Since the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019, the incidence and mortality of cardiac arrest have increased significantly worldwide, and the management of cardiac arrest is facing new challenges. The European Resuscitation Council issued the 2021 European Resuscitation Council Guidelines in March 2021 to update the important parts of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and added recommendations for the management of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during the coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic. This article will compare the difference between this guideline and the 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care and integrate some key points, review literature and then summarize the latest research progress in cardiopulmonary resuscitation since the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic. The content mainly involves cardiopulmonary resuscitation during the coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic, early prevention, early recognition, application of new technologies, airway management, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and post-resuscitation treatment.
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a salvage therapy for patients suffering cardiac arrest refractory to conventional resuscitation, and provides circulatory support in patients who fail to achieve a sustained return of spontaneous circulation. ECPR serves as a bridge therapy that maintains organ perfusion whilst the underlying etiology of the cardiac arrest is determined and treated. Increasing recognition of the survival benefit associated with ECPR has led to increased use of ECPR during the past decade. Commonly used indications for ECPR are: age<70 years, initial rhythm of ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia, witnessed arrest, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation within 5 min, failure to achieve sustained return of spontaneous circulation within 15 min of beginning cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This review provides an overview of ECPR utilization, recent outcomes, risk factors, and complications of ECPR. Identifying ECPR indications, rapid deployment of extracorporeal life support equipment, and high-quality ECPR management strategies are of paramount importance to improve survival.
ObjectiveTo analyze the long-term effect on cardiopulmonary resuscitation skill between video-led and scene simulation training and traditional instructor-led courses in medical student with eight-year program.MethodsNinety-nine medical students with eight-year program who studied in Peking Union Medical College were trained in cardiopulmonary resuscitation skill from January to February 2018. They were randomly divided into two groups, 53 students participated in basic life support course training, which belonged to video-led and scene simulation training as the trial group, and 46 students were trained by traditional instructor-led courses as the control group. In January 2019, the above 99 students were re-evaluated for cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and the outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skill test in total scores and sub-items scores between two groups were compared. The data were analyzed using t test and Wilcoxon rank sum test.ResultsThe total average scores of the trial group (8.02±1.11) was higher than that of the control group (6.85±1.50) (P<0.05). The sub-items scores of the trial group in the three aspects of on-site assessment, chest compressions and simple respirators (1.64±0.37, 3.38±0.46, 1.52±0.58) were higher than those of the control group (1.33±0.45, 2.80±0.76, 1.19±0.58) (P<0.05). In terms of opening airway, there was no significant difference in scores between the two groups (1.02±0.47 vs. 1.10±0.45, P>0.05). The excellent rate of the trial group (60.3%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (30.4%) (P<0.05), and the unqualified rate (5.6%) was significantly lower than that of the control group (21.7%) (P<0.05).ConclusionsThe video-led and scene simulation training has a better effect on cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills acquisition and long-term maintenance than traditional instructor-led courses for medical student with eight-year program.