Objective To investigate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy for distant gastric cancer. Methods All 18 patients with distant gastric cancer receiving laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy were analyzed. Results Laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy was performed successfully in all patients. The mean operation time was (291.33±19.61) min. The mean blood loss was (151.32±71.78) ml. The mean numbers of harvested lymph node were 14.57±3.11. The mean time of gastrointestinal function recovery was (3.46±0.93) d, the mean out of bed activity time was (1.75±0.45) d. All patients were followed up for 1-24 months, mean 11 months. No local recurrence, trocar implant or distant metastasis happened. Conclusion Laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy is a feasible and safe surgical procedure combined with minimal trauma and fast recovery.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effects of continuous hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion chemotherapy (CHPPC) and intravenous chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer patients, and find better nursing methods. MethodsSixty advanced gastric cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy between June 2013 and June 2014 were divided into CHPPC group (group C, n=30) and intravenous chemotherapy group (group V, n=30). We recorded the nursing methods for both the two groups, patients' satisfaction to the nursing and treatment, peritoneal metastasis rate and quality of life during the chemotherapy. ResultsThe life quality in group V was lower than that in group C (P<0.05). The differences in patients' satisfaction rate, peritoneal metastasis rate, and one-year survival rate were not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionFor patients with advanced gastric cancer requiring chemotherapy, in spite of higher cost and more complicated operations, CHPPC is superior in lower adverse events rate, better quality of life during chemotherapy and doesn't decrease patients' satisfaction to the nursing and treatment.
Objective To systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy for HER-2 positive patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods We searched ClinicalTrails.gov, PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library (Issue 5, 2016), CNKI, CBM, WanFang Data, VIP and major meeting proceeding databases (ASCO and ESMO) from inception to May 2016, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or non-RCTs about trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric cancer. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. Results Nine studies involving 1 034 HER-2 positive patients were included, of which three were RCTs and the other six were non-RCTs. Meta-analysis results indicated that the trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy group (the trial group) was superior to the chemotherapy alone group (the control group) in complete remission (OR=2.76, 95%CI 1.40 to 5.44,P=0.003), partial remission (OR=1.81, 95%CI 1.40 to 2.33,P<0.000 01), overall response rate (OR=2.09, 95%CI 1.63 to 2.68,P<0.000 01) and disease control rate (OR=2.20, 95%CI 1.63 to 2.98,P<0.000 1), while there was no statistical significances in stable disease (OR=0.87, 95%CI 0.66 to 1.14,P=0.31). In terms of safety, the incidence of diarrhea (OR=1.51, 95%CI 1.10 to 2.06,P=0.01) and erythra (OR=4.35, 95%CI 1.25 to 15.10,P=0.02) in the trial group were higher than the control group. However, other adverse reactions were no significant differences in two groups. Conclusion Compared with chemotherapy alone, trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of HER-2 positive patients with advanced gastric cancer can significantly improve response rate, but it may increase the incidence of diarrhea and erythra. Because of the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, the above conclusion needs to be verified by conducting more high quality studies.
