Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of chewing gum in promoting bowel recovery after cesarean section. Methods Such databases as The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMbase and CBM were searched from their establishment to 2010 to include the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of comparing chewing gum with other procedures for promoting postoperative bowel function after cesarean section. The risks of bias in the included studies were evaluated at randomization, allocation concealment, blinding, completeness of outcomes, and selective reporting. Meta-analyses were performed by RevMan 5.0.22 software. Results Three RCTs involving 745 participants were included. The results of meta-analyses showed chewing gum after cesarean section significantly shortened the time before getting the first postoperative flatus (MD= –6.54, 95%CI –7.82 to –5.27, Plt;0.000 01), reduced the risks of postoperative ileus (RR=0.54, 95%CI 0.34 to 0.87, P=0.01) and possibly shortened the length of hospital stay (MD= –0.21, 95%CI –0.39 to –0.03, P=0.02) compared with blank control. Currently, no adequate data supported the safety of chewing gum after cesarean section. Conclusion Chewing gum after cesarean section can promote the postoperative bowel recovery, and reduce the odds of postoperative ileus. However, more high quality RCTs are required for lack of included studies and poor quality of methodology.
Objective To summarize our diagnostic and treatment experience for patients with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection （AAAD） during pregnancy. Methods Clinical data of 3 AAAD gravida （age of 30，32，35） who received surgical treatment in Beijing Anzhen Hospital of Capital Medical University from May 2008 to July 2010 were retros-pectively analyzed. One gravida received Sun’s procedure （total arch replacement combined with stented elephant trunk implantation） 3 days after cesarean section，but the fetus died in the uterus. Another gravida successfully underwent Bentall procedure and Sun’s procedure immediately after cesarean section and hysterectomy. The third gravida received cesarean section with the uterus in situ followed by ascending aorta replacement and Sun’s procedure. Results All the 3 puerperasrecovered uneventfully，and the 2 newborns of the second and third puerperas also lived well. The 3 puerperas were followedup for 6 months after discharge. CT scan showed organized thrombus in the aortic false lumen. During follow-up，the 3 puerperas recovered well，and the 2 infants had normal growth and development. Conclusions Management principles of AAAD during pregnancy firstly include timely and accurate diagnosis，which is of prime importance. Secondly，gravidas’hemodynamics should maintain stable. Thirdly，intraoperative hemorrhage should be satisfactorily controlled. Lastly，multi-modality treatment is very important to improve the prognosis of both gravidas and fetuses.
Objective To explore the value of lower abdominal aorta compression in emergent hysterectomy during cesarean section because of pernicious placenta previa. Method We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of four patients who underwent hysterectomy for pernicious placenta previa with the assistance of lower abdominal aorta compression between January 2016 and March 2017 in Sichuan Provincial Hospital for Women and Children. Result The four patients were cured successfully, and the mothers and babies were all well with no pelvic organ damage or complications related to lower abdominal aorta compression. Conclusions Lower abdominal aorta compression in hysterectomy for pernicious placenta previa during cesarean section is a feasible procedure; it can effectively reduce the amount of bleeding, less affect maternal blood circulation, make surgery area clear, and give the operators the chance to do hysterectomy calmly. Lower abdominal aorta compression presents more and more advantages to treat pernicious placenta previa and may be an effective emergency measure to reduce hemorrhage during perioperative period especially under the circumstances of no chance to carry out vascular intervention treatment.
