Objective To learn if appropriate methods and clinically relevant outcomes were used by analyzing methods of outcome assessment in Chinese acute stroke trials. Method Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials on acute stroke published before March 2003 in 6 Chinese neurological journals were included. Types of outcome measures, blinding of outcome assessment, duration of follow up, statistical methods used for data analysis and the significance of the results were evaluated. Types of outcomes were classified as death and four levels: ① Pathology. ② Impairment. ③ Disability. ④ Handicap/quality of life. Results Two hundreds and ten trials were included in this analysis. 57% of the trials used outcomes in pathology level, 77% in impairment level, 12% in disability level and none in the quality of life level. No dichotomous data was analyzed for disability measures. Only 16% of the trials reported number of death but few of them designed death as an outcome measure. Duration of follow up ranged from 3h to 3 years (median 17 d, interquartile range 14-30 d). Most trials did not assess outcomes blindly. Results in 95% of the trials were favorable to the tested interventions. Conclusions In Chinese acute stroke trials, outcome measures used were mainly in pathology and impairment levels and very few trials used functional outcome or death. Blinding of outcome assessment was not commonly used. The average duration of follow up was short.
Economic evaluation used alongside clinical trials has become a hot spot in the development of clinical studies. The definition and classification of the cost were introduced in this article. The ways to conduct cost analysis in clinical trials were introduced systematically, including the identification, collection and analysis of the data of costs, and the concern of the analysis.
With the advancement of research on rare ocular diseases such as inherited retinal dystrophy (IRD) has advanced in recent years, especially breakthroughs in therapeutic approaches represented by cell and gene therapy, potential intervention strategies have emerged for these conditions. Establishing standardized endpoints and evaluation methods for visual function in patients with IRD has become crucial for assessing disease progression, safety, and therapeutic efficacy of innovative treatments. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) is widely recognized as one of the primary endpoints for assessing visual function. However, for IRD patients with severe rod photoreceptor dysfunction, who often present with profound low vision or even legal blindness, the applicability of BCVA as a traditional visual function indicator is limited. The multi-luminance mobility test (MLMT) has emerged as a functional visual assessment tool that evaluates the ability to navigate obstacle courses under varying illumination levels. By establishing graded evaluation standards, MLMT objectively quantifies the impact of lighting conditions on patients’ nobility and spatial orientation, providing a novel quantitative tool for assessing visual function in IRD clinical trials. Currently, there is a lack of unified and standardized guidelines for the use of MLMT in China, posing challenges to its implementation in practical clinical research. To address this, Ocular Fundus Disease Society of Chinese Medical Association and Chinese Medical Doctor Association convened a multidisciplinary team comprising clinical experts in genetic retinal diseases, statisticians, and optical specialists to investigate the current applications and technical characteristics of MLMT, ultimately formulating consensus recommendations for its use as a clinical trial endpoint for IRD gene therapies. This consensus aims to provide a set of MLMT operating norms applicable to China's national conditions, guide clinical practice and research in ophthalmology and related disciplines, and promote the standardization process of IRD clinical trials in China, so as to better serve the IRD patient population and promote the development of related fields.
In the clinical trials, the rights and interests of participants must be considered. Ethical principles including the Declaration of Helsinki for clinical research have been established, and the institutional review board (IRB) and informed consent are important for protecting the rights and interests of participants. Whether a clinical trial is in accordence with the ethics depends on if the available clinical evidence is valuable and credible. The better candomize controlled trial (RCT) is one of the best evidence which will make different results equal between the treatment group and the controlled group. Thus benefits and risks of participants are allocated equitably and useless treatment is prohibited when the effective treatment affirmed at the same time. Economic health evaluation and outcome measurements are emphasized in EBM, and the clinical evidence is updated regularly. It is EBM and its emphasis of evidence that need the high-quality clinical trials, therefore the problems of ethics involved in clinical trials is important.
The use of placebo controls in acupuncture trials has been an international concern for many years. We discussed some common problems in placebo controls and introduced four kinds of control methods (sham acupuncture, non-points acupuncture, minimal acupuncture and non-specific sites acupuncture). For sham acupuncture, non-points acupuncture and non-specific sites acupuncture, patients who have received acupuncture are liable to doubt the intervention they are taking. Minimal acupuncture has better reliability but is limited to use in many diseases for its physiological effect. Needling on some special parts of the body, for example, head and back side of the body, can make balance among factors as reliability, physiological effect and feasibility. This paper recommends a control method needling special parts according to the tradiontional acupuncture theory, which provides references for acupuncture clinical trials.
To show that a new drug is better than, as good as, or no worse than that of a known effective drug. Theoretically, it is necessary to confirm the efficacy of a treatment, but the current practice of clinical trial suggests that there exists many problems in its confirmation including the objectives of clinical investigation vary based on the fact that more and more clinical trials use active controls. Applied statistical methods have to adapt to these changes. In this paper, we illustrated some statistical issues of confirming efficacy in clinical trials, including its conditions, the determination of clinical margin, the forms of the null and alternative hypothesis and confidence intervals, the choice of endpoints and some miscellaneous considerations. We bly suggests that it is necessary to make biostatisticians and clinical trialists understand the importance of using the right statistical methods when investigating clinical trials. We also think these methods introduced in the paper may provide some help in trial design and evaluation.
Compared with traditional medical devices, artificial intelligence medical devices face greater challenges in the process of clinical trials due to their related characteristics of artificial intelligence technology. This paper focused on the challenges and risks in each stage of clinical trials on artificial intelligence medical devices for assisted diagnosis, and put forward corresponding coping strategies, with the aim to provide references for the performance of high-quality clinical trials on artificial intelligence medical devices and shorten the research period in China.
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is currently a world-wide major public health event. Since study sites of clinical trials are primarily at healthcare institutions and investigators are primarily clinicians, the epidemic inevitably has a huge impact on a large number of ongoing clinical trials. The proper implementation of clinical trials in key aspects and the quality of core data collection will greatly influence the validity of the final results. In this paper, we analyzed the potential impact of the outbreak of a new epidemic infectious diseases on the clinical trials from seven aspects, which involves the selection of study participants, randomization, blinding, implementation of intervention measures, follow-up of primary outcomes, safety monitoring and project management. Corresponding countermeasures were put forward.