Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex) in the treatment of macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Methods Thirty-nine patients (39 eyes) with ME secondary to RVO were enrolles in this study. Of the patients, 27 were male and 12 were female. The mean age was (41.9±16.3) years. The mean course of disease was (5.0±5.3) months. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed. BCVA was measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts. Central macular thickness (CMT) was measured by OCT. The mean BCVA was (13.4±15.3) letters. The mean intraocular pressure (IOP) was (14.1±2.8) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa). The mean CMT was (876.1±437.9) μm. Of the 39 eyes, 33 were central RVO, 6 were branch RVO. Patients were categorized into ischemic (18 eyes)/non-ischemic (21 eyes) groups and previous treatment (22 eyes)/treatment naïve (17 eyes) groups. All eyes underwent intravitreal 0.7 mg Ozurdex injections. BCVA, IOP and CMT were assessed at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12 months after injection. Three months after injection, intravitreal injections of Ozurdex, triamcinolone acetonide or ranibizumab could be considered for patients with ME recurrence or poor treatment effects. Change of BCVA, IOP and CMT were evaluated with paired t test. The presence of ocular and systemic adverse events were assessed. Results BCVA, IOP significantly increased and CMT significantly decreased at 1 month after injection compared to baseline in all groups (t=3.70, 3.69, 4.32, 3.08, 4.25, 6.09, 6.25, 4.02, 5.49, 8.18, 6.54, 5.73; P＜0.05). Two months after injection, change of BCVA, IOP and CMT was most significant (t=4.93, 6.80, 6.71, 5.53, 4.97, 5.89, 5.13, 7.68, 7.31, 8.67, 8.31, 5.82; P＜0.05). Twelve months after injection, there was no statistical difference regarding BCVA of ischemic RVO group and previous treatment group, compared to baseline (t=1.86, 0.67; P＞0.05); BCVA of non-ischemic RVO group and treatment naïve group significantly increased compared to baseline (t=2.27, 2.30; P＜0.05); there was no statistical difference regarding IOP in all groups (t=0.30, 0.13, 0.64, 1.53; P＞0.05);however, CMT significantly decreased in all groups (t=4.60, 3.26, 3.00, 4.87; P＜0.05). Twenty-seven eyes (69.2%) experiences ME recurrence (4.5±1.5) months after injection. Most common side-effect was secondary glaucoma. 41.0% eyes had IOP more than 25 mmHg, most of which were lowered to normal range with use of topical IOP lowering drugs. Four eyes (10.3%) presented with significant cataract progression and needed surgical treatment, all were central RVO eyes. No serious ocular or systemic adverse events such as vitreous hemorrhage, retinal detachment or endophthalmitis were noted. Conclusions Intravitreal injection of Ozurdex for patients with ME secondary to RVO is effective in increasing BCVA and lowering CMT in the first few months. Significant treatment effect could be seen at 1 month after injection and was most significant at 2 months after injection. The long-term vision of eyes in non-ischemic RVO group and treatment naïve group are better. 69.2% eyes experience ME recurrence at 4 months after injection. Short term adverse events were mostly secondary glaucoma and long term adverse events are mostly cataract progression.
Integrins is a family of multi-functional cell-adhesion molecules, heterodimeric receptors that connect extracellular matrix to actin cytoskeleton in the cell cortex, thus regulating various physiological and pathological processes. Risuteganib (Luminate®) is a novel broad-spectrum integrin inhibitor. Based on multiple biological functions of anti-angiogenesis, vitreolysis, and neuroprotection, risuteganib is hopeful in treating several fundus diseases such as diabetic macular edema, vitreomacular traction, and non-exudative age-related macular degeneration. By far, risuteganib has successfully met the endpoints for three phase 2 studies and is preparing to enter the phase 3 of diabetic macular edema clinical trials. Overall the risuteganib is safe with no serious ocular or systemic adverse events. Given the unique mechanism of action and longer duration of efficacy, intravitreal injection of risuteganib has the potential to serve as a primary therapy, or adjunctive therapy to anti-VEGF agents.
ObjectiveTo observe the short-term intraocular pressure changes of the affected eye after the implantation of dexamethasone vitreous implant (Ozurdex), and indirectly understand the tightness of the scleral perforation of the 22G implant device.MethodsThis is a prospective cohort design clinical observational study. From January 2018 to January 2020, 90 eyes (90 patients) who underwent vitreous Ozurdex implantation in the Department of Ophthalmology of Beijing Hospital were included in the study. There were 52 males (52 eyes), and 38 females (38 eyes); they were 14-79 years old. Forty-three eyes (43 patients) had retinal vein occlusion with macular edema, 29 eyes (29 patients) had uveitis with or without macular edema, 18 eyes (18 patients) had diabetic macular edema. All eyes underwent standard scleral tunnel vitreous cavity implantation Ozurdex treatment. The intraocular pressure was measured with a non-contact pneumatic tonometer 10 min before implantation (baseline) and 10, 30 min and 2, 24 h after implantation. The difference were compared between the intraocular pressure at different time points after implantation and the baseline. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare intraocular pressure between baseline and different time points after implantation.ResultsThe average baseline intraocular pressure of the affected eye was 14.85 [interquartile range (IQR): 11.60, 17.63] mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa). The average intraocular pressure at 10, 30 and 2, 24 hours after implantation were 11.90 (IQR: 8.95, 16.30), 13.75 (IQR: 9.95, 16.80), 13.60 (IQR: 10.95, 17.20), and 14.65 (IQR: 12.20, 17.50) mmHg. Compared with the baseline intraocular pressure, the intraocular pressure decreased at 10 and 30 minutes after implantation, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.001, P=0.002); the intraocular pressure difference was not statistically significant at 2, 24 h after implantation (P=0.140, 0.280).ConclusionsThere is a statistically significant difference in intraocular pressure reduction compared with the baseline in 10 and 30 minutes after vitreous implantation of Ozurdex, and there is no statistically significant difference between 2, 24 hours. This suggests that the 22G scleral puncture port of the preinstalled implant device cannot be completely closed immediately, and short-term intraocular pressure monitoring after implantation should be appropriately strengthened.