Objective To systemically review the clinical application of esketamine for postoperative analgesia in cesarean section. Methods Databases including CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data, PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on esketamine in cesarean section from inception to January 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Results A total of 16 RCTs involving 1 715 cesarean section patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that esketamine decreased the patients’ visual analog scale scores after surgery (MD=−0.67, 95%CI −0.86 to −0.49, P<0.000 01) and reduced the need for analgesics for 48 hours after surgery (MD=−2.38, 95%CI −3.15 to −1.62, P<0.000 01) compared with the control drugs (such as opioids, ropivacaine, and normal saline), without increasing adverse reactions such as nausea and vomiting (RR=0.84, 95%CI 0.62 to 1.12, P=0.23), hallucinations (RR=3.00, 95%CI 0.37 to 24.43, P=0.30), drowsiness (RR=1.49, 95%CI 0.16 to 13.99, P=0.73), itching (RR=1.05, 95%CI 0.79 to 1.41, P=0.72), hypotension (RR=0.31, 95%CI 0.04 to 2.40, P=0.26), bradycardia (RR=0.40, 95%CI 0.01 to 11.24, P=0.59), and dizziness (RR=2.24, 95%CI 0.63 to 7.94, P=0.21). Compared with the control drugs, esketamine extended the operation time (MD=2.23, 95%CI 1.73 to 2.74, P<0.000 01), accelerated heart rate (MD=1.31, 95%CI 0.25 to 2.37, P=0.02), and increased the mean arterial pressure (MD=3.88, 95%CI 0.19 to 7.56, P=0.04) during surgery. Additionally, esketamine improved the Apgar score of neonates (MD=0.45, 95%CI 0.26 to 0.63, P<0.000 01) and the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale score of mothers (MD=−1.12, 95%CI −1.87 to −0.55, P=0.000 3), having no effects on the cord blood pH of neonates (MD=0.03, 95%CI −0.01 to 0.07, P=0.14). Conclusion Esketamine has certain advantages when used for postoperative analgesia in cesarean section. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to further verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of different rehydration strategies on the incidence of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension and neonatal outcomes during elective cesarean section.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochran Library, China National Knowledge Internet, VIP database, Wanfang database, and China Biology Medicine database from inception to January 2018, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the incidence of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during elective cesarean section and neonatal outcomes of preloading or coloading. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias in the study. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 11 RCTs were included, including 894 parturients, of whom 448 cases in the preload group and 446 cases in the coload group. Comparing with the preload group, the incidence of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during cesarean section in the coload group significantly decreased [risk ratio (RR)=1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.13, 1.43), P<0.000 1]. Subgroup analysis showed that in the crystalloid fluid group, the difference in the incidence of hypotension between the preload group and the coload group was statistically significant [RR=1.48, 95%CI (1.26, 1.73), P<0.000 01]; while in the colloidal fluid group, the difference in the the incidence of hypotension between the preload group and the coload group was not significant [RR=1.00, 95%CI (0.85, 1.17), P=0.96]. The lowest systolic blood pressure, the incidence of nausea and vomiting, and neonatal outcomes had no significant difference between the two groups.ConclusionsComparing with preloading crystalloid fluid, rapid infusion of crystalloid fluid at the same time implementation of spinal anesthesia could significantly reduce the incidence of hypotension during cesarean section while there was no superiority in infusion of colloid fluid. There was no significant effect on the severity of hypotension, nausea and vomiting, and neonatal outcomes. Due to the limitation of the quantity and quality of the included studies, the above conclusions need to be verified by more high-quality studies.
Objective To review the adverse event of hysterectomy caused by postoperative infection after cesarean section, formulate prevention and control strategies in combination with risk assessment tools, promote the standardization of perioperative management, reduce the medical burden on pregnant women, and improve patient satisfaction. Methods The two adverse events of hysterectomy caused by postoperative infection after cesarean section that occurred in the obstetrics ward between October and November 2024 were selected as the research objects. A root cause analysis and risk assessment team composed of personnel from multiple departments was established. Through interviews, observations, and data review, the potential failure modes and causes were sorted out. The risk priority number (RPN) was calculated to determine the high-risk factors. Improvement strategies were formulated and implemented. After two-month implementation, the RPN scores and the compliance of various measures before and after the implementation were compared. Results Before the improvement, the total RPN of the healthcare failure mode and effects analysis was 367.8. When rechecked in January 2025, the total RPN after the improvement dropped to 105.7, and no serious adverse events occurred again. The compliance and passing rates of various operations significantly increased: the intervention rate for maternal malnutrition rose from 17.5% to 48.6%, the passing rate of appropriate timing for prophylactic use of antimicrobial agents before surgery increased from 50.5% to 81.0%, the compliance rate of scrubbing the vagina with disinfectant before surgery increased from 15.0% to 60.0%, the implementation rate of standardized skin disinfection during surgery rose from 66.7% to 95.2%, the passing rate of aseptic techniques and hand hygiene operations during surgery increased from 75.0% to 95.2%, and the timely submission rate of specimens from infected patients increased from 29.4% to 47.6%, and all these differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The combination of healthcare failure mode and effect analysis and root cause analysis can effectively improve adverse events during the perioperative period, optimize the perioperative management of cesarean section, and reduce the risk of infection.
