OBJECTIVE: To observe the strength of thigh muscles after reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament by autogenous bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. METHODS: Twenty-three patients, 9 males and 14 females, were followed up one year after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with autogenous bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Through arthroscope, no intra-articular derangement was found. The strengths of isometric and isotonic contractions of the quadri ceps and the hamstrings muscles of the affected and contralateral thighs were recorded. RESULTS: The donor side for autogenous bone-patellar tendon-bone graft showed significant decrease (P lt; 0.01), but no effect on that of the hamstrings muscle(P gt; 0.05). CONCLUSION: To reconstruct the anterior cruciate ligament, harvest of the bone-patellar tendon-bone graft as a reparative material may markedly lower the strength of the quadriceps femoris muscle.
Objective The tendon-bone heal ing is the key point to ensure the success of the anterior cruciate l igament (ACL) reconstruction. To observe the histological change in the tendon-bone heal ing after ACL reconstruction by different concentrations of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) combined with deproteinized bone (DPB) of calf as bone tunnel infill ing and to investigate the active effect of the complex on tendon-bone heal ing and to define the optimal concentration of PRP. Methods Eight mL blood was drawn from central artery of New Zealand rabbit ears; PRP was prepared by Landesbergmethod, and l iquid supernatant was used as thinner to prepare different concentrations of PRP (30%, 60%, and 100%). Fresh osteoepiphysis spongy bone was harvested from lower end of femur of newborn calf to prepare DPB by way of 30% H2O2 and ether alternating soaking for 24 hours continuous 6 times. DPB was soaked in different concentrations of PRP and mixed with activator to prepare the PRP/DPB complex. A total of 54 New Zealand white rabbits, aging 8-12 months, weighing (2.5 ± 0.4) kg, were divided randomly into 3 groups: group A (30%PRP/DPB complex, n=18), group B (60%PRP/DPB complex, n=18), and group C (100%PRP/DPB complex, n=18). The legs of the rabbits were randomly divided into experimental side and the control side; ACL was reconstructed by semitendinosus and PRP/DPB complex in bone tunnel in the experimental side, and only by semitendinosus in the control side. The general conditions of the rabbits were observed postoperatively and HE staining was used to observe the tendon-bone heal ing, then I-IV levels of semi-quantitative analysis of the tendon-bone heal ing were evaluated according to Demirag standard at 3, 6, and 12 weeks. Results General observation: Synovial fluid sl ightly increased in the specimens and no bony tissue was found in inner of femoral tunnel at 3 weeks; there was no synovial fluid in all the specimens and scar tissue was discovered in inner of femoral tunnel at 6 weeks; and there was no synovial fluid and the tendons became tighter with fibrous tissue at 12 weeks. Histological observation: New granulation tissue formed in the tendon-bone interface of group A experimental sides at 3 weeks; there was various widths of Sharpey type textile fiber in the tendon-bone interface at 6 weeks; Sharpey type textile fiber arranged regularly, which formed an irregular and blur “tidal l ine” at 12 weeks. Group B experimental sides were better than any other group at 3, 6, and 12 weeks; chondrocyte-l ike arranged regularly in the tendonboneinterface at 3 weeks; the number of chondrocyte-l ike per unit area was more than that of the other groups at 6 weeks;and chondrocyte-l ike prol iferated and matured in the tendon-bone interface, Sharpey type textile fiber became tighter andordered. Group C experimental sides were similar to both sides of group A at 3 weeks, however, the prol iferation of relatively mature dense connective tissue was worse than that of other groups at 6 and 12 weeks. According to Demirag grading, there were significant differences in tendon-bone heal ing between the experimental sides and the control sides of group B at 3 and 6 weeks, and between group B experimental sides and group C experimental sides at 12 weeks (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The mixture of PRP/PRP has good biocompatibil ity and bone induction, so it can enhance tendon-bone heal ing after ACL reconstruction when the concentration of PRP is 60%.