目的:研究低氧性肺动脉高压大鼠对实验性红细胞增多的适应。方法:健康SD大鼠28只,体重200～250 g,随机分为4组:常氧对照组（N）、单纯低氧组（H）、低氧+低剂量人重组促红细胞生成素（rEPO） 600 u/kg（H+E1）组、低氧+高剂量rEPO 1200 u/kg（H+E2）组,每组7只大鼠。除常氧对照组外各低氧组大鼠均缺氧21 d,每日8 h。其中后两组每周腹部皮下注射不同剂量的rEPO三次。取血样测定红细胞数、全血粘度及红细胞变形指数；颈外静脉插管测定平均肺动脉压力；光镜观察反映肺动脉重构程度的形态学参数肺小动脉管壁厚度百分比、肺非肌性小动脉肌化程度。结果:①随着rEPO注射剂量的增加,红细胞、全血粘度有不同程度的增高；②全血粘度增高的同时红细胞变形指数也相应地增加；③随着rEPO剂量的增加,平均肺动脉压力逐渐增高,但是肺血管重构程度反而有所缓解。结论:实验性红细胞增多通过改变红细胞变形性和缓解肺血管重构程度来阻遏低氧性肺动脉高压的进一步发展。
Objective To investigate the safety of thoracic surgery for high-altitude patients in local medical center. MethodsWe retrospectively collected 258 high-altitude patients who received thoracic surgery in West China Hospital, Sichuan University (plain medical center, 54 patients) and People's Hospital of Ganzi Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture (high-altitude medical center, 204 patients) from January 2013 to July 2019. There were 175 males and 83 females with an average age of 43.0±16.8 years. Perioperative indicators, postoperative complications and related risk factors of patients were analyzed. ResultsThe rate of minimally invasive surgery in the high-altitude medical center was statistically lower than that in the plain medical center (11.8% vs. 55.6%, P<0.001). The surgical proportions of tuberculous empyema (41.2% vs. 1.9%, P<0.001) and pulmonary hydatid (15.2% vs. 0.0%, P=0.002) in the high-altitude medical center were statistically higher than those in the plain medical center. There was no statistical difference in perioperative mortality (0.5% vs. 1.9%, P=0.379) or complication rate within 30 days after operation (7.4% vs. 11.1%, P=0.402) between the high-altitude center and the plain medical center. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that body mass index≥25 kg/m2 (OR=8.647, P<0.001) and esophageal rupture/perforation were independent risk factors for the occurrence of postoperative complications (OR=15.720, P<0.001). ConclusionThoracic surgery in the high-altitude medical center is safe and feasible.
短期进入高原从事高强度工作所致高原反应是值得探讨的问题,查阅文献,探讨其病因及发病机理、临床表现,总结国内外在诊断、预防及治疗方面的经验,探索一套可行、有效的预防及治疗措施,具有重要的临床意义。
Objective To explore the clinical features, treatment measures, disease outcomes, and differences in patients with asthma admitted to hospitals in Qinghai and Tibetan Plateau, and further analyze the risk factors. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 297 patients with asthma admitted to Qinghai Provincial People’s Hospital and Tibet Autonomous Region People’s Hospital from 2015 to 2021. A standardized case report form (CRF) was designed and used to collect patients’ general information, International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10), clinical symptoms, treatment, laboratory examination, and pulmonary function test data. The clinical features of the patients were described, and the risk factors of the clinical features of asthma patients admitted to hospitals in Qinghai and Tibetan Plateau were analyzed by using a stepwise Logistic regression model. Results A total of 297 patients with asthma admitted to hospitals in Qinghai and Tibetan Plateau were included in this study. The overall pulmonary function of asthma patients admitted to hospitals in Qinghai was worse than that in Tibetan Plateau (FEV1/FVC%: 73.22±13.59 vs. 80.70±18.36, P<0.001; TLC: 101.50 vs. 163.00, P=0.001). The incidence of related clinical symptoms in asthma patients admitted to hospitals in Qinghai were higher than those in Tibetan Plateau (dyspnea: 98.0% vs. 66.0%, P<0.001; cyanosis: 82.0% vs. 34.0%, P<0.001; pulmonary rales: 80.7% vs. 70.7%, P=0.046). There was no significant difference in treatment measures between patients in Qinghai and Tibetan Plateau (P>0.05). The main factors contributing to the differences in clinical characteristics between the two regions were the altitude of residence (OR=0.94, 95%CI: 0.91-0.98, P=0.004) and the co-existence of allergic diseases (OR=9.47, 95%CI: 2.68-3347.07, P=0.012).ConclusionsCompared with Tibet, the incidence of asthma symptoms and poorer lung function were higher among inpatients with asthma in Qinghai; there was no significant difference in treatment measures between the two regions, but there was a significant difference in prognosis; the main factors contributing to the differences in clinical characteristics between the two regions were the altitude of residence and the co-existence of allergic diseases.