ObjectiveTo discuss the clinical characteristics, treatment and prevention of abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE). MethodsA retrospective analysis of 295 cases of AWE from February 2007 to August 2011 in our hospital was performed. ResultsAll of the patients had abdominal operations before and 99% of them had a history of caesarean section. The mean age of the patients was (31.55±4.52) years old. The average size of the mass was (2.66±1.12) cm, significantly larger than the estimation of ultrasonography before operation which was (1.91±0.83) cm (P<0.001). No relapse was discovered five months to three years after the operation. ConclusionIt is easy to diagnose abdominal wall endometriosis through medical history, clinical characteristics, physical signs and ultrasonic assessment. The prevention of AWE is very important. Operation is still the best treatment for AWE.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effectiveness and safety of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean section. MethodsWe searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 10, 2013), PubMed, MEDLINE, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data for randomized controlled trials on combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean section up to October 2013. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.2.9 software. ResultsA total of 9 studies containing 616 delivery women were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that:compared with epidural anesthesia, combined spinal-epidural anesthesia was superior in the time of sensory blockade to T4 (MD=-7.38, 95%CI-9.54 to-5.23, P < 0.000 01), muscle relaxation (OR=6.09, 95%CI 2.65 to 13.97, P < 0.000 1), and recovery of motor block (MD=-41.57, 95%CI-58.98 to-24.17, P < 0.000 01). Compare with spinal anesthesia, combined spinal-epidural anesthesia was superior in lowering the incidence of low blood pressure (OR=0.49, 95%CI 0.29 to 0.81, P=0.006). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that combined spinal-epidural anesthesia could increase the effectiveness and safety of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean section.
Objective To study the clinical significance of the microorganism culture result of amniotic fluid in cesarean section in the treatment of anti-infection after operation. Methods From August 2016 to May 2017 in Women’s and Children’s Hospital of Sichuan Province, 502 amniotic fluid samples were collected in cesarean section to carry out bacteria culture. The correlations between the amniotic fluid culture result and the preoperative and intraoperative risk factors and the correlations between postoperative infection and the preoperative and intraoperative risk factors were analyzed. Results In the 502 amniotic fluid samples, there were 131 samples culture-positive. The microbiological culture results of amniotic fluid were statistically different between the puerperae with gestational age<37 weeks and the ones with gestational age≥37 weeks (P=0.001). Postoperative infection occurred in 6 puerperae, in whom the amniotic fluid culture results were positive in 3 puerperae. There was no statistical difference in the occurrence of postoperative infection between the puerperae with amniotic fluid culture-positive results and the ones with negative results (P=0.382). The occurrence of postoperative infection was associated with preoperative infections, gestational age, using time of antimicrobial, and preoperative rupture of membranes (P<0.05). Conclusions The contamination rate of amniotic fluid specimen was high, which was of low reference value to anti-infection treatment after operation. When an extension of anti-infection treatment be carried out after cesarean section, suitable specimens should be selected according to the infection site.
ObjectiveTo compare the anesthetic potency and influence on maternal hemodynamics among spinal anesthesia (SA), epidural anesthesia (EA) and combined spinal epidural anesthesia (CSEA) for women undergoing cesarean sections. MethodsA total of 180 singleton term nulliparous pregnancies of American Sociaty of Anethesiologists physical status Ⅰor Ⅱ for cesarean sections in Guangyuan Central Hospital from January to December 2012 were allocated into three groups using the method of random number table. Patients in group SA received SA (n=60), group EA underwent EA (n=60) and patients in group CSEA accepted CSEA (n=60). Patients wderwent punere all placed in left lateral position. Group EA patients unctures at the L1-2 interspace and the volume of carbonated lidocaine used initially was 12-15 mL. Group SA and CSEA accepted the anesthesia at either L2-3 or L3-4 interspace. The volume for group SA was 0.75% bupivacaine 1.2 mL with 10% glucose solution 1 mL, and for group CSEA was 0.5% bupivacaine 1.4 mL with 10% glucose solution 0.8 mL. A catheter was inserted into the epidural space for 3-4 cm after spinal needle exit so as to add additional epidural medication according to the block level and the level of anesthesia subsidence. The values of the basis of blood pressure and heart rate, the lowest blood pressure and heart rate, umbilical venous blood gas, start effect and induction time of anesthesia and the highest block level of anesthesia were record. ResultsThere were statistically significant differences in terms of start effect time of anesthesia among the three groups (F=24.642, P<0.001). The start effect time of anesthesia in group SA and CSEA was significantly shorter than that in group EA (t=8.076, 7.996; P<0.05). The induction time of anesthesia in group SA was significantly shorter than those in group EA and CSEA (P<0.05). The lowest blood pressure and heart rate in group SA and CSEA were significantly lower than the values of basis (P<0.05). The lowest blood pressure and heart rate in group SA was significantly lower than that in group EA (P<0.05). The incidence of hypotension and bradycardia in group SA and CSEA was significantly higher than that in group EA (P<0.05). The block level of anesthesia in the three groups were at thoracic 8.12±1.22, 8.36±1.88 and 8.52±1.92 respectively, and there was no significant difference among the three groups (F=0.081, P=0.923). ConclusionEA and CSEA surpass SA in the choice of neuraxial anesthesia for cesarean sections, and 1.73% carbonated lidocaine for EA can improve anesthetic potency and better maintain relatively stable hemodynamic indexes.