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of different concentrations of osteoprotegerin (OPG) combined with deproteinized bone (DPB) on the bone tunnel after the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. MethodsThe femoral epiphyseal side was harvested from newborn calf, and allogenic DPB were prepared by hydrogen peroxide-chloroform/methanol method. Then, DPB were immersed in 3 concentrations levels of OPG (30, 60, 100 μg/mL) and 3 concentration ratios (30%, 60%, 100%) of the gel complex were prepared. Sixty healthy New Zealand white rabbits, male or female, weighing (2.7±0.4) kg, were divided randomly into 4 groups (n=15):control group (group A), 30% (group B), 60% (group C), and 100% (group D) OPG/DPB gel complex. The ACL reconstruction models were established by autologous Achilles tendon. Different ratios of OPG/DPB gel complex were implanted in the femoral and tibial bone tunnel of groups B, C, and D, but group A was not treated. The pathology observation (including the percentage of the femoral bone tunnel enlargement) and histological observation were performed and the biomechanical properties were measured at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after operation. ResultsOne rabbit died of infection in groups A and D, 2 rabbits in groups B and C respectively, and were added. General pathology observation showed that the internal orifices of the femoral and tibia tunnels were covered by a little of scar tissue at 4 weeks in all groups. At 8 weeks, white chondroid tissues were observed around the internal orifices of the femoral and tibia tunnels, especially in groups C and D. At 12 weeks, the internal orifices of the femoral and tibia tunnels enlarged in groups A, B, and C, but it was completely closed in group D. At each time point, the rates of the femoral bone tunnel enlargement in groups B, C, and D were significantly lower than that in group A, and group D was significantly lower than groups B and C (P<0.05); group C was significantly lower than group B at 8 weeks, but no significant difference was found at 4 and 12 weeks (P<0.05). Hisological observation showed that fresh fibrous connective tissue was observed in 4 groups at 4 weeks; there was various arrangements of Sharpey fiber in all groups at 8 weeks and the atypical 4-layer structure of bone was seen in group D; at 12 weeks, Sharpey fiber arranged regularly in all groups, with typical 4-layer structure of bone in groups B, C, and D, and an irregular "tidal line" formed, especially in group D. Biomechanics measurement showed that the maximum tensile load in group D was significantly higher than that in groups A and B at 4 weeks (P<0.05), but no significant difference was shown among groups A, B, and C, and between groups C and D (P>0.05); at 8 weeks, it was significantly higher in groups C and group D than group A, and in group D than group B (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between groups A, C and group B (P>0.05); at 12 weeks, it was significantly higher in groups C and D than groups A and B, and in group D than group C (P<0.05), but difference was not significant between groups A and B (P>0.05). ConclusionDifferent concentrations ratios of OPG/DPB gel complexes have different effects on the bone tunnel after ACL reconstruction. 100% OPG/DPB gel complex has significant effects to prevent the enlargement of bone tunnel and to enhance tendon bone healing.
Objective To evaluate knee stability after double-bundle and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized controlled trials (quasi-RCTs) were collected from MEDLINE (1966 to October 2007), OVID (1950 to October 2007), The Cochrane Library (issue 4, 2007) and China Academic Journals Full-text Database (1979 to October 2007). The quality of included trials was assessed. Data analyses were performed with The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.10 software. Results One RCT (quality B) and 5 quasi-RCTs (quality C) involving 426 patients met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses showed significant differences between the two operative procedures in terms of anterior stability (WMD –0.75, 95%CI –1.14 to –0.37, P=0.000 1) and rotational stability [RR 1.38, 95%CI 1.17 to 1.61, Plt;0.000 1]. Conclusion The double-bundle anterior cruciate liagament is superior to single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament in terms of anterior stability and rotational stability. Since the included trials were small and of poor quality, more high-quality, large-scale randomized controlled trials are required.