ObjectiveTo observe the efficacy of phacoemulsification with intravitreal triamcinolone injection (IVTA) in diabetic patients with severe cataract and diabetic macular edema (DME). MethodsTwenty-one patients (25 eyes) with severe cataract and DME were enrolled in this retrospective study. Fifteen eyes underwent standard phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation with 4 mg IVTA at completion of surgery. Ten eyes underwent standard phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. All the patients were followed up for best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography(OCT) and ophthalmological examination.Changes in logarithm of he minimal angel of resolution (logMAR) BCVA and central macular thickness (CMT) were evaluated preoperatively and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months postoperatively by repeated measures ANOVA. Correlations between logMAR BCVA and CMT preoperatively and postoperatively were analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis. Postoperative 6 months logMAR BCVA and affecting factors were evaluated by multivariate linear regression analysis. ResultsBoth groups showed significant improvements of logMAR BCVA after surgery (F=4.855, 6.235; P=0.037, 0.020). There were no statistical differences of logMAR BCVA improvement at different time points postoperatively (F=0.007, 0.006, 0.023; P=0.973, 0.938, 0.882). The CMT reductions in IVTA group at month 1 and month 3 postoperatively were statistically significant than the reductions in group without IVTA(F=10.449, 7.374; P=0.012, 0.026), and there was no statistical difference of CMT reduction at month 6 postoperatively between two groups(F=2.173; P=0.114). Correlation Coefficients between CMT and BCVA were not statistically significant preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively(r=0.279, 0.172; P=0.295, 0.574). Analysis of multiple linear regression showed that external limiting membrane status and duration of diabetes are factors affecting the visual recovery (β=0.577, -0.411; P=0.025, 0.030). ConclusionsPhacoemulsification with concurrent IVTA for treatment of patients with severe cataract and DME is effective in reducing edema. But IVTA does not further improve logMAR BCVA postoperatively.
Objective To investigate the effects of Atorvastatin calcium on the incidence of macular edema after phacoemulsification in diabetic patients. Methods Forty two eyes of 42 cataract patients with diabetes and hypercholesterolemia who underwent phacoemulsification surgery were divided into interventional group (23 patients) and non-interventional group (19 patients) by random number table methods. The blood glucose and pressure of patients in two groups was controlled strictly before and after surgery. 10 mg Atorvastatin calcium per day was delivered one day after cataract surgery for the patients of interventional group and used for 24 weeks. No lipid-lowing agent was provided to the patients of non-interventional group. The main outcome measures included the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retina thickness (CRT), total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). No significant difference was shown in the BCVA, CRT, TC, LDL-C and HDL-C in two groups before phacoemulsification surgery (t=1.251, 1.257, 1.031, 1.042, 1.461; P > 0.05). At the end of the 24 weeks after surgery, the efficacy evaluation and comparative analysis were performed. The analysis included the BCVA, the incidence of macular edema, CRT, TC, LDL-C and HDL-C. Results The BCVA was no significantly different between two groups one day after surgery (t=1.523，P > 0.05). But 4, 12, 24 weeks after phacoemulsification surgery, the BCVA in interventional group was better than that in non-interventional group(t=3.920, 3.012, 7.025; P < 0.05). 24 weeks after the operation, macular edema was occurred in 2 eyes (8.69%) in interventional group and 4 eyes (21.05%) in non-interventional group. Significance difference was found between two groups (χ2=4.896，P < 0.05). There was no significance different of the CRT between two groups one day after operation (t=1.501，P > 0.05). Whereas, the significance difference of the CRT was occurred in two groups 4, 12, 24 weeks after surgery(t=4.673, 7.583, 9.035; P < 0.05). Comparing with that in non-interventional group, the level of TC (t=7.043, 7.930, 8.611)and LDL-C (t=9.374, 9.554, 10.856) in interventional group was significantly decreased 4 to 24 weeks after operation (P < 0.05). But no significance different of HDL-C was shown in two groups 4, 12 and 24 weeks after surgery (t=1.057, 1.127, 1.295; P > 0.05). Conclusion The treatment of Atorvastatin calcium effectively reduced the incidence rate of macular edema in hypercholesterolemia patients with good glycemic and hypertension control after phacoemulsification surgery.