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of esophageal cooling (EC) on lung injury and systemic inflammatory response after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in swine.MethodsThirty-two domestic male white pigs were randomly divided into sham group (S group, n=5), normothermia group (NT group, n=9), surface cooling group (SC group, n=9), and EC group (n=9). The animals in the S group only experienced the animal preparation. The animal model was established by 8 min of ventricular fibrillation and then 5 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the other three groups. A normal temperature of (38.0±0.5)℃ was maintained by surface blanket throughout the experiment in the S and NT groups. At 5 min after resuscitation, therapeutic hypothermia was implemented via surface blanket or EC catheter to reach a target temperature of 33℃, and then maintained until 24 h post resuscitation, and followed by a rewarming rate of 1℃/h for 5 h in the SC and EC groups. At 1, 6, 12, 24 and 30 h after resuscitation, the values of extra-vascular lung water index (ELWI) and pulmonary vascular permeability index (PVPI) were measured, and meanwhile arterial blood samples were collected to measure the values of oxygenation index (OI) and venous blood samples were collected to measure the serum levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and inerleukin-6 (IL-6). At 30 h after resuscitation, the animals were euthanized, and then the lung tissue contents of TNF-α, IL-6 and malondialdehyde, and the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) were detected.ResultsAfter resuscitation, the induction of hypothermia was significantly faster in the EC group than that in the SC group (2.8 vs. 1.5℃/h, P<0.05), and then its maintenance and rewarming were equally achieved in the two groups. The values of ELWI and PVPI significantly decreased and the values of OI significantly increased from 6 h after resuscitation in the EC group and from 12 h after resuscitation in the SC group compared with the NT group (all P<0.05). Additionally, the values of ELWI and PVPI were significantly lower and the values of OI were significantly higher from 12 h after resuscitation in the EC group than those in the SC group [ELWI: (13.4±3.1) vs. (16.8±2.7) mL/kg at 12 h, (12.4±3.0) vs. (16.0±3.6) mL/kg at 24 h, (11.1±2.4) vs. (13.9±1.9) mL/kg at 30 h; PVPI: 3.7±0.9 vs. 5.0±1.1 at 12 h, 3.4±0.8 vs. 4.6±1.0 at 24 h, 3.1±0.7 vs. 4.2±0.7 at 30 h; OI: (470±41) vs. (417±42) mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa) at 12 h, (462±39) vs. (407±36) mm Hg at 24 h, (438±60) vs. (380±33) mm Hg at 30 h; all P<0.05]. The serum levels of TNF-α and IL-6 significantly decreased from 6 h after resuscitation in the SC and EC groups compared with the NT group (all P<0.05). Additionally, the serum levels of IL-6 from 6 h after resuscitation and the serum levels of TNF-α from 12 h after resuscitation were significantly lower in the EC group than those in the SC group [IL-6: (299±23) vs. (329±30) pg/mL at 6 h, (336±35) vs. (375±30) pg/mL at 12 h, (297±29) vs. (339±36) pg/mL at 24 h, (255±20) vs. (297±33) pg/mL at 30 h; TNF-α: (519±46) vs. (572±49) pg/mL at 12 h, (477±77) vs. (570±64) pg/mL at 24 h, (436±49) vs. (509±51) pg/mL at 30 h; all P<0.05]. The contents of TNF-α, IL-6, and malondialdehyde significantly decreased and the activities of SOD significantly increased in the SC and EC groups compared with the NT group (all P<0.05). Additionally, lung inflammation and oxidative stress were further significantly alleviated in the EC group compared with the SC group [TNF-α: (557±155) vs. (782±154) pg/mg prot; IL-6: (616±134) vs. (868±143) pg/mg prot; malondialdehyde: (4.95±1.53) vs. (7.53±1.77) nmol/mg prot; SOD: (3.18±0.74) vs. (2.14±1.00) U/mg prot; all P<0.05].ConclusionTherapeutic hypothermia could be rapidly induced by EC after resuscitation, and further significantly alleviated post-resuscitation lung injury and systemic inflammatory response compared with conventional surface cooling.
Currently, cardiac arrest has become a major public health problem, which has a high incidence rate and a high mortality rate in humans. With the continuous advancement of cardiopulmonary resuscitation techniques, the overall prognosis of cardiac arrest victims is gradually improved. However, cardiac arrest events under special circumstances are still serious threats to human health. This article reviews the progress of epidemiology, pathogenesis, treatment characteristics, and key points of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in those special cardiac arrest events associated with trauma, poisoning, drowning and pregnancy.