Objective To observe the effect of cisplatin in bletilla hyacinthine particle chemotherapy combined with 125I brachytherapy on short-and long-term outcomes and the toxic and side effects in advanced gastric cancer. Methods One hundred seventy-six patients with stage Ⅱ or stage Ⅲ advanced gastric cancer underwent curative surgical resection were included in this study. They were randomly divided into brachytherapy and chemotherapy group (n=48), intraperitoneal chemotherapy group (n=32) and intravenous chemotherapy group (n=48), and other patients who abandoned radiotherapy and chemotherapy and signed informed consent form by themselves were considered as control group (n=48). The short-and long-term outcomes and the toxic and side effects were observed and the survival of all patients was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and Log-Rank test. Results For short-term outcomes, the total effective rate in 4 groups were 95.83%, 71.88%, 64.58% and 52.08% respectively, and the difference was significant (Plt;0.05). For long-term outcomes, the 3 -and 5-year mortality rate was 37.50% and 56.30%, and 5-year median survival time was (14±4.51) months (95%CI: 14.419-4.512) in brachytherapy and chemotherapy group patients. The 3- and 5-year mortality rate was 78.12%and 93.75%and 5year median survival time was (10.6±1.13) months (95%CI: 10.620-1.163) in intraperitoneal chemotherapy group patients. The 3-and 5-year mortality rate was 79.21%and 95.80%and 5-year median survival time was (11±3.10) months (95%CI: 11.130-3.162) in intravenous chemotherapy group patients. The 3-and 5-year mortality rate was 87.50%and 95.83% and 5-year median survival time was (9±2.30) months (95%CI: 10.024-1.180) in control group patients. Compared with the vein chemotherapy group, the short distance puts the chemotherapy group disgusting vomit, the marrow to suppress, the liver function harm, the kidney function harm formation rate to reduce obviously (Plt;0.05). Conclusion Cisplatin in bletilla hyacinthine particle chemotherapy combined with 125I brachytherapy can reduce the toxic and side effects of drugs and prolong survival time of patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Objectives To systematically review the efficacy and safety of docetaxel or epirubicin based regimens in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Methods We searched EMbase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data from inception to March 2017, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on docetaxel or epirubicin based regimens in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 12 RCTs involving 984 advanced gastric cancer patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that docetaxel based regimens were superior to epirubicin based regimens in ORR (RR=1.21, 95%CI 1.02 to 1.43, P=0.03), DCR (RR=1.13, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.26, P=0.03), 1-year survival rate (RR=1.26, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.56, P=0.04) and 2-year survival rate (RR=3.03, 95%CI 1.59 to 5.75, P=0.000 7), while there was no statistical difference between two groups in the incidence of grade Ⅲ to Ⅳ adverse events. The results of sensitivity analysis showed that docetaxel based regimens were superior to epirubicin based regimens in 2-year survival rate (RR=2.56, 95%CI 1.06 to 6.19, P=0.04), but there were no statistical differences in ORR (RR=1.13, 95%CI 0.88 to 1.45, P=0.34), DCR (RR=1.02, 95%CI 0.85 to 1.21, P=0.84) and 1-year survival rate (RR=1.29, 95%CI 0.92 to 1.80, P=0.14). The results of sensitivity analysis indicated that the overall outcomes might be affected by the risk bias of included studies. The comparision between docetaxel based regimens and epirubicin based regimens was consistent with the overall outcomes in the incidence of grade Ⅲ to Ⅳ adverse events. Conclusions Compared with epirubicin based regimens, docetaxel based regimens may have more clinical benefits for advanced gastric cancer patients. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
ObjectiveTo summarized the clinical experience on laparoscopic radical surgery in patients with advanced distal gastric cancer. MethodsThe clinical data of 26 patients with advanced distant gastric cancer undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsLaparoscopic distal gastrectomy was performed successfully in all patients. The operation time was (283.2±27.6) min (270-450 min) and the blood loss was (178.4±67.4) ml (80-350 ml). The time of gastrointestinal function recovery was (2.8±1.2) d (2-4 d), out of bed activity time was (1.5±0.4) d (1-3 d) and liquid diet feeding was (3.5±1.4) d (3-4 d). The hospital stay was (10.0±2.6) d (7-13 d). The number of harvested lymph nodes was 11 to 34 (17.8±7.3). The distance from proximal surgical margin to tumor was (7.0±2.1) cm (5-12 cm) and the distance from distal surgical margin to tumor was (5.5±1.8) cm (4-8 cm), thus surgical margins were negative in all samples. All patients were followed up for 3-48 months (mean 18.5 months), two patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma died of extensive metastasis in 13 and 18 months, respectively, and other patients survived well. ConclusionsLaparoscopic radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer is safe and feasible. However, the advantage of laparoscopic technique over the conventional open surgery requires further study.
ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. MethodThe literatures about the research progress of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the advanced gastric cancer were reviewed. ResultsThe neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the advanced gastric cancer could significantly improve the R0 resection rate, improve the long-term survival rate, and reduce the risk of death.The course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer without distant metastasis generally was 6-9 weeks, and then according to the results of the curative effect evaluation to decide whether to undergo surgery treatment.Further the clinical research and improvement of chemotherapy sensitivity detection method were helpful to the unity of the standard of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. ConclusionsThe curative effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer is clear.But there is no uniform standard on such as indications, chemotherapy regimens, medication time, and curative effect evaluation index, and so on.It is still needed the further research of multicenter and large clinical trials.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the therapeutic effect and adverse reaction of paclitaxel liposome combined with continuous infusion of large-dose 5-fluorouracil(5-fu) in treatment for advance gastric cancer(AGC). MethodsFrom May 2009 to August 2012, 63 consecutive patients with AGC in this hospital were enrolled in this study. All the patients were given chemotherapy including paclitaxel liposome and continuous infusion of large-dose(2.5 g/m2) 5-fu. The efficacy and toxicity of this regimen were observed. ResultsThere was no patient who could not tolerate adverse reaction related to such regimen. Five cases achieved complete response and 31 cases achieved partial response, the overall response rate was 57.1%(36/63). Hematologic toxicity included gradeⅢ/Ⅳleucopenia 8 cases(12.7%) and neutropenia 10 cases(15.9%), while there was no occurrence of gradeⅢ/Ⅳanemia or thrombopenia. Non-hematologic toxicity was fairly mild. ConclusionsPaclitaxel liposome is safe, well tolerated, highly targeted, and has long duration of effect. Paclitaxel liposome combined with continuous infusion of large-dose 5-fu is safe and effective in treatment for patients with AGC.
ObjectiveTo observe the clinical curative effect of interventional chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. MethodsThirty advanced gastric cancer patients underwent arterial infusion chemotherapy and embolization treatment between January and December 30, 2013. The treatment was carried out every three weeks. We evaluated the clinical results after the third treatment. The clinical improvement was assessed based on alleviation of such symptoms as epigastric pain, poor appetite, nausea, vomiting and fecal occult blood. The tumor size was evaluated through abdominal CT examination. ResultsAbdominal pain relieved in 19 out of 28 patients (67.9%); appetite improved in 18 out of 24 patients (75.0%); vomiting relieved in 15 out of 16 cases (93.8%); and fecal 9 out of 12 patients with positive occult blood turned to negative (75.0%). The total effective rate was 83.3%, and 8 patients accepted interventional therapy after operation. The survival rates during the 6, 12 and 24-month follow-up were respectively 85.0%, 65.0%, and 25.0%. ConclusionsInterventional chemotherapy and embolization treatment are effective for advanced gastric cancer, which can relieve symptoms and lower tumor stage. Some patients have a second chance of operation, which can be an effective method in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.
ObjectiveTo compare the effect and safety between laparoscopic versus laparotomy D2 radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. MethodsTwo hundred and seventeen patients with advanced gastric cancer who were treated in our hospital from March 2011 to March 2014 were selected as research objects. According to surgical method, they were divided into laparoscopy group (103 patients received laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy) and laparotomy group (114 patients received laparotomy D2 radical gastrectomy). Comparison of the surgical effect-related indicators between 2 groups was performed. ResultsIn the aspect of intra-operative indicators:the operation time, proximal margin length, distal margin length, and the number of removal lymph node between the 2 groups did not significantly differed with each other (P>0.05); while the bleeding volume and the length of incision in laparoscopy group were significantly less (shorter) than those of laparotomy group (P<0.05). In the aspect of post-operative indicators:the time to first flatus, time to resumed oral intake, time to ambulation, post-operative hospital stay, time of analgesics given, and the total incidence of postoperative complication in laparoscopy group were significantly shorter (less or lower) than those of laparotomy group (P<0.05), the operating cost in laparoscopy group was significantly higher than that of the laparotomy group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in total treatment cost, mortality of gastric cancer, and recurrence or metastasis rate between the 2 groups (P>0.05). ConclusionsBoth laparoscopic and laparotomy D2 radical gastrectomy in treatment of advanced gastric cancer can obtain good clinical effect. But compared with laparotomy D2 radical gastrectomy, laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy can reduce operative wound, reduce incidence of complications, improve postoperative recovery, and has higher safety.