ObjectiveTo compare the strength difference between the interfacial screw and the interfacial screw combined with bone tunnel crossing technology to fix the tibial end of ligament during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction through the biomechanical test.MethodsTwenty fresh frozen pig tibia were randomly divided into two groups (n=10) to prepare ACL reconstruction models. The graft tendons in the experimental group were fixed with interfacial screw combined with bone tunnel crossing technology, and the graft tendons in the control group were fixed with interfacial screw. The two groups of specimens were fixed in the high-frequency dynamic mechanics test system M-3000, and the length change (displacement), ultimate load, and stiffness of graft tendons were measured through the reciprocating test and load-failure test.ResultsThe results of reciprocating test showed that the displacement of the experimental group was (3.06±0.58) mm, and that of the control group was (2.82±0.46) mm, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (t=0.641, P=0.529). The load-failure test results showed that the stiffness of the experimental group and the control group were (95.39±13.63) and (91.38±14.28) N/mm, respectively, with no significant difference (t=1.021, P=0.321). The ultimate load of the experimental group was (743.15±173.96) N, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (574.70±74.43) N (t=2.648, P=0.016).ConclusionIn ACL reconstruction, the fixation strength of tibial end with interface screw combined with bone tunnel crossing technology is obviously better than that of interface screw alone.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of anatomical single-bundle (ASB) and over-the-top singlebundle (OSB) reconstruction of the anterior cruciate l igament (ACL). Methods Between January 2008 and June 2008, 64 patients with ACL injury underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. ASB ACL reconstruction was performed in 28 cases (ASB group) and OSB ACL reconstruction in 36 cases (OSB group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, diseaseduration, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, and side-to-side difference between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results All incisions healed by first intention; no infection or other compl ications occurred. All cases were followed up 20-24 months (mean, 21.5 months). There were significant differences in the IKDC score, Lysholm score, and the side-to-side difference between last follow-up and preoperation in 2 groups (P lt; 0.05), but there was no significant difference between 2 groups at last follow-up (P gt; 0.05). Significant differences were found in negative rate of the pivot shift test between last follow-up and preoperation in ASB group and between 2 groups at last follow-up (P lt; 0.05), but there was no significant difference between last follow-up and preoperation in OSB group (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The effectiveness of arthroscopic ASB ACL reconstruction is better than that of arthroscopic OSB ACL reconstruction, especially in controll ing rotational stabil ity.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical effect of reconstructing anterior cruciate ligament by using a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft under arthroscopy. METHODS: Among 13 patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury, there were 9 males and 4 females(aged 23-45). Their anterior cruciate were reconstructed by applying the mid-one third autologous bone-patellar tendon-bone strip in -press fit technique under arthroscopy. The result was positive in 13 cases in anterior drawer test, in 4 cases in pivot shift test and in 7 cases in Lachman’s test preoperatively. RESULTS: The follow-up period was 5-25 months averaged 15 months. The results of the above tests were negative in all the patients. According to Boszotta’s evaluation quota, the results were excellent in 9 cases, good in 3 cases and fair in 1 case. The knee stability improved obviously in all patients. CONCLUSION: Anterior cruciate ligament injury can be treated by arthroscopic reconstruction with autologous bone-patellar tendon-bone strip and the clinical result of short-term followup is satisfactory.
Objective To investigate the effect of acid, basic fibroblast growth factor (aFGF, bFGF) and epidermal growth factor (EGF), andtheir combination on the proliferation of rabbit anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and medial collateral ligament (MCL) in vitro. Methods Thecells of ACL and MCL were isolated and subcultured from the knee joints of tenweek-old New Zealand white rabbits. The cells were seeded into 96-well corning cluster plates. Three growth factors of different concentration alone or in combination were added into the culture medium respectively, which were 0, 1, 5, 10, 50 and 100 ng/ml for aFGF, bFGF and 0, 1.56, 3.13, 6.25, 12.5, 25 and 50 ng/ml for EGF. The proliferation of the fibroblasts was measured for 48 h with XTT method. Results All of the three growth factors alone promoted the cell proliferation of ACL and MCL fibroblasts. The concentration of aFGF hada significant effect on the proliferation of both ACL and MCL fibroblasts. The concentration of 1 ng/ml bFGF and 5 ng/ml EGF was most effective in promoting the proliferation of ACL, and both bFGF and EGF had a significant effect on MCL. 5ng/ml aFGF with 50 ng/ml EGF had effect on ACL. 1 ng/ml aFGF with 3.13 ng/ml EGF had effect on MCL. Conclusion The three growth factors may promote the cell proliferation of ACL and MCL. These findings suggest that topical application of aFGF, either alone or in combination with EGF may have the potential to promote the proliferation of rabbit ACL and MCL,and aFGF of low concentration in combination with EGF is more effective than single growth factor.