In November 2022, the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation updated the International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations for the sixth time. The 2022 review includes 21 topics addressed with systematic reviews by the Recovery Task Force of International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Among them, there are nine topics related to life support for newborns and children, including public-access defibrillation devices for children, pediatric early warning systems, maintaining normal temperature immediately after birth, suctioning of amniotic fluid at birth, tactile stimulation for resuscitation immediately after birth, use of continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress at term birth, respiratory monitoring in the delivery room, heart rate monitoring in the delivery room, and supraglottic airway use in neonates. The Task Force made treatment recommendations for each of the above topics after weighing evidence and discussion. In some cases, good practice statements have been provided for topics thought to be of particular interest to the resuscitation community when the evidence is insufficient to support a recommendation. Good practice statements are not recommendations but represent expert opinion. In order to facilitate the readers to understand the treatment recommendation well, in the recommendation basis part, the basic principle is briefly described. In addition, the existing problems and future research directions of each topic after the systematic reviews are also clearly stated.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of different peak flow on the airway pressure to explore a preferable value of peak flow in ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) under volume control ventilation (VCV) mode and decreasing-wave. Methods30 patients who underwent CRP in the emergency unit between January 2012 and 2014 was recruited in the study. When the chest compressions came into a stable state by a same doctor,the peak flow was set at 50 L/min and 30 L/min respectively while other parameters fixed in the same patient. Then the pressure-time curve of a respiratory cycle was randomly frozen to achieve the highest peak pressure in inspiratory phase. ResultsThe highest peak airway pressures were (54.1±4.9)cm H2O and (35.5±5.3)cm H2O when the peak flow were set at 50 L/min and 30 L/min respectively with significant difference. The incidence of peak airway pressure greater than 40 cm H2O was 96.7% and 26.7%,and the incidence of peak airway pressure greater than 50 cm H2O was 76.7% and 0%,respectively. Compared with 50 L/min,the peak flow of 30 L/min obviously reduced the peak pressure (P=0.000). ConclusionIn the mechanical ventilation during CPR using VCV mode and decreasing-wave,compared with peak flow of 50 L/min,smaller peak flow of 30 L/min can significantly reduce peak airway pressure,and significantly reduce the adverse effects to ventilation by repeated violent changes in airway pressure caused by continuing chest compressions,and make airway peak pressure under 40 cm H2O in most patients,so it is a reasonable and safe choice.
The American Heart Association (AHA) released the 2017 American Heart Association Focused Update on Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality (2017 AHA guidelines update) in November 2017. The 2017 AHA guidelines update was updated according to the rules named " the update of the guideline is no longer released every five years, but whenever new evidence is available” in the 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. The updated content in this guideline included five parts: dispatch-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), bystander CPR, emergency medical services - delivered CRP, CRP for cardiac arrest, and chest compression - to - ventilation ratio. This review will interpret the 2017 AHA guidelines update in detail.
In November 2017, the American Heart Association updated the pediatric basic life support and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality. The new guidelines focused on the clinical value of chest compression-only CPR versus CPR using chest compressions with rescue breaths in children, rather than a comprehensive revision of the 2015 edition guidelines. The Pediatric Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation updated part content of the guidelines according to the continuous evidence review process. Guidelines recommend CPR using chest compressions with rescue breaths should be provided for infants and children with cardiac arrest. Bystanders provide chest compressions if they are unwilling or unable to deliver rescue breaths. This article mainly interprets the updated content.
American Heart Association issued American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care in October 2020. A sixth link, recovery, has been added to both the adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest chain and in-hospital cardiac arrest chain in this version of the guidelines to emphasize the importance of recovery and survivorship for resuscitation outcomes. Analogous chains of survival have also been developed for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and in-hospital cardiac arrest. The major new and updated recommendations involve the early initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation by lay rescuers, early administration of epinephrine, real-time audiovisual feedback, physiologic monitoring of cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality, double sequential defibrillation not supported, intravenous access preferred over intraosseous, post-cardiac arrest care and neuroprognostication, care and support during recovery, debriefings for rescuers, and cardiac arrest in pregnancy. This present review aims to interpret these updates by reviewing the literature and comparing the recommendations in these guidelines with previous ones.