based on adaptive training, with resistance exercise as the main focus, while monitoring the patient’s physical signs and adverse events during exercise.
Objective To construct an intervention program for postoperative fear of falling in elderly patients with hip fracture based on cognitive behavioral theory. Methods Based on cognitive behavioral theory and literature review, an initial draft of intervention plan for postoperative fear of falling in elderly patients with hip fracture was constructed. From January to March 2025, after two rounds of expert consultations and revisions, the final plan was formed. Results A total of 16 experts across the country were invited to participate in two rounds of Delphi expert consultations, covering areas such as orthopedic clinical nursing, orthopedic clinical medicine, nursing education, nursing management, rehabilitation therapy, and psychological therapy. The active participation rates for the two rounds of consultations were 94.12% and 100.00%, respectively. The expert authority coefficients were 0.860 and 0.907, respectively, and the Kendall harmony coefficients were 0.369 and 0.524, respectively. Ultimately, a program composed of 5 primary indicators (fall fear management team, fall fear management goals, fall fear assessment, fall fear intervention measures, and post-intervention effect evaluation), 17 secondary indicators, and 31 tertiary indicators was constructed. Conclusion The intervention program for postoperative fear of falling in elderly patients with hip fracture based on cognitive behavior theory constructed in this study is scientific and operable, which can provide reference and guidance for clinical nursing staff.
Objective To observe the clinical application of multidisciplinary team (MDT) treatment in the management of geriatric hip fractures and evaluate its effectiveness. Methods The clinical data of 76 elderly patients with hip fracture managed by MDT approach between August 2016 and February 2018 (MDT group) were retrospectively analyzed and compared with 102 patients managed by traditional orthopedics approach between January 2014 and December 2015 (conventional group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, fracture type, surgical procedure, and other general data between the two groups (P>0.05). However, the number of comorbidities in the MDT group was significantly higher than that in the conventional group (t=6.295, P=0.000), and the proportion of the number of comorbidities between the two groups was also significantly different (χ2=28.442, P=0.000). The consultation rate and transfer rate, time to surgery, rate of surgery within 2 or 3 days, operation time, postoperative hospitalization stay, length of hospitalization stay, hospitalization expense, rate of loss to follow-up, and mortality during hospitalization, 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, and 1-year mortality after operation were compared between the two groups. Results The rates of total consultations of the conventional group and the MDT group were 56.86% (58/102) and 56.58% (43/76), respectively, and the rates of total transferred patients were 15.69% (16/102) and 15.79% (12/76), respectively, with no significant differences (P>0.05). Among them, the proportion of patients who transferred into intensive care unit (ICU) in conventional group was significantly higher than that in MDT group and the rates of patients who received geriatric consultation or transferred into geriatric department in MDT group were both significantly higher than those in conventional group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in rates of other department consultation or transfer between the two groups (P>0.05). The time to surgery, operation time, postoperative hospitalization stay, and length of hospitalization stay in MDT group were significantly less than those in conventional group, but the proportion of patients who received surgery within 3 days in MDT group was significantly higher than that in conventional group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients who received surgery within 2 days (χ2=2.027, P=0.155). The hospitalization expenses of total patients, femoral neck fracture, and intertrochanteric fracture subgroups in MDT group were all significantly higher than those in conventional group (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in hospitalization expense of subtrochanteric fracture subgroup between the two groups (Z=−1.715, P=0.086). The rate of loss to follow-up in conventional group and MDT group was 6.86% (7/102) and 3.95% (3/76), respectively, with no significant difference (χ2=0.698, P=0.403). The mortalities at hospitalization, 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year after operation in conventional group were 0, 1.05% (1/95), 3.16% (3/95), and 7.37% (7/95), respectively, and in MDT group were 0, 0, 2.74% (2/73), 6.85% (5/73), respectively, showing no significant differences in mortalities between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion MDT model in the management of geriatric hip fractures has been shown to reduce time to surgery, postoperative hospitalization stay, length of hospitalization stay, operation time, and the proportion of patients who received ICU consultation or transferred into ICU. Furthermore, MDT can improve the capacity for developing operations for patients with complex medical conditions and make medical resources used more rationally.
ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress on the application of tranexamic acid (TXA) in traumatic orthopedic surgery in recent years.MethodsThe domestic and foreign literature in recent years was reviewed, and the efficacy and safety of TXA in traumatic orthopedic surgeries with different regimen, dose and route of administration were comprehensively summarized and compared.ResultsThe application of TXA in traumatic orthopedic surgeries increased gradually in recent years. Intravenous or topical administration of TXA efficaciously reduced blood loss and transfusion requirements during hip fracture surgery without significantly increasing the risk of thromboembolic events. However, the efficacy was not clear in other traumatic orthopedic surgeries such as pelvic and acetabular fractures.ConclusionMore studies are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of TXA in traumatic orthopedic surgeries.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical features of elderly hip fracture in Leshan area in China. MethodsThe clinical data of patients with hip fractures from June 2006 to January 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Gender, age, fracture type, injury causes, activities before injury and treatment were analyzed. ResultsThe mean age of patients with a hip fracture was 76.5 years. The overall male to female ratio with hip fracture was 1:1.44. There were 154 patients (50.0%) with femoral neck fracture, 138 patients (44.8%) with intertrochanteric fracture, and 16 patients (5.2%) with subrtrochanteric fracture. A total of 248 patients (77.3%) were poorly educated, and 210 patients (68.2%) had basic medical insurance. The mean time between being injured and hospitalized after injury was 3 days. There were 257 patients (83.4%) with fall damage. ConclusionFemale patients with hip fracture are more than male patients. Fall damage is the main injure type. The features of elderly hip fracture in Leshan include retardation to consult a doctor, poor education of the patients, dependence primarily on basic medical insurance and under-emphasis of anti-osteoporosis therapy.