ObjectiveTo observe the anatomical morphology of the tibial insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in Chinese adults so as to offer theoretical guidance for ACL reconstruction and meniscus transplantation. MethodsFifteen adult cadaveric knees (8 left knees and 7 right knees) were dissected, including 10 males and 5 females, with an age ranged from 25 to 47 years (mean, 32.4 years). All knees were generally observed through standard medial parapatellar approaches, then the ACL midsubstance and the tibial insertion (direct and indirect insertions) were anatomically measured. ResultsIn all specimens, the ACL was flat with a lot of fine fibers. The anteromedial bundle and posterolateral bundle could be observed in 13 of 15 knees. However, no obvious bundles were found in 2 knees. The arc-shaped tibial direct insertion started at the medial tibial eminence and ended at the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus. The width of the arc was (11.2±2.4) mm; the thickness was (3.0±0.3) mm; and the cross-sectional area was (28.8±7.8) mm2. And the left-right diameter of the whole insertion was (9.5±1.8) mm; anteroposterior diameter was (11.9±0.6) mm; and the cross-sectional area was (117.8±12.5) mm2. The width of the anterior horn of lateral meniscus was (12.3±2.0) mm. The anterior horn of lateral meniscus was surrounded by arc-shaped direct insertion in the middle, and its fibers were partly intertwined with indirect insertion of ACL. ConclusionAnatomical ACL reconstruction may therefore require a arc-shaped tibial footprint. There are overlap covering relationship between the attachment location of anterior horn of the lateral meniscus and tibial insertion of ACL. It should pay more attention to protecting tibial insertion of ACL in lateral meniscus transplantation.
Objective To compare the recovery of proprioception between autograft and allograft for anterior cruciate l igament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods Between January 2008 and January 2010, 40 patients underwent ACL reconstruction with autologous tendon (autograft group, n=20) and allogeneic tendon (allograft group, n=20). No significant difference was found in gender, age, disease duration, and function scores between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). All the patients underwent the ACL reconstruction with single-bundle technique. The knee range of motion (ROM), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and Lysholm score were measured after operation. The proprioception was assessedby the joint position sense (JPS) at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. The normal knee was used as control. Results Thepatients of 2 groups achieved heal ing of incision by first intention without compl ication of infection or haemarthrosis. Allpatients were followed up 12-18 months (mean, 13.5 months). There were significant differences in knee ROM, IKDC score, and Lysholm score between preoperation and 12 months postoperatively in 2 groups (P lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in JPS 30°, JPS 60°, and JPS 90° between affected knees and normal knees in autograft group at 3 months postoperatively (P gt; 0.05). No significant difference was found in JPS 30° between affected knees and normal knees in allograft group at 3 months postoperatively (P gt; 0.05); but significant differences were found in JPS 60° and JPS 90° between affected knees and normal knees in allograft group at 3 months postoperatively (P lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in JPS 30°, JPS 60°, and JPS 90° between affected knees and normal knees in 2 groups at 12 months postoperatively (P gt; 0.05). Significant differences were also found in JPS 60° and JPS 90° between affected knees of 2 groups (P lt; 0.05) at 3 months postoperatively, whereas no significant difference was found in JPS 30° between affected knees of 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). No significant difference was found in JPS 30°, JPS 60°, and JPS 90° between affected knees of 2 groups at 12 months postoperatively (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion Autologous andACL reconstruction is better than allogeneic ACL reconstruction in the recovery of proprioception at early time